Henrik Jørgensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Yes, but as far as I understand emi2 is version 4.0 of the protocol,
where as emi_ip is version 3.5. Am I correct?
Our Telco runs version 3.5, that the reason for my selection.
emi 4.0 has only two or three differences from 3.5 and they are not
Hi,
Am Samstag, 12. Juli 2003 07:25 schrieb Stipe Tolj:
Nisan Bloch wrote:
hi
Have you tried the new emi module? smsc_emi2 is a rework of the older
smsc_emi. try the same config with
smsc=emi2.
which brings us up again to the question if we should drop the old
ones, ie. emi, at?
if
Hi,
I have a problem using a smsc of type emi_ip.
When ever I reveive a sms on that smsc Kannel core-dumps.
Cut from kannel.conf:
group = smsc
smsc = emi_ip
host = (removed)
port = 6000
smsc-id = TDCSMSC1
smsc-username = (removed)
smsc-password = (removed)
connect-allow-ip = (removed)
hi
Have you tried the new emi module? smsc_emi2 is a rework of the older
smsc_emi. try the same config with
smsc=emi2.
At 11:34 AM 7/11/03 +0200, Henrik Jørgensen wrote:
Hi,
I have a problem using a smsc of type emi_ip.
When ever I reveive a sms on that smsc Kannel core-dumps.
Cut from
Hi,
Yes, but as far as I understand emi2 is version 4.0 of the protocol,
where as emi_ip is version 3.5. Am I correct?
Our Telco runs version 3.5, that the reason for my selection.
/ Henrik
Nisan Bloch wrote:
hi
Have you tried the new emi module? smsc_emi2 is a rework of the
older smsc_emi.
Nisan Bloch wrote:
hi
Have you tried the new emi module? smsc_emi2 is a rework of the older
smsc_emi. try the same config with
smsc=emi2.
which brings us up again to the question if we should drop the old
ones, ie. emi, at?
Any votes for dropping them. I'll be +1 in this case.
Stipe
