The easiest way to do this might be to do queue management outside
Kannel itself and interface your queue with Kannel either using membox
or customize sqlbox and build in queuing capbailities into it, and have
a simple round robbin algorithm which could take into consideration user
priorities.


Ehi



On Tue, 2008-09-23 at 12:01 +0530, jyoti wrote:
> To solve my problem I have to make separate qeue for different users.
> As I am a small programmer I am not able to catch which function is
> doing what.
> please sugest me the function uses used in kannel so that I will
> achive my goal.
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2008 11:09 AM
> To: devel Devel
> Subject: Re: Does kannel maintain multiple qeue for each user conected
> 
> 
> 
> On 23.09.2008, at 06:53, jyoti wrote:
> 
> > I am waiting for any reply, please sugest me,
> >  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: jyoti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 5:32 PM
> > To: devel@kannel.org
> > Subject: Does kannel maintain multiple qeue for each user conected
> > 
> > 
> > I am facing problem which I have mentioned below.
> >  
> > I have configured 2 send sms user  for push purpose to my
> > kannel(1.4.0) sms gateway.
> > Suppose user1 sent 1000 msg ,then if it's not delevered it will be
> > stored in store.log.
> > Now the user2 sent 10 msg,then thease 10 msg will be stored next to
> > those previous 1000 msg,i.e after those 1000 msg delivered the msg
> > of client2 will be delivered.
> > so the user2 msg is unnecesserily delayed for the previous qeue of
> > user1.
> >  
> > My question is does there is any config parameter  by which I can
> > assign priority so that kannel will pick one by one msg from user1 &
> > user2  from store.log ?
> 
> 
> Last time I checked, there was no priority. Did someone implement
> something like that recently?
> 
> >  
> > Does kannel maintain separate qeue for different users? 
> 
> 
> no. it uses first in / first out.
> 
> 



Reply via email to