, June 01, 2007 11:13 AM
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Bug: extract_msgdata_part_by_coding / message split
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
any gsm-03.38 chars via
: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:13 AM
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Bug: extract_msgdata_part_by_coding / message
split
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
any gsm
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2007 11:13 AM
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: Bug: extract_msgdata_part_by_coding / message
split
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Re: Bug: extract_msgdata_part_by_coding / message
split
Hi,
do u define alt_charset = GSM for the first SMSC? It seems yes. Please
don't define this and this should work as expected.
Ehizogie Binitie wrote:
I pulled the latest version
: Monday, June 04, 2007 12:42 PM
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Re: Bug: extract_msgdata_part_by_coding / message
split
Hi,
do u define alt_charset = GSM for the first SMSC? It seems yes. Please
don't define this and this should work as expected.
Ehizogie Binitie wrote:
I
Hi,
why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
any gsm-03.38 chars via smsbox.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi Paco,
please find attached patch that should fix SMPP charset issue.
I don't know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
any gsm-03.38 chars via smsbox.
yep, +1, confirmed... my ChangeLog at that time:
2006-09-29 Stipe Tolj stolj at kannel.org
*
ok, commited to cvs.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
why it should be necessary now? we have utf-8 internally and you can send
any gsm-03.38 chars via smsbox.
yep, +1, confirmed... my ChangeLog at that time:
2006-09-29
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi Paco,
please find attached patch that should fix SMPP charset issue.
I don't know why there any GSM-03.38 comparisons because we don't use it
anywhere. So this peace of code was just plain wrong.
- -1, veto against
