the
docs shouldn't matter. May be an error in the SHA??
Cheers,
Edward
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bagyenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel OMA-OTA
Hi Edward,
I have the CVS snapshot of the time if you want that.
Paul,
I did make the change to the code port is showing up as 9200
but still pin is incorrect.
Edward
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bagyenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 1:18 AM
Subject: RE: Kannel OMA-OTA
> Edward,
>
> In
Edward,
In gw/ota_prov.c there is a function ota_pack_udh() -- it sets the
UDH, which contains the source port. Try changing the source port to 23
f0 and see if that helps. I doubt the issue is with the HMAC
computation, since nokia seems to understand it fine, and the other
Paul's code seems
Replying to Edward C.A. Tromp:
> Paul,
>
> After making the file you send it as a normal SMS?
sendWithUDH splits message in 119-byte chunks, adds UDH with
fragmentation and sport/dport fields, then sends it as a normal SMS
with UDH.
--
Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // http://stingr.net/key <- my
Paul,
After making the file you send it as a normal SMS?
Edward
- Original Message -
From: "Paul P Komkoff Jr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Edward C.A. Tromp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:55 PM
Subject: Re: Kannel OMA-OTA
Replying to Edward C.A. Tromp:
> Hi Paul,
I'm Paul too, so I'll respond
> I tried it with Motorola ones without luck
> the messages arrived and the phone but when i try to enter the pin it give
> incorrect pin number but i enter the right one.
I do not use kannel or mbuni for OTA configuration t
y difference i
see is the
source port on kannel port 2948 is being used and on Nowsms port 9200. But
according to the
docs shouldn't matter. May be an error in the SHA??
Cheers,
Edward
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bagyenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, Jul
Guys,
Any updates regarding provisioning of
OMA
Edward
- Original Message -
From:
Edward C.A.
Tromp
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2004 7:26
AM
Subject: Kannel OMA-OTA
Guys,
I'm planning to use OMA-OTA as a provision
mechanism fo
>
Sent: Friday, July 23, 2004 8:09 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel OMA-OTA
> Is that a question? I failed to find the question mark in the sentence,
> so it just seemed like an odd affirmation.
>
>
> \\pb
>
>
> Edward C.A. Tromp wrote:
> > Guys,
> >
> > Any
Guys,
Any updates regarding OMA code.
Edward
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Bagyenda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel OMA-OTA
> Hi Edward,
>
> I have the CVS snapshot o
nt: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 4:47 AM
Subject: Re: Kannel OMA-OTA
> Hi Edward,
>
> I have the CVS snapshot of the time if you want that. It shouldn't be
> a big problem getting those changes into the current one though...
>
> P.
>
> -- You wrote ---
On tir, 2004-07-20 at 07:26 -0400, Edward C.A. Tromp wrote:
> My question are:
> 1. Is there a way to get an older CVS that's from that specific day.
> (Maybe Paul can assist)
Sure!
cvs checkout -D yesterday gateway
cvs checkout -D "2003-04-01" gateway
cvs checkout -D "a fortnight ago" gateway
cvs
Hi Edward,
I have the CVS snapshot of the time if you want that. It shouldn't be
a big problem getting those changes into the current one though...
P.
-- You wrote --
Subject: Kannel OMA-OTA
Date: Tuesday 20 July 2004 04:26 am
From: "Edward C.A. Tromp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [
13 matches
Mail list logo
