Yes, WAP 2.0 is based on it.
Aarno
On 23.12.2003, at 11:36, James Wong wrote:
x-tad-biggerHi all,/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-bigger /x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerHas the standardization for the Wireless Profiled TCP completed?/x-tad-bigger
x-tad-bigger /x-tad-bigger
x-tad-biggerJames/x-tad-bigger
I have tried to download the specs from the wapforum website
but the server asks for a login/password. I do not recall
having this problem when I last downloaded the past version
a few months ago, has something changed?
Thanks,
Marco
Marco Fassiotto wrote:
I have tried to download the specs from the wapforum website
but the server asks for a login/password. I do not recall
having this problem when I last downloaded the past version
a few months ago, has something changed?
check the new home of the WAP specs at OMA.
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Marco Fassiotto wrote:
I have tried to download the specs from the wapforum website
but the server asks for a login/password. I do not recall
having this problem when I last downloaded the past version
a few months ago, has something changed?
check the new home of the
Konstantin Vayner wrote:
Here, i can only find *-OMA-* docs, and , omfg - they are also all .DOC
now...
Are they nuts? :(
What happened to good old PDF and the whole set of the specs made by
wapforum? :(
refer to:
http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/affiliates/wap/wapindex.html
where
Hi all,
Has the standardization for the Wireless Profiled TCP
completed?
James
