wapbox restart (Kannel wapbox version cvs-20030917)

2004-03-09 Thread Yury Mikhienko
Hi all! I again paste my question about of wapbox restart reason. Some time of time I get wapbox restart. In DEBUG trace I see the following: ... 2004-03-09 11:04:50 [7] DEBUG: Octet string dump ends. 2004-03-09 11:04:50 [2] DEBUG: WSP (UNIT): event arrived 2004-03-09 11:04:50 [2] DEBUG: WSP: M

Re: wapbox restart (Kannel wapbox version cvs-20030917)

2004-03-10 Thread Yury Mikhienko
On Tue, 9 Mar 2004 11:47:21 +0300 Yury Mikhienko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all! > > > I again paste my question about of wapbox restart reason. > > Some time of time I get wapbox restart. > In DEBUG trace I see the following: > > 2004-03-09 11:04:50 [9] DEBUG: data: 6c 3d 22 55 50 22 3

Re: wapbox restart (Kannel wapbox version cvs-20030917)

2004-03-10 Thread Paul P Komkoff Jr
Replying to Yury Mikhienko: > Hi again! > > What about my question? > Any suggestions? > > I need help :((( can you instead of yelling and screaming provide us backtrace of yours situation? if it dumps core when crashes load it into gdb and do a bt full ? -- Paul P 'Stingray' Komkoff Jr // h

Re: wapbox restart (Kannel wapbox version cvs-20030917)

2004-03-11 Thread Stipe Tolj
Yury Mikhienko wrote: > > Hi all! > > I again paste my question about of wapbox restart reason. > > Some time of time I get wapbox restart. > In DEBUG trace I see the following: > > I seen problem in "Cookie" element, but can I solve that? this is BUG#95 and has been fixed in cvs. See URL h

Re: wapbox restart (Kannel wapbox version cvs-20030917)

2004-03-11 Thread Yury Mikhienko
On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 17:51:48 +0100 Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.kannel.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/wap/cookies.c.diff?r1=1.4&r2=1.5 Many thanks Stipe! I already fixed that. (But, in first time, set the safe NULL octstr_compare) Thank you again. -- Best regards, Yu

Re: wapbox restart (Kannel wapbox version cvs-20030917) SOLVED

2004-03-10 Thread Yury Mikhienko
On Wed, 10 Mar 2004 13:34:32 +0300 Paul P Komkoff Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Replying to Yury Mikhienko: > > Hi again! > > > > What about my question? > > Any suggestions? > > > > I need help :((( > > > can you instead of yelling and screaming provide us backtrace of yours > situation? >

Re: wapbox restart (Kannel wapbox version cvs-20030917) SOLVED

2004-03-10 Thread Aarno Syvänen
Less dirtier way IMHO is define semantics: either NULL is equal to NULL or NULL is unequal to everything, including NULL or NULL is equal to everything Problem is that if you compare something to NULL, you have one (or two) unhandled NULL pointers earlier. NULL is Kannel means quite often "no confi