Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote:
> It is not enough just to change packet size. We must avoid PANIC if
> maximal document size exceeded.
>
> Wap gw must send abort indication instead of PANIC if segment's count
> more than 255.
>
> Attached patch do it.
++1, commited to cvs.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I believe that the best way to do it, is to alter the C code of the
> charset.c file. But what about the iconv() functionality and alt-charset you
> are referring to? The alt-charset variable in the SMSC group, also uses the
> charset.c file?
manually changing .c file
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You are right about this. In the CVS manual I checked out the alt-charset
> directive. It is supposed to be a nummeric value, but I don't know which
> value do I have to put there. Can you give me an example, or just give me
> the range of this numeric field ?
the val
there may be a good change to use libsdb to interact via ODBC to the
MS SQL server. But I guess non of us here has ever tried this.
And to be honest, I'd wouldn't consider it as a production solution.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruno Rodrigues schrieb:
>
> Igor Ivoilov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Nokia 6600 does not need wap gw, the same to SonyEricsson P800.
> > I think that when we implement ESAR there will very few phones which
> > use wap-gw ;)
>
> And guess what's CMG's wap 2.0 gateway based ?
>
> tchan tchan t
Phuah Yee Keat wrote:
>
> I was previously just a user of Kannel (such a great project!), and now
> am dwelving into developing a new smsc module, for our local telco
> support in Malaysia. The standard's (or just a spec) name is CPA
> (Content Provider Architecture).
>
> Its a http-get type inte
Vjacheslav Chekushin schrieb:
>
> Hi, David.
> Current kannel http implementation doesn't free sockets for client->server
> part too (I mean conn_pool dictionary).
> This part even more important for WAP than server's part of http library.
> I've made patch some time ago to clean timeouted connect
Hi list,
the attached patches is a feature add in terms of customizing the
access-log format for bearerbox. This will allow to use custom format
access-log lines using escape codes (commonly known from the
sms-service groups).
Here are the changes:
* gw/bb_alog.c: handles the custom bearerbox
Nisan Bloch wrote:
>
> Perfect timing - we have such an item on our current to do lists.
>
> Looks good - compiles and works with brief testing on our dev box.
great. Nisan you could do me a favor and test performance of the
escape code translation. Simply setup 1 or 2 fakesmsc connections and
d
thanks for testing.
commited to cvs.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-syste
Rafael 'Dido' Sevilla wrote:
>
> While hacking the Kannel source to add CIMD2 tariff class and service
> descriptions, I noticed that the present code limits service
> descriptions to one byte and values from 0-9. However, the telco
> required us to use a SD value of 29... Reading the CIMD2 inte
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>
> I would like to deploy my own MMS Center. I already did some analysis of MMS
> service a year+half ago during a pilot MMS project of the local operator:
> http://www.jankratochvil.net/etmms/
>
> and it looks 'easy enough' for me to provide MMS Center without any
Angel Fradejas schrieb:
>
> Indeed, kannel 1.3.1 outputs a warning every time it sees param 069.
> My advise: switch as soon as you can to CVS-version, as it is far more
> stable than 1.3.1
agreed. CVS head is currently very stable.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
yep, my fault.
sorry, will commit fix tomorrow before lunch.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
commited changes to cvs. Please update and re-try.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ww
Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
>
> How can anyone help to get the mmsbox up and running?
hmmm, you can't help ;) the beast is still living in a cage here at
Wapme and "waits" to be released.
The only way to get this release faster done is to consider modular
configure/make process enhancements so we
> Would you pls tell me where to get "mmsbox" software? I can't found it in
> Kannel.
it's yet not released, consider it property of Wapme at the present
time.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
404
> I found that Kannel doesn't process socket timeout. If the WEB site
> doesn't response, kannel will keep the socket for ever.
David, any comments from your side to this?
You should check David's patch that he will be posting to the list in
a couple of hours. It implements both server and client
ghhou wrote:
>
> If there is comparative URL in the redirection page, then error will occurs.
> For the terminal keeps the original Host, it will send the request to the
> original web site.
sorry, seems it's too early in the morning ;) -- I didn't get the
point. Can you please re-fraze this?!
S
Web site A will redirect the request to B. But B can
only return the page sent before.
Best Regards,
Guanghua Hou
- Original Message -----
From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "ghhou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, Nove
Raditha Dissanayake wrote:
>
> Stipe,
> this sounds like a beast that everyone want's to get released from it's
> cage :-) I know 'me too' posts are discouraged but can't resist this one
yep, seems it's a "most wanted" animal living in this little Wapme box
;)
So it's not up to me. Main holdin
Rene Kluwen wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> If you mean a relative URL in the Location: header.
> Then this is something against HTTP specs. One should not use them.
> Even though almost all browsers do prepend the original http-path if you do
> send them.
nop, the
Alan McNatty wrote:
>
> Just a question really. I've been looking at the X-Kannel headers and
> noted that if you receive an MO message from SMSC 'A' and you specify
> the message should go back via SMSC 'A' for normal short message fine.
> However if you respond with content with content that get
Martin,
please don't cross-post to lists!
> I'm on the look out for tools/emulators with which to test the SMSC
> connections. What do people use? What do the Kannel developers use? I'm
> talking about the SMPP, CIMD, UCP/EMI, OIS, SM/ASI etc.
Now, Kannel has it's own "fake SMSC" connection mod
Hi list,
just made some benchmark testing on the new custom access-log
formating. Seems the escape code parsing and Octstr appending is
reducing general performance by bearerbox by a factor of 3.
Which is in some sense un-acceptable. So be warned in case you need
something realy fast.
Alex propo
Alan,
> Note my config doesn't include any allowed or preferred sections in smsc
> configurations (except for MODEL connection). So it seems to run only
> random (ie: cgi variables are ignored).
now, you *have to* restrict the smsc groups to ensure that the set
'smsc' value at sendsms interface i
Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote:
>
> Hi, list
>
> In wsp_server_method_states.def:
>
> /*
> * The Siemens S35 adds an extra NUL character to the end
> * of the request body which may not work with certain cgi
> * scripts. It is re
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> There can't be that many S35 floating around still; I recall that the
> WAP browser UI was so bad to be almost unusable.
>
> I'd recommend forgetting about the S35 and removing this hack...
+1 from me. Any objections by others?
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Alan McNatty wrote:
>
> Tested again with TEST1 and TEST2 connections both with allowed-smsc-id
> = "TEST1;TEST2" - this makes them available as 'best' choices but not
> preferred (so the first best choice wins, TEST1 or TEST2). So, if I have
> smsc=TEST2 I still can't guarantee delivery via TEST2
David Schmitz wrote:
>
> attached are two patches for the HTTP-timeout thing. The first one uses
> a threaded-approach and the second one works without threads. As some
> tests have shown, the threaded version only performs better in high-load
> situations, and even then only marginally. Thus, I w
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Stipe, are you really want more complicated http-module as needed?
> I would propose to stress-test/benchmark 2 patches and vote for only one for
> inclusion...
>
> P.S. I'm +1 for 4) ;) (just a joke)
nop really ;)
ok, who's going to stress test? I guess it should be
Hi list,
the current EMI/UCP module does not send any OP/31 (see spec, section
4.6, p. 19) PDUs to the SMSC in case the emi group has no
smsc-username defined.
The reason for this is the semantical clash about having to insert the
mandatory field AdC (address code of SMT) into that PDU and if no
ok, while digging in the code this seems to be the more relevant part:
static struct emimsg *make_emi31(PrivData *privdata, int trn)
{
struct emimsg *emimsg;
if(octstr_len(privdata->username) ||
octstr_len(privdata->my_number)) {
emimsg = emimsg_create_op(31, trn, privdata->name);
it's not, hmmm adding.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> In sms.c,
>
> int dcs_to_fields(Msg **msg, int dcs)
>
> There are 2 instances of
>
> (*msg)->sms.alt_dcs = 0;
>
> I think this is wrong and should be
>
> (*msg)->sms.alt_dcs = SMS_PARAM_UNDEFINED;
>
> as 0 is no longer used to indicate that the service is not required.
Hi list,
as I stated a couple of weeks ago my personal working environment has
been taken on a forced travel to Timbuktu (or some other place far far
away from IP world ;) and I tought my sqlbox implementation (at least
the first scratch) would have been lost.
Refound the source on our REFPOOL WA
Alex Kinch wrote:
>
> Came across this today as a "new DLR format" on SMPP v3.4. Any
> thoughts - apart from telling the carrier in question to actually
> follow some standards? :-)
>
> By the way it's not a small carrier, it's quite a large one
> beginning with "V".. no prizes for guessing.
>
>
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> just import as independent cvs module and later (if me or others have time to
> do configure stuff) we can put it into gateway module.
yep, was thinking of about exactly that... ;)
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
yep, we know. :]
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-
I have to calm everyone down...
The eseential work on the SQL pre-processor magic out of gw/msg-decl.h
is not included. This was a very early working framework.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I believe, it's correct... alt_dcs just indicate 0xFX coding and for those 2
> cases we have 0x0X coding...
correct in terms of "Paul implied solution" or "the way it's done
now"?
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> correct , "the way it's done now" ...
ok, the rumble is opened...
In the left corner: Paul, chief developer at ANAM, irish wireless
software solution provider.
In the right corner: Alexander, chief Kannel developer at Centrium,
Bulk-SMS carrier.
:]]
Stipe
mailto:[E
Cesar Garcia wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> How I can submit modifications to the CVS?
in terms of modifications, we have the following guide of rules:
* user provides a 'diff -u' formated patch of their changes against
current cvs head tree
* user submits the patch with a "[PATCH]" prefix in the subje
seems they are all narrow minded.
Sometimes it appears that those people did have got the point about
agreeing to a protocoll/specification. They don't get it that it will
be for the sake of all and for their personal/business benefit.
It's like in (normal) life. To some you can show and they wil
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> > but it's simple:
> > alt_dcs flag is used to define either 0xFX coding (alt_dcs=1)
> > or 0x0X coding
> > (alt_dcs=0). alt_dcs may be SMS_PARAM_UNDEF==-1 only if
> > message was generated
> > on the extern interface (e.g. sendsms in smsbox) and user has
> > not supplied
> >
"Kita B. Ndara" wrote:
>
> I was having problems sending WAP POST messages
> larger than 8kb or so. I realised after some poking
> around that Wapbox kept reporting a Timeout-A event.
> More digging turned up fact that this is controlled to
> an extent by the wapbox conf "timer-freq". Once I set
Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote:
>
> Have somebody tried OMA bootstrap provisioning?
> I've sent configuration to phone using USERPIN method successfully, but
> can't do the same with NETWPIN.
> I'm using semi-octet encoded IMSI as key:
> 123456789012345 => (hex encoded string, length 8) 21 43 65 87 09
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi List,
>
> attached you can find a patch that implements UUID (Universal Unique Id)
> support for kannel. The uuid functions where borrowed from libuuid
> (http://e2fsprogs.sourceforge.net) that implements DEC compatible UUIDs (see
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinep
definetly +1, applying patch (including gw/smsc_fake.c fix).
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
collective applause to Alexander please!
This is a major conceptual improvement. Also in terms of modularity to
other "smsbox modules" that can dock to bearerbox.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
Hi all,
any "results" on this issue?!
Paul, I'll try to re-create the behaviour in our smppbox and claim
your rights at Alex if we definetly can't handle the values
transparently allong Kannel's Msg structure.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Igor Ivoilov wrote:
>
> I can not find in wapbox access log file records of failed attemps
> to fetch the given url.
> Let's say in a case when this url is not available from the wap
> gateway.
> Is it done on purpose? Is there a way to configure wapbox to log it?
actualy it is not a "purpose". B
Hi all,
any update on this issue?!
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-systems
Igor Ivoilov wrote:
>
> >
> > Any suggestions why this would be semantically necessary to log to
> > access-log?
>
> For me access log shows users activity. Even if they are not able to get something
> I have to see what they have tried to access.
that's the question.
If you consider the Apache
Hi list,
Alex has introduced the new UUIDs for message IDs and there are some
sections marked with #warning's in gw/smsc/smsc_soap.c, which need to
be resolved.
Who is currently actively using the SOAP SMSC module? It is yet not
"bound" to the SMSCConn abstraction layer. He/she should resolve the
> I have just buy a Wavecom Fastrack M1206B modem,
> but kannel doesn't arrive to detect him :
> [5] DEBUG: AT2[test]: --> AT^M
> 2003-12-09 18:28:54 [5] DEBUG: AT2[test]: --> AT^M
> 2003-12-09 18:28:58 [5] ERROR: AT2[test]: no answer from modem
> 2003-12-09 18:28:58 [5] ERROR: AT2[test]: Opening f
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
>
> The links under
> http://www.wapforum.org/what/technical.htm
> are password protected. I'll change my bookmarks to point
> to the new locations.
as OMA has taken all WAP Forum activities under their "umbrella", I
guess the OMA site is more "official".
But you're right,
there is no PANIC in the wapbox.log, so the wapbox process does
SEGFAULT?!
Can you please generate a core dump file and analyze it with gdb to
see at which position the segmentation fault happens?!
I can try to reproduce the crash on our side meanwhile...
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Here is gdb output:
>
> Core was generated by `/usr/local/kannel-rad2/sbin/wapbox -v 0 /etc/
> kannel2.conf'.
> Program terminated with signal 9, Killed.
> #0 0xff033084 in ?? ()
did you include debug symbols into the build?
If possible, recompile using the following additional configure
swit
Vjacheslav Chekushin wrote:
>
> Hi, list.
>
> I'm encounter problem in header's handling in Connect PDU.
> If Accept header contain value 00, (80 00), than it doesn't
> parsed and all remaining headers are skipped.
> It is clear that zero value is not expected by Accept header,
> but this header
Vjacheslav Chekushin schrieb:
>
> Hi, Stipe
> No, it doesn't PANIC. It simply doesn't serve request because think
> that client doesn't support wmlc.
> To be correct WAP gw send "Not Acceptable" response.
ok, checking the sources...
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Alexander Malysh schrieb:
>
> have you tried w/ debug options (cflags: -g ) on solaris ? if yes, what say
> the gdb to coredump?
>
> just guess: if it works for linux but not for solaris, then is extern library
> to blame...
Alex is correct here.
If you have only libxml2 as direct dependency li
can you point us directly to the section of the WSP spec where you
"see" that a WSP header may be empty, hence with 0x00 as value?!
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
David Chkhartishvili schrieb:
>
> I recompiled libxml2 with -g flag and ofcoarse kannel with all debugging
> options.
> I'm getting same output from gdb.
>
> I couldn't understand, whats wrong.
> Ideas, are welcome =)
how about letting us the output know?! ;)
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>
> you get a 5xx gateway timeout if you can't reach the other server
so you're voting +1 in getting non-access error codes to access-log??
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
Ok,
ow about trying this patch and access with the device again to see
what happens.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Stipe Tolj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
> >>
> >> you get a 5xx gateway timeout if you can't reach the other server
> >
> > so you're voting +1 in getting non-access error codes to acc
Igor Ivoilov wrote:
>
> I am +1 too
> Stipe, will you do it?
yep, it's marked on my TOOD.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.7484
Hi list,
here is a patch that will allow to log 502 HTTP response code for
proxied WAP GW requests that did not have any internal HTTP response
code, ie. wapbox could not connect to the port or host was not
reachable.
Please try and vote on commitment.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Hi list,
we expect that we have a huge ammount of people reading the list
because they use Kannel actively as SMS or/and WAP gateway for their
commercial purposes.
Alexander and I had a couple of discussions today about how strong (or
consider the word weak better) the participation in the Kanne
Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> But here, to be frank, I have certain bad feelings that my contributions
> (not only code, but also ideas, suggestions, RFCs, etc.) have not been very
> sucessful (surely for very good reasons), but anyway you cannot abstract
> from that feelings.
>
> It comes to my minf
Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm very thankfull and honorebly respect the work Angel
> > and his company contributed to Kannel. -- (and I liked to talk we had
> > in Hannover ;) -- so please keep rolling
> >
> > Stipe
>
> Mmmm I guess we _couldn't_ talk more you know why :-
has been commited to cvs.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-
guys,
keep in mind that email clients will show your mail postings in
cascading threads, because they do send references.
If you switch the semantical context of your mail, then please try
*NOT* to post an answer to an other thread, because this makes
organizational structuring of mail threads ha
Bill Brigden wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have just tried sending messages through another provider via smpp, and
> they are giving DLR's back ok, except for not using spaces inbetween fields,
> ie:
>
> 2003-12-16 08:16:50 [24] DEBUG: short_message:
> 2003-12-16 08:16:50 [24] DEBUG: Octet string a
Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> Attached a patch to fix broken functionality (caused by fread()'s
> bad behaviour) in kannel-monitor script.
>
> We have observed that with only one call to fread($buffer,20),
> the script does not receive the entire xml status document, for
> documents bigger than 1
James,
the MMS architecture is based to be build on WAP 1.2.1.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Rene,
Rene Kluwen wrote:
>
> This is what I get compiling latest CVS version.
> Is there some file missing in the repository?
>
> gcc -D_REENTRANT=1 -I. -Igw -g -O2 -DBROKEN_PTHREADS=1 -I/usr/include/libxml
> 2/libxml -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include -I'/usr/include/mysql' -I/usr
> /include
to all Kannel Group members and those who participate in the
development of Kannel,
to all readers and contributors of the devel mailing list,
to all people "behind the scenes", ie. the good people of Trigenix for
hosting etc,
to all companies that do use Kannel for commercial purposes and claim
t
Jarrod Hermer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I cannot seem to compile Kannel 1.3.1 or latest CVS due to some files
> missing. Could someone pls take a look at the ./configure output. My dev
> knowledge is quite limited.
I don't see anything "missing". configure did complete it's
configuiration step and pre-
> Is it already planned in Kannel project?
no. At least I'm not aware of such an SMSC protocol.
> Or, is there anybody who knows the specification of SMCI ?
no. Same again.
> I am trying to implement SMCI. ;-)
if it's TCP based and if you have a full specification to your hand,
then addopt the
Marco Fassiotto wrote:
>
> I have tried to download the specs from the wapforum website
> but the server asks for a login/password. I do not recall
> having this problem when I last downloaded the past version
> a few months ago, has something changed?
check the "new home" of the WAP specs at OMA
Konstantin Vayner wrote:
>
> Here, i can only find *-OMA-* docs, and , omfg - they are also all .DOC
> now...
> Are they nuts? :(
> What happened to good old PDF and the whole set of the specs made by
> wapforum? :(
refer to:
http://www.openmobilealliance.org/tech/affiliates/wap/wapindex.html
w
"J.Mohamed Zahoor" wrote:
>
> Hi all
> I want to dump debug mesages when an sms reaches our smsbox from
> an SMSC through the bearerbox.
> I tried starting smsbox with the following option, but in vain.
> "smsbox -v 1 -D "sms" smskannel.conf"
> I want to see all the debug messages in the code whic
Jarrod Hermer wrote:
> Adding a second smpp connection causes CPU usage to jump to 54-55% (on a
> duel P3) and stay there - bearerbox being the culprit. Now trying to
> query the status of Kannel via a browser (lynx, IE, etc) fails 99.9% of
> the time - I managed to get a status result once which
Aidan Kehoe wrote:
>
> I'm calling /cgi-bin/sendsms with '&dlr-mask=31&dlr-url='.
> URI::Escape::uri_escape('http://localhost/delivery-report.phtml?type=%d') in
> the GET query, where uri_escape is a Perl function that does the url
> encoding. The message gets delivered fine, but the delivery repo
> My company has a requirement to offer an SMPP interface to third
> parties, something that Kannel currently lacks. I understand
> however, that the project is currently working on an SMPP Box.
>
> Does anyone know who is working on it and when it is due for
> release? If not anytime soon, is it
Hello Srinivasa,
> To implement this SMS Gateway for GSM Networks , should we pay
> special charges to the
> Service provider and whether the Kannel Gateway has to be
> implemented in the side of
> Service provider or in our own inhouse setup. Please clarify the
> above doubts to enable
> us to pr
"Mario Goorden (RY/ETM)" schrieb:
>
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to send a MMS notification to my Sony Ericsson P800 using the Kannel
> gateway software 1.3.1 and an ericsson R520M as a "SMSC".
> I use the program test_ppg to send the notification:
>
> test_ppg -a mms -c mms
> http://localhost:
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Hi list,
>
> attached you can find patch that removes unneeded DLR_[MYSQL|SDB] defines and
> --with-dlr= configure option. These confuse all users and just make no sense
> because if we compile with --enable-mysql as example we anyhow have a mysql
> dependencies.
>
>
Linkas wrote:
>
> Hello to all - first of all thanks for this gateway, it's my first
> day using it and I'm actually able to send
> sms messages with 3 smsc, so thanks a lot to devlopers!
paypal checks are welcome too ;) (just kidding ;)
@org: but this may be a idea to raise up financial resourc
Alexander Malysh wrote:
>
> Hi Stipe,
>
> I hope you are healthy now ;)
sort of ;)
> It's fine with me to change things as follow:
> --with-[mysql|sdb|oracle] enable XXX support
> --with-[mysql|sdb|oracle]-dir specify XXX install directory
>
> I'm volunteer if no objections there?
yep, got fo
DILWORTH MICHAEL wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> I am wondering if anyone can shed some light on what I am seeing. When
> sending SMS or OTA messages using sendsms or sendota programmatically I
> was specifying HTTP as version 1.1. I was seeing up to 20 seconds for
> the request to complete.
>
> When I
forwarded to the list.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
>Can you help me with running the stable version gateway.zip. I have installed the
> Cygwin, I have passed the compiling the gateway stage and in the installing stage.
> After I typed " gw/bearerbox "
>
> The following message shown up:
>
> $ gw/bearerbox
> 2004-01-10 18:30:23 [0] INFO: Deb
Torkil,
Torkil Zachariassen schrieb:
>
> The currently distributed spec files do not work on Fedora.
>
> Having worked on this over the weekend, finaly I got a spec file which seems
> to work on Fedora Core 1 (and possibly older RedHat systems).
>
> As my knowledge of kannel is still quite limi
"Arne K. Haaje" schrieb:
>
> Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator
> (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol?
yes, this is one "operation mode" of EMI/UCP.
Stipe
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> Somebody had a problem recently about sending MMS notifications
> to the SE T610.
>
> I've just found an item on the SE developer site that says WAP pushes
> (ie. MMS notifications) are limited to 120 bytes for this and other
> SE devices. I've tested it and its true :-(.
h
"Arne K. Haaje" wrote:
>
> onsdag 14. januar 2004, 13:11, skrev Stipe Tolj:
> > "Arne K. Haaje" schrieb:
> > > Is this the same as EMI/UCP? Can that module be used for an operator
> > > (TeliaSonera Sweden) that say it use that protocol?
&g
"Arne K. Haaje" wrote:
>
>
> Yes, I know - but that is what they are using.. To send an SMS you craft a
> packet then send it over HTTPS.
>
> I am okay with the encryption for the transport, but why use HTTP (S). Why not
> just connect to a SMSC that speak the protocol natively? There is also th
501 - 600 of 1793 matches
Mail list logo
