Until Friday Aug 20 you can buy any list below for just $199 each, 3 for $299
or 5 for $399:
All lists are 100% optin and are 6 months or newer.
== HEALTHCARE LISTS ==
* Physicians (34 specialties) - 788k records, 17k emails, 200k fax numbers
* Chiropractors - 108,421 total records * 3,414 emai
Until Friday Aug 20 you can buy any list below for just $199 each, 3 for $299
or 5 for $399:
All lists are 100% optin and are 6 months or newer.
** HEALTHCARE LISTS **
- Physicians (34 specialties) - 788k records, 17k emails, 200k fax numbers
- Chiropractors - 108,421 total records * 3,414 emai
On 08/19/10 10:35, Savoy, Pavan wrote:
> Randy,
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:randy.dun...@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:32 PM
>> To: Savoy, Pavan
>> Cc: gre...@suse.de; a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
>> de...@driverd
Randy,
> -Original Message-
> From: Randy Dunlap [mailto:randy.dun...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:32 PM
> To: Savoy, Pavan
> Cc: gre...@suse.de; a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> de...@driverdev.osuosl.org; Jain, Naveen
> Subject: Re: [PATCH]
On 08/19/10 11:08, pavan_sa...@ti.com wrote:
> From: Pavan Savoy
>
> In order to support multiple ST platform devices, a new symbol
> 'st_get_plat_device' earlier needed to be exported by the arch/XX/brd-XX.c
> file which intends to add the ST platform device.
>
> On removing this dependency, no
From: Pavan Savoy
In order to support multiple ST platform devices, a new symbol
'st_get_plat_device' earlier needed to be exported by the arch/XX/brd-XX.c
file which intends to add the ST platform device.
On removing this dependency, now inside ST driver maintain the array of
ST platform device
On 08/18/2010 10:39 PM, Bernie Thompson wrote:
> +static ssize_t dlfb_ops_write(struct fb_info *info, const char __user *buf,
> + size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> + ssize_t result = -ENOSYS;
> + struct dlfb_data *dev = info->par;
> + u32 offset = (u32) *ppos;
> +
On 08/18/2010 10:39 PM, Bernie Thompson wrote:
> static int dlfb_ops_blank(int blank_mode, struct fb_info *info)
> {
> struct dlfb_data *dev = info->par;
> +
> + if (blank_mode != FB_BLANK_UNBLANK) {
> char *bufptr;
> struct urb *urb;
>
> urb = dlfb_get_urb(dev);
>
