On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:39:11PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
> ---
> drivers/staging/hv/osd.h |5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/osd.h b/drivers/staging/hv/osd.h
> index ce064e8..61ae54c 1006
You are receiving this email because we wish you to use our 3D/2D
animation services.
We are a China based animation studio. We are specialized in providing
3D designing/modelling/animation services across the globe. We utilize
the finest equipment available in the industry, offer efficient data
d
This series provides more code cleanup, w/o any functional changes
-
Intel Israel (74) Limited
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s). Any review or distrib
1. remove declarations from the header file
2. rearange code in main.c to reduce number of forward declarations
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler
---
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h | 27 +---
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap_main.c | 262 +++-
2 files changed, 12
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler
---
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h |2 --
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap_settings.c | 12 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h
b/drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h
index 2cc5b2
for in-tree driver we can use snd_card_create
for backports to older kernels this can be easily wrapped
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler
---
drivers/staging/easycap/Makefile|1 -
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap_sound.c |9 -
2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
1. For readability group module parameters handling on one place
2. Introduce kernel config option EASY_DEBUG
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler
---
drivers/staging/easycap/Kconfig| 13 +
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h |6 +++---
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap_main.c
use common #ifndef __EASYCAP_H_ instead of if (!defined(EASYCAP_H))
for protecting header from double inclusion
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler
---
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h
b/dr
Hello,
Please, I seek your help in receiving a contract payment, if you would be kind
enough to grant me permission, I will be glad to give you the details. I am
ready to offer you 30% of the total amount for your input.
If you are interested, get back to me with the following details
Your
Am Montag 10 Januar 2011, 23:28:06 schrieb Peter Huewe:
> This patch fixes the sparse warnings
> "obsolete struct initializer, use C99 syntax" in vt6655/device_main.c
> by converting the struct to C99 syntax
>
> KernelVersion: linux-next-20110110
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe
> ---
Ping - any
Am Montag 10 Januar 2011, 23:18:33 schrieb Peter Huewe:
> This patch fixes the sparse warnings
> "obsolete struct initializer, use C99 syntax" in icp_multi.c
> by converting the struct to C99 syntax
>
> KernelVersion: linux-next-20110110
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe
> ---
Ping - any updates o
Am Montag 10 Januar 2011, 23:07:16 schrieb Peter Huewe:
> This patch fixes the sparse warnings in me4000.c:
> me4000.c:122:1: warning: obsolete struct initializer, use C99 syntax
> me4000.c:123:1: warning: obsolete struct initializer, use C99 syntax
> me4000.c:124:1: warning: obsolete struct initia
Le mardi 18 janvier 2011 à 23:25 +0300, Denis Kirjanov a écrit :
> I have sent a patch to fix this problem: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/10/329
> It also fixes a bug #26472: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26472
OK, next time CC netdev so that we can Ack your patches ;)
Le mardi 18 janvier 2011 à 21:16 +0100, Giangiacomo Mariotti a écrit :
> Hi, the following message was logged on a 2.6.37 kernel(it says
> tainted, but it's actually a micro patch I wrote and applied on top of
> current 2.6.37 vanilla, patch appended, but it should be irrelevant, I
> just shut up a
I have sent a patch to fix this problem: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/1/10/329
It also fixes a bug #26472: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26472
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:16 PM, Giangiacomo Mariotti
wrote:
> Hi, the following message was logged on a 2.6.37 kernel(it says
> tainted, but
Hi, the following message was logged on a 2.6.37 kernel(it says
tainted, but it's actually a micro patch I wrote and applied on top of
current 2.6.37 vanilla, patch appended, but it should be irrelevant, I
just shut up a bunch of useless debug output for this staging driver):
[ 31.747937] --
Most comedi hardware drivers that support the INSN_BITS instruction
ignore the base channel (specified by insn->chanspec) and assume it is
0. The base channel is supposed to affect how the mask (in data[0]) and
bits (in data[1]) are treated. Bit 0 applies to the base channel, bit 1
applies to bas
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König
---
drivers/staging/hv/osd.h |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/osd.h b/drivers/staging/hv/osd.h
index ce064e8..61ae54c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/hv/osd.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/hv/osd.h
@@ -28,10 +28,9
place all globals to easycap.h, which is included
by all c-files
easycap_standard: fix declaration vs. definiton conflict
Signed-off-by: Tomas Winkler
---
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap.h | 19
drivers/staging/easycap/easycap_ioctl.c|1 -
drivers/staging/easycap/
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 02:03:23PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> easycap_main.c:34:5: warning: symbol 'easycap_debug' was not declared. Should
> it be static?
> easycap_main.c:36:5: warning: symbol 'easycap_gain' was not declared. Should
> it be static?
>
> These two variables actually were decl
easycap_main.c:34:5: warning: symbol 'easycap_debug' was not declared. Should
it be static?
easycap_main.c:36:5: warning: symbol 'easycap_gain' was not declared. Should it
be static?
These two variables actually were declared in several places.
The variables are used in several files.
I've fixed
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 09:37:06AM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> easycap_main.c:34:5: warning: symbol 'easycap_debug' was not declared. Should
> it be static?
> easycap_main.c:36:5: warning: symbol 'easycap_gain' was not declared. Should
> it be static?
>
First of all there are some code proble
22 matches
Mail list logo