On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 09:21:05AM +0100, Marek Belisko wrote:
> Marek Belisko (21):
> staging: ft1000: Replace camelcase CardSendCommand function name.
> staging: ft1000: Fix coding style in card_send_command function.
> staging: ft1000: Fix coding style in dsp_reload function.
> staging:
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:41:25AM -0800, Grant Grundler wrote:
> Increase QLEN to avoid TX Queue overflow.
> iperf testing results in poor throughput and massive reporting of:
> dhd_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
>
> Also renamed QLEN/et al to reflect usage as TX queue parameters.
> Te
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 08:01:40PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> Fixed a brace coding style issue
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
> ---
> drivers/staging/comedi/drivers.c |4 ++--
What kernel tree did you do this against? Please do all patches against
the linux-next tree as it looks like this
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:11:13AM +0800, Huang Weiyi wrote:
> Remove duplicated #include('s) in
> drivers/staging/brcm80211/sys/wlc_mac80211.c
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Weiyi
> ---
> drivers/staging/brcm80211/sys/wlc_mac80211.c |1 -
This file isn't in the linux-next tree, so I can't apply
Remove dhd_doflow. iperf result without flow control is unacceptable.
Signed-off-by: Grant Grundler
---
tested on ARM tegra2_seaboard.
Broadcom sent me a patch with "dhd_doflow = true" and I just don't
see a use case for "= false". ergo remove it.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/
Fixed all issues reported by checkpatch script on this file.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
---
drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c | 31 ---
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c
index a6ce
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 01:21:28PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> You're correct. The script checkpatch didn't complain about the
> missing license header.
Where did you get that license header from? Are you sure you were
allowed to license the code in that specific way?
> But since the license hea
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:50:01PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
>> Fixed all issues reported by checkpatch script on this file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c | 51
>> +--
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 07:44:47PM +0100, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> Resubmitted the patch to be included in the staging-linus branch.
>
> Only hardware switch state needs to be handled by driver. RFKILL is
> informed when hardware switch is activated. MAC80211 rfkill_poll
> callback is used to che
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:50:01PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> Fixed all issues reported by checkpatch script on this file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
> ---
> drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c | 51 +
> 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Belisko Marek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Vinay Sawal wrote:
>> Fixed all issues reported by checkpatch script on this file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
>> ---
>> drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c | 51
>> +
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> Fixed all issues reported by checkpatch script on this file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
> ---
> drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c | 51 +
> 1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --
Fixed all issues reported by checkpatch script on this file.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
---
drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c | 51 +
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/Bcmnet.c
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:50:54AM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:58:22PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
>> >> Fixed all issues reported by 'checkpatch.pl' for thi
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:50:54AM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:58:22PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> >> Fixed all issues reported by 'checkpatch.pl' for this file.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
> >> ---
> >>
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:58:22PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
>> Fixed all issues reported by 'checkpatch.pl' for this file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
>> ---
>> +
>> +#define __NO_VERSION__
>
> What do these __NO_VERSION__ defines do?
Resubmitted the patch to be included in the staging-linus branch.
Only hardware switch state needs to be handled by driver. RFKILL is
informed when hardware switch is activated. MAC80211 rfkill_poll
callback is used to check hardware switch deactivation.
Reviewed-by: Brett Rudley
Reviewed-by: He
Resubmitted the patch to be included in the staging-linus branch.
Only hardware switch state needs to be handled by driver. RFKILL is
informed when hardware switch is activated. MAC80211 rfkill_poll
callback is used to check hardware switch deactivation.
Reviewed-by: Brett Rudley
Reviewed-by: He
Increase QLEN to avoid TX Queue overflow.
iperf testing results in poor throughput and massive reporting of:
dhd_bus_txdata: out of bus->txq !!!
Also renamed QLEN/et al to reflect usage as TX queue parameters.
Tested with "dhd_doflow = true".
Signed-off-by: Venkat Rao
Sig
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:58:22PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> Fixed all issues reported by 'checkpatch.pl' for this file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vinay Sawal
> ---
> +
> +#define __NO_VERSION__
What do these __NO_VERSION__ defines do?
> #include "headers.h"
regards,
dan carpenter
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?
http://daringfireball.net/2007/07/on_top
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 09:16:29AM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. I used the same branch to generate two
> unrelated patches. And that's probably why the second patch (this)
> cam
Sorry for the confusion. I used the same branch to generate two
unrelated patches. And that's probably why the second patch (this)
came out the way it did. If you don't think that's the reason then I
am sorry I don't know what's going on. I am new to the community and
this is my first attempt at su
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:58:22PM -0800, Vinay Sawal wrote:
> Fixed all issues reported by 'checkpatch.pl' for this file.
Where is the 1/2 patch in this series?
confused,
greg k-h
___
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.li
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 12:59:33AM -0500, George Nychis wrote:
> This was a *huge* help to get this response from you, thanks a bunch for that.
>
No problem, I wish this particular idea could be higher on my project
list. ;-)
> I'd love to poke GregKG's staging tree and the mac80211 driver for t
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 10:23:01AM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> >On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:16:11PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> >>bIntegratedMMEnabled is always true, so the field and checks can be
> >>eliminated.
> >>
> >What about for the chi
Hi,
On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 10:16:11PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
bIntegratedMMEnabled is always true, so the field and checks can be
eliminated.
What about for the chips that came before the XG40? Are we dropping
support for them?
They were never
26 matches
Mail list logo
