CAD Drafting Services
We are a China based studio providing innovative and cost effective CAD
drafting and design solutions that provide value to business needs. We
introduced ourselves with a vision to be the best rather than to be the
biggest of all the players in the industry. We truly believe
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:23:40PM +0200, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> Hi Janitors, staging-list
>
> what is your opinion on using set_bit instead of using |= to set a bit?
> Is it worth the effort to convert existing |= to set_bit?
I doubt converting existing stuff is needed, but any future stuff is
alw
Hi.
You my wantto look here
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48880
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46639
It is regression in gcc 4.6
Particulry this error happens in binfmt_misc.c file.
gcc 4.6 errornously print error in this file.
However I could not find such behav
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> Am Montag 30 Mai 2011, 22:45:04 schrieb Andre Bartke:
> > In case kzalloc() fails the second or third time
> > we should free the previous allocated resources.
>
> Good catch!
> Personally I prefer putting the cleanup logic to the bottom, maybe like this
Am Montag 30 Mai 2011, 22:45:04 schrieb Andre Bartke:
> In case kzalloc() fails the second or third time
> we should free the previous allocated resources.
Good catch!
Personally I prefer putting the cleanup logic to the bottom, maybe like this -
but that's just personal preference.
>From 1a13a1
Hi Janitors, staging-list
what is your opinion on using set_bit instead of using |= to set a bit?
Is it worth the effort to convert existing |= to set_bit?
__set_bit
pro:
- often implemented in optimized assembly (e.g. for x86)
- intention might be clearer
- less error prone
- "they are the only
In case kzalloc() fails the second or third time
we should free the previous allocated resources.
Signed-off-by: Andre Bartke
---
drivers/staging/altera-stapl/altera.c |9 +++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/altera-stapl/altera.c
b/driver
From: Márton Németh
The function match_busid() is only referenced in the stub_main.c so it can be
changed
to static. This will remove the following warning when compiling with "make W=1
...":
* drivers/staging/usbip/stub_main.c:40: warning: no previous prototype for
‘match_busid’
Signed-off
From: Márton Németh
The dev_attr_group variable is never changed and it is only passed
to the second parameter of sysfs_create_group() and sysfs_remove_group()
functions.
These functions are defined in linux/sysfs.h: the second parameter is a pointer
to
const in both cases.
Signed-off-by: Márt
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer
---
drivers/staging/sep/sep_driver.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/sep/sep_driver.c b/drivers/staging/sep/sep_driver.c
index 52342c1..800060d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/sep/sep_driver.c
+++ b/drivers/
You are receiving this email because we wish you to use our 3D/2D Animated
Movie/TV Series Services.
We are a China based Animated Movie/TV Series Studio. with the technical, our
studio is a animation studio with the technical, creative and production
capabilities to create a new generation of
11 matches
Mail list logo
