> Presumably it was larger once and the person
> making the change decided to be lazy.
>
Oh, OK, that makes sense. I was really scratching my head there :-)
Thanks for the reply.
Cheers
Julie
___
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://dr
OK, so it's probably obvious to everyone else, but please indulge a
newbie. Why do we need a for() here? I've looked at the source file
and I'm missing whatever it is.
(I guess it must be deliberate, it's in more than one place in the source file.)
- for (uiLoopIndex=0; uiLoopIndex <
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 07:36:54AM -0300, Joilnen Leite wrote:
>> Should I to do git pull ?
>> or like said
>> http://linux.f-seidel.de/linux-next/pmwiki/pmwiki.php?n=Linux-next.FAQ
>>
>> $ git remote add linux-next
>> git://git.kernel.org/pu
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 6:28 AM, Sahana B Adiga - ERS, HCL Tech
wrote:
> Thanks a lot Julie.
> This info is helping me a lot.
>
>
> Regards,
> Sahana
Btw in case you have just come back from a two-week holiday on a
desert island, the host for the kernel devs' collection of git kernel
trees - kern
Hi Sahana
> 2. I read somewhere that GIT is the revision control system used by
> Linux Driver Developers. How to add our driver source code to GIT repository?
> I assume there is some strict validation involved as non-working or
> improperly validated source code should not be added to t
>
> Yeah. The driver only works under 32 bit. This is listed in the
> TODO file as something to fix before it leaves staging.
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
Oh, OK. Thanks for the response.
Cheers
Julie
___
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverprojec
> I am using GregKH's staging-next repo:
> git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging-2.6.git
>
> The patch applies on top of 5ad7b85b90e30eb5af4fbf6ce21907a2bd8934df.
>
> Bye, Roland.
>
OK, this compiles fine on x86-64/SMP. It's probably not interesting
but there are just a few warni
Roland,
I'm happy to compile test this change (I don't have the hardware on a
working machine) but I can't get this series to apply again, what tree
are you using?
If it's -next a tag reference would be helpful, it could be that my
version is too recent. :-)
Cheers
Julie
__
>
> #include
>
> #include
> #include
> -typedef const struct si_pub si_t;
> +
> +struct si_pub;
>
> #include
> #include
Is there any reason why dngl_stats.h and dhd.h are included twice in wl_iw.c?
(if not, maybe you corrected this in another patch, I couldn't get the
series to apply cleanly
> --- a/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/brcm80211/brcmfmac/dhd_sdio.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
>
> #include
> #include
> -#include
> --- a/drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_common.h
> +++ b/drivers/staging/usbip/usbip_common.h
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
> #include
> #i
10 matches
Mail list logo
