This if() check was flipped from a test for valid data params
to a test for invalid params.

As pointed out by Dan Carpenter, the orignal test was:

        if ((data[1] > data[0]) && (data[0] > 0)) {

the flipped test should be:

        if (data[1] <= data[0]) ...

Add the missing '='.

Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hswee...@visionengravers.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpen...@oracle.com>
Cc: Ian Abbott <abbo...@mev.co.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s526.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s526.c 
b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s526.c
index 4ad6adf..a1e2562 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s526.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/s526.c
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@ static int s526_gpct_winsn(struct comedi_device *dev,
                   The above periods must be expressed as a multiple of the
                   pulse frequency on the selected source
                 */
-               if ((data[1] < data[0]) || !data[0])
+               if ((data[1] <= data[0]) || !data[0])
                        return -EINVAL;
 
                /* Fall thru to write the PULSE_WIDTH */
-- 
1.7.11

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to