Candidate packages for removal due to FTBFS, implications

The following 30 packages, with respective FTBFS bugs, have been open since the Fedora 11 time frame, and continue to fail to build. These are the oldest non-building packages in the distribution, everything else (over 8800) managed to build for Fedora 12 or newer already. awn-extras-applets-0.3.

Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping to build out the Python 3 stack > (help would be most welcome!) > > I've run into a snag with the plan of building out parallel python 2 and > python 3 stacks [1]: What do we do about executables

Re: Pulseaudio update issue...

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 22:09 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 14.01.10 14:06, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote: > > > >> When I advance to the next song in rhythmbox I get odd sound behaviour, > > >> *after* I've received mail, *if* thunderbird is configured to play an > > >>

Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 18:49 -0500, David Malcolm wrote: > > Thanks. As I understand it, the alternatives system is a host-wide > configuration setting: only one set of things can be at use at a time on > a host; that seems too blunt for this, alas - I think people should be > able to use a mixtur

Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 22:29 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote: > 2010/1/14 David Malcolm : > > Anyone got any better ideas? Thoughts about which of the above is > > preferrable? > > I am not sure it qualifies as "better" than your suggestions... but > the problem of different executables with the s

Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage

On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:26:39 + (UTC) Zing wrote: > On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:37:20 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > Because it won't be on the live media that many of the install > > from, or the default groups that would be choosen from the dvd > > install. > > Just FYI, since it seems this is

Re: Proposal: fedora-release-rawhide subpackage

On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:37:20 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Because it won't be on the live media that many of the install from, or > the default groups that would be choosen from the dvd install. Just FYI, since it seems this is happening anyway, I didn't think rawhide was available from an anacon

Re: Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks

2010/1/14 David Malcolm : > Anyone got any better ideas?  Thoughts about which of the above is > preferrable? I am not sure it qualifies as "better" than your suggestions... but the problem of different executables with the same name providing equivalent functionality via a different implementatio

Plan for tomorrow's (2010-01-15) FESCo meeting

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 17:00UTC (noon EST) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Followups: #298 Revoke Paul Johnsons pacakger access and put him on probation. #291 Man pages Packaging Guideline New business: Finalize new meeti

Globally-visible executables with parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks

python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping to build out the Python 3 stack (help would be most welcome!) I've run into a snag with the plan of building out parallel python 2 and python 3 stacks [1]: What do we do about executables that live in /usr/bin ? For example if we have a 'console_scripts' in a

Re: Pulseaudio update issue...

On 01/14/2010 02:09 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 14.01.10 14:06, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote: > When I advance to the next song in rhythmbox I get odd sound behaviour, *after* I've received mail, *if* thunderbird is configured to play an audio alert. It h

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:46:52PM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > thats exactly what i am "complaining" about. it states that burning > failed. id expect it to tell me that polling failed. thats not really > "randomly" but a common way to tune systems for maximized battery > lifetime. powertop e.g.

Re: Pulseaudio update issue...

On Thu, 14.01.10 14:06, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote: > >> When I advance to the next song in rhythmbox I get odd sound behaviour, > >> *after* I've received mail, *if* thunderbird is configured to play an > >> audio alert. It has been configured this way since F11, and has had no

Re: Pulseaudio update issue...

On 01/14/2010 02:02 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 14.01.10 13:58, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote: > >>> You can fix this issue by disabling flat-volumes by setting >>> flat-volumes=no in daemon.conf. Ideally however those drivers should >>> get fixed. >> >> The issue is tha

Re: Pulseaudio update issue...

On Thu, 14.01.10 13:58, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote: > > You can fix this issue by disabling flat-volumes by setting > > flat-volumes=no in daemon.conf. Ideally however those drivers should > > get fixed. > > The issue is that this *only* started to happen with the latest releas

Re: Pulseaudio update issue...

On 01/14/2010 01:49 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 07.01.10 10:42, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote: > >> Hello, >> >>First off, not trying to bash or otherwise start a war about pulseaudio. >> >>Just checking if anyone else is experiencing issues with the >> latest F1

Re: Pulseaudio update issue...

On Thu, 07.01.10 10:42, Nathanael D. Noblet (nathan...@gnat.ca) wrote: > Hello, > > First off, not trying to bash or otherwise start a war about pulseaudio. > > Just checking if anyone else is experiencing issues with the > latest F12 update (0.9.21-2) of pulseaudio? > > For me changing b

Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 12:59:32PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > > Anyone else interested in working on packaging this? > > Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs? > No. That's "Needs Work". Wait, scratch that -- the

f13 boost-1.41.0 upgrade: notice of intent

Hey. The boost maintainers are planning to update the boost versions to the current release (1.41.0) in rawhide for F13. See more detail here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F13Boost141#Detailed_Description Suggested plan is to push this to devel in the next 24 hrs, which will be ann

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-01-10 x86_64

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 10:51:56AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: > Fedora Rawhide-in-Mock Build Results for x86_64 > using rawhide as of 2010-01-10. This is a full rebuild of all 8812 packages. > > Full logs at http://linux.dell.com/files/fedora/FixBuildRequires/ I have now filed bugs in bugzilla fo

[389-devel] Commit: Bug 509201 - rhds81 hub with 71 master - err=32 on replica base search during replication

pushed to master - thanks to Noriko for the review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=509201 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=383718&action=diff -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

%cmake macro usage, dropping -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON

If you're the maintainer of a cmake-based package, and use the %cmake macro, be aware I just implemented a change in rawhide (to cmake-2.8.0-2) to drop the usage of -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON as previously discussed(1). If you want or need to continue with the old behavior, use %cmake %{?_cmake_

[Bug 552554] Merge Review: perl-Convert-BinHex - Macintosh BinHex extractor library for Perl

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552554 --- Comment #1 from Jan Vcelak 2010-01-14 12:59:22 EST --- MUST items: [YES] rpmlint is silent: $ rpmlint ./perl-Convert-BinHe

Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 06:36:47PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote: > > Anyone else interested in working on packaging this? > Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs? No. That's "Needs Work". -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org -- devel mailing l

[Bug 555505] New: FTBFS perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-3.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-3.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=05 Summary: FTBFS perl-ExtUtils-InferConfig-1.03-3.fc12 P

[Bug 555506] New: FTBFS perl-libintl-1.16-10.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-libintl-1.16-10.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=06 Summary: FTBFS perl-libintl-1.16-10.fc12 Product: Fedora

[Bug 555508] New: FTBFS cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=08 Summary: FTBFS cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13 Product: Fedora Version: raw

Re: RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?

Matthew Miller píše v Čt 14. 01. 2010 v 12:29 -0500: > Good news for photographers: > > > > > Anyone else interested in working on packaging this? Can it be build and used without the rawzor binary blobs? Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists

[Bug 555507] New: FTBFS perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-2.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=07 Summary: FTBFS perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp-0.10-2.f

[Bug 555483] New: FTBFS perl-File-ShareDir-1.00-3.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-File-ShareDir-1.00-3.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555483 Summary: FTBFS perl-File-ShareDir-1.00-3.fc12 Product: Fedora

Re: package kbackup is blocked for tag...

Le jeudi 14 janvier 2010 18:06:57, Mamoru Tasaka a écrit : > Please file a ticket on rel-eng trac: > > https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ > > with the information that you are going to reintroduce orphaned > "kbackup" package (as the re-review request: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?i

[Bug 555496] New: FTBFS perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555496 Summary: FTBFS perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12 Product: Fedora

[Bug 555481] New: FTBFS perl-Devel-Cover-0.64-3.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-Devel-Cover-0.64-3.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555481 Summary: FTBFS perl-Devel-Cover-0.64-3.fc12 Product: Fedora

[Bug 555437] New: FTBFS perl-SQL-Translator-0.11002-1.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-SQL-Translator-0.11002-1.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555437 Summary: FTBFS perl-SQL-Translator-0.11002-1.fc12 Product

[Bug 555464] New: FTBFS perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.05-2.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.05-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555464 Summary: FTBFS perl-File-ShareDir-PAR-0.05-2.fc12 Product

[Bug 555460] New: FTBFS perl-Padre-0.32-2.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-Padre-0.32-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555460 Summary: FTBFS perl-Padre-0.32-2.fc12 Product: Fedora Vers

RawTherapee now GPLv3 -- anyone else interested?

Good news for photographers: Anyone else interested in working on packaging this? -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

[Bug 555448] New: FTBFS perl-Module-Install-0.91-2.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-Module-Install-0.91-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555448 Summary: FTBFS perl-Module-Install-0.91-2.fc12 Product: Fedo

[Bug 555430] New: FTBFS perl-Text-VimColor-0.11-3.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-Text-VimColor-0.11-3.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555430 Summary: FTBFS perl-Text-VimColor-0.11-3.fc12 Product: Fedora

[Bug 555435] New: FTBFS perl-Archive-RPM-0.04-3.fc13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-Archive-RPM-0.04-3.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555435 Summary: FTBFS perl-Archive-RPM-0.04-3.fc13 Product: Fedora

[Bug 555418] New: FTBFS perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.06-3.fc13

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.06-3.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555418 Summary: FTBFS perl-DateTime-Format-ISO8601-0.06-3.fc13

[Bug 555413] New: FTBFS ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-13.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-13.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555413 Summary: FTBFS ocaml-cmigrep-1.5-13.fc12 Product: Fedora

Re: Change to DSO-linking semantics of the compiler

On 01/11/2010 01:45 PM, Charley Wang wrote: > The change will force explicit declaration of links rather than implicitly > detecting links. More detailed info is here: > It would be nice if libtool were also updated to not explicitly link all dependent libraries transitively. rpmlint complains ab

[Bug 555420] New: FTBFS perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.005-6.fc12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.005-6.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=555420 Summary: FTBFS perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.005-6.fc12 Produ

Re: package kbackup is blocked for tag...

Alain Portal wrote, at 01/15/2010 01:50 AM +9:00: > Hi, > > I´m trying to build updates of kbackup but built failed with the following > error message : "package kbackup is blocked for tag dist-*". > > Can somebody tell me where is the problem? > > Regards, > Alain > Please file a ticket on

Soname change for irrlicht

I am updating irrlicht to 1.6.1 in rawhide (and possibly F-12, depending on what SuperTuxKart needs). This is an soname change, but it only affects SuperTuxKart (which will be using irrlicht going forward and needs 1.6.*) and SolarModel (which I maintain). ~spot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.

package kbackup is blocked for tag...

Hi, I´m trying to build updates of kbackup but built failed with the following error message : "package kbackup is blocked for tag dist-*". Can somebody tell me where is the problem? Regards, Alain -- Les pages de manuel Linux en français http://manpagesfr.free.fr signature.asc Description:

Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide

Hi, On 01/14/2010 04:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said: >>> [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires >>> 'libparted-1.9.so.0()(64bit)' >>> qtparted-0:0.4.5-22.fc12.x86_64 >>> DeviceKit-disks-0:009-3.fc12.x86_64 (now udisks) >>> gparted-0:0.4.8-

Re: [389-devel] Please review: Allow modrdn to move subtree and rename non-leaf node

Hi Noriko, >  Allow modrdn to move subtree and rename non-leaf node > >    This patch includes > ... I've read your design and implementation guide. It is very detailed and discusses a lot of questions in a rather comprehensive way. A lot of uncertainties i had in the beginning of the document we

Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide

Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said: > > [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires > > 'libparted-1.9.so.0()(64bit)' > > qtparted-0:0.4.5-22.fc12.x86_64 > > DeviceKit-disks-0:009-3.fc12.x86_64 (now udisks) > > gparted-0:0.4.8-1.fc12.x86_64 > > kde-partitionmanager-0:1.0.0-2.fc12

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010/1/14 Jud Craft : > On 1/14/10 6:30 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: >> On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical >>> user: >>> >>> 1. i insert a blank >>> 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

On 1/14/10 6:30 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> Hello >> >> Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: >> >> 1. i insert a blank >> 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd >> >> -> so

[Bug 553140] Merge Review: perl-MailTools - Various mail-related perl modules

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553140 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 552554] Merge Review: perl-Convert-BinHex - Macintosh BinHex extractor library for Perl

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552554 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

[Bug 552822] Merge Review: perltidy - Tool for indenting and reformatting Perl scripts

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552822 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: soname changing parted heading for rawhide

On Mon, 2010-01-11 at 20:19 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > Today I've rebased parted to parted-2.1, this means that the libparted > soname has changed, and all libparted using packages need to be rebuild: > > [h...@localhost ~]$ sudo repoquery -q --whatrequires > 'libparted-1.9.so.0()(64b

Re: rawhide report: 20100114 changes

On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 01:26:11PM +, Rawhide Report wrote: > cduce-0.5.3-3.fc13.i686 requires ocaml(runtime) = 0:3.11.1 I just nudged upstream about this one again. > 1:libguestfs-1.0.81-1.fc13.i686 requires /usr/lib/libxtables.so.2 Unannounced soname bump ... I've kicked off a

rawhide report: 20100114 changes

Compose started at Thu Jan 14 08:15:10 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- DeviceKit-disks-009-3.fc12.i686 requires libparted-1.9.so.0 PyKDE-3.16.6-1.fc13.i686 requires sip-api(6) >= 0:6.0 anjal-0.1.0-1.fc13.i686 requires

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

2010/1/14 Bastien Nocera : > On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: >> Hello >> >> Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: >> >> 1. i insert a blank >> 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd >> >> -> so far so good >> >

Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

On Thu, 2010-01-14 at 12:09 +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > Hello > > Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: > > 1. i insert a blank > 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd > > -> so far so good > > 3. i get a new window stating how

burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing

Hello Burning an iso file with gnome is really confusing even for a technical user: 1. i insert a blank 2. i right click on an iso in nautilus and choose burn to cd/dvd -> so far so good 3. i get a new window stating how much free space the blank has (but in reality it already substracted the s