Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update - pthread question

2010-02-13 Thread Remi Collet
Le 08/02/2010 23:37, Roland Grunberg a écrit : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking + mysql++ should be fixed. now http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1981564 But I'm asking about -pthread option (which is detect/use for this package). According to

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Haïkel Guémar
Le 13/02/2010 01:45, Jesse Keating a écrit : As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We don't yet have a clever name for this

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Frank Murphy
On 13/02/10 05:18, Adam Williamson wrote: --snipped-- Want to help us come up with a term we could use to reference this tree? Email away! Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't really need to have its own name that's always the same... +2 Easier tell the

Re: No lzma sdk in fedora

2010-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Bruno Wolff III wrote: I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a way forward. If it looks like I can figure it out, I plan on submitting a package for

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Kevin Kofler
Jesse Keating wrote: As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We don't yet have a clever name for this concept yet, and we've just

Re: No lzma sdk in fedora

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:57:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Bruno Wolff III wrote: I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a

Re: No lzma sdk in fedora

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:57:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Bruno Wolff III wrote: I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a

kplayer

2010-02-13 Thread Frode Nicolaisen
Hi! Using the KDE version of fedora 12 and notice that the kplayer doesnt play mp3s via samba/networkshares. It plays for some seconds and just crash! Anyone know what to do to fix it!? __ Bruker du Yahoo!? Lei av spam? Yahoo! Mail har den beste

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Mike Chambers
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 16:45 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We don't yet have a clever name for

Re: Proposal: move comps to fedorahosted git

2010-02-13 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 04:45:06PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: I'd like to propose moving comps to fedorahosted git. Why? Because CVS is a pain. I can work on fixing the automated releng tasks that use comps. What I'd like to know is if doing this at some point over the next few weeks (say,

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: rawhide - packages for rawhide dir testing - packages for current development release going to testing stable - packages for current development release going to main dir release - packages for current officially released already gold

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13  That's where we'll be putting things that are tagged for the release after they get through testing.  We don't yet have a clever name for

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: rawhide - packages for rawhide dir testing - packages for current development release going to testing stable - packages for current development release going to main dir

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Jesse Keating
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 09:25 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: staging - devel release for main dir We use the term staging when we have are putting things on the master mirror for our other mirrors to pick up (: -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Frank Murphy
On 13/02/10 00:45, Jesse Keating wrote: As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We don't yet have a clever name for this concept

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Sven Lankes
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:48:07AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't really need to have its own name that's always the same... Mostly because it becomes awkward to talk about things in 13 before 13 is released, In my world

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

2010-02-13 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 06:29:33PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 17:07 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: An interesting note here is that target audience is of no use in deciding this. KDE and GNOME aim for the same target audiences but have different ideas of how to reach

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Johan Cwiklinski
Le 13/02/2010 16:50, Matt Domsch a écrit : trasher: gcompris,homebank,tuxtype2 gcompris and homebank are already fixed and has been rebuilt. tuxtype2 will be soon, I'm working on it. Regards, Johan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?

2010-02-13 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 07:12:24PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Mike McGrath wrote: Spins didn't help, reinstalling did. No. His problem was with switching desktop environment. It was solved by reinstalling with the spin for the target environment, getting the exact package selection

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29 -0600, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: Of those expected to have worked... Without a bug filed: 659 -- glest-3.2.2-2.fc12 (build/make) bruno,bruno I believe I fixed glest on 2010-02-11. -- devel mailing list

rawhide report: 20100213 changes

2010-02-13 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Sat Feb 13 08:15:06 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- balsa-2.4.6-3.fc13.i686 requires libgmime-2.4.so.2 beagle-0.3.9-15.fc12.i686 requires mono(gmime-sharp) = 0:2.4.0.0

Re: rawhide report: 20100213 changes

2010-02-13 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:00 +, Rawhide Report wrote: kernel-2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc13 * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com 2.6.33-0.44.rc8 - 2.6.33-rc8 * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com 2.6.33-0.43.rc7.git6 -

Re: rawhide report: 20100213 changes

2010-02-13 Thread darrell pfeifer
Mike, On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 17:00 +, Rawhide Report wrote: kernel-2.6.33-0.44.rc8.git0.fc13 * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com 2.6.33-0.44.rc8 - 2.6.33-rc8 * Fri Feb 12 2010 Chuck Ebbert cebb...@redhat.com 2.6.33-0.43.rc7.git6 -

Re: rawhide report: 20100213 changes

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:27:59 -0800, darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562514 You may have to edit you grub.conf. Look for missing lines compared to working stanzas. That might not be the problem here. I am getting the initrd lines

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. This is responsible for 446 failures noted below. See

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 16:52:55 +0100, Sven Lankes s...@lank.es wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:48:07AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: Why not just call it 13 now, and 14 next time, and so on? It doesn't really need to have its own name that's always the same... Mostly because it

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt How is package ownership determined? I have nothing to do anymore with Sylpheed for F-13 or

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13 (missing_DSO_to_linker__http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking) itamarjp,cwickert,mschwendt How is package

Draft of maintainer and sponsor responsibility policies

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
At the last fesco meeting we talked about the ramifications of allowing any person in the packager grop to commit to packages and decided that rather than having more accounts and acls on to manage this, that it was desirable to change the responsibilities of sponsors and maintainers. The goal is

Orphaning Some Packages

2010-02-13 Thread Brian Pepple
Hey all, I'm orphaning the following packages: SDL_image SDL_mixer SDL_net SDL_ttf freeciv fyre ggz-gtk-client gossip swfdec swddec-gnome twitux Thanks, /B -- Brian Pepple bpep...@fedoraproject.org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Bpepple gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys 810CC15E

Re: No lzma sdk in fedora

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 10:57:35 +0100, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote: Bruno Wolff III wrote: I'll take a quick look over the weekend. We probably want to wait until the branch next week anyway. I have been meaning to get back to squashfs-tools in any case, as this gives me a

Re: Draft of maintainer and sponsor responsibility policies

2010-02-13 Thread Björn Persson
Toshio Kuratomi wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities%28draft%29 It says package sponsor in the URL, in the heading and in the second paragraph. I think it should be packager sponsor as the sponsor sponsors a packager, not a package. Björn Persson

Re: rawhide report: 20100213 changes

2010-02-13 Thread darrell pfeifer
2010/2/13 Tomasz Torcz to...@pipebreaker.pl On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:35:53AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:27:59 -0800, darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562514 You may have to edit you grub.conf.

Re: Orphaning Some Packages

2010-02-13 Thread Alain Portal
Hi, Le samedi 13 février 2010 20:34:16, Brian Pepple a écrit : Hey all, I'm orphaning the following packages: I think it should be nice, when a Fedora packager say he orphaned some packages, he tells why he orphans its: - no time to package - no use it any more - lack of communication with

Re: Fast-track Nonresponsive maintainer: Frank Bütt ner (frankb)

2010-02-13 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 3:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Frank Büttner wrote: I have done some like at my first package, and then to my was spoken, that I use local mock and not the infrastructure. But after some updates of mock, mock it now dead. The no response from them maintainer. Don't

Re: No lzma sdk in fedora

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 13:34:13 -0600, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote: It seems Lougher added a wrapper for xz about a week ago. I haven't tried it out yet, but I think that will likely make it significantly easier for me to get 4.1 into rawhide. I won't do this before the alpha, but

Re: rawhide report: 20100213 changes

2010-02-13 Thread Mike Chambers
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 19:44 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 11:35:53AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:27:59 -0800, darrell pfeifer darrel...@gmail.com wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=562514 You may have to edit

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:53:20PM -0500, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Matt Domsch wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:50:29AM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Mail Lists
On 02/13/2010 01:34 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 11:07 -0500, Mail Lists wrote: Pre or Prerelease was the name we used to use for Beta, so that's not saving any confusion there :/ Ok - how about 13-dev ... or 13-frontier .. or 13-alpha .. or even 13-not-yet-beta

Suggestion: An earlier freeze for soname bumps

2010-02-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
It is hard to do testing for spins when there is also some broken dependency in rawhide. (The latest last minute breakage being gmime.) Doing soname bumps right before the alpha freeze (I think under the new development rules the updates would be blocked for beta and beyond) results in fire drills

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread drago01
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 4:50 PM, Matt Domsch matt_dom...@dell.com wrote: Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 using rawhide from 2010-02-10 This run includes the new default linker feature --no-add-needed. This is responsible for 446 failures noted below.  See

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Louis Lagendijk
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:11 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:36 -0600, Mike Chambers wrote: rawhide - packages for rawhide dir testing - packages for current development release going to testing stable - packages for current development release going to main dir

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-13 Thread Simo Sorce
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:36:00 -0800 Jesse Keating jkeat...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 16:03 +, Frank Murphy wrote: CuredHide Actually, I kind of like where this is going. Rawhide - Curing - Stable braising ... what a meal will it be ... Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat,

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Matt Domsch
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt wrote: sylpheed-3.0.0-3.0.beta7.fc13

Re: documentation on Bugzilla bug lifecycle/developer procedures?

2010-02-13 Thread Eric Smith
Adam Williamson wrote: The bug lifecycle documentation is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/BugStatusWorkFlow it's linked extensively from the Bugzilla HOWTO, the QA Wiki section, and also if you get to [...] Great, thanks! Now I feel really dumb for not having found it on

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-02-10 x86_64

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sun, Feb 14, 2010 at 02:50:35AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 18:04:33 -0600, Matt wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 02:06:06PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 07:28:34PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 09:50:29 -0600, Matt

Re: Draft of maintainer and sponsor responsibility policies

2010-02-13 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 09:03:37PM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: Toshio Kuratomi wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_sponsor_responsibilities%28draft%29 It says package sponsor in the URL, in the heading and in the second paragraph. I think it should be packager sponsor as the

[Bug 564664] New: FTBFS perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.05002-2.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.05002-2.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564664 Summary: FTBFS perl-HTML-FormFu-Model-DBIC-0.05002-2.fc13

[Bug 564680] New: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-0.08112-2.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-0.08112-2.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564680 Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-0.08112-2.fc13 Product:

[Bug 564677] New: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.00006-1.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-EncodedColumn-0.6-1.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564677 Summary: FTBFS

[Bug 564702] New: FTBFS perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80013-2.fc12

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80013-2.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564702 Summary: FTBFS perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.80013-2.fc12

[Bug 564769] New: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault-0.03-4.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault-0.03-4.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564769 Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-DynamicDefault-0.03-4.fc13

[Bug 564835] New: FTBFS perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.03-5.fc12

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.03-5.fc12 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564835 Summary: FTBFS perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-0.03-5.fc12

[Bug 565027] New: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.3-2.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIC-Schema-0.3-2.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565027 Summary: FTBFS

[Bug 565048] New: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-2.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-2.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565048 Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-TimeStamp-0.12-2.fc13

[Bug 565126] New: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-2.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Application-Structured-0.003-2.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565126 Summary: FTBFS

[Bug 565180] New: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.05-5.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.05-5.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565180 Summary: FTBFS perl-DBIx-Class-DateTime-Epoch-0.05-5.fc13

[Bug 565192] New: FTBFS perl-CGI-Untaint-date-1.00-8.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Untaint-date-1.00-8.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565192 Summary: FTBFS perl-CGI-Untaint-date-1.00-8.fc13 Product:

[Bug 565201] New: FTBFS perl-DBICx-TestDatabase-0.02-4.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: FTBFS perl-DBICx-TestDatabase-0.02-4.fc13 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565201 Summary: FTBFS perl-DBICx-TestDatabase-0.02-4.fc13

File DateTime-Format-DateParse-0.04-ANDK-01.patch.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by cweyl

2010-02-13 Thread Chris Weyl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse: 72e41a67fda841f094228ea47ea1f281 DateTime-Format-DateParse-0.04-ANDK-01.patch.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-02-13 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv30551 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime-Format-DateParse.spec sources Log Message: * Sat Feb 13 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.04-5 - apply

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite/devel perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite.spec, 1.4, 1.5

2010-02-13 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1517 Modified Files: perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite.spec Log Message: * Sat Feb 13 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.11-1 - auto-update by cpan-spec-update

File DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.11.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by cweyl

2010-02-13 Thread Chris Weyl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite: 9cc9cc861407a1bbc696226605279842 DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.11.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-02-13 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv2020 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Log Message: * Sat Feb 13 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.11-1 - auto-update by cpan-spec-update 0.002 - added

[Bug 564309] Bogus perl(DB) provide

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564309 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 564715] FTBFS perl-DateTime-Format-SQLite-0.10-4.fc13

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564715 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu changed: What|Removed |Added

File CPAN-DistnameInfo-0.09.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by steve

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-DistnameInfo: d402bfb2974875ea1309dace53f13aeb CPAN-DistnameInfo-0.09.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/devel .cvsignore, 1.13, 1.14 perl-BerkeleyDB.spec, 1.26, 1.27 sources, 1.13, 1.14

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-BerkeleyDB/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11199 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-BerkeleyDB.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.41. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-CPAN-DistnameInfo/devel .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 perl-CPAN-DistnameInfo.spec, 1.9, 1.10 sources, 1.4, 1.5

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-CPAN-DistnameInfo/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv11775 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-CPAN-DistnameInfo.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.09. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-DateTime-Event-ICal.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime-Event-ICal/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15820 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime-Event-ICal.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.10. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF.spec, 1.8, 1.9 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv17000 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.05. Update Source0 URL. Build with Module::Build. Index:

File HTML-Mason-1.44.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by steve

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Mason: efc1efd53caaaf7432cf0fab774614c3 HTML-Mason-1.44.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-DateTime-Set/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-DateTime-Set.spec, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
Author: steve Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-DateTime-Set/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv20970 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-DateTime-Set.spec sources Log Message: Update to 0.28. BR DateTime::Event::Recurrence for better test coverage. Index: .cvsignore

File HTTP-DAV-0.40.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by steve

2010-02-13 Thread Steven Pritchard
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-DAV: d4573ef7f24280f410736da4c2439e67 HTTP-DAV-0.40.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check/devel .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4 perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.spec, 1.4, 1.5 sources, 1.3, 1.4

2010-02-13 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv23816 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-B-Hooks-OP-Check.spec sources Log Message: * Sun Feb 14 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.18-1 - auto-update by

rpms/perl-Archive-RPM/devel perl-Archive-RPM.spec,1.4,1.5

2010-02-13 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Archive-RPM/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv24957 Modified Files: perl-Archive-RPM.spec Log Message: * Sat Feb 13 2010 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 0.04-5 - PERL_INSTALL_ROOT = DESTDIR - add

[Bug 557015] ExtUtils::MakeMaker 6.51_01+ causing build failures w/Module::Install::Share and others

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557015 FTBFS ft...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 555506] FTBFS perl-libintl-1.16-10.fc12

2010-02-13 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=06 FTBFS ft...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: why is Padre dependent on Win32::API on Fedora ? [was Re: Broken dependencies: perl-Padre]

2010-02-13 Thread Gabor Szabo
It took me some time but I think I still have not managed to fully digest this discussion. I am in the hope that both the Fedora Perl packagers and CPAN authors would prefer to eliminate as much of the manual work required by the packagers as possible. One of the biggest complaints about Perl I