Re: gconf settings for gdm login

2010-02-23 Thread Jon Masters
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 07:51 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le lundi 22 février 2010 à 19:05 -0800, John Reiser a écrit : > > On 02/22/2010 03:07 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > There is much worse - it does not let you set the keyboard layour > > > anymore, so anyone in a non-qwerty locale will h

Re: Intel GPU powersaving

2010-02-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:41:56AM +0100, Rudolf Kastl wrote: > still got hangs on a lenovo x301. with 2.6.32/31 the hangs are gone. And with other F13 .33 kernels? -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: Intel GPU powersaving

2010-02-23 Thread Rudolf Kastl
still got hangs on a lenovo x301. with 2.6.32/31 the hangs are gone. 2010/2/23 Matthew Garrett : > We tried some new Intel powersaving code in the F12 cycle, but it caused > a range of problems including screen flickering and crashes. I've > reworked this a little and it seems to work on a machine

Intel GPU powersaving

2010-02-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
We tried some new Intel powersaving code in the F12 cycle, but it caused a range of problems including screen flickering and crashes. I've reworked this a little and it seems to work on a machine that had problems in the past, so I'd like to try it again. If anyone with an Intel GPU (except GMA

Re: hdparm -B for netbooks

2010-02-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:34:54PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > it was my understanding that "hdparm -B" has nothing to do with the BIOS but > changes > the power management feature specific to the drive? Either the drive set the initial value, or the BIOS did. We tend to assume that there

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Till Maas wrote: > Now that I know the command to do this, here it is: > > $ koji latest-pkg dist-f12-build qt | grep override > > If this returns something, the package must only be moved to stable > together with the big qt update. Right, I should have included this hint, thanks for pointing t

Summary/Minutes from 2010-02-23 FESCo Meeting

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Fenzi
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-02-23) === Meeting started by nirik at 20:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-23/fesco.2010-02-23-20.00.log.html Meeting summary -

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Till Maas
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:41:59PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I wrote: > > for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, > > but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to > > push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Rex Dieter
Tom Lane wrote: > I guess I am wondering why such a change is being made in a "stable" > branch in the first place. Why isn't this sort of thing strictly > rawhide material? To be clear, it's a backward, but not forward compatible change in question, which similarly affects lots of newer softwa

Re: hdparm -B for netbooks

2010-02-23 Thread Chuck Anderson
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:34:54PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:18:21PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:10:03PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > What is the state of this - is some package responsible for this or is it >

Re: hdparm -B for netbooks

2010-02-23 Thread Richard Zidlicky
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 08:18:21PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:10:03PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > Hi, > > What is the state of this - is some package responsible for this or is it > > up to > > the user to do it manualy? > > We have no understanding of the

Re: hdparm -B for netbooks

2010-02-23 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:10:03PM +0100, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > Hi, > > I have one of these netbooks that need "hdparm -B high_value" to avoid > unhealthy > frequent head parking. From some archived mails I had the impression that it > was > planned that gnome power manager and similar would

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Tom Lane
Kevin Kofler writes: > I wrote: >> for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, >> but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to >> push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt your >> package got built against and DO NO

hdparm -B for netbooks

2010-02-23 Thread Richard Zidlicky
Hi, I have one of these netbooks that need "hdparm -B high_value" to avoid unhealthy frequent head parking. From some archived mails I had the impression that it was planned that gnome power manager and similar would take care of such issues - which does not appear to happen in my case. What is

Re: Rawhide repo

2010-02-23 Thread Dennis Gilmore
On Saturday 20 February 2010 02:19:47 pm Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 08:17:28PM +, Paul wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just checked why I've not been able to grab the updates from rawhide and > > it looks like the only fedora.repo files in /etc/yum.repos.d is fedora > > and fedora-te

Re: Bodhi update levels

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Michael Cronenworth wrote: > How would one tell the difference between a bodhi edit and the first > bodhi update push? On the surface I cannot tell this by looking at the > updates e-mail or using bodhi. There isn't really a way, as for Bodhi, editing means unpushing and queueing the modified upd

Re: Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
I wrote: > for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, > but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to > push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt your > package got built against and DO NOT PUSH your update to stable

Outage: NFS Crash - 2010-02-23 18:30 UTC

2010-02-23 Thread Mike McGrath
There was an outage starting at 2010-02-23 18:30 UTC, which will lasted about 15 minutes. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2010-02-23 18:30 UTC' Reason for outage: The nfs server rebooted. Still looking at

Read this if your package BuildRequires qt(4)-devel!!!

2010-02-23 Thread Kevin Kofler
Hi, for all maintainers of packages which BuildRequire qt4-devel (or qt-devel, but the versioned virtual Provides is preferred): please, when you plan to push updates for your packages, ALWAYS CHECK what version of Qt your package got built against and DO NOT PUSH your update to stable before t

Bodhi update levels

2010-02-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth
How would one tell the difference between a bodhi edit and the first bodhi update push? On the surface I cannot tell this by looking at the updates e-mail or using bodhi. Thanks, Michael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rawhide report: 20100223 changes

2010-02-23 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Tue Feb 23 08:15:18 UTC 2010 New package ghc-binary Haskell binary serialisation library New package globus-gram-client-tools Globus Toolkit - Job Management Tools (globusrun) New package goddard-kde-theme Goddard KDE Theme New package pam_radius

[Bug 567633] Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567633 Chris Weyl changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 567120] perl-Set-Scalar: please update to v1.25 and create EPEL branches

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567120 Jason Tibbitts changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Fwd: Inclusion of Ingres RDBMS in Fedora

2010-02-23 Thread Jay Hankinson
On 2/23/10 12:07 AM, Oliver Falk wrote: > Hi Jay! > > On 02/23/2010 04:09 AM, Jay Hankinson wrote: > [ ... ] > >> * Ingres requires that the server executable is setuid (non-root) >> > Actually I don't know any>rules< that speak against this. However, if > it's really needed, then

Re: Inclusion of Ingres RDBMS in Fedora

2010-02-23 Thread Jay Hankinson
On 2/22/10 9:33 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Jay Hankinson > wrote: > >> Hello Fedora Devs, >> > Hello Ingres Dev, > > >> Over the last few weeks, I spent a lot of time review and amending the >> Ingres (a highly scalable, full-featured open source RDBMS

Re: Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points

2010-02-23 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:06:09PM -0500, Jens Petersen wrote: > Perhaps I missed it but I didn't see any clear indication that > a Talking Point has to be a Feature. Is that the case? It doesn't. A Talking Point should be clearly advantageous to the latest release or somehow contemporaneous wit

KDE-SIG meeting report (08/2010)

2010-02-23 Thread Sebastian Vahl
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply to this email or add it to the related meeting page. -- = Weekly KDE Summary

[Bug 567632] Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567632 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-23 10:24:48 EST --- See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567630#c1

[Bug 567630] Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567630 --- Comment #1 from Richard W.M. Jones 2010-02-23 10:24:14 EST --- (In reply to comment #0) > Additional info: > There is the s

Re: Orphan packages

2010-02-23 Thread Adam Jackson
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 15:22 +0100, Eric Tanguy wrote: > libupnp > ushare Yoink. - ajax signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 567633] Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567633 Niels de Vos changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re:Orphan packages

2010-02-23 Thread Chen Lei
I'll take scidavis. Co-maintainers are welcome for all of my packages. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/supercyper Regards, Chen Lei 在2010-02-23?22:22:45,"Eric?Tanguy"??写道: >I?need?to?orphan?these?packages?: >drgeo >drgeo-doc >gperiodic >libupnp >scidavis >ushare > >Thanks

Orphan packages

2010-02-23 Thread Eric Tanguy
I need to orphan these packages : drgeo drgeo-doc gperiodic libupnp scidavis ushare Thanks Eric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 567633] New: Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567633 Summary: Cannot upload pa

[Bug 567632] New: Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567632 Summary: Cannot upload pa

[Bug 567630] New: Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Cannot upload package to Redhat Satellite Server because of "RPM Requires"-Problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567630 Summary: Cannot upload pa

rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel .cvsignore, 1.22, 1.23 perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec, 1.27, 1.28 sources, 1.22, 1.23

2010-02-23 Thread Paul Howarth
Author: pghmcfc Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-IO-Socket-SSL/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv10137 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-IO-Socket-SSL.spec sources Log Message: * Tue Feb 23 2010 Paul Howarth - 1.32-1 - Update to 1.32 (die in Makefile.PL if Scalar::Ut

File IO-Socket-SSL-1.32.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-02-23 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IO-Socket-SSL: 324ec02c26ecb41c481d0586c4174a56 IO-Socket-SSL-1.32.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m

Re: Upcoming Schedule Tasks

2010-02-23 Thread Jesse Keating
On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 12:37 +, Mat Booth wrote: > > Hi, > > What does "Allow Pre-branch Fedora 13" mean in the context of the new > No Frozen Rawhide process? > > It means that some items on the schedule need to be adjusted/removed now that we've enacted no frozen rawhide. This particular

[Bug 567620] New: YAML::Dumper fails with Can't locate object method "global_object"

2010-02-23 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: YAML::Dumper fails with Can't locate object method "global_object" https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=567620 Summary: YAML::Dumper fails with Can't l

Re: Orphaning some Ruby gems...

2010-02-23 Thread Darryl L. Pierce
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:49:35PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: > Darryl L. Pierce wrote, at 02/22/2010 10:37 PM +9:00: > > Since I have little time and no use for the packages, I'm orphaning the > > following items: > > > > * rubygem-activeldap > > * rubygem-gruff > > * rubygem-hoe > > * rubyg

Package Review Stats for last 4 weeks ending 21st Feb

2010-02-23 Thread Rakesh Pandit
Top five FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package review" components on bugzilla for last 4 weeks ending 21st Feb were Mamoru Tasaka, Parag AN(पराग), Alexander Kurtakov, Chris Weyl and Thomas Spura. Mamoru Tasaka : 21 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557021

Re: Upcoming Schedule Tasks

2010-02-23 Thread Mat Booth
On 23 February 2010 01:42, John Poelstra wrote: > Start       End         Name > Tue 02-Mar  Tue 02-Mar  Allow Pre-branch Fedora 13 Hi, What does "Allow Pre-branch Fedora 13" mean in the context of the new No Frozen Rawhide process? Regards, Mat -- Mat Booth -- devel mailing list devel@list

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader/devel auto.ini, NONE, 1.1 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader.spec, 1.14, 1.15

2010-02-23 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv1323 Modified Files: perl-Catalyst-Plugin-ConfigLoader.spec Added Files: auto.ini Log Message: * Tue Feb 23 2010 Chris Weyl 0.27-3 - update by F

rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication/devel auto.ini, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.10, 1.11 perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.spec, 1.13, 1.14 sources, 1.10, 1.11

2010-02-23 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv786 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication.spec sources Added Files: auto.ini Log Message: * Tue Feb 23 2010 Chris Weyl

File Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10016.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by cweyl

2010-02-23 Thread Chris Weyl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication: 2e7d26f11cafdbe499dd1b7e959cbdbe Catalyst-Plugin-Authentication-0.10016.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject

rpms/perl-namespace-clean/devel perl-namespace-clean.spec,1.8,1.9

2010-02-23 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-namespace-clean/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv32212 Modified Files: perl-namespace-clean.spec Log Message: * Tue Feb 23 2010 Chris Weyl 0.13-2 - update by Fedora::App::MaintainerTools 0.003 - PERL_INSTALL_ROOT =>

rpms/perl-JSON-Any/devel auto.ini, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.4, 1.5 perl-JSON-Any.spec, 1.10, 1.11 sources, 1.4, 1.5 with_older_json.patch, 1.1, NONE

2010-02-23 Thread Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-JSON-Any/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv31839 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-JSON-Any.spec sources Added Files: auto.ini Removed Files: with_older_json.patch Log Message: * Tue Feb 23 2010 Chris

File JSON-Any-1.22.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by cweyl

2010-02-23 Thread Chris Weyl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-JSON-Any: c576a6765c310ad36135e2c090eb0be7 JSON-Any-1.22.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: Fwd: Inclusion of Ingres RDBMS in Fedora

2010-02-23 Thread Oliver Falk
Hi Jay! On 02/23/2010 04:09 AM, Jay Hankinson wrote: [ ... ] > * Ingres requires that the server executable is setuid (non-root) Actually I don't know any >rules< that speak against this. However, if it's really needed, then we cannot really do anything against it. And if there's a rule that