Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-29 Thread Paul
Hi, Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository: rawhide. Please verify its path and try again To get more info use: URLGRABBER_DEBUG=1 yum check-update This gives me 2010-03-29 07:18:52,993 attempt 1/10: https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhidearch=i686

Re: fedora-packager-setup crash

2010-03-29 Thread Léon Keijser
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 14:41 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: My cert was expired. I D/L new cert and rename to ~/.fedora-cert. Then run fedora-packager-setup and it crashes: fedora-packager-setup Setting up Fedora packager environment You need a client certificate from the Fedora Account

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 13 Beta RC#1 Available for testing Now! / kernel crash

2010-03-29 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:33:09AM +0800, He Rui wrote: Greetings testers, F13 Beta RC1 has been uploaded for testing. As before, please follow the guidance in the below links to download the images and execute test cases to make sure they meet the beta release criteria[1]:

Re: Maximum length of userid on Fedora Linux

2010-03-29 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 06:12:32PM +0100, Jochen Schmitt wrote: I want to ask which is the maximum length of a userid on Fedora Linux. I think the maximum length of a userid should be 16 but I want to get a confiration about this assumetion. Even old Red Hat Linux supported long account

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-29 Thread David Woodhouse
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 07:23 +0100, Paul wrote: Oddly, Matt's solution of wget -O - \ 'https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhidearch=i686' does work, but it looks like the problem is a crypto one... It's also a yum bug that it doesn't give you a sane error message, and you

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-29 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote: Hi, I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back to find a problem. When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository:

Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Christoph Wickert
I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If the reporter doesn't respond, the bug is closed NOTABUG or WONTFIX. But if the bug has

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Monday 29 March 2010 13:09:46 Christoph Wickert wrote: I am irritated by the way the KDE SIG and the KDE bugzappers handle bugs. For most bugs that are reported they demand the reporter to file an upstream bug report at bugs.kde.org and set the bug to NEEDINFO. If the reporter doesn't

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Oliver Falk
I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream bugzillas because of exactly this... -of Christoph Wickert christoph.wick...@googlemail.com

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Monday 29 March 2010 13:38:52 Oliver Falk wrote: I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream bugzillas because of exactly this... Me

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/3/29 Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at: I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on upstream bugzillas because of exactly this... I

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Tim Waugh
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:35 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: The problem is - we can't act as man in middle - it's better when original reporter is also upstream reporter = direct communication. Wait -- *any* Fedora developer could say this about any bug. I just don't think it's true, and it

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/29/2010 01:38 PM, Oliver Falk wrote: I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! Me too. Except that I would not want to restrict this complaint to Fedora KDE. There are many other maintainers who apply a similar strategy and therefore deserve the same amount of

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Yaakov Nemoy
2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at: I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream bugreporting plattform. I already have plenty of accounts on

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at: I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! The maintainer should not redirect the bugreporter to the upstream

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Yaakov Nemoy
2010/3/29 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com: On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at: I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! The maintainer should not

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Monday 29 March 2010 13:57:54 Tim Waugh wrote: On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 13:35 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: The problem is - we can't act as man in middle - it's better when original reporter is also upstream reporter = direct communication. Wait -- *any* Fedora developer could say this

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/29/2010 02:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com: 2010/3/29 Oliver Falkoli...@linux-kernel.at: I had similar issues already and I totally agree with Christoph! The maintainer should not redirect

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Monday 29 March 2010 14:20:57 Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 03/29/2010 02:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com: 2010/3/29 Oliver Falkoli...@linux-kernel.at: I had similar issues already and I totally

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Monday 29 March 2010 14:16:55 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: 2010/3/29 Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com: On Monday 29 March 2010 14:03:51 Yaakov Nemoy wrote: 2010/3/29 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: 2010/3/29 Oliver Falk oli...@linux-kernel.at: I had similar issues already and I totally

FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
Hi, I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles: ... [updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm Could not retrieve package kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch. Error was failure: kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm from

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Till Maas
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:20:57PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: As a user, having been hit by a bug, CLOSED UPSTREAM is nothing but a cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix a bug having hit a user. In other words: FIXED UPSTREAM does not fix anything for

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Josephine Tannhäuser
2010/3/29, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: I don't see any problem here if KDE SIG just declare we don't fix KDE bugs, we just update packages. wtf? You can not be serious! It's the duty of every maintainer to accept responsibility for his/her package(s). If there is no responsibility

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/3/29 Josephine Tannhäuser josephine.tannhau...@googlemail.com: 2010/3/29, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com: I don't see any problem here if KDE SIG just declare we don't fix KDE bugs, we just update packages. wtf? You can not be serious! It's the duty of every maintainer to accept

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:10 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: But still bugs are fixed by program developers not Fedora developers. IMO 'Fedora developers' (really, what you mean here are packagers, I guess) should strive to become 'program developers' for the packages they maintain. Getting

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
On Monday 29 March 2010 15:13:56 Matthias Clasen wrote: On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 15:10 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: But still bugs are fixed by program developers not Fedora developers. IMO 'Fedora developers' (really, what you mean here are packagers, I guess) should strive to become

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Yaakov Nemoy
2010/3/29 Till Maas opensou...@till.name: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 02:20:57PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: As a user, having been hit by a bug, CLOSED UPSTREAM is nothing but a cheap bold lie packagers use as weak excuse to for not being able to fix a bug having hit a user. In other words:

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles: ... [updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm Could not retrieve package kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch. Error was failure:

Upcoming Fedora 13 Tasks

2010-03-29 Thread John Poelstra
Start End Name Thu 25-Mar Thu 01-Apr Test Beta Candidate Wed 31-Mar Wed 31-Mar Beta Go/No-Go Meeting (20:00 EST) Thu 01-Apr Thu 01-Apr Start Stage Sync Beta to Mirrors Thu 01-Apr Thu 01-Apr Beta Project Wide Release Readiness Meeting Thu 01-Apr Tue 06-Apr Stage Sync Beta

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/29/2010 04:30 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles: ... [updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading kde-l10n-Korean-4.4.1-2.fc12.noarch.rpm Could not retrieve package

Orphaning package NAS

2010-03-29 Thread Frank Büttner
Hello, because for the new Qt installation, nas it not needed anymore, to play sounds I orphaning it. When somebody will you can take it. For EL4 and EL5 I will maintain it until EL4/EL5 will be unsupported at upstreanm. Current Bugs: #565181 - The make file for FC12 must be fixed. smime.p7s

Re: rawhide repo giving me an odd error

2010-03-29 Thread Marc Dionne
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 5:57 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul p...@all-the-johnsons.co.uk wrote: Hi, I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back to find a problem. When I try to do an update from yum, I'm

File Net-STOMP-Client-0.9.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by stevetraylen

2010-03-29 Thread stevetraylen
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-STOMP-Client: 0cb3ba1526f50210c7787f2f7c1658f9 Net-STOMP-Client-0.9.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/devel .cvsignore, 1.2, 1.3 perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec, 1.2, 1.3 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-03-29 Thread stevetraylen
Author: stevetraylen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv11838 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources Log Message: New 0.9 upstream. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-5 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-03-29 Thread stevetraylen
Author: stevetraylen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-5 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/EL-5 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources Log Message: Up 0.9. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-12 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-03-29 Thread stevetraylen
Author: stevetraylen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources Log Message: Up 0.9. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-11 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-03-29 Thread stevetraylen
Author: stevetraylen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-11 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/F-11 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources Log Message: Up 0.9. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-4 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-03-29 Thread stevetraylen
Author: stevetraylen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/EL-4 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/EL-4 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources Log Message: Up 0.9. Index: .cvsignore

rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-13 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.2, 1.3

2010-03-29 Thread stevetraylen
Author: stevetraylen Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-STOMP-Client/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv12702/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore perl-Net-STOMP-Client.spec sources Log Message: Up 0.9. Index: .cvsignore

rawhide report: 20100329 changes

2010-03-29 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Mar 29 08:15:07 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- anaconda-14.2-1.fc14.i686 requires fcoe-utils = 0:1.0.12-2.20100323git dsniff-2.4-0.8.b1.fc13.i686 requires libnids.so.1.23

[Bug 577880] The timeout option is not working as expected

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-29 12:31:54 EDT --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.fc12

[Bug 577880] The timeout option is not working as expected

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-29 12:30:55 EDT --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.el5

setuid binary for beep program

2010-03-29 Thread Jan Klepek
Hi, I'm looking for a way how to correctly have beep program[1] with setuid binary (I mean, what is correct process for this from maintainer point of view? Or what should be done except change in spec file). I saw http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Privilege_escalation_policy however, I have no idea

[pkgdb] perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Tie-RefHash-Weak -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Test-JSON ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Test-JSON ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Test-JSON ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Test-JSON ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Test-JSON ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Test-JSON in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Test-JSON -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Net-DBus-GLib ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Net-DBus-GLib ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Net-DBus-GLib ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Net-DBus-GLib ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Net-DBus-GLib ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Net-DBus-GLib ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Net-DBus-GLib in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Net-DBus-GLib -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Singleton ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Singleton ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Singleton ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Singleton ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 12 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Singleton ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Singleton in Fedora 11 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Singleton -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Oliver Falk: Yeah. Kick out KDE! Use XFCE! Flamewar! *g* +1 :D Just jokin'... I also agree with Fine. Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs. And of course not everybody is able to fix any kind of bug... I also agree with

Plan for tomorrow's (2010-03-30) FESCo meeting

2010-03-29 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:00UTC (3pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. NOTE: The Meeting Time has CHANGED. See above. = Followups = #347 tor is not compliant with Fedora guidelines #351 Create a policy for updates

Re: Orphaning Packages

2010-03-29 Thread Jon Ciesla
Allisson Azevedo wrote: I am orphaning the following packages. == amora -- A mobile remote assistant couchdb -- A document database server, accessible via a RESTful JSON API eina -- A classic player

Re: Orphaning package NAS

2010-03-29 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 17:39:08 +0200, Frank Büttner frank-buett...@gmx.net wrote: Hello, because for the new Qt installation, nas it not needed anymore, to play sounds I orphaning it. When somebody will you can take it. For EL4 and EL5 I will maintain it until EL4/EL5 will be unsupported

Re: Orphaning Packages

2010-03-29 Thread Filipe Rosset
Em 29-03-2010 16:40, Jon Ciesla escreveu: Allisson Azevedo wrote: I am orphaning the following packages. I'm took amora and pino. Comaintainers welcome as always. Regards, -- Filipe Rosset Projeto Fedora Brasil ros...@projetofedora.org rosset.fil...@gmail.com Rio Grande do Sul - Brasil First

Re: setuid binary for beep program

2010-03-29 Thread Miloslav Trmač
Jan Klepek píše v Po 29. 03. 2010 v 20:59 +0200: I'm looking for a way how to correctly have beep program[1] with setuid binary (I mean, what is correct process for this from maintainer point of view? Or what should be done except change in spec file). I saw

Re: Desktop layout comparison

2010-03-29 Thread Rex Dieter
Mike Chambers wrote: (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen instead?) Yes (depends only on kdelibs). -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Desktop layout comparison

2010-03-29 Thread Mike Chambers
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Mike Chambers wrote: (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen instead?) Yes (depends only on kdelibs). Hrm, is it called kdm? If so, it wanted 52 deps with it. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY Best lil

Re: Desktop layout comparison

2010-03-29 Thread Rex Dieter
Mike Chambers wrote: On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Mike Chambers wrote: (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen instead?) Yes (depends only on kdelibs). Hrm, is it called kdm? If so, it wanted 52 deps with it. Yes, kdm. kdelibs

Re: Desktop layout comparison

2010-03-29 Thread Mike Chambers
On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 19:38 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Mike Chambers wrote: On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 18:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: Mike Chambers wrote: (Can KDM be installed with minimal deps and be used for that screen instead?) Yes (depends only on kdelibs). Hrm, is it

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 03/29/2010 04:30 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles: ... [updates: 2742 of 6885 ] Downloading

Re:Re: Orphaning Packages

2010-03-29 Thread Chen Lei
在2010-03-30 03:40:30,Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 写道: Allisson Azevedo wrote: I am orphaning the following packages. == amora -- A mobile remote assistant couchdb -- A document database server,

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Seth Vidal
On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Matt Domsch wrote: I do wish yum would be more verbose about _which_ mirror it is using, which is available as a debug option. That would help folks like me look for which mirrors might be out of date. But if a mirror is more than 2 days out of date, yum won't try to

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/30/2010 03:40 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 05:31:33PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 03/29/2010 04:30 PM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: On 3/29/2010 7:33, Ralf Corsepius wrote: I am trying to reposync updates, but reposync seems to be having troubles: ... [updates: 2742

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Matt Domsch
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 09:58:08PM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: On Mon, 29 Mar 2010, Matt Domsch wrote: I do wish yum would be more verbose about _which_ mirror it is using, which is available as a debug option. That would help folks like me look for which mirrors might be out of date. But if

Re: Upstream bugs vs. Fedora bugs: KDE people do it wrong

2010-03-29 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Thomas Spura wrote: Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 21:05 +0200 schrieb Thomas Spura: Am Montag, den 29.03.2010, 19:47 +0200 schrieb Oliver Falk: I also agree with Fine. Pkg maintainers are responsible for their pkgs. And of course not everybody is able to fix

Re: FC12 update repo broken?

2010-03-29 Thread Ralf Corsepius
On 03/30/2010 05:46 AM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Ralf Corsepiusrc040...@freenet.de said: The files in question also exist in my reposync'ed repository, but they are broken: kdeartwork-4.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm: rsa sha1 (MD5) PGP MD5 NOT OK So your reposynced respository is bad.

File Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.024.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by mmaslano

2010-03-29 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib: 5b637dbb36955b13db261f049fe529d9 Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.024.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec, 1.7, 1.8 sources, 1.4, 1.5 .cvsignore, 1.3, 1.4

2010-03-29 Thread Marcela Mašláňová
Author: mmaslano Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv10367 Modified Files: .cvsignore Added Files: perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib.spec sources Log Message: * Mon Mar 29 2010 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com

[Bug 577669] perl independent sub-package tracking bug.

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577669 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 577669] perl independent sub-package tracking bug.

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577669 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 577790] perl-X11-Protocol - Request for EL-5 branch

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577790 Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed: What|Removed |Added

Broken dependencies: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile

2010-03-29 Thread buildsys
perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile-0.07-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(HTML::BarGraph) perl-CGI-Application-Plugin-DBIProfile-0.07-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(SVG::TT::Graph::Bar)

[Bug 577880] The timeout option is not working as expected

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-29 12:30:24 EDT --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.el4

[Bug 577880] The timeout option is not working as expected

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-29 12:31:23 EDT --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.fc11

[Bug 577880] The timeout option is not working as expected

2010-03-29 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=577880 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-03-29 12:29:54 EDT --- perl-Net-STOMP-Client-0.9-1.fc13

[pkgdb] perl-Object-Event ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-Object-Event in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Object-Event -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Async ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Async in Fedora devel was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Async -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Async ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Async in Fedora 13 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Async -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Async ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Async in Fedora 10 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Async -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

[pkgdb] perl-MooseX-Async ownership changed

2010-03-29 Thread Fedora PackageDB
Package perl-MooseX-Async in Fedora 9 was orphaned by allisson To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-MooseX-Async -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list

  1   2   >