Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

2010-04-02 Thread Jesse Keating
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 10:39 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > Is numpy > it critpath for the Beta? I'm looking for input on whether we should > revert asap to make sure numpy 1.3 is in the Beta. > > It's basically too late for Beta, I've composed RC4 which should fix all known issues and become the r

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

2010-04-02 Thread Matthew Miller
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 10:39:33AM -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > It looks like we may be reverting back to 1.3 regardless...if numpy > upstream does not have an expected re-release date for 1.4. Is numpy > it critpath for the Beta? I'm looking for input on whether we should > revert asap to make su

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

2010-04-02 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 7:54 AM, David Malcolm wrote: > Doing so now and forcing a rebuild _might_ help isolate the change.  I > don't know if that's a good idea at this stage for F-13, though. > > Hope this is helpful; I haven't had enough coffee yet today so I may be > missing something. It look

Re: sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

2010-04-02 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 04/02/2010 09:34 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I suppose yum might want to complain that sssd wants an earlier version > than that already installed rather than trying to grab the i686 version. > It does if you try to run the transaction: Error: Transaction Check Error: package libdhash-0.4

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

2010-04-02 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 10:06:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The turnout was somewhat disappointing: we only had results from about a > half dozen testers. If anyone has a particular reason they didn't > attend, we'd love to hear about it. We'd have liked much wider testing > on the autom

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

2010-04-02 Thread John Reiser
> [1] http://cyberelk.net/tim/2010/04/01/printer-device-ids-wanted/ What a horrible user interface! The "git clone" step spewed more than 4500 lines of garbage. I wondered whether it was working. Please do a "git gc" to repack the git database before inflicting this on users. -- -- devel mai

F-13 Branched report: 20100402 changes

2010-04-02 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Fri Apr 2 09:15:03 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- edje-0.9.9.050-6.fc12.i686 requires libembryo.so.0 edje-devel-0.9.9.050-6.fc12.i686 requires embryo-devel gnome-web-photo-0.9-4.fc13.i686 requires

Re: 2010-03-25 Printing test day recap

2010-04-02 Thread Gianluca Sforna
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 7:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > The turnout was somewhat disappointing: we only had results from about a > half dozen testers. If anyone has a particular reason they didn't > attend, we'd love to hear about it. We'd have liked much wider testing > on the automatic driver i

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

2010-04-02 Thread David Malcolm
On Fri, 2010-04-02 at 04:11 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Jussi Lehtola > wrote: > > A Python package BuildRequiring numpy does not need to mean anything. > > All of my packages on the list BuildRequires numpy simply because the > > install scripts have a dummy chec

Re: sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

2010-04-02 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 09:34:31 -0600 Orion Poplawski wrote: > This more of things disappearing from updates-testing before > appearing in the main F13 repo? Multi-lib issue? Only sssd-client should be multilib, and it does not require the other libs. > I suppose yum might want to complain that s

Re: sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

2010-04-02 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 04/02/2010 09:18 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > Is it possible that yum is trying to pick up 686 versions of the > libraries because they are missing from the x86_64 repo ? Yeah, something is screwed up in the repo: # yum list libcollection --showduplicates Loaded plugins: downloadonly, presto Inst

Re:sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

2010-04-02 Thread Chen Lei
在2010-04-02 21:03:52,"Mike Chambers" 写道: > > > sssd-1.1.1-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2010-5644) > System Security Services Daemon > >Update Infor

Re: sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

2010-04-02 Thread Simo Sorce
On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 08:03:52 -0500 Mike Chambers wrote: > > > sssd-1.1.1-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2010-5644) > System Security Services Daemon > --

rawhide report: 20100402 changes

2010-04-02 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Apr 2 08:15:03 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- banshee-mirage-0.6.0-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Banshee.Core) = 0:1.5.0.0 banshee-mirage-0.6.0-1.fc13.i686 requires mono(Hyena) = 0:1.5.0.0 banshee

sssd update pulling in 686 packages [Fwd: Fedora 13 updates-testing report]

2010-04-02 Thread Mike Chambers
sssd-1.1.1-1.fc13 (FEDORA-2010-5644) System Security Services Daemon Update Information: * Fixed the IPA provider (which was segfaul

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

2010-04-02 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > A Python package BuildRequiring numpy does not need to mean anything. > All of my packages on the list BuildRequires numpy simply because the > install scripts have a dummy check in them for checking that all > necessary runtime modules are i

Re: Packages requiring numpy may require a rebuild in f13 and rawhide

2010-04-02 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 22:48 -0800, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Thomas Spura > wrote: > > Are you sure, packages like gnuplot-py *have* to get rebuild? > > Your first programm that causes troubles 'python-basemap' is not noarch. > > A compiled programm needs a rebuild, bu