2010/6/17 Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org:
Hello,
xchat in Fedora needs to be restarted after switching to a different
nameserver or it fails to resolve.
The xchat developers say that all xchat does is call gethostbyname(). A
There was a topic 3 years ago about replacing gethostby*
2010/6/20 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com:
Hi,
I've just build latest version of mysql++ in rawhide.
This version breaks ABI.
Thanks for the notice! I'll take care of SEMS rebuild.
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2010/6/19 Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se:
lör 2010-06-19 klockan 19:32 +0200 skrev Andrea Musuruane:
I do not know how should I threat those internal libraries. How should
I package them? Because upstream uses static libraries the dynamic
versions cmake creates are not versioned.
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 7:44 PM, Chen Lei supercyp...@gmail.com wrote:
You can open a RFE report against this package in bugzilla for review.
Can you point me to an example?
For internal libs, if those libs are not libs from other project, you
can simply use %cmake
Andrea Musuruane píše v Ne 20. 06. 2010 v 11:25 +0200:
2010/6/19 Alexander Boström a...@root.snowtree.se:
lör 2010-06-19 klockan 19:32 +0200 skrev Andrea Musuruane:
I do not know how should I threat those internal libraries. How should
I package them? Because upstream uses static
On 06/20/2010 12:45 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On 06/20/2010 12:22 AM, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package.
We have a
On 06/20/2010 12:22 PM, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package.
With zope 2.12 supporting py2.6, I think we might actually have a shot
util-vserver556099 - CLOSED
FYI, util-vserver is re-enabled to ship static libraries again by the
maintainer now after spot disabled it.
Chen Lei
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 20 Jun 2010 19:56:23 +0800, Chen wrote:
util-vserver556099 - CLOSED
FYI, util-vserver is re-enabled to ship static libraries again by the
maintainer now after spot disabled it.
Not a problem as long as it packages them in adherence to the Packaging
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 17:07:02 -0400,
Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
Perhaps they are, and I will look into them. However, my curiosity has
been piqued, so I'd still like to know how it's supposed to be done. It
seems to me like it should be a somewhat straight forward task, so I am
Am 18.06.2010 15:08, schrieb Robin 'cheese' Lee:
And I hope for the co-maintainership of following packages, which are
required by Zope2:
(...)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-zope-interface
I'm happy to grant you these :-)
fs
--
devel mailing list
On 06/20/2010 07:00 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
On 06/20/2010 12:22 PM, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
legacy 2.10.x 'zope' package.
With zope 2.12 supporting
On 06/20/2010 05:42 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
On 06/20/2010 12:45 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On 06/20/2010 12:22 AM, Jonathan Steffan wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 21:08 +0800, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
The 'zope' package itself is most kept under the same conventions of the
legacy
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 17:07:02 -0400,
Digimer li...@alteeve.com wrote:
Perhaps they are, and I will look into them. However, my curiosity has
been piqued, so I'd still like to know how it's supposed to be done. It
19.06.2010 20:34, Ian Baker ?:
Hello to all.
The subject package is currently orphaned and I'm thinking of taking
it over.
One problem I can foresee is that, as far as I can tell, there's no
longer an upstream maintainer and at least one patch is required to
fix compilation issues
Thanks for the information.
I have tried to contact upstream with no success, their website hasn't been
updated in a while, and the latest sources appear to be five years old.
There hasn't been a package update in three months so I'll submit as new after
I fix a few issues.
Thanks.
Ian
Probably thought of a million times, but was wondering whether it would
be possible, and useful to give diff capabilities within the koji web
interface.
eg: x86_64 build
...
Output build.log (tail)
root.log (tail)
state.log (tail)
could become:
Output build.log (tail)
Am Mon, 21 Jun 2010 09:32:07 +1000
schrieb David Timms dti...@iinet.net.au:
Probably thought of a million times, but was wondering whether it
would be possible, and useful to give diff capabilities within the
koji web interface.
eg: x86_64 build
...
Output build.log (tail)
On 06/20/2010 11:08 PM, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Am 18.06.2010 15:08, schrieb Robin 'cheese' Lee:
And I hope for the co-maintainership of following packages, which are
required by Zope2:
(...)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/python-zope-interface
I'm happy
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-06-15)
===
Meeting started by mjg59 at 19:35:11 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-06-15/fesco.2010-06-15-19.35.log.html
Meeting summary
umm why did you make that change?
On Sunday, June 20, 2010 03:06:32 pm stevetraylen wrote:
Author: stevetraylen
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/xml-security-c/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv2536
Modified Files:
xml-security-c.spec
Log Message:
EPEL5 one
I built ghc-6.12.3 for F14. This will require rebuilding all
ghc library packages, which I and the Haskell SIG will be doing
over the coming days - the meantime please bear with us with
the broken dependencies...
Thanks,
Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
[cut]
Question 1:
Suppose package A fails to build from source due to a bug in package B
that is listed in package A's BuildRequires. Now that package B gets
2010/6/21 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com:
On 06/20/2010 05:42 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote:
I suspect BlueBream solves our namespace issue; namely, the zope
namespace will be zope2 only.
Nathaniel
--
Agree, all zope components won't have any namespace conflict issue now
as I
On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 10:24:27PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Jun 3, 2010 at 10:42 AM, Matt Domsch wrote:
Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64
using rawhide from 2010-06-01
[cut]
Question 1:
Suppose package A fails to build from source due to a bug in package B
2010/6/20 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com:
We have a unique opportunity to address many of the failings of the
current zope namespace. We should get anyone interested (and willing to
do the work) into a meeting
I think we should talk sooner rather than later. Anyone want to
26 matches
Mail list logo
