Re: Evolution update in F13

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 06:58 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 06/29/2010 06:17 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > > Updating F13 now works; > > Does it? > > Not for me. Sigh... You're right. Some other updates happened and I thought this one was included. But it just got skipped. -- Braden McD

Re: Evolution update in F13

On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:58:54 +0200 Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 06/29/2010 06:17 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > > > Updating F13 now works; > > Does it? > > Not for me. It's only in updates-testing yet. Also, pidgin needed to be added to it. It failed rebuild due to a new tcl in the buildroot.

Re: Evolution update in F13

On 06/29/2010 06:17 AM, Braden McDaniel wrote: > Updating F13 now works; Does it? Not for me. ... Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libedataserver-1.2.so.11 for package: pidgin-evolution-2.7.1-2.fc13.i686 --> Processing Dependency: libedataserver-1

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

- "Bruno Wolff III" wrote: > I'll probably be doing one in F14 to get the latest upstream release, > once I get a bit of a lull. So there should be one before release. Cool > > You should not need those Requires since they are for shared libs. > > Rpm would generate them for you automaticall

Re: Evolution update in F13

On Fri, 2010-06-25 at 16:27 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Can anybody tell me what went wrong with this update? It was submitted > at 15:09 on 06-23, then made it into testing at 16:19 on 06-24 and was > submitted for stable two hours later. B

Re: Missing dependency that is already installed

On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 21:32 -0400, Mohammed Morsi wrote: > Hey just to follow up, the mistake was on my part I believe. I was using > the ancient ruby-activerecord package, which will soon be retired as it > has long since been replaced w/ rubygem-activerecord. > > I'm still not sure why ruby-ac

Re: Missing dependency that is already installed

Hey just to follow up, the mistake was on my part I believe. I was using the ancient ruby-activerecord package, which will soon be retired as it has long since been replaced w/ rubygem-activerecord. I'm still not sure why ruby-activerecord didn't work, especially with rubygem-activesupport inst

Re: Feature, Fedora 14: Go Programming

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Go_Programming Here is the feature page On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Rakesh Pandit wrote: > 2010/6/27 Brandon Lozza : > > No I have not actually, didn't know I had to. I saw some other feature >

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 20:25:19 -0400, Jens Petersen wrote: > - "Bruno Wolff III" wrote: > > I just suggested the rebuilds as best practice. :) I'll probably be doing one in F14 to get the latest upstream release, once I get a bit of a lull. So there should be one before release. > > No

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

- "Bruno Wolff III" wrote: > > > Probably kaya and hedgewars should be rebuilt too. > > > > I'll bump hedgewars once the update shows up. > > I am not seeing a conflict with hedgewars after the update. So for now > at least, I don't think hedgewars needs to be rebuilt. Right, there shouldn'

[Bug 540356] & and & are treated as & during rendering

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540356 Jeff Fearn changed: What|Removed |Added

Plan for tomorrow's FESCo meeting (2010-06-29 at 19:30UTC)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 19:30UTC (3:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. = Followups = #topic #351 Create a policy for updates - status report on implementation https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/351 #topic #382 Imp

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 08:35:39 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 20:43:26 -0400, > Jens Petersen wrote: > > Just to update I finished rebuilding all the ghc packages in dist-f14-ghc > > over the weekend and they should appear in the next rawhide push. > > > > Probably

Re: glib causes mock build failure

On Tue, 2010-06-29 at 00:59 +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote: > hello, > > I'm trying to build a package that has glib2-devel as a BuildRequires. > > Mock fails with the error: > > Error Downloading Packages: > glib2-devel-2.25.9-3.fc14.i686: failure: > Packages/glib2-devel-2.25.9-3.fc14.i686.rpm fro

glib causes mock build failure

hello, I'm trying to build a package that has glib2-devel as a BuildRequires. Mock fails with the error: Error Downloading Packages: glib2-devel-2.25.9-3.fc14.i686: failure: Packages/glib2-devel-2.25.9-3.fc14.i686.rpm from fedora: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. This is for fedora-rawhid

Re: Missing dependency already installed

On Monday 28 June 2010, Mohammed Morsi wrote: > Note how it says 'rubygem-activesupport = 2.3.8' is required while > rubygem-activesupport-2.3.8-1.fc13.noarch is installed. [...] > What could be the cause of this problem? Maybe it's because rubygem-activesupport has a non-zero Epoch (at least the

Re: move libusb from /usr/lib to /lib

On 06/25/2010 09:23 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: > computer while its on. The process looks something like: - nut signals the UPS to shut down in x seconds (default 120) - nut halts the machine - after x seconds the UPS shuts down > > Ideally your UPS is smart enough to sense when

Re: Missing dependency already installed

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 19:36, Mohammed Morsi wrote: > Howdy, >    I've been scratching my head over this problem for the last few days and > figured it was time to get some help. > > I'm trying to build Ruby on Rails v2.3.8 against Fedora 13 but am running > into dependency issues. Namely the 'ru

Missing dependency that is already installed

Howdy, I've been scratching my head over this one for a few days now and figure I'd ask for some help. I'm trying to build Ruby on Rails v 2.3.8 against Fedora 13. Rails itself simply pulls in various active* / action* packages, eg activerecord, activesupport, and a few more. Activerecor

Missing dependency already installed

Howdy, I've been scratching my head over this problem for the last few days and figured it was time to get some help. I'm trying to build Ruby on Rails v2.3.8 against Fedora 13 but am running into dependency issues. Namely the 'rubygem-activerecord' package (rails is simple a collection of

Fedora 14 Schedule Tasks

Start End Name Wed 26-May Tue 03-Aug Packaging and Development (precedes Alpha) Tue 29-Jun Tue 29-Jun Feature Submission Deadline Two Weeks away Tue 06-Jul Tue 06-Jul Feature Submission Deadline One Week away Thu 08-Jul Thu 08-Jul Create Installable Images for QA testing #1 Tu

Re: Feature 14 - official Fedora re-spins

- "Michał Piotrowski" wrote: > Thanks for the explanation of the problem. I never thought it could > be > a big issue. > > Regards, > Michal > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Michal, Re-Spins as mentioned a

Re: Feature 14 - official Fedora re-spins

Thanks for the explanation of the problem. I never thought it could be a big issue. Regards, Michal -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 594464] perl-POE-Component-IRC: arbitrary IRC command execution due to insufficient stripping of CR/LF [fedora 11]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=594464 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 540356] & and & are treated as & during rendering

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=540356 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 537138] Bioperl doesn't bootstrap on other platforms, circular dependencies

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537138 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: Feature 14 - official Fedora re-spins

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/27/10 2:12 PM, Micha? Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if it would be a big problem to create regular (for example, > every three months) re-spins of main installation images - cd's and > dvd's for i386 and x86_64 (not livecd's). > > Fedorau

Re: Feature 14 - official Fedora re-spins

On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 23:12 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder if it would be a big problem to create regular (for example, > every three months) re-spins of main installation images - cd's and > dvd's for i386 and x86_64 (not livecd's). > > Fedoraunity http://fedoraunity.org/re-s

[Bug 530137] Fedora::Bugzilla - $bug->blocks_bug() fail

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530137 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 520530] cpanspec adds /usr/local/bin/perl as dependency to created rpms?

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=520530 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 519710] flags argument of $pool->refresh() undocumented

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519710 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 519648] virStorageVolLookupBy* not implemented

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=519648 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug 513987] man Sys::Virt: get_node_info onwards is confusing

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513987 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: [Fedora-haskell-list] headsup: ghc-6.12.3

On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 20:43:26 -0400, Jens Petersen wrote: > Just to update I finished rebuilding all the ghc packages in dist-f14-ghc > over the weekend and they should appear in the next rawhide push. > > Probably kaya and hedgewars should be rebuilt too. I'll bump hedgewars once the updat

rawhide report: 20100628 changes

Compose started at Mon Jun 28 08:15:14 UTC 2010 Broken deps for i386 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.i686 requires li

[Bug 608669] New: perl-Pod-Strip - Request for EL-6 branch

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Pod-Strip - Request for EL-6 branch https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608669 Summary: perl-Pod-Strip - Request for EL-6 branch Product

Re: Seeking new maintainer for lzip

On 06/28/2010 07:36 AM, Till Maas wrote: > On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:16:51AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > >> I maintain upx, from which I'm in the process of unbundling lzma-sdk, so >> while this isn't necessarily directly related, I might as well try to >> maintain some consistency if possibl

Broken dependencies: perl-DBI-Dumper

perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) On i386: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extra

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extra

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as

Re: Seeking new maintainer for lzip

On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 07:16:51AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > I maintain upx, from which I'm in the process of unbundling lzma-sdk, so > while this isn't necessarily directly related, I might as well try to > maintain some consistency if possible. > > So, short version, orphan and I'll take it.

[Bug 499243] Net::DBus::Object does not correctly validate requested method name to invoke

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499243 Bug Zapper changed: What|Removed |Added

Re: samba4 NVR koji issue

On 06/28/2010 02:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday, June 28, 2010 12:53:10 am Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The samba4 package in rawhide would need a rebuild for perl-5.12.x. >> However building fails with strange error message[1]: >> >> samba4-4.0.0-23.alpha11.fc14.2 (180065) failed o

rawhide perl-5.12 status

Hi, AFAICT, these packages remain to be looked after * BackupPC-3.1.0-14 wants perl-suidperl (Abandoned by perl-5.12.) * gnumeric-plugins-extras-1.10.0-1 Fails to build for reasons outside of Perl. * perl-DBI-Dumper Fails to build - Dead upstream. * perl-Data-Alias Fails to build - Dead upstre

Re: samba4 NVR koji issue

On Monday, June 28, 2010 12:53:10 am Ralf Corsepius wrote: > Hi, > > The samba4 package in rawhide would need a rebuild for perl-5.12.x. > However building fails with strange error message[1]: > > samba4-4.0.0-23.alpha11.fc14.2 (180065) failed on > ppc06.phx2.fedoraproject.org (noarch): >pg.D

Re: Seeking new maintainer for lzip

On 06/26/2010 07:03 AM, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > is there someone interested in lzip? It is a lmza compression tool, that > was for a short time used by upstream of one other package of mine. > Upstream of lzip is very responsive, but since I do not use it at all, I > have a lack of interest in m

Re: rawhide report: 20100625 changes

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 04:08:23PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 02:58:09PM +0100, Richard Jones wrote: > > If a proven packager can just do a bump and rebuild it ought > > to fix the issue. > > OK I see that failed with: > > guestfsd: error: cannot find required program m

Gpsim 0.25.0 release candidate

The release candidate for Gpsim 0.25.0 has been built in rawhide. The source tarball and SVN can also be found at https://sourceforge.net/projects/gpsim/. The planned release date is July 12. The features of the release are given below. Roy Rankin gpsim GNU Pic Si

Non responsive maintainer: cheese ?

Dear all, Does someone know how to contact Cheese ? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cheese I have tried to join him by the bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817 He has two packages in updates-testing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584966