08.07.2010 00:29, Tom spot Callaway пишет:
> Hello Fedora!
>
> Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
>
> Upon the advice of Red Hat Legal, we have slightly amended the Fedora
> Licensing Guidelines
> (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines). T
Top three FAS account holders who have completed reviewing "Package
review" components on bugzilla for last week ending 1st August were
Stanislav Ochotnicky, Parag AN(पराग) and Marcela Mašláňová.
Stanislav Ochotnicky : 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609142 felix-main
On Sun, Aug 01, 2010 at 05:32:47PM +0100, M A Young wrote:
> I was trying a yum update on F-14 (fedora-release-14-0.7) but was offered
> a few F-15 packages. I checked
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-14&arch=x86_64
> and the mirrors it points to are all rawhide rather than
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 22:04:08 -0400
Adam Goode wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 09:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > rpm -q fedora-packager
> >
> > Are you using a version older than 0.5.0 ?
> >
> > If so, you are hitting the old staging repo, and not the current
> > production repo.
>
> Nope, it's definit
> F-14 Alpha TC1 has been posted for testing:
>
> * http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620274
pyconfig-32.h and [respectively] pyconfig-64.h are missing.
The only thing that can run is Media Check (my CD1 passed)
and shell on VT
Greetings Testers,
F-14 Alpha TC1 has been posted for testing:
* http://serverbeach1.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/14.TC1/
Please read the instructions and help executing the test cases at:
Installation:
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
* h
On 08/01/2010 09:32 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:18:38 -0400
> Adam Goode wrote:
>
>> On 08/01/2010 08:12 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
>>>
>>> Those were added recently, because I needed to do a bodhi commit.
>>> But I definitely was able to push even without those ACLs. I could
>>> t
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 20:54 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:58:26PM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
>
> > That's not "corruption", that's just an unreferenced object, which does
> > no harm except to waste space. "git gc" will delete such objects.
>
> (20:50:18:da...@gelk:k
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 20:18:38 -0400
Adam Goode wrote:
> On 08/01/2010 08:12 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
> >
> > Those were added recently, because I needed to do a bodhi commit.
> > But I definitely was able to push even without those ACLs. I could
> > try revoking my commit ACL (but not ACL ACL) and s
On 08/02/2010 05:51 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> If I take a currently updated F13 system and update to F14 (and hafta
> use --skip-broken, prolly due to python deps), would I have to
> configure/change anything like initrd or systemdid (sp?) to boot/work
> right after?
Shouldn't be required but if
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:58:26PM -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> That's not "corruption", that's just an unreferenced object, which does
> no harm except to waste space. "git gc" will delete such objects.
(20:50:18:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
dangling blob 41bc432a23a83d5775562572936
If I take a currently updated F13 system and update to F14 (and hafta
use --skip-broken, prolly due to python deps), would I have to
configure/change anything like initrd or systemdid (sp?) to boot/work
right after?
And will builds/upgrades for F14 go to the updates/testing/f14 now as
tests then t
On 08/01/2010 08:12 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
>
> Those were added recently, because I needed to do a bodhi commit. But I
> definitely was able to push even without those ACLs. I could try
> revoking my commit ACL (but not ACL ACL) and see what happens.
I just revoked my el5 commit ACL, but managed t
On 08/01/2010 01:54 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 07/31/2010 05:05 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> I only have commit ACLs on el6 and el5 for python-gdata, but it seems I
>> am able to push to all branches. Is this correct? My username is "agoode".
>
>
>> Thanks,
>
>> Adam
>
>
>
> Accordin
Martin Sourada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty
> important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last
> update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul who even isn't in
> the commit acl's on webkitgtk and since then
There will be an outage starting at 2010-08-02 02:00 UTC, which will
last approximately 2 hours. Outages will be small but noticeable for
small segments as systems are updated and rebooted.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or r
On 1 August 2010 19:27, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
> Sven Lankes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
>>
>> > Following the process
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>> > Is someone abl
On 1 August 2010 19:27, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
> Sven Lankes wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
>>
>> > Following the process
>> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>> > Is someone abl
On Sun, 01 Aug 2010 09:24:28 +0200
Martin Sourada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's
> pretty important gnome desktop component but it looks rather
> neglected. Last update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul
> who even isn't in the comm
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 10:39:02 +0200
Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 02:31:19PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
>
> > Following the process
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
> > Is someone able to get in touch with Christian Balint (rezso)?
> >
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/01/2010 09:32 AM, M A Young wrote:
> I was trying a yum update on F-14 (fedora-release-14-0.7) but was offered
> a few F-15 packages. I checked
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-14&arch=x86_64
> and the mirrors it points t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/31/2010 05:05 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I only have commit ACLs on el6 and el5 for python-gdata, but it seems I
> am able to push to all branches. Is this correct? My username is "agoode".
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Adam
>
>
According to
http
W dniu 30.07.2010 17:28, Tom "spot" Callaway pisze:
> On 07/30/2010 11:10 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 07/30/2010 03:16 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
>>> So I just created:
>>>
>>> http://repos.fedorapeople.org/
>>>
>>> Anyone want to help me test the steps and process before we announce and
>>> depl
I was trying a yum update on F-14 (fedora-release-14-0.7) but was offered
a few F-15 packages. I checked
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=fedora-14&arch=x86_64
and the mirrors it points to are all rawhide rather than the F-14 branch.
Michael Young
--
devel mailing list
dev
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
>> I just yesterday had similar problems and then found out my
>> ~/.fedora.cert was out of date since five days ago. Maybe it's the same
>> for you, did you already had a look there? :)
2010/8/1 Neal Becker :
> I received this:
>
> unuran has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
> On x86_64:
> unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
> unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
> On i386:
> unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.i686 requires /sbin/ins
I received this:
unuran has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires /sbin/install-info
On i386:
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc14.i686 requires /sbin/install-info
unuran-1.7.1-1.fc
Neal Becker wrote, at 08/01/2010 08:07 PM +9:00:
> Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
>>
>> The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current
>> release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. More info here:
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144
>>
>> Rebuilds for devel packages t
On Sun, Aug 1, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Dominic Hopf wrote:
> I just yesterday had similar problems and then found out my
> ~/.fedora.cert was out of date since five days ago. Maybe it's the same
> for you, did you already had a look there? :)
Yes. It will be valid until Dec 7, 2010.
Bye,
Andrea.
--
The current release is 1.43
Benjamin Kosnik wrote:
>
> The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current
> release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. More info here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144
>
> Rebuilds for devel packages that require boost are mand
Am Sonntag, den 01.08.2010, 11:42 +0200 schrieb Andrea Musuruane:
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> > OK. I deleted the current repo and started again. I do have
> > fedora-packager 0.5.1.
> >
> > Now fedora-packager crashes when uploading new sources.
> >
> > $ fedpkg
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> OK. I deleted the current repo and started again. I do have
> fedora-packager 0.5.1.
>
> Now fedora-packager crashes when uploading new sources.
>
> $ fedpkg clone zaz
> Cloning into zaz...
> [..]
> Resolving deltas: 100% (11/11), done.
>
Hi,
I've been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty
important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last
update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul who even isn't in
the commit acl's on webkitgtk and since then there where three upstream
bugfix
On Sun, 2010-08-01 at 00:25 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> Check this out..
>
> (00:13:25:da...@gelk:kernel)$ fedpkg -v upload patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
> Creating module object from /mnt/data/src/fedora/kernel
> Uploading: f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
> Running curl -k
34 matches
Mail list logo
