Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Bill Nottingham wrote: >> Orphan: nas >>     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12 >>     gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2 >>     speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2 >>     speech-dispatcher

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

Bill Nottingham wrote: > Orphan: nas > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12 > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free-extras requires libaudio.so.2 > speech-dispatcher requires libaudio.so.2 > speech-dispatcher requires nas-devel = 1.9.1-6.fc12 I suggest that these be ju

Re: [ANNOUNCE] bfq disk I/O scheduler

Vivek Goyal ha scritto: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 02:44:21PM -0400, Ric Wheeler wrote: > >> On 08/04/2010 01:58 PM, Paolo Valente wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> I have been working for a few years (with Fabio Checconi) on a disk >>> scheduler providing definitely lower latencies than cfq, as well as

Re: dist-git tag question

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:35:23AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 03:05:42PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > I don't think git hashes are an equivalent to the nvr tags though. I may > > have multiple commits for each nvr, a tag that explicitly specifies which > > version ended u

Re: Out of action for a while & mono heads up

Hi Paul, On 08/04/2010 10:22 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: > Onto something else, mono 2.8 is due out in September so Novell are > going to be releasing a 2.7 release candidate/test candidate series at > some point either late this week or early next. Please remember that the > 2.8 branch will not have

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

Bill Nottingham wrote: > Unblocked orphan xautolock I use this; taken. Co-maints welcome. --Ben -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Creating private branches under fedpkg/git

I believe the manifest ACL behavior is that you are permitted to push to a branch called fN/anything if you are on the pkgdb ACL for fN, and to anything not matching fN/* if you are on the pkgdb ACL for devel/rawhide. So the practical answer is probably that whatever the maintainers for a particula

Creating private branches under fedpkg/git

What is the policy on creating private branches under fedpkg/git? Can it be done by anyone with acl commit or do you need special permissions? My interest is that I had a private branch of the kernel package under CVS which I used to build pvops enabled kernels so that the more adventurous coul

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:47 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 22:36 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 22:36 +0200, Martin Sourada wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > > Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included a

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't > > > seem to find it at all. > > > > Parts

Re: Integrity protection of fetches

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 09:42:01AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > I suspect it might short-circuit the 'ahhh, but what about...' 'oooh, > but then I can...' nature of the conversation if you just put together a > proof-of-concept attack and document it somewhere. I suspect the git > maintainers m

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On 08/04/2010 06:05 PM, Frank Murphy wrote: > This from an F13.x86> F14-Rawhide> F14-Branched Guest > (Host if F13.x86_64) > > Some still from the video: > > http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php > > http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php > > http://www.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > | xiphmont's Info | xiphmont's Packages (328) > | https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/xiphmont > > How is that package count to be interpreted? It is the amount of all packages that match any of the selected fi

Fwd: Re: [ANNOUNCE] bfq disk I/O scheduler

My response got rejected by list. Now I have subscribed to the list. Hoepefully it will go through this time. Vivek - Forwarded message from Vivek Goyal - Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 15:18:45 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: Paolo Valente Cc: Development discussions related to Fedora , J

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

Hi, pycairo has *14* co-maintainers, one of them should step up and take ownership. I took gconfmm26 (required by bakery and glom), glademm24 (bakery), as usual co-maintainers are welcome. best regards, H. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Re: [ANNOUNCE] bfq disk I/O scheduler

On 08/04/2010 01:58 PM, Paolo Valente wrote: > Hi, > I have been working for a few years (with Fabio Checconi) on a disk > scheduler providing definitely lower latencies than cfq, as well as a > higher throughput with most of the test workloads we used (or the same > throughput as cfq with the othe

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

> "MS" == Michael Schwendt writes: MS> More than a dozen Red Hat people with "commit" access, but access MS> was "denied" to one other Red Hat employee. Why? You'll find that for some odd reason xiphmont has commit set to "Denied" on several packages. I've never understood why it ended up t

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

This from an F13.x86 > F14-Rawhide > F14-Branched Guest (Host if F13.x86_64) Some still from the video: http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185144.php http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185343.php http://www.zimagez.com/zimage/screenshot-040810-185650.php http://www.zi

[ANNOUNCE] bfq disk I/O scheduler

Hi, I have been working for a few years (with Fabio Checconi) on a disk scheduler providing definitely lower latencies than cfq, as well as a higher throughput with most of the test workloads we used (or the same throughput as cfq with the other workloads). We named this scheduler bfq (budget fair

Re: local / scratch builds with fedpkg

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 18:29 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > That's a neat trick, since 1.1.1 didn't even have configs for Fedora > > 14. > > I roll all of my own mock configs, with different names from the bundled > ones so they don't disappear when a new mock version comes around. > > > They wer

Fedora 14 Alpha Can Still Ship on Time IF these bugs get attention TODAY

It's been an exciting ride so far and we're embracing the peaks and valleys of the Fedora release process in real time. Even with all the recent changes and bugs we still have a shot at creating the Fedora 14 Release Candidate on schedule TOMORROW. Failure to successfully build the RC tomorro

Re: local / scratch builds with fedpkg

On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:47:43 -0700 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:31 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > > On 04/08/10 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > > >> I have a modified package locally and want to install and test >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: > > Unblocked orphan librsvg2 > > What's going on here? The procedure used to be for various gnome-y packages in the days before provenpackager to just assign a single maintainer and a whole slew of co-maintainers, so anyone in the Desktop SIG could u

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 13:01 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:44:23PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > > Would it make sense for the obsolete list to be specified with versions? > > yes, of course - it was just a sample. > > google for package-swift and/or look at the fesco disc

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:44:23PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > Would it make sense for the obsolete list to be specified with versions? > yes, of course - it was just a sample. > google for package-swift and/or look at the fesco discussions from dec > or january and you'll see that discussed, ad n

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] orphaned packages in F-14

On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:32:23 -0400, Bill wrote: > Unblocked orphan librsvg2 What's going on here? More than a dozen Red Hat people with "commit" access, but access was "denied" to one other Red Hat employee. Why? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/librsvg2 | xiphmont's Info | xiphmo

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: >> > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla: >> >>> Also I think that with >> >>> wordpress 3 the separate w

Re: local / scratch builds with fedpkg

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:31 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote: > On 04/08/10 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> I have a modified package locally and want to install and test it. Since > >> it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 version

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 12:40 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a > > problem with it. > > maybe even the package was named package-swift > > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.or

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 17:33 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > > Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't > > > seem to find it at all. > > > > Parts

Re: Integrity protection of fetches (Re: The move to git!)

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 01:33 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 22:09 +, Ben Boeckel wrote: > > Matt McCutchen wrote: > > > No. If the attacker MITMs the entire connection, they can lie about the > > > values of the remote refs too, so there is no need to find a hash > > > co

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:53:55AM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a > problem with it. > maybe even the package was named package-swift > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec Would it make sense for the obsolete lis

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:03:23AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Yeah, I forgot that bit. Adrian(CCd), if you like, orphan > both wordpress and wordpress-mu, and I'll take over. If I do, I plan to > update wordpress to 3.0.1 and EOL wordpress-mu. > >>> I orphaned it for EL-5 and E

Re: F14 TC2 x86_64b

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 22:10 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:25 -0700, John Reiser wrote: > > > Ok, so this compose seems to have anaconda-14.14. When trying to do an > > > nfs install, once I put in the server/directory information, it shows it > > > connecting and trying to

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 09:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > > Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't > > seem to find it at all. > > Parts of it will reappear soon, in different form. The whole of it will re

Re: The move to git!

Hi. On Wed, 04 Aug 2010 09:30:41 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote > Clearly Linus stood out even in his youth =) He is a bit obsessed with the number 5, though. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: local / scratch builds with fedpkg

On 04/08/10 17:28, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: >> I have a modified package locally and want to install and test it. Since >> it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 version too. How? > > Is there a reason not to use mock locally? I mi

Re: The move to git!

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 11:29 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: > On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Matt McCutchen > wrote: > > don't want malware landing on my machine because someone did a MITM > > attack on a Fedora maintainer's unencrypted "git fetch" and inserted > > some extra patches to get pushe

Re: local / scratch builds with fedpkg

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 15:06 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > I have a modified package locally and want to install and test it. Since > it's a biarch package, I need to build the i686 version too. How? Is there a reason not to use mock locally? That's how I'd do it - just 'fedpkg srpm' then 'mock -

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

seth vidal writes: > I think I had suggested it, multiple times, and each time fesco had a > problem with it. > > maybe even the package was named package-swift > > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/package-swift.spec You can also use package-cleanup --orphans. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab,

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On 04/08/10 16:41, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Well, can you be more precise? Can you try this bodhi build? Just got my daughter to take a video of start up, so will try grab snaps from it and or upload somewhere. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.3.2-0.1.885483.fc14,systemd-5

[Bug 620937] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib "update" does not update

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=620937 Michal Jaegermann changed: What|Removed |Added -

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 11:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > > >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.

Re: git branch help?

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 00:13 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > >> http://blog.vagmim.com/2009/04/git-branch-on-command-prompt.html > > > > Would it be nice to stick this customization into fedora-packager, or > > would it just confuse/surprise people? > > Please no. In additi

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7 > > > >  I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Rec

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On Wed, 04.08.10 16:27, Frank Murphy (frankl...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >>># systemctl enable graphical.target > >>> > >>> This makes sure the default.target link is created properly > >> > >> I still believe that for this particular one (and a few

Re: git branch help?

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 16:23 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 01:17:26PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Would it be nice to stick this customization into fedora-packager, or > > would it just confuse/surprise people? > > If it's there as something that's easily enabled with

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On 04/08/10 16:08, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>># systemctl enable graphical.target >>> >>> This makes sure the default.target link is created properly >> >> I still believe that for this particular one (and a few of the others) we >> should make the trivial changes to the spec to have it done

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

On Wed, 04.08.10 10:51, Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: > > And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command > > when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide: > > > > # systemctl enable graphical.

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> Also I think that with >>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: > And here's another addition: you might also want to run this command > when upgrading from older rwahide to current F-14/rawhide: > > # systemctl enable graphical.target > > This makes sure the default.target link is created properly I still b

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> Also I think that with >> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged >> into mainline. So wouldn't it be

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Also I think that with > wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged > into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? > W

Re: dist-git tag question

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 12:55:09AM -0400, Jarod Wilson wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:40 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> > Jarod Wilson wrote: >> >> I'm not having any problems submitting builds and adding tags by hand >> >> *which is exactl

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (???) wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla > wrote: On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/8/3 Jon Cieslamailto:l...@jcomserv.net>>: >>> Also I think that with >>> wordpress 3 the separate wo

Re: F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 05:01 -0500, Mike Chambers wrote: > Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't > seem to find it at all. Parts of it will reappear soon, in different form. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma

[perl-Perl-Critic/el6/master: 4/4] Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-Perl-Critic into el6/master

commit 74ab313d5410fe326acfdf54b886f8bef878a636 Merge: c2732d5 af683bd Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed Aug 4 13:38:24 2010 +0100 Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-Perl-Critic into el6/master --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras

[perl-Perl-Critic/el6/master: 3/4] Rebuilt for EPEL-6

commit c2732d518f29cdc8271ffe4ec69dde6e136510c3 Author: Marcela Mašláňová Date: Wed Aug 4 13:33:39 2010 +0100 Rebuilt for EPEL-6 This package is included in RHEL-6 but not for all architectures (e.g. ppc64). It is needed to satisfy dependencies in EPEL-6 and so the RHEL-6 p

[perl-Perl-Critic/el6/master: 2/4] fix typo

commit 991de5ebd49f1d2a3216e2e8633f50a9eda96beb Author: Štěpán Kasal Date: Wed Oct 7 17:00:41 2009 + fix typo perl-Perl-Critic.spec |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Perl-Critic.spec b/perl-Perl-Critic.spec index db8152d..808bb05 100644

[perl-Perl-Critic/el6/master: 1/4] - new upstream version - update build requires

commit 8350841938c82d6fb08d94f3fe2b8c8bc4e5562d Author: Štěpán Kasal Date: Wed Oct 7 16:59:49 2009 + - new upstream version - update build requires .cvsignore|2 +- perl-Perl-Critic.spec | 22 +++--- sources |2 +- 3 files change

[perl-Perl-Critic/el6/master] (4 commits) ...Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-Perl-Critic into el6/master

Summary of changes: 8350841... - new upstream version - update build requires 991de5e... fix typo c2732d5... Rebuilt for EPEL-6 74ab313... Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/p -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mai

Re: git branch help?

On 08/03/2010 11:49 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Björn Persson wrote: >> Adam Williamson wrote: >>> Would it be nice to stick this customization into fedora-packager, or >>> would it just confuse/surprise people? >> >> Is it fast enough to not delay the prompt noticeably even on old computers? > > I u

rawhide report: 20100804 changes

Compose started at Wed Aug 4 08:15:11 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.41.0()(64bit) LuxRender-0.6.1-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.41.0()

F14 gnome-control-panel appearance

Is this hidden somewhere, missing or not included any longer? I can't seem to find it at all. -- Mike Chambers Madisonville, KY "Best lil town on Earth!" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: dist-git tag question

On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 03:05:42PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote: > I don't think git hashes are an equivalent to the nvr tags though. I may > have multiple commits for each nvr, a tag that explicitly specifies which > version ended up as an rpm in koji would be quite helpful. I have troubles > remem

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7 > >  I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to > python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed

Re: Transfer to git breaks my package?

Thanks everybody for info and sorry for missing the original thread. Please could Jesse or somebody also fix this for me? Thanks & regards Jaroslav - Original Message - From: "Michael Schwendt" To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2010 10:37:30 AM GMT +01:00 Am

Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote: > Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7 I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Recently upgrade to python2.7 failed because of "rhpl" package. rhpl was removed from Fedora some time ago, so it wasn't rebuild lately. No

[perl-String-Format/el6/master: 2/2] Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-String-Format into el6/master

commit f3da9b2da64552eb3e8fa387ba18247b43c24186 Merge: 7ad60ce 3d45a63 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed Aug 4 09:49:37 2010 +0100 Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-String-Format into el6/master --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extr

[perl-String-Format/el6/master: 1/2] Rebuilt for EPEL-6

commit 7ad60cee7e84353db4a3fb6219e4e1251ad9a20a Author: Dennis Gregorovic Date: Wed Aug 4 09:43:17 2010 +0100 Rebuilt for EPEL-6 This package is included in RHEL-6 but not for all architectures (e.g. ppc64). It is needed to satisfy dependencies in EPEL-6 and so the RHEL-6 p

[perl-String-Format/el6/master] (2 commits) ...Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-String-Format into el6/master

Summary of changes: 7ad60ce... Rebuilt for EPEL-6 f3da9b2... Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/p -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Took over libgeotiff

Hello! I've taken over libgeotiff, which was recently orphaned. The package will need a re-review, since it was last touched in November. Volker -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Transfer to git breaks my package?

On Wed, 2010-08-04 at 04:29 -0400, Jaroslav Skarvada wrote: > I encountered file in initial git repo that differs from version in > latest cvs head. I cannot find this change in logs nor I didn't make > this change (as far as I remember ;). > --- sendmail-8.13.7-pid.patch.cvs 2007-08-27 12:25:

Re: Transfer to git breaks my package?

On Wed, 4 Aug 2010 04:29:23 -0400 (EDT), Jaroslav wrote: > Hi, > > I encountered file in initial git repo that differs from version in latest > cvs head. I cannot find this change in logs nor I didn't make this change (as > far as I remember ;). > > --VERSIONID(`$Id: submit.mc,v 8.14 2006/04/

Integrity protection of fetches (Re: The move to git!)

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 22:09 +, Ben Boeckel wrote: > Matt McCutchen wrote: > > No. If the attacker MITMs the entire connection, they can lie about the > > values of the remote refs too, so there is no need to find a hash > > collision. > > And how would you then be allowed to push? The git se

Problems with the current rawhide

Hi, Following the disaster with my hard drive, the only way to fix was a complete re-install. I did a clean F13 install, did the updates and then moved to rawhide - something I normally do. I've hit several problems though 1. I can't mount anything via the desktop. The DVD/RW is not showing when

[perl-Test-Spelling/el6/master: 1/2] Rebuilt for EPEL-6

commit 26ad9bd79886d717b4c70ee738112ab39ecdf19b Author: Dennis Gregorovic Date: Wed Aug 4 09:27:24 2010 +0100 Rebuilt for EPEL-6 This package is included in RHEL-6 but not for all architectures (e.g. ppc64). It is needed to satisfy dependencies in EPEL-6 and so the RHEL-6 p

[perl-Test-Spelling/el6/master: 2/2] Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-Test-Spelling into el6/master

commit c1a7ff848be518340dc0640d96e9a286711818f4 Merge: 26ad9bd 787a711 Author: Paul Howarth Date: Wed Aug 4 09:28:40 2010 +0100 Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-Test-Spelling into el6/master --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extr

[perl-Test-Spelling/el6/master] (2 commits) ...Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/perl-Test-Spelling into el6/master

Summary of changes: 26ad9bd... Rebuilt for EPEL-6 c1a7ff8... Merge branch 'el6/master' of ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/p -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm

Transfer to git breaks my package?

Hi, I encountered file in initial git repo that differs from version in latest cvs head. I cannot find this change in logs nor I didn't make this change (as far as I remember ;). CVS: sendmail/F13/sendmail-8.13.7-pid.patch, md5sum: e0b17fda96f4bb398cf94de550d81967 GIT: sendmail/F13/sednmail-8.

[Bug 616626] python-pip pkg conflict with perl-pip

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616626 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added -

Out of action for a while & mono heads up

Hi, Due to a drive falling over dead (it held my /home directory) and then the computer's RAID software deciding it knew how to fix the problem by duplicating the /dev/sda drive (where my boot loader and lvm partitions sit) instead of it asking, I've just about managed to get my computer up and ru

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: Also I think that with wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? >>> >>> Well, yes, probably. That might even help with th