On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 22:21 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mercredi 08 septembre 2010 à 19:07 +0100, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> > The i18n situation is also pretty sad from my point of view too. If you
> > use pretty much any design app, OO Writer and Inkscape being the ones
> > which cause me pai
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 09:26, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> Fonts being in RPMs and supported in PackageKit is something I totally
> support, but attempting to re-use a more generic software installation
> UI to allow users to manage fonts seems severely sub-optimal to me.
Well, this thread is about
On 9 September 2010 09:52, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> It needs works both packagekit-side and font packaging side, but there is
> absolutely no way I'm going to expand energy on pushing the packaging changes
> through FPC & other font packagers if there is no buy-in packagekit-side to
> make use of
On Sep 9, 2010, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 09:26, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> Fonts being in RPMs and supported in PackageKit is something I totally
> support, but attempting to re-use a more generic software installation
> UI to allow users to manage fonts seems severely sub
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 11:03 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm interested in font installing, but I think it might be better to
> integrate this with app-install rather than packagekit, as app-install
> has a pointer to a screenshot URL we can show in the preview window.
I'm not sure why this shou
On 09/09/2010 01:24 PM, Alex Hudson wrote:
>
> A screenshot is marginally useful, but how do you give a good idea of
> how the font works in different weights, sizes, and with different text
> (particularly those fonts with good Unicode coverage)? I think it's
> sub-optimal to say the least.
You a
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 12:03, Richard Hughes a écrit :
>
> On 9 September 2010 09:52, Nicolas Mailhot
> wrote:
>> It needs works both packagekit-side and font packaging side, but there is
>> absolutely no way I'm going to expand energy on pushing the packaging
>> changes
>> through FPC & other f
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 14:28 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 09/09/2010 01:24 PM, Alex Hudson wrote:
> > A screenshot is marginally useful, but how do you give a good idea of
> > how the font works in different weights, sizes, and with different text
> > (particularly those fonts with good Unicode c
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 12:24, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> What you really want is a font store which has functionality like this:
>
> http://code.google.com/webfonts/preview#font-family=Cantarell
What you do not realize is that this kind of preview works by having the
complete font file downl
Compose started at Thu Sep 9 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.6-5.fc15.x86_64 requires
libclutter-gtk-0.10.so.0()(6
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 13:49 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 12:24, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> > What you really want is a font store which has functionality like this:
> >
> > http://code.google.com/webfonts/preview#font-family=Cantarell
>
> What you do not realize is that
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 12:23:01PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> mingw32-OpenSceneGraph-2.8.2-4.fc14.noarch requires
> mingw32(libpng-3.dll)
I've asked the maintainer about this, but no response so far. See also:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=51#c8
> mingw32-libvi
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 14:29, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 13:49 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 12:24, Alex Hudson a écrit :
>> > What you really want is a font store which has functionality like this:
>> >
>> >http://code.google.com/webfonts/preview
2010/9/8 Simo Sorce :
>
> Hello all,
> I have recently discovered I am still owner of pam_smb :-) and I think
> I would like to retire this package entirely, for I find it useless and
> even dangerous.
>
> If someone is interested in picking up maintainership because they need
> it I am also willin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Rodd
> After a flurry of work over night I have finally managed to get some
> .rpm's ready for testing on x86_64 F13.
>
> A quick question. Can you connect to a x86_64 server with i686 clients
> using ltsp?
Yes a x86_64 Server can serve
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 15:05 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 14:29, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> > .TTF fonts (as an example) just aren't very big. I tried a sample font
> > in my .fonts directory, it's 75K and five lines of varied "The quick
> > brown fox.." in PNG format comes o
This article:
http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
seems to say that fedora is ranking poorly in deployment of various
userspace memory protection mechanisms. Is this information accurate?
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi LTSP/Fedora Community.
I am working on the F13 issue with the ltsp upstream source and think
I have a working version ready to roll into the next version of the
5.2.4-*.rpm
I am doing all my testing on x86_64 but the changes I am making to the
ups
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> This article:
>
> http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
>
> seems to say that fedora is ranking poorly in deployment of various
> userspace memory protection mecha
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> This article:
>
> http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
>
> seems to say that fedora is ranking poorly in deployment of various
> userspace memory protection mecha
commit 76f44c9861600bd4d13458e10f6a07eacf49a7f7
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Sep 9 16:37:55 2010 +0200
updat to 0.08123
- dbicadmin script needs to be executable for tests
- manually tweak real buildrequires
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBIx-Class.spec | 23
Summary of changes:
76f44c9... updat to 0.08123 (*)
ff69d89... Merge branch 'master' into el6
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedorapr
commit ff69d89260e5377412c230a4906e7035da8e419c
Merge: 29dd3ef 76f44c9
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Thu Sep 9 16:39:55 2010 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el6
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DBIx-Class.spec | 23 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed
On 09/09/2010 12:30 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> It looks like the nss-3.12.8-0.1.beta1.fc13 in spot's firefox4 repo is
> breaking fedpkg upload (and new-sources, of course) when you have a
> shiny new 2048-bit client certificate.
Yep. I fixed it last night, if you update to the new packages in that
r
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630094
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446084&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446087&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446093&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446
Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 15:32, Alex Hudson a écrit :
> On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 15:05 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>> Le Jeu 9 septembre 2010 14:29, Alex Hudson a écrit :
>> > .TTF fonts (as an example) just aren't very big. I tried a sample font
>> > in my .fonts directory, it's 75K and five lines
Compose started at Thu Sep 9 13:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req
On 08/25/2010 03:13 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Christopher Aillon wrote:
>> I missed the first notice of this go by, but I use zsh so can play with
>> it in the next few days. Can you post the updates so I don't hit the
>> same bugs you did?
>
> Sure. Attached. The bugs were mainly with zsh convent
Hi,
The following is in BZ : 632042
I'm seeing this with my Samsung ML2250 (my box is using Rawhide, updated
today 09/09/10) so it looks like the problem is not with hplip but with
CUPS or CUPS/Gutenprint
However, looking at koji, the last update to Cups was 20th Aug but I've
seen no reports of
Thanks to everyone who turned out for the systemd Test Day. Here's the
recap.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2010-09-07_Systemd
The turnout was good, especially given the late re-schedule of the day
(sorry about that!), and it seemed like people did a lot of good
testing.
Here's the lis
>
> Paul,
>
> The following is in BZ : 632042
>
> I'm seeing this with my Samsung ML2250 (my box is using Rawhide, updated
> today 09/09/10) so it looks like the problem is not with hplip but with
> CUPS or CUPS/Gutenprint
>
> However, looking at koji, the last update to Cups was 20th Aug but I've
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 02:50:49PM -0700, darrell pfeifer wrote:
> Ran into this yesterday and it took a bit to figure out.
Me too.
This also breaks importing eps/ps in Inkscape, viewing them in Okular or
Evince ...
> Cups is fine, but ghostscript is broken in the latest update.
Both the F13
So, perl-Digest-SHA went away on the fedora side of things and got
auto-marked as dead in the package tree (not by me; I seem to recall it
was something automatic or at least someone else). This was actually
quite a while ago.
But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't
e
Fedora 14 Beta TC1 is now available [1]. Please refer to the following
pages for download links and testing instructions.
Installation:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test
Desktop:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test
Ideally, all
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 04:41:01PM -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> But the perl-Net-DNS-SEC package requires Digest::SHA which doesn't
> exist on RHEL. How do I convert a dead package on the fedora side to a
> EL only set of branches? I'd assume it'll be the original bug request
> and re-opening a n
When: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Without these bugs fixed we can't compose the Fedora 14 Beta Release
Candidate on 2010-09-16.
We'll be discussing these bugs to determine if they meet the criteria,
should stay on the list, and are ge
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:30:57AM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > This article:
> >
> > http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
> >
> > seems to say that fe
37 matches
Mail list logo
