On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 21:54 -0500, inode0 wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> > btw, I think Kyle said earlier he's standing aside. So does that mean
> > there now is a new FESCo election?
>
> No, FESCo has policies in place to deal with this situation described here
>
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:09 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> That's a good point, but I would hope that someone elected to serve on a
>> body in Fedora would actually *want* to vote, and the measures above are
>> just ideas meant to be motivation/
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:04 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> Nils Philippsen said the following on 09/15/2010 03:28 AM Pacific Time:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 17:13 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> >> Shouldn't ABRT be looking to a file like /etc/fedora-release to
> >> determine the release version?
> >
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:09 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:33 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> > I really don't see the point. A forced vote is not better than no vote
> > (can easily be worse). As far as I know in most countries actual laws
> > are passed by whoever is prese
As a reminder, we have reached the Beta Change Deadline for Fedora 14.
"At the change deadlines for Alpha and Beta, pushes to the branched
development repository (e.g. /pub/fedora/linux/development/14), are
suspended until the Release Candidate has been successfully tested and
staging has start
Thank you to all the feature owners and developers for all their hard
work to make Fedora 14 the best Fedora release yet. We are almost to
the end!
As a follow-up to last week's reminder
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2010-September/000676.html
ALL feature pages are no
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 22:33 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 21:26 -0400, Máirín Duffy a écrit :
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
> > > Any ideas? I could try making the tick
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 03:56:39 pm Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi Dennis,
>
> > Mono has had alot of issues building on x86_64 recently. it would be
> > great if you worked with upstream to track down and resolve the 64 bit
> > issues.
> >
> >From what I've seen, 2.8 fixes quite a lot of t
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:11:52PM +0200, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> > boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michal Schmidt
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:03 PM
> > To: devel@
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michal Schmidt
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:03 PM
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with 2.6.35.4-12.fc14.x86_64
>
> On Wed
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 11:53:51 -0400 Brandon Lozza wrote:
> If I have to wait for the next release of Fedora (14 for example) to
> get KDE 4.5 then it's looking like the stable updates vision has made
> Fedora incompatible with what I need.
KDE 4.5 has not been released to updates because it has kno
Nils Philippsen said the following on 09/15/2010 03:28 AM Pacific Time:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 17:13 -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
>> Shouldn't ABRT be looking to a file like /etc/fedora-release to
>> determine the release version?
>
> r...@rawhide:~> cat /etc/fedora-release
> Fedora release 15 (Fi
> I can email you over the throwback from the build (or the spec file with
> altered patches), but as it dies on on the missing build ID (even with
> the LDFLAGS thing added), there is no build.
The log might help. I meant, the source, so I can attempt the build.
Use git. It's your friend. Just
Hi,
> > googling suggests that there has been a change and that I need to add
> > LDFLAGS += --build-id in the build and install parts. I've not had to do
> > this before, so am I missing something and if I include it, will it then
> > fail to build on koji?
>
> That is not usually the ideal solu
Hi Dennis,
> Mono has had alot of issues building on x86_64 recently. it would be great
> if
> you worked with upstream to track down and resolve the 64 bit issues.
>From what I've seen, 2.8 fixes quite a lot of the issues with 64 bit
systems. Are there any specifics I should look at?
TTFN
P
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630097
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447549&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447566&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev
Le mardi 14 septembre 2010 à 21:26 -0400, Máirín Duffy a écrit :
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
> > Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive
> > subject like "HEY VOTE ON THIS
2010/9/15 Dave Jones :
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:11:47PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > One problem fixed, introduced another
> >
> > ===
> > [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> > --
Le mercredi 15 septembre 2010 à 12:40 +0200, drago01 a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:27 PM, M A Young wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, drago01 wrote:
> > I agree. I was worried when systemd appeared in F14 just before the alpha.
> > Really we should have been much closer to where we are now
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:11:47PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> One problem fixed, introduced another
>
> ===
> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> ---
> include/linux/cgro
2010/9/15 Morten P.D. Stevens :
>> -Original Message-
>> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
>> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michal Schmidt
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:03 PM
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Subject: Re: Problem wit
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:devel-
> boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Michal Schmidt
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2010 8:03 PM
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with 2.6.35.4-12.fc14.x86_64
>
> On Wed,
Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> Actually, iiuc, tomasz is talking about migrating sysv-init scripts to
> systemd unit files. There is a blocker to doing that in F15 which is that
> lennart, notting, and walters (that I remember) are against doing a mass
> migration to unit files unti
On Wednesday, September 15, 2010 10:41:26 am Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've not come across this (mainly as I've not been that active due to a
> mix of work problems and hardware problems which meant a big
> re-install). Most of mono is built, but I've just hit this error
>
> *** ERROR: No
Just a quick heads up that I'm going to be updating introspection to
(at least) 0.9.5 in rawhide.
For libraries, this is generally a simple rebuild with no impact on
primary functionality. However
if you are a library maintainer, do see
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2010-Sept
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
>
> So, would be acceptable to register requests for -static package
> variants as tickets on bugzilla? Or is there a better way to try to
> encourage people to generate these packages?
Providing static libraries for user needs like
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:28:46AM -0700, John Poelstra wrote:
> I don't recall any situation where someone submitted a feature at the
> deadline without having done anything and then scrambling for two weeks
> to finish by feature freeze.
I'm looking at the current situation. If we had hard, ea
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 19:59, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:36:40PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
>> Gregdek mentioned voter fatigue on FAB a while back. I know exactly what
>> he's talking about though I'm not quite sure how to fix it. I suppose
>> meeting fatigue isn't much d
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625363
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-15 14:29:26 EDT ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.0-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fed
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625363
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625363
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System
2010-09-15 14:28:26 EDT ---
perl-Directory-Queue-1.0-1.el4 has been pushed to the Fed
Matthew Miller said the following on 09/15/2010 07:57 AM Pacific Time:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:37:55PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> I'm a bit confused. You spend the rest of the mail talking about when
>> the feature freeze is for F15, but I'm not sure why. As long as F15 is
>> open and it
2010/9/15 Michal Schmidt :
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:44:47 +0200 Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
>> Does anyone know something about this issue?
>>[...]
>> ===
>> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
>> ---
Thorsten Leemhuis said the following on 09/15/2010 12:09 AM Pacific Time:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote on 15.09.2010 04:54:
>> On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 07:02:33PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:48:13 -0400
>>> Máirín Duffy wrote:
Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this iss
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 17:44:47 +0200 Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
> Does anyone know something about this issue?
>[...]
> ===
> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
> ---
> kernel/sched.c:616
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:36:40PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> Gregdek mentioned voter fatigue on FAB a while back. I know exactly what
> he's talking about though I'm not quite sure how to fix it. I suppose
> meeting fatigue isn't much different.
http://www.public-software-group.org/liquid_fe
> I've not come across this (mainly as I've not been that active due to a
> mix of work problems and hardware problems which meant a big
> re-install). Most of mono is built, but I've just hit this error
>
> *** ERROR: No build ID note found
> in
> /home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mono-2.8-1.fc15.i3
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 21:26 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
> > > Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descripti
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 17:06 +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
> I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
> Fedora or even to get
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
> > integration as ses
"Bryn M. Reeves" writes:
> On 09/15/2010 05:06 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
>> So, would be acceptable to register requests for -static package
>> variants as tickets on bugzilla? Or is there a better way to try to
>> encourage people to generate these packages?
> You might find the Fedora packagin
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 21:26 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 19:02 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > I'm happy to look for ways to make the other fesco voices heard.
> > Any ideas? I could try making the tickets have some more descriptive
> > subject like "HEY VOTE ON THIS PLEASE BEF
The Fedora 14 Beta RC compose is scheduled for tomorrow.
ALL open bugs on Fedora 14 Blocker list (http://bit.ly/cZKo9K) MUST BE
FIXED TODAY or we risk delaying the release. In other words we are very
short on time to address the remaining bugs.
Here is the current state of things based on the
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 17:20:22 +0200,
drago01 wrote:
>
> I said _someone_ not _you_ ;) ... if Lougher is working on it fine.
It's on his to do list, which isn't really the same thing. Lately he
has been doing more getting the extended attributes feature cleaned up
and a bit with the lzo stuf
On 09/15/2010 05:06 PM, Robert Spanton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
> Fedora or even to get th
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 05:06:20PM +0100, Robert Spanton wrote:
> I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
> it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
> user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
> Fedora or even
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:53:51AM -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> If I have to wait for the next release of Fedora (14 for example) to
> get KDE 4.5 then it's looking like the stable updates vision has made
If you need the absolute latest of everything without waiting three months
for the release,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634133
--- Comment #2 from Petr Sabata 2010-09-15 12:07:34 EDT ---
Thanks Paul. I've been playing with the failing tests for a while no
Hi,
I've recently had to link a fair amount of my work statically so that
it'll run on a cluster of RHEL machines. Unfortunately, I am just a
user of these machines, and so I don't have the power to get them to run
Fedora or even to get the admins to install RHEL packages in a timely
manner. Bui
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634133
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634133
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630097
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=446995&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447038&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447061&action=edit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=447
Oh, sorry. I may have chosen a bad email subject.
This failed scratch build shows what was happening:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2468876
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Robin Lee wrote:
> The main issue is failing to use a macro defined with %__python3 to specify
> th
If I have to wait for the next release of Fedora (14 for example) to
get KDE 4.5 then it's looking like the stable updates vision has made
Fedora incompatible with what I need. I will need to consider another
distribution (OpenSUSE most likely, their GCC 4.5 also doesn't suck;
LTO = enabled). After
Richard Hughes (hughsi...@gmail.com) said:
> On 14 September 2010 23:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 21:33:35 The other 2 items I had were:
> > 21:33:56 application installer issues
> > 21:33:57 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968
> > 21:34:04 and
> > 21:34:05 BuildIdBuild infrastr
Hi,
Does anyone know something about this issue?
Setting APIC routing to flat
..TIMER: vector=0x30 apic1=0 pin1=2 apic2=-1 pin2=-1
CPU0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5450 @ 3.00GHz stepping 0a
lockdep: fixing up alternatives.
===
[ INFO: suspic
drago01 (drag...@gmail.com) said:
> The only real issues pointed out where lack of documentation and
> system-config-service integration for native services.
> Neither that we have with upstart so not really a regression and thus
> warrant a reject.
system services have not been migrated to upsta
Hi,
I've not come across this (mainly as I've not been that active due to a
mix of work problems and hardware problems which meant a big
re-install). Most of mono is built, but I've just hit this error
*** ERROR: No build ID note found
in
/home/paul/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/mono-2.8-1.fc15.i386/usr/li
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 17:11:03 +0200,
> drago01 wrote:
>>
>> That doesn't work ... someone has to be activly pushing the patches
>> upstream .. instead of just waiting and hoping that they magically
>> make it in.
>
> It's somewhere on
Compose started at Wed Sep 15 13:15:11 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php
RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch)
1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc1
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 17:11:03 +0200,
drago01 wrote:
>
> That doesn't work ... someone has to be activly pushing the patches
> upstream .. instead of just waiting and hoping that they magically
> make it in.
It's somewhere on Lougher's to do list. We can still be ready to take advantage
of i
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:38 PM, FlorianFesti wrote:
> While showing the user "applications" instead of packages might be a
> good idea for several use cases I think this approach misses the point
> here. The questions for redesigning the Updater dialog should be:
It is not only about the update
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:20:30 -0700,
> John Poelstra wrote:
>>
>> And we are already reviewing and accepting features for Fedora 15. The
>> process never stops.
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy
>
> Thanks for the r
The main issue is failing to use a macro defined with %__python3 to specify
the version of a requirement.
The recipe is sth like this:
%global py3_ver %(echo `%{__python3} -c "import sys;
sys.stdout.write(sys.version[:3])"`)
...
Requires: python(abi) = %{py3_ver}
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 16:38 +0200, FlorianFesti wrote:
> So I would suggest an UI that gives a summery (Didn't we already have
> that in the past?) and offers 3 buttons:
>
> [Show/Hide Details] [Do not install updates now] [Install updates now]
>
> The first being a toggle button hiding/showing
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:37:55PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> I'm a bit confused. You spend the rest of the mail talking about when
> the feature freeze is for F15, but I'm not sure why. As long as F15 is
> open and it's not frozen (which it obviously isn't, yet) you can start
> doing developm
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633728
Petr Sabata changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
While showing the user "applications" instead of packages might be a
good idea for several use cases I think this approach misses the point
here. The questions for redesigning the Updater dialog should be:
What's the user supposed to decide and what information does he need to
do so?
The ans
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 10:32 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:14:24AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > For people wanting to make big changes to F15.. Do it *now*! F15 is in
> > its infancy. It's taking shape. If you want your feature to be a
> > defining feature of F15. G
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:14 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >
> > > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full
I suspect I haven't had enough coffee yet, but I don't see the problem
here. Why not simply add "python3-devel" as a build requirement as
Ignacio says?
If a build requirement isn't installed, it's acceptable for a build to
fail: it's a violation of a precondition.
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 19:35 +08
commit 69e0bc83d7c1bd83b80e732b372686032e10d296
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Sep 15 16:33:29 2010 +0200
0.11 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks:
980d382b277b22c487fef95a8e3d61cd HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-0.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:14:24AM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> For people wanting to make big changes to F15.. Do it *now*! F15 is in
> its infancy. It's taking shape. If you want your feature to be a
> defining feature of F15. Get it in *now*.
This seems like a completely sensible idea. Howe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633729
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 07:20:30 -0700,
John Poelstra wrote:
>
> And we are already reviewing and accepting features for Fedora 15. The
> process never stops.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Policy
Thanks for the reminder; I'll put LZMA back in for F15 and hope the kernel
change
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633725
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Mike McGrath said the following on 09/15/2010 07:14 AM Pacific Time:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>
>>>Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
>>> cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F1
commit b33cb75d50ec3b694394945f5f2286fd4cf40cc9
Author: Petr Písař
Date: Wed Sep 15 15:34:50 2010 +0200
1.07 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS.spec | 10 +++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
commit b1ee707c871291591973d62dbe13e2bc5f6699db
Author: Petr Sabata
Date: Wed Sep 15 16:16:11 2010 +0200
New sources for 0.06
.gitignore |1 +
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ff321f7..25f3e8e 100644
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Format-Human-Bytes:
709e90c62599def49071735e842632c8 Format-Human-Bytes-0.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
> > integration as session daemon in DEs ev
commit 7c54128cdca81f038038baa330d571438e820b33
Author: Petr Sabata
Date: Wed Sep 15 16:12:32 2010 +0200
New release, v0.06
Format-Human-Bytes-no-autoinstall.patch | 10 ++
Format-Human-Bytes-switch_off.patch | 12
perl-Format-Human-Bytes.spec| 1
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
> > > > irregardless of its conclusion?
> > > 'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'. =)
> > The OED disagrees.
> Not really. It lists '
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 09:03 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 14 September 2010 23:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 21:33:35 The other 2 items I had were:
> > 21:33:56 application installer issues
> > 21:33:57 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=488968
> > 21:34:04 and
> > 21:34:05 BuildIdB
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 03:04:31PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:57 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > 'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'. =)
> >
> > The OED disagrees.
>
> Not r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568172
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568172
Daniel Berrange changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:57 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:48 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> >
> > > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
> > > irregardless of its conclu
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 08:49:46AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:09:58 -0400,
> "John W. Linville" wrote:
> >
> > AIUI, they main technical reason that they were finally willing to
> > open-up was that they were able to add some regulatory enforcement code
> > in th
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:48:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 20:48 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else feeling a little uncomfortable about the voting process,
> > irregardless of its conclusion?
>
> 'regardless'. 'irregardless' would mean 'not regardless'.
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:01:03PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> * pjones and ajax are traveling today, will not be able to attend.
> (nirik, 19:30:30)
Sorry, I thought I had mentioned this on IRC before, but I have a
conflict with the current scheduling for the next four months due to a
class
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 09:09:58 -0400,
"John W. Linville" wrote:
>
> AIUI, they main technical reason that they were finally willing to
> open-up was that they were able to add some regulatory enforcement code
> in their firmware. The added firmware functionality required more
> firmware reso
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 01:25 -0400, Trever Fischer wrote:
>> Excuse me if this is the wrong place to send this.
>>
>> As my fedora ambassador duties, I tend to show other students the neat
>> things you can do with Fedora with my trusty USB drive I always keep on
>> my
>> keychain. More often tha
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-ShareDir:
edb4b9d418a03bf9b0cf6d0fa9585c3f File-ShareDir-1.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=633726
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=568172
Denise Dumas changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:05:34AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> There's something seriously wrong with the Fedora development
> process, folks. And with you, FESCO. You excelled in erratic behaviour,
> not in steering engineering.
Lennart, I don't think you're being fair. I tried to alert yo
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Find-Rule-VCS:
d695c3529109ed69ded833163c2a4f43 File-Find-Rule-VCS-1.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo
