On 09/23/2010 06:09 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 15:51:37 +0200,
FlorianFestiffe...@redhat.com wrote:
1) Comps groups. Not even used by PK to the full extend. Nevertheless
several groups are huge with over 100 packages (winner being Games
with over 300). Sorry, 100
I have packaged xneur, which on review [1] and its build fine on Fedora
12 and 13. On Fedora 14 it is failed [2] with error:
/usr/include/libnotify/notification.h:28:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such
file or directory
I try figure out what happened and go step by step add includes in
CFLAGS
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/24/2010 06:11 PM +9:00:
I have packaged xneur, which on review [1] and its build fine on Fedora 12
and 13. On Fedora 14 it is failed [2] with error:
/usr/include/libnotify/notification.h:28:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such
file or
24.09.2010 13:27, Mamoru Tasaka пишет:
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/24/2010 06:11 PM +9:00:
I have packaged xneur, which on review [1] and its build fine on Fedora 12
and 13. On Fedora 14 it is failed [2] with error:
/usr/include/libnotify/notification.h:28:21: fatal
Michał Piotrowski, Mon, 20 Sep 2010 17:32:49 +0200:
PostgreSQL 9 was released
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news.1235
Are there any chances to get this for F14? The new version supports
basic replication scenarios, so I would not have to use PgPool :)
I think this is an ideal project for
Hi,
On 09/22/2010 07:37 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
Eric Smithe...@brouhaha.com wrote:
A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
added a patch to resolve it and
Compose started at Fri Sep 24 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
Hi all,
I'm so sorry for a late notice, but there was a soname bump of
libedataserverui library from evolution-data-server package in time for
2.31.91 update, but I didn't notice this change, and because this update
didn't get it to the testing repo, then I realized just now, when I
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included
changelog or a URL to a changelog that people can go and reference. I
remember this being
commit df4968db479bcdb91a4321e5e658ce4756b0dae0
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Sep 24 14:41:36 2010 +0100
Filter LWP::Protocol and other bogus provides (#557485)
- Filter bogus provide of perl(LWP::Protocol) (#557485)
- Filter additional bogus provides:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557485
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, 24 Sep 2010 10:57:41 +0200, Milan wrote:
Hi all,
I'm so sorry for a late notice, but there was a soname bump of
libedataserverui library from evolution-data-server package in time for
2.31.91 update, but I didn't notice this change, and because this update
didn't get it to the
Compose started at Fri Sep 24 13:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
cyphesis-0.5.21-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libpython2.6.so.1.0()(64bit)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=570321
Mark Chappell trem...@tremble.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
rpm changelog?
On 09/24/2010 12:43 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomia.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it really necessary to include entire
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 17:43:47 +0100,
Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
For the fact that its gone from version X to version Y yes. For the
actual application changed between version X and version Y they can
see the ChangeLog that's in the %doc or alternatively check the
release
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:43:47PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Is it really
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630091
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=449474action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I would much prefer to generate the git log from the rpm changelog than
vice-versa, though. THe git log is going to contain more entries than the
rpm changelog as little things get fixed from time to time that deserve a
commit in git but don't deserve a mention in the
On 09/24/2010 01:32 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The rpm changelog should be more like NEWS than a changelog; and usually
a summary of NEWS, at that. (imho, no packaging guidelines currently
mandate this, etc.)
I could swear I had written don't copy the upstream changelog into the
rpm
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 13:11 -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
In principle, the system for extracting %changelog from git might work,
with two provisos:
- people understand that git changelogs have slightly different purpose
than RPM changelogs: git records 'what' changed, while RPM should
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
I would much prefer to generate the git log from the rpm changelog than
vice-versa, though. THe git log is going to contain more entries than the
rpm changelog as little things get fixed from time to time
Why is this happening?
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 unsuccessfully untagged from
dist-f12-updates-testing-pending by bodhi
Operation failed with the error:
koji.TagError: build rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 not in tag
dist-f12-updates-testing-pending
Is it something i can fix?
On Thu, 2010-09-23 at 12:58 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hi, everyone. So we partly used the proposed new nice-to-have bug
tracking system during the F14 Beta process, and it seemed to go well.
In a quick burst of airport productivity, I've quickly written up a
bunch of proposed new wiki
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 14:48 -0430, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
Why is this happening?
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 unsuccessfully untagged from
dist-f12-updates-testing-pending by bodhi
Operation failed with the error:
koji.TagError: build rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 not in
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 16:50 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-24 at 14:48 -0430, Guillermo Gómez wrote:
Why is this happening?
rubygem-state_machine-0.9.4-3.fc12 unsuccessfully untagged from
dist-f12-updates-testing-pending by bodhi
Operation failed with the error:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: PID file location miss match
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637077
Summary: PID file location miss match
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-HTML-Encoding-0.61 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637110
Summary: perl-HTML-Encoding-0.61 is available
Product:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637111
Summary: perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.34 is available
Product: Fedora
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-LibYAML:
85b4427e88597392d9cdefbad0469245 YAML-LibYAML-0.34.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d3310af87e2de6d9aca1d95de4c41df7ad87a31d
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Sep 24 13:30:25 2010 +0200
- udpate
.gitignore |1 +
perl-YAML-LibYAML.spec | 13 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=637111
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Variable-Magic:
9c8c4f73547996d6f08a3a2452f2a444 Variable-Magic-0.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit c35617a512b49b304963c76a0ee509b8f2074a72
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Sat Sep 25 01:30:28 2010 +0200
Update to 0.44
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Variable-Magic.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Package perl-Module-Build in Fedora devel has been unretired by kevin and is
now orphan.
To make changes to this package see:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-Module-Build
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=635987
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=449487action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=449487action=edit
Thanks to Rich for analysing the bug introduced by the previous commit. The
attached patch should fix it.
37 matches
Mail list logo
