On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:07:34AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:30:43PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
The newer yubikey hardware has provision for two AES keys but I'm not sure
how that works and whether it actually allows you to use separate keys with
separate
On Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:37:19 -0700
Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/5/10 2:30 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Well, how about creating dist-f14-for-chainbuild build target and
allow people to tag or untag build as/from that tag freely?
For example
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 01:21:03 -0400 Jon Masters wrote:
It would seem that systemd employs some kind of arbitrary timeout (30
seconds?)
60 s
Certain services, such as kdump.service might require some time to
recreate their initramfs and will thus never be able to start normally
(I'm very
Hi all,
seems that I forgot to send meeting minutes from our last Java SIG
meeting. So here goes...
Summary:
* New packaging guidelines are being created:
- https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
* Wiki to collect monitored packages
-
2010/10/8 Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com:
* New packaging guidelines (sochotnicky, 17:19:37)
* LINK:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Akurtakov/JavaPackagingDraftUpdate
(akurtakov_, 17:22:21)
* LINK:
On 10/08/2010 10:49 AM, Guido Grazioli wrote:
Hello and thanks for minutes; should we consider free to contribute to
the draft
page directly, or maybe in the discussion page? Or better in this ml?
I think it would be best to discuss possible improvements on java-devel
mailing list. If proposed
Hi,
I am the maintainer for ykpers and libyubikey for Fedora. It's great
to see Fedora starting to use these nifty devices!
If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler. It might
be interesting to add a README.Fedora to
Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
much as the above proposed page covers the blocker review process.
Martin Sourada, Thu, 07 Oct 2010 22:55:52 +0200:
but unless someone announces API/ABI changes, you'll notice them only
after someone fills a bug that your plugin does not work (yes, this is
precisely the kind of thing that could be caught by usual dependency
check if mozilla used properly
On Fri, 08.10.10 01:21, Jon Masters (jonat...@jonmasters.org) wrote:
Folks,
It would seem that systemd employs some kind of arbitrary timeout (30
seconds?) by default and will log operation timed out. Terminating if
things take longer than this time to start up. I would like to know how
to
Compose started at Fri Oct 8 08:15:19 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0)
0:1.3.0
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
Hi,
I am the maintainer for ykpers and libyubikey for Fedora. It's great
to see Fedora starting to use these nifty devices!
If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler.
In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make
differences.
After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
for each available branches something similar:
fedpkg switch-branch el5;
git pull
git merge origin/master
git push
fedpkg build
fedpkg update
On Friday, October 08, 2010 12:06:58 am Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 7 Oct 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:
My understanding on this is, and I reserve the right to misunderstand
this, is that once the AES key is on the yubikey, there is no way to get
it off of there. That key is just used to
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
-
# fedpkg scratch-build
Could
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to make a scratch build i always got:
Dear Fedora Comunity,
We would like to draw your attention to forthcoming Fedora Test Day focused on
OpenLDAP [1] with TLS encryption.
The crypto implementation for TLS/SSL was recently changed from OpenSSL to
Mozilla Network Security Services (MozNSS). And there are 88 packages
depending on
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Even if you use your yubikey with yubicos servers. and auth against multiple
different providers your AES key is never exposed to to any of the places that
you auth to.
That is correct if different service providers auth the OTP against
yubicos
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler. It might
Fixing the pam module to not crash might be good. :)
Have you considerd packaging up the
Compose started at Fri Oct 8 13:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
On the other hand it has taken us a *long* time to get to the place
where we are today where churn in RC has been reduced to a bare minimum.
I still subscribe to the theory (realizing some in Fedora don't) that
every additional
All,
I shall be working on some web frontends for ResultsDB, and I have
been told that y'all already have some mock-ups/ideas for such a
beast. If so, could y'all point me in the right direction.
Thanks
John Dulaney
--
devel mailing list
On 2010-10-08 10:57:16 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
If there is anything I can do to help out and make the use of
Yubikey's in the Fedora project into a success, just holler. It might
Fixing the pam module to not crash might be
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas Spura wrote:
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 11:19:21 +0200
Farkas Levente wrote:
hi,
while try to
Hello,
Will OpenLayers see any more updates for F13? The version available is
2.8-5.fc12 while latest upstream is 2.10.
I'll file an RFE for update if necessary.
--
Thanks!
Regards,
Ankur
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
FranciscoD
--
devel mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas
On 10/08/2010 07:19 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 04:28 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 09:15:08 am Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 03:53 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Thursday, October 07, 2010 04:25:45 am Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to build again. then today
i can't build
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie: fedora-packager-setup i was able to build again. then today
i can't build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 11:09 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631993
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=452403action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Friday, October 08, 2010 12:19:46 pm Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 9:57 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
[lfar...@eagle jna (f12)]$ fedora-cert -v
Verifying Certificate
cert expires: 2011-04-06
CRL Checking not implemented yet
[lfar...@eagle jna (f12)]$ fedpkg -v build
Creating
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
new cert ie:
Paul Wouters wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
for each available branches something similar:
fedpkg switch-branch el5;
git pull
git merge origin/master
git push
fedpkg build
fedpkg
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
much as the
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:33 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
All,
I shall be working on some web frontends for ResultsDB, and I have
been told that y'all already have some mock-ups/ideas for such a
beast. If so, could y'all point me in the right direction.
I think this was intended for
=
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=538277hide_resolved=1
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH bugs?
I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
I'd propose that NTH bugs must be tested and have appropriate bodhi
karma for them to be
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) fo...@hubbitus.com.ru wrote:
In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to
make differences.
...snip...
I would hope a real reason would be that the update is not a security
or bugfix only update,
On 10/08/2010 04:03 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons to make
differences.
After made some changes in origin/master and commit is I also must do
for each available branches something similar:
fedpkg switch-branch
On 10/08/2010 08:49 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but
On 10/08/2010 08:51 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Friday, October 08, 2010 01:09:32 pm Farkas Levente wrote:
On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
rhel-6 beta2's
nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 08:48, Paul Wouters p...@xelerance.com wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
It sounds like you do not fully understand how the yubikeys work. either that
or i dont understand the attack you are describing?
It all comes down to this being based on symmetric
On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
encryption key for disk encryption. I'd prefer the disk crypto key to
not be on the disk at all, protected by just a passphrase. It would be
nice to have it on a yubikey instead.
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 12:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH
bugs?
I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
I'd propose that NTH
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
encryption key for disk encryption. I'd prefer the disk crypto key to
not be on the disk at all, protected by just a passphrase. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/8/10 2:48 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On 10/07/2010 10:58 PM, Paul Wouters wrote:
One usage of yubikey I would like very much is as storage for the AES
encryption key for disk encryption. I'd
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:31:00PM +0530, Ankur Sinha wrote:
Will OpenLayers see any more updates for F13? The version available is
2.8-5.fc12 while latest upstream is 2.10.
I'll file an RFE for update if necessary.
No, sorry.
According to the new fedora update rules, an update like
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 17:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
Oh your right. Lemme rethink if there is a better way to articulate my
thoughts. I was searching for a generic way to say, potentially
disruptive changes to core packages aren't a good fit for NTH. The NTH
xorg bug#596557 discussed
On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
Note that yubikeys are not (yet) usable for this. You cannot request the
AES key from it (AFAIK), only an OTP. And the OTP can also not be used to
unlock
an AES key on the harddisk because it is different for each activation.
Can't you use one of
I've just updated perl-MooseX-StrictConstructor to the latest upstream
version in rawhide and f14. This brings a license change from GPL+ or
Artistic (aka same as perl) to Artistic 2.0.
--
Iain.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi!
I would like to introduce reviewing package q4wine: Qt4 GUI for wine. It can:*
Work with different wine versions at same time;* Creat, delete and manage
prefixes (WINEPREFIX);* Cd-image use;* Backup and restore for managed
prefixes;* Winetriks support.And other.
Review request is on
On Sat, 2010-10-09 at 00:17 +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
No, sorry.
According to the new fedora update rules, an update like openlayers
2.8
- 2.10 is no longer allowed as the it could break code that is using
openlayers (e.g. with the OpenLayers.Layer.Google changes).
I have just built 2.10
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640752
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-08
05:50:47 EDT ---
perl-5.12.2-135.fc14 has been
Summary of changes:
5ae7776... 1.79 imported (*)
0afd3e7... 1.81 bump (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=640752
Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
274290a... update to 0.47 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3e54b456e73726ad48b55c181860f95d82f87882
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Oct 9 04:49:18 2010 +0200
update to 0.11
- license change from GPL+ or Artistic to Artistic 2.0
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
.gitignore |1 +
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-IPC-Run:
9dc3b8cca378b871fafab7c6e5a61cdd IPC-Run-0.89.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
51e7acf... update to 0.89 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Catalyst-Runtime:
4f9f169ba96360898edefb2ee28fede5 Catalyst-Runtime-5.80029.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Getopt:
0e0a8f46c0325f4f7eb2607f564e8b80 MooseX-Getopt-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5f60d8b174d75767ba127aa845b880f444373f9e
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Oct 9 06:41:03 2010 +0200
updating to latest GA CPAN version (0.33)
- update by Fedora::App::MaintainerTools 0.006
- altered br on perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) (6.42 = 6.31)
-
commit a9d1a7918ad97643c682c74333b36226d3a27393
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Oct 9 06:44:52 2010 +0200
update to 1.09
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-MOP.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Moose:
6dc129e44ec032079f80015818906c4e Moose-1.15.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit edce4189d096ff9c1427be2c758ed32bf54aa5a2
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Oct 9 06:50:15 2010 +0200
update to 1.15
- update BR perl(Class::MOP) = 1.09
- new BR perl(Params:Util)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Moose.spec | 10 --
sources
commit ffb7eca912b8f98dfa58a12122f7d444ac25bc82
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Sat Oct 9 07:44:46 2010 +0200
updating to latest GA CPAN version (5.80029)
- update by Fedora::App::MaintainerTools 0.006
- added a new br on perl(HTML::HeadParser) (version 0)
-
On 10/08/2010 03:17 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
70 matches
Mail list logo
