Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

2010-10-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 10/28/2010 01:11 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * #480 F15Feature - RemoveSETUID ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID ) (nirik, 19:15:16) * AGREED: the feature is approved. (nirik, 19:26:46) This feature is now approved and I see bugs get filed. The documentation and

Heads Up - New Firefox update

2010-10-28 Thread Martin Stransky
Hi, there's a new Firefox update waiting in Bodhi and we can't push it to stable because of new rules. We recommend you to update to it ASAP as it fixes a public critical 0day vulnerability (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607222). Bodhi links:

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

2010-10-28 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: This feature is now approved and I see bugs get filed.  The documentation and guidelines are very incomplete.  How does one figure out which file capabilities are needed by the programs I maintain that currently use setuid?  Help,

Re: who broke fedoraproject.org usability?

2010-10-28 Thread Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mer 27 octobre 2010 21:33, Laurent Rineau a écrit : Le mercredi 27 octobre 2010 18:32:29, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit : MP == Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com writes: MP Where is the link to the wiki? It's in page footer. Actually it's right at the top; click Contributors. (I can't

Re: who broke fedoraproject.org usability?

2010-10-28 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/10/28 Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com:  On 10/28/2010 03:27 AM, Benjamín Valero Espinosa wrote: 2010/10/27 Michał Piotrowski     2010/10/27 Matthew Miller     On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 09:49:14PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:     Someone should fix this ugly font - looks bad in

Re: who broke fedoraproject.org usability?

2010-10-28 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 10/28/2010 04:51 PM, Arnoldas S. wrote: Isn't Hulk the copyrighted trademark? coprighted trademark is not correct usage. It might be a trademark. Does not prevent fair use. Legal questions should be directed to legal AT fedoraproject.org Rahul -- devel mailing list

Orphaning packages

2010-10-28 Thread Victor G. Vasilyev
appframework -- Swing Application Framework beansbinding -- Beans Binding (JSR 295) reference implementation bindex -- Bundle Manifest Header Mapper bytelist -- A java library for lists of bytes cobertura -- Java tool for calculating the test coverage felix-framework -- Apache Felix Framework

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

2010-10-28 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/2010 04:14 AM, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: This feature is now approved and I see bugs get filed. The documentation and guidelines are very incomplete. How does one figure out

Re: Space for public package git repositories

2010-10-28 Thread Todd Zullinger
Tim Niemueller wrote: Recently I wanted to modify a package. Since we now use git for packages, the following work flow feels natural: git clone package-repo make changes in package repo commit push repo somewhere send pull request to package maintainer Is that the anticipated workflow?

[Bug 647503] New: perl-Log-Dispatch: please update to 2.27

2010-10-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: perl-Log-Dispatch: please update to 2.27 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647503 Summary: perl-Log-Dispatch: please update to 2.27

Re: experimental systemd + initscripts repo

2010-10-28 Thread Bill Nottingham
Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) said: Fixed in git, thanks for the report. BTW: A nice way to make activation of services conditional based on existance of a file is the relatively new ConditionPathExists= setting in [Unit]. If the file listed there doesn't exist, then the unit

Re: Space for public package git repositories

2010-10-28 Thread yersinia
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Todd Zullinger t...@pobox.com wrote: Tim Niemueller wrote: Incidentally, if you'd like to see an updated git for EL-5, point anyone you know that uses emacs-git my way. AFAIK, the only hang up to updating EPEL to git-1.7 is working out how to maintain the

F-14 Branched report: 20101028 changes

2010-10-28 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Oct 28 13:15:57 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit) Broken deps for i386 --

Re: Space for public package git repositories

2010-10-28 Thread Todd Zullinger
yersinia wrote: Beware also that git 1.7 by default enforce that it is not possible to push to a repository git not bare, and, from my experience, many EPEL users don't haven't read the advice on this of the git manual - just an example of another possible incompatibility Yep, but that's a

Re: Building boo against mono-2.8 problem

2010-10-28 Thread Michel Alexandre Salim
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 00:50:24 +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote: Hi, In order to build the latest version of boo (the current one in the repos won't build against mono-2.8), the old version of boo has to be removed as there is a conflict with Boo.Lang.Extensions in gac (it is a known bug which

Re: Building boo against mono-2.8 problem

2010-10-28 Thread Paul F. Johnson
Hi, Is it possible to build boo on koji without removing the old version or is there a way to just remove Boo.Lang.Extensions from the gac? Not sure how this is a problem. Boo.Lang.Extensions.dll is only shipped by the boo package, right? And rebuilding boo does *not* pull in the old

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!

2010-10-28 Thread Joe Nall
On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:44:52PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: On 10/28/2010 01:11 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: * #480 F15Feature - RemoveSETUID ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID ) (nirik, 19:15:16) * AGREED: the

F-14 updates hosed?

2010-10-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
Not sure if I'm imagining things, but it looks as if those have been hosed. For example: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/14/x86_64/ Any ideas? -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: F-14 updates hosed?

2010-10-28 Thread Jose Manimala
Maybe it is to get populated after the release of Fedora 14? On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Bojan Smojver bo...@rexursive.com wrote: Not sure if I'm imagining things, but it looks as if those have been hosed. For example: http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/14/x86_64/

Re: F-14 updates hosed?

2010-10-28 Thread Bojan Smojver
Jose Manimala josemm at fedoraproject.org writes: Maybe it is to get populated after the release of Fedora 14? Don't think so. These directories get populated as updates are released, after the creation of the branch. They had files in them just yesterday. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list

Re: Default partitioning

2010-10-28 Thread Javier Prats
Hello Stephen, On a default Fedora installation using encryption and LVM it partitioned a 50GB drive giving 44GB to the root partition and only 4GB to /home. In most environments saving things to the root partition is avoided and it seems there is more than enough room for applications. This is

RemoveSETUID feature (Was: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting (2010-10-26) NEW TIME!)

2010-10-28 Thread Jason L Tibbitts III
JN == Joe Nall j...@nall.com writes: JN On Oct 28, 2010, at 5:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: More to the point, I can easily see the setuid bit easily on a binary. How do I tell if these strange/hidden capabilities are present on a binary? 'ls' doesn't mention anything. JN getcap

[Bug 598160] genkey segfaults

2010-10-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598160 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2010-10-28 01:56:52 EDT --- perl-Newt-1.08-27.fc14 has been

[Bug 647503] perl-Log-Dispatch: please update to 2.27

2010-10-28 Thread bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647503 --- Comment #1 from Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt 2010-10-28 11:27:52 EDT --- Due to the requirement Sys::Syslog 0.16

File WWW-Curl-4.14.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eponyme

2010-10-28 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WWW-Curl: d57bc06036e13c1d1071a8c86193de40 WWW-Curl-4.14.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[perl-WWW-Curl] Update to 4.14

2010-10-28 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
commit a6202706bc201b7528bb2d2b8594fcbd3f6c4519 Author: eponyme epon...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Oct 28 21:15:44 2010 +0200 Update to 4.14 .gitignore |1 + perl-WWW-Curl.spec | 10 +- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[perl-WWW-Curl/f14/master] Update to 4.14

2010-10-28 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
commit efb6a3e9870cef7b88943efd7e0d9c3d525b1a95 Author: eponyme epon...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Oct 28 21:16:19 2010 +0200 Update to 4.14 .gitignore |1 + perl-WWW-Curl.spec | 10 +- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[perl-WWW-Curl/f13/master] Update to 4.14

2010-10-28 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
commit 9b863170abfb11b7108061a6a85b75d039a9f026 Author: eponyme epon...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Oct 28 21:16:54 2010 +0200 Update to 4.14 .gitignore |1 + perl-WWW-Curl.spec | 10 +- sources|2 +- 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

[perl-WWW-Curl] Update to 4.14

2010-10-28 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
commit bfd9a8afca016d30e9256ff8a19995ec096e43a1 Author: eponyme epon...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Oct 28 21:29:50 2010 +0200 Update to 4.14 perl-WWW-Curl.spec |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-WWW-Curl.spec b/perl-WWW-Curl.spec index

[perl-WWW-Curl/f14/master] Update to 4.14

2010-10-28 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
commit 79305f2154704678db3459d3c23aeea22e7a5b0c Author: eponyme epon...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Oct 28 21:34:47 2010 +0200 Update to 4.14 perl-WWW-Curl.spec |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-WWW-Curl.spec b/perl-WWW-Curl.spec index

[perl-WWW-Curl/f13/master] Update to 4.14

2010-10-28 Thread Nicoleau Fabien
commit c32a4e3980692c08381c6528d30add86a878bc7a Author: eponyme epon...@fedoraproject.org Date: Thu Oct 28 21:35:23 2010 +0200 Update to 4.14 perl-WWW-Curl.spec |1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-WWW-Curl.spec b/perl-WWW-Curl.spec index