On 11/26/2010 04:50 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> The draft release notes are at http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.9.0
> and Fedora compatible SRPM(s) can be found at
> http://laiskiainen.org/rpm/srpms/
I am using this now on my Fedora 14 box and I haven't noticed any
obvious breakages. Beyond that,
On Fri, 26 Nov 2010 10:24:34 +0100
Olaf Kirch wrote:
> 3. Why not NetworkManager?
>
> On the other hand, there's NetworkManager (and I'm getting to this point
> because Pete Zaitcev brought this up). Right now, NetworkManager doesn't
> handle bridges, bonds, infiniband, token ring - that's why I
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657153
--- Comment #6 from Andrew McNaughton 2010-11-26
19:26:03 EST ---
I sorted it our for my own purposes by removing one of the de
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> I'm no longer interested in this package, so I'm going to orphan in it.
> IMHO there is not much users anyway, so how about removing it entirely?
I'd like to take it if you orphan it, if you don't mind.
François
--
devel mailing list
deve
I recently rebuilt a failing mail server (sendmail and cyrus-imapd), replacing
the hardware and building the replacement machine offline (leaving the current
server in place while I did so).
This would seem normal enough to do, but had some unintended pitfalls that
really should be more address
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 04:02:28PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
> Hi Olaf,
>
> Thanks for posting about your project.
>
> On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
>
> > 1. ifcfg files are dead
>
> Ok. But I think we want to be very careful with this. Yes, it's nice to
> use structured
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 4:45 PM, TK009 wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Ronald Wahl wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> today I was very surprised that updating my F13 system required me to
>> install ~20 fonts packages. Digging around a bit showed me that change
>> in the java-1.6.0-openjdk package:
>>
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Ronald Wahl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today I was very surprised that updating my F13 system required me to
> install ~20 fonts packages. Digging around a bit showed me that change
> in the java-1.6.0-openjdk package:
>
> http://osdir.com/ml/general/2010-11/msg38744.html
>
commit e8e6105c017c7d1f48bd9b2b9514e22e6c8297fc
Merge: 618acad 9c9fdbe
Author: Philip Prindeville
Date: Fri Nov 26 14:28:44 2010 -0700
Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into f14
.gitignore |3 +++
perl-Net-Patricia.spec | 18 +++---
sources|
Summary of changes:
2075f03... Maintenance version update. (*)
4588717... Improve parameter checking. (*)
9c9fdbe... Re-release of 1.18_81 as 1.19. (*)
e8e6105... Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into f14
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedor
commit 1b4a95193c488baadda7eb3ba2ff8eea67ef59b7
Merge: e623d13 9c9fdbe
Author: Philip Prindeville
Date: Fri Nov 26 14:19:22 2010 -0700
Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into f13
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Patricia.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 fil
Summary of changes:
9c9fdbe... Re-release of 1.18_81 as 1.19. (*)
1b4a951... Merge remote branch 'origin/master' into f13
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing li
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-26 16:12:21 EST ---
amavisd-new-2.6.4-2.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649761
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2010-11-26
16:06:05 EST ---
perl-POE-Filter-IRCD-2.42-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561389
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System
2010-11-26 16:04:38 EST ---
amavisd-new-2.6.4-2.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14
Hi Olaf,
Thanks for posting about your project.
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:24 +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> 1. ifcfg files are dead
Ok. But I think we want to be very careful with this. Yes, it's nice to
use structured data formats but IMO we want to make sure sysadmins can
still edit files by hand
Hi,
today I was very surprised that updating my F13 system required me to
install ~20 fonts packages. Digging around a bit showed me that change
in the java-1.6.0-openjdk package:
http://osdir.com/ml/general/2010-11/msg38744.html
Can anyone tell me the reason for all these fonts dependencies?
commit 9c9fdbe2f0b449443fc08169834e59d9db0f4fae
Author: Philip Prindeville
Date: Fri Nov 26 13:55:37 2010 -0700
Re-release of 1.18_81 as 1.19.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Net-Patricia.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deleti
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-Patricia:
fe19e3ab96bdefc1184288067490290f Net-Patricia-1.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657153
--- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth 2010-11-26 15:40:58 EST ---
OK. I trust you got the modules installed OK via the repository whe
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=657153
--- Comment #4 from Andrew McNaughton 2010-11-26
14:53:10 EST ---
I'm adding another module to a company's in-house repository
Miloslav =?UTF-8?Q?Trma=C4=8D?= writes:
> [...] If the system integrates everything into one process, the
> only remaining troubleshooting mechanisms are integrated logging
> [...], debugger [...] and systemtap (only a little better than a
> debugger, and not available for most programs).
To c
Even better, fixing libtool revealed some bugs (missing -llibs).
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.re
[Apologies if this has been covered before, but I cannot find anything
in the archives]
When building a package I noticed that binaries in the package were
still getting unnecessary DT_NEEDED entries. Example:
binary ---> depends only on libfoo.so
|
2010/11/26 Tomasz Torcz :
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> How to start things that really are not demons?
>>
>> Amtu seemed to be a simple service to convert
>>
>> [Unit]
>> Description=Abstract Machine Tests
>> After=syslog.target
>>
>> [Service]
>
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 03:42:33PM +0100, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> How to start things that really are not demons?
>
> Amtu seemed to be a simple service to convert
>
> [Unit]
> Description=Abstract Machine Tests
> After=syslog.target
>
> [Service]
> EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/amt
Hi,
How to start things that really are not demons?
Amtu seemed to be a simple service to convert
[Unit]
Description=Abstract Machine Tests
After=syslog.target
[Service]
EnvironmentFile=/etc/sysconfig/amtu
ExecStart=/usr/sbin/amtu $EXTRAOPTIONS
[Install]
WantedBy=multi-user.target
sudo system
I'm no longer interested in this package, so I'm going to orphan in it.
IMHO there is not much users anyway, so how about removing it entirely?
Jirka
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Petr Sabata wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:53:21AM -0300, Horst H. von Brand wrote:
> > After yesterday's updates, on login to Gnome a error message shows up
> > saying that "CPU Frequency scaling is unsupported", and claims either
> > misconfiguration or just isn't supported. It used to word
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 22:05 -0700, Jerry James wrote:
> Is anybody else seeing this? Is there any other component besides
> gtk-vnc that I should examine as a possible source of the slowdown?
I'm seeing this too. Downgrading to gtk-vnc-0.4.1-6.fc14.1 fixes it
here.
I've filed a bug report about
Compose started at Fri Nov 26 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
bognor-regis-0.6.11-1
2010/11/26 Panu Matilainen :
> the new, pluggable and enhanced dependency extration system.
That's really awesome!
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
It's that time of year again, although there seems to be an off-by-one bug
in the calendar system causing some inconsistency in the timing wrt last
year :P
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2009-November/042339.html
Anyway, before going to beta and starting the inevitable Fedora Fe
26.11.2010 11:38, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 11/25/2010 11:24 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
>
>> Furthermore, step to reproduce also is very important, and may be we
>> should enforce users fill it?
> This doesn't seem a clever idea to me, because at least for me, many
> abrt alerts
On Thursday 25 November 2010 21:29:30 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:24:37PM +0100, Olaf Kirch wrote:
> > You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have
> > NetworkManager, connman, netcf, and a few more?
>
> Indeed ... You don't explain how it's better
Ankur Sinha writes:
>> ./configure: line 11660: XORG_MANPAGE_SECTIONS: command not found
>> ./configure: line 11661: XORG_RELEASE_VERSION: command not found
Report that upstream.
>> libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-4, but
>> the
>> libtool: definition of th
On 11/25/2010 11:24 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote:
> Furthermore, step to reproduce also is very important, and may be we
> should enforce users fill it?
This doesn't seem a clever idea to me, because at least for me, many
abrt alerts originate from breakdowns without any obvious
On Thu, 2010-11-25 at 23:11 -0500, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 11/25/2010 11:01 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
> >> Well, I actually believe we should design an OS here, not just a set of
> >> independent tools. And that means I think closer integration is g
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 03:05 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 26.11.10 02:07, Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) wrote:
>
> > Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
> > > On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > > And also, cron does a couple of real
On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 02:07 +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Lennart Poettering píše v Pá 26. 11. 2010 v 01:27 +0100:
> > On Thu, 25.11.10 17:33, Tomas Mraz (tm...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > And also, cron does a couple of really nasty things. For example it
> > wakes up in regular intervals to check if
42 matches
Mail list logo
