On Tuesday 18 January 2011 16:42:36 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* keep kdepim-4.6 or revert to kdepim-4.4. Testing so far as been mixed:
** rdieter did quick test against gmail imap: ok
** dgilmore testing against ~100gb imap mail: (mostly) fail, initial sync
of
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.38-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
e665b64... Update to 1.38
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
configuration storage system for some reason. If you do, you'll have
to
make sure whatever method
Hi,
I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
Isn't it the same amount of time as Fedora, that is, one week?
Thanks.
--
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
--
devel
Paulo Cavalcanti píše v St 19. 01. 2011 v 09:22 -0200:
Hi,
I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
Isn't it the same amount of time as Fedora, that is, one
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 11:03 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:20 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
So all the gconf schemas are now in -gconf subpackages which you don't
have to install unless you really, really want to use the gconf
configuration storage system for some
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
configure compiz!' was one of the most popular bug reports (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532229 ). I can't really
think of a really good way to set this up, especially given that the
compiz user base seems split
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 12:03 +, Adam Williamson wrote:
for now I'm going to at least see if I can get a 'pure-gconf' setup to
work with ccsm.
well, I think I have this going now. the question now is whether to
force gconf on all compiz users...I think I'll update the bug report
with the
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
ccsm-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.noarch.rpm
compiz-0.9.2.2-0.8.git619abc05b1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compizconfig-python-0.9.2.1-1.fc15.x86_64.rpm
compiz-plugins-main-0.9.2.1-4.fc15.x86_64.rpm
fusion-icon-0.1.0-0.9.5e2dc9git.fc15.noarch.rpm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 06:22 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
Hi,
I have had a new package in EPEL5 testing for 11 days,
but when I try to push it to stable I get a message
saying that the minimum time on testing has not been reached.
Isn't it the same
I am using the compile directive
-I%{buildroot}%{_includedir}
during the test phase of a projects rpm build. This tests the installed
copy of the include files instead of the copy in the distribution (and
hence is a better test of the install).
The problem is that rpmlint complains with
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
after a good night of sleep, i just noticed that *just* removing the
-fexceptions flag won't change anything.
-fexceptions is for C code linking to C++ code, but it's already default
when compiling C++, then you
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: When installed per
/usr/share/dspam/sql-scripts/mysql/mysql_objects-space.sql dspam is missing
tables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670878
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670878
Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
-felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. I now realize that it's
a bit silly to do that when the plain-C files (of which there are
plenty) are being built with
Dan Horák dan at danny.cz writes:
there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any
detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified.
I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote:
mysql defines min
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com writes:
Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
-felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
-fexceptions / -frtti are essentially harmless, so I am curious why
they were
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 03:52:24PM +, Mark Wielaard wrote:
Dan Horák dan at danny.cz writes:
there is some clash in min/max macros/functions, but I've not done any
detailed investigation yet, Tom has been notified.
I asked Stan Cox, who said he was using the following workaround:
I
Mark Wielaard m...@redhat.com writes:
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 10:48 -0500, Stan Cox wrote:
mysql defines min and max to be macros in my_global.h which conflicts
with the definition of max and min in numeric_limits in limits.
This use of max and min is described in the WG14 c++ standard under
Hello,
We are conducting a Fedora Rawhide Test Day on Network Device Naming on
Thursday, January 27th 2011.
The objective is to test the new naming scheme for onboard and PCI add-in
network interfaces as suggested by 'biosdevname' utility. It would be great if
you could participate and
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 22:30 +0530, narendr...@dell.com wrote:
The objective is to test the new naming scheme for onboard and PCI
add-in network interfaces as suggested by 'biosdevname' utility.
It would be great if you could participate and provide your feedback
which would help us flush
I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
/etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts).
This feature is enabled by default on Fedora (due to
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
/etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:57:09AM -0800, Brad Bell wrote:
Is there another rpm macro I should use to specify the path
%{buildroot}%{_includedir} ?
did you try $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ?
Richard
---
Name and OpenPGP keys available from pgp key servers
--
devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=616850
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474335action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=474335action=edit
Description: Attempting to modify an unknown attribute in the
config entry fails with LDAP_UNWILLING_TO_PERFORM,
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 04:47 -0800, Steven I Usdansky wrote:
Compiz works, but emerald refuses to decorate my windows
emerald-0.8.4-7.fc15.x86_64.rpm
That's the old, un-fixed emerald build - it must not have made it into
the last compose. The fixed build is
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 01:11:08PM -0600, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01 drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
years and it is working just fine).
tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-01-19)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:35:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-01-19/fesco.2011-01-19-17.35.log.html
Meeting summary
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts.
I hope this issue will be fixed before F15 release.
Is the uhelper option in /proc/mounts?
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 18:35 +0100 skrev Karel Zak:
The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
/etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts).
Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
/Alexander
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström:
Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter.
/Alexander
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
cases, because not all necessary mount options are in /proc/mounts.
I hope this issue will be fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/19/2011 03:25 PM, Alexander Boström wrote:
ons 2011-01-19 klockan 21:12 +0100 skrev Alexander Boström:
Wasn't that supposed to be /proc/self/mounts?
Nevermind, /proc/mounts is a symlink so it doesn't matter.
/Alexander
/bin/chown
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 19:43 +0100, Richard wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:57:09AM -0800, Brad Bell wrote:
Is there another rpm macro I should use to specify the path
%{buildroot}%{_includedir} ?
did you try $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ?
that's not the problem. rpmlint just thinks you usually
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount will not work in some
cases, because not all necessary mount
AW == Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com writes:
AW that's not the problem. rpmlint just thinks you usually shouldn't do
AW anything with the build root in certain sections of spec files and
AW so complains if it sees usage of any buildroot definition
AW ($RPM_BUILD_ROOT or %buildroot) in those
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 10:16:03PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 09:31:27PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 08:29:16PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
Note, it's possible that NFS umount/remount
tgl wrote:
[...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
in mysql. [...]
We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
But the real issue here is that systemtap has got to be more chary of
what they
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 07:02:21PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 06:35:52PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 04:49:04PM -0500, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
tgl wrote:
[...] I think the only near-term fix is to turn off dtrace support
in mysql. [...]
We'll do one better; we'll add a hack to sys/sdt.h to make mysql build
and respin systemtap today or tomorrow.
But the
Just upgraded to the latest and greatest. Most of compiz seems to work
properly. However, ccsm-0.9.2.1-1 now crashes when I try to
set command key bindings. Reverting to ccsm-0.8.4-5 did not solve the
problem.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
* desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
the login manager you can use to get a GNOME 2 + Compiz-style desktop
(with
On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 00:13 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
In gmane.linux.redhat.fedora.devel Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
* desktop-effects is deprecated and broken, do not use it: install
'compiz-gnome' and there'll be a 'Classic GNOME with Compiz' choice at
the login manager
f...@redhat.com (Frank Ch. Eigler) writes:
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com writes:
Hmm ... so what should I do with mysql? Since approximately forever,
upstream has recommended using -fno-exceptions (and also
-felide-constructors -fno-rtti) in CXXFLAGS. [...]
...
Seems like I should either drop
For Mozilla, see
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/C___Portability_Guide#Don%27t_use_exceptions
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=593768
Takanori
Matej Cepl wrote:
Dne 19.1.2011 07:53, Haïkel Guémar napsal(a):
Morale: that's just *PLAIN USELESS* to only remove the -fexceptions
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 18:35 +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
I have pushed new util-linux into rawhide. The project has been
renamed from util-linux-ng back to util-linux.
The util-linux v2.19-rc1 contains support for systems without
/etc/mtab (the file is replaced with symlink to /proc/mounts).
On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
years and it is working just fine).
tmp isn't a persistent storage so it makes a lot of sense, and it is
*not*
Nathanael D. Noblet píše v Čt 20. 01. 2011 v 00:33 -0700:
On 01/19/2011 12:11 PM, Callum Lerwick wrote:
On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 11:26 AM, drago01drag...@gmail.com wrote:
Well /tmp should be mounted tmpfs anyway (I have been doing this for
years and it is working just fine).
tmp isn't a
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183028
Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-NoWarnings-0.083-1.el4' was created pointing to:
e1f4e81... dist-git conversion
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
--- Comment #9 from Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-19
04:40:38 EST ---
Nevermind, I just saw it's in the
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552564
--- Comment #10 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2011-01-19
04:44:43 EST ---
I found perl-IO-stringy in optional
commit e665b6461f1d8e5f43720bfd26887e1fb6412154
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Wed Jan 19 10:04:41 2011 +
Update to 1.38
- New upstream release 1.38:
- fixed wildcards_in_cn setting for http, wrongly set in 1.34 to 1
instead of anywhere (CPAN
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.1()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.i686 requires librpm.so.1
55 matches
Mail list logo
