So I've followed the process at
As per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
With zero response from anyone so far (nothing from the maintainer,
nothing from anyone who might know how to contact the
maintainer/etc.).
So how do I go about this part of the
On Monday, January 24, 2011 02:06:50 am Kevin Kofler wrote:
You can run systemsettings from a terminal or a run command interface.
(I think we should reconsider the decision of having KDE's System Settings
only shown in the menu in KDE/Plasma sessions, I'll bring this up in our
KDE SIG
Hi,
I would like to re-introduce the Power Management (PM) SIG meetings.
The PM SIG (http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=SIGs/PowerManagement)
is a group of Fedora contributors that wants to improve the current state
of power management and savings across the whole Fedora distribution.
Compose started at Mon Jan 24 08:15:20 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
Erik Blankinship wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.com
mailto:athma...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/24/2011 05:36 AM, Erik Blankinship wrote:
Can someone point me at an example of how to package a fedora
python rpm
without the source code
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:23:41 +0100
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
But all that's really required is to get the existing build scripts
to work with the system version of waf.
You are free to volunteer to do that, I am not going to do it for
samba4, I simply do not have the time to
Per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663151
I've not received any response in my attempts to make contact over the past
couple of months, and would ask FESCo to approve my taking ownership.
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 05:13:19PM -0500, Andy Lawrence wrote:
Instead of annoying Kyle and Dave, is bugzilla.kernel.org a better place to
file kernel bugs while in RC? I couldn't find any documentation but perhaps
I'm blind!
For example; the Function keys to adjust the LCD brightness on my
Hi,
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :)
Thanks in advance!
--
--
Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified
--
devel
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 09:17:41PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
febootstrap doesn't like:
febootstrap: error: /etc/mtab is a config file which is listed in two
packages
(setup-2.8.30-1.fc15.noarch.rpm,
util-linux-2.19-0.2.fc15.x86_64.rpm)
Is it OK for a %config file to exist
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 04:03:15PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 09:17:41PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
febootstrap doesn't like:
febootstrap: error: /etc/mtab is a config file which is listed in two
packages
(setup-2.8.30-1.fc15.noarch.rpm,
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:22:44AM -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote:
Instead of annoying Kyle and Dave, is bugzilla.kernel.org a better place to
file kernel bugs while in RC? I couldn't find any documentation but perhaps
I'm blind!
You can file them in whichever you feel like, but I've not
Karel Zak k...@redhat.com writes:
it's not %config, but %ghost
It is both.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
And now for something completely different.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :)
Why not?
It is the only 32bit only CPU still being sold, and it
Simo Sorce wrote:
We can easily test for rpath,
But who does it on all packages regularly? AutoQA is still vaporware.
Then you should love waf, as it ships only source code, no generated
code at all. In this it is much better than autoconf/automake/libtool
I guess this is a point in favor
Simo Sorce wrote:
You are free to volunteer to do that, I am not going to do it for
samba4, I simply do not have the time to waste on such a thing.
(Samba4 people are in strict contact with the waf author and use
regularly the svn version du jour to fix build bugs they found, good
luck trying
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:01 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Should I rebuild my package myself or wait for the GCC mass rebuild?
Please rebuild it yourself.
Ok, will do!
--
Tadej Janež tadej.ja...@tadej.hicsalta.si
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sergio Belkin wrote:
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :)
Because everything that's not an Atom should be using x86_64 these days
(unless it's ancient, in which case you can't be
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Simo Sorce wrote:
We can easily test for rpath,
But who does it on all packages regularly? AutoQA is still vaporware.
Because you haven't taken the time to familiarize yourself with a
project doesn't make it vaporware. AutoQA [1]
2011/1/24 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at:
Simo Sorce wrote:
You are free to volunteer to do that, I am not going to do it for
samba4, I simply do not have the time to waste on such a thing.
(Samba4 people are in strict contact with the waf author and use
regularly the svn version du jour
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 01:34:46 -0700
Kurt Seifried k...@seifried.org wrote:
So I've followed the process at
As per
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
With zero response from anyone so far (nothing from the maintainer,
nothing from anyone who might
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 07:58:43 -0600
Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu wrote:
Per
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663151
I've not received any response in my attempts to make contact over
the past couple of months, and would ask FESCo to approve my taking
ownership.
I'll approve
On 01/24/2011 07:43 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :)
Why not?
It is the only
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 6:25 PM, John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:43 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that
On 01/24/2011 12:25 PM, John Reiser wrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:43 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Sergio Belkinseb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that mtune=atom. Just because I'm
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:25:45AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:43 AM, drago01 wrote:
It is the only 32bit only CPU still being sold,
There are plenty of machines with 32-bit only CPUs (such as early Celeron,
Pentium socket 478, even some Core Duos [Apple Mini]) which run
commit b29a41d482de62eb9085dd358b05f84a92471a71
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 24 19:02:49 2011 +0100
- Add Convert-Color-0.07.diff (Remove comment, confusing rpm's dep
tracking).
Convert-Color-0.07.diff | 13 +
perl-Convert-Color.spec |
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:25:45AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:43 AM, drago01 wrote:
It is the only 32bit only CPU still being sold,
There are plenty of machines with 32-bit only CPUs (such as early
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:55:59PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jakub Jelinek (ja...@redhat.com) said:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:25:45AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
Actually many of them should be using the new x86_32 software
architecture,
which is the 64-bit instruction set (thus
Here's a revised patch that exposes if mozldap or openldap is used by
dirsrv.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=475007action=edit
On 01/21/2011 11:14 AM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252249
commit 20c9ed847bb472fc746071e9e4ebf8976d374d81
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 24 19:22:12 2011 +0100
Import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Server-Starter.spec | 87 ++
sources |1
commit 1ead01fb3776e99ad16671bd451ab59374ab69b8
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 24 19:23:01 2011 +0100
Import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Server-Starter.spec | 87 ++
sources |1
commit d46d63d8a97f2e61a155b964d180ceaa13291a32
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 24 19:23:29 2011 +0100
Import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Server-Starter.spec | 87 ++
sources |1
Adrian Reber (adr...@lisas.de) said:
I was trying to do a scratch build an got following error:
error: line 78: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttrans):
/sbin/service
Is Requires(posttrans) deprecated with the newest RPM or is that a bug?
AFAIK, it never existed. So it's
Rich Megginson (rmegg...@redhat.com) said:
Ok. Do I need any Requires at all for this? Or should I just
remove that line from the spec?
I believe folding any requirements for %posttrans scripts into
'Requires(post)' should be sufficient.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
You can't, it's against packaging guidelines
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Source_files
While I appreciate and would like to respect the guidelines, is it
technically possible to create a python rpm without source? This rpm
would only be distributed
-Original Message-
From: Michael Chan [mailto:mc...@broadcom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 12:04 PM
To: David Woodhouse
Cc: Andy Gospodarek; Development discussions related to Fedora; Iyer,
Shyam; KM, Paniraja; jla...@redhat.com; Rose, Charles
Subject: Re: bnx2 driver fails
Erik Blankinship wrote:
You can't, it's against packaging guidelines
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python#Source_files
While I appreciate and would like to respect the guidelines, is it
technically possible to create a python rpm
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Am I missing something, or would this also be binary-incompatible? If so,
that's very very very much not worth the effort.
- X32 System V Application Binary Interface:
A new 32bit psABI for x86-64 with 32bit pointer size.
https://sites.google.com/site/x32abi/
--
On 01/24/2011 12:02 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Rich Megginson (rmegg...@redhat.com) said:
Ok. Do I need any Requires at all for this? Or should I just
remove that line from the spec?
I believe folding any requirements for %posttrans scripts into
'Requires(post)' should be sufficient.
Ok -
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Variable-Magic:
1e3c169cf8392e5c96e826e44fdeda6d Variable-Magic-0.46.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3783c52a8668a3fc871d8ad19edf9ddeb274b2f8
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Mon Jan 24 21:37:33 2011 +0100
Update to 0.30
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Config-Auto.spec |8 ++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8
On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:19:17 +0100, Adrian wrote:
A build from today only contains the files but not the provides.
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2740176
$ rpm -qlp ~/tmp/bind-libs-lite-9.7.3-0.4.b1.fc15.i686.rpm --provides -R
bind-libbind-devel = 31:9.3.3-4.fc7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=576534
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=475042action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=475042action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:13 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
I already posted all the missing firmware files for the linux-firmware
git tree last week.
Did you repost the patches with appropriate entries in the WHENCE file,
as requested?
--
dwmw2
--
devel mailing list
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 14:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
I believe folding any requirements for %posttrans scripts into
'Requires(post)' should be sufficient.
I don't think so... IIUC, Requires(post) only applies until installation
is complete, but a %posttrans script also runs following
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
Is this a bug in the spec file or in rpm?
$ rpmls -p bind-libs-lite-9.7.3-0.4.b1.fc15.i686.rpm
lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libdns-export.so.69
-rw-r--r-- /usr/lib/libdns-export.so.69.1.0
lrwxrwxrwx /usr/lib/libirs-export.so.60
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 16:57 -0500, Erik Blankinship wrote:
What would be the best practice for python applications targeting f11
gnome on the olpc xo?
I am developing on f13, but my target is f11 (an olpc xo machine)
running python 2.6.
Both f13 and f11 had Python 2.6, though slightly
Kevin Kofler wrote:
Björn Persson wrote:
As an example, Kmail and Kate recently started making noises in certain
situations, when displaying dialog boxes and the like, even though I had
sound effects turned off.
In that case, they were always supposed to make those event sounds, there
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 04:43:47PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
This seems like it might be useful in many virtual machine setups. Can you
quantify measurable?
Measurable means 1% or more. Obviously this depends on the workload.
1% or more _what_? Performance gain?
--
Matthew Miller
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 12:55 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 12:53 -0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 11:13 -0800, Michael Chan wrote:
I already posted all the missing firmware files for the linux-firmware
git tree last week.
Did you repost the
On 01/24/2011 05:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 04:43:47PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
This seems like it might be useful in many virtual machine setups. Can you
quantify measurable?
Measurable means 1% or more. Obviously this depends on the workload.
1% or more
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 05:30:49PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 04:43:47PM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
This seems like it might be useful in many virtual machine setups. Can you
quantify measurable?
Measurable means 1% or more. Obviously this depends on the workload.
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Am I missing something, or would this [*] also be binary-incompatible? If
so, that's very very very much not worth the effort.
+1
I don't think having another Fedora build for x86_64 machines is worth the
effort. (And it definitely doesn't make sense to replace the true
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 09:25 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
On 01/24/2011 07:43 AM, drago01 wrote:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Sergio Belkin seb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've read on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables
that mtune=atom.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671861
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-App-cpanminus:
b77c7a43b01ba1425894e585198e97b2 App-cpanminus-1.1007.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671864
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hi,
I'm interested in having perl-Net-DBus available in EPEL6. Is there any
reason why it's not?
If the only reason is no one did it yet, then I would be willing to
help co-maintain it and make it happen.
Cheers,
--
Mathieu
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ORLite:
801594baee11f55c5608d5434ba2b044 ORLite-1.48.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d4f86943ad1345c3bc719848ddcad6e089902bf2
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 24 11:31:44 2011 +0100
1.48 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ORLite.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671864
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671865
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
- Original Message -
From: Mathieu Bridon boche...@fedoraproject.org
To: perl-net-dbus-ow...@fedoraproject.org
Sent: Monday, January 24, 2011 11:25:21 AM
Subject: perl-Net-DBus in EL6
Hi,
I'm interested in having perl-Net-DBus available in EPEL6. Is there
any
reason why it's
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-SQL-Statement:
615738c7223e61498e4fc74d77d5931a SQL-Statement-1.32.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit be80da97433fd5294da927262088231df8b22d5d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jan 24 13:25:44 2011 +0100
1.32 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-SQL-Statement.spec | 25 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 21
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671865
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-RPM2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpmio.so.1()(64bit)
perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.x86_64 requires librpm.so.1()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-RPM2-0.68-9.fc15.i686 requires librpm.so.1
commit e7e598e8210e81ee81fecf3cbc92bea1671a8bb1
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 24 18:07:47 2011 +0100
- Add Convert-Color-0.07.diff (Remove comment, confusing rpm's dep
tracking).
Convert-Color-0.07.diff | 13 +
perl-Convert-Color.spec |
commit 7cb0ae82b6cf7b98633cc778b442fc2be9976f3c
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Jan 24 18:47:22 2011 +0100
- Add Convert-Color-0.07.diff (Remove comment, confusing rpm's dep
tracking).
Convert-Color-0.07.diff | 13 +
perl-Convert-Color.spec |
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Parallel-ForkManager:
b49dbc6fafb697945d33ffbded0009f7 Parallel-ForkManager-0.7.9.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 954725d75a1d91b86c039ba41d59518e136317ba
Author: Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu
Date: Mon Jan 24 21:53:53 2011 -0600
Update to latest upstream version.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Parallel-ForkManager.spec | 32 ++--
sources
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Eval-Closure:
aba60e35313642cf0b7b40c1d94e47e3 Eval-Closure-0.01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 917c679fc9f3602a0d0916a4d6546abfa81bd730
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Tue Jan 25 05:05:07 2011 -0500
initial import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Eval-Closure.spec | 67
sources|1 +
3
Summary of changes:
917c679... initial import (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Broken NEVR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=672463
Summary: Broken NEVR
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform:
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Athmane Madjoudj athma...@gmail.comwrote:
On 01/24/2011 05:36 AM, Erik Blankinship wrote:
Can someone point me at an example of how to package a fedora python rpm
without the source code (only the .pyc or .pyo files)?
Would I make this change in my spec
I have a lot of media assets to include in my python rpm. I am confused as
to the best way to include these files in my rpm.
Here is my setup:
setup.py
sun.py
gfx/sun_1.png
gfx/sun_2.png
gfx/sun_3.png
gfx/core/core_1.png
gfx/core/core_2.png
...
gfx/core/core_99.png
I list everything I want to
On Mon, 2011-01-24 at 21:02 -0500, Erik Blankinship wrote:
Unfortunately, there does not appear to be a way to include *.png for
all subdirectories in gfx.
You might find os.walk() or glob.glob() useful here.
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com
signature.asc
Description: This is
79 matches
Mail list logo
