On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:59:42PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Orphan TeXmacs
Grabbed.
Jindrich
--
Jindrich Novy jn...@redhat.com http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/
Kdo víno má a nepije, kdo hrozny má a nejí je, kdo ženu má a nelíbá,
kdo zábavě se vyhýbá, na toho vemte bič a hůl, to není
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 06:16:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
The problem is it would require making screen setuid root which I do not
think it is too good idea.
Well, I think the fear of making something SUID root is not reason
enough not to make things technically correct.
How
Hi,
I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in return:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=671883
Bug 671883 - Review Request: v4l-utils - Utilities for video4linux and DVB
devices
Thanks Regards,
Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi Hans.
I'll get this one done for you, can you do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926
Peter
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi,
I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in
return:
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 18:31:21, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Is ldapsearch on your rawhide machine working?
It is. What's not working is logging in as a user other than root. I
can't even su to a user other than root.
I am using Kerberos for user authentication; however, kinit user
On 02/08/2011 02:22 AM, Roberto Spadim wrote:
hi guys, i made some changes to md raid1 software, could fedora test
it? for me it work very nice =)
the raid1 new code is based in kernel 2.6.37
here is the new and old code:
www.spadim.com.br/raid1
just read_balance changed (4 modes:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Something in a recent round of updates seems to have hosed use of
LDAP-based user
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 12:31 PM, Braden McDaniel wrote:
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 14:36 +0100, Jan Vcelak wrote:
On Wednesday 09 February 2011 06:10:25, Braden McDaniel wrote:
Something in a
Hi,
to allow porting applications to GTK+ 3 and testing them with a current GTK+
3 on Fedora 14 (the stock 2.90.5 is quite old, from before the theming
changes, among other things), I have prepared packages of the latest gtk3
(2.99.3) for Fedora 14:
# F15-Alpha Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2011-02-11
# Time: 17:00 UTC (12:00 EDT, 09:00 PDT) [1]
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release of Fedora
15. We'll be discussing all of these to determine if they meet the
Alpha
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el4' was created pointing to:
8827c41... Initial EPEL 4/5 release, based on F-14 version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
The lightweight tag 'perl-Test-CPAN-Meta-0.17-1.el5' was created pointing to:
8827c41... Initial EPEL 4/5 release, based on F-14 version
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Karl Vogel has an interesting discussion relevant to the bugzilla growth
and management issues from the 'abrt' debate. The blog is titled Bug
Growth is Proportional to User Growth, and Bugs are not Technical Debt:
http://www.rants.org/2010/01/10/bugs-users-and-tech-debt/
He makes a point that
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Hi,
to allow porting applications to GTK+ 3 and testing them with a current GTK+
3 on Fedora 14 (the stock 2.90.5 is quite old, from before the theming
changes, among other things), I have prepared packages of the latest gtk3
Hey just pinging you, do I need to do anything to get added to the
packages still?
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Kurt Seifried k...@seifried.org wrote:
I'll approve it as a fesco member. ;) Just ping me in 3 days and we can
add you to the package.
Sorry got caught up with some other stuff,
I will be working on archiving fedora release 12 from
/pub/fedora/linux to /pub/archive/fedora/linux. The data should be
mostly across already, but I want to let people know that the changes
are occuring and that we will be making changes to Mirror manager
point from one to the other.
--
Stephen
The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
failures can be found at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/failed.html and the
list of all things not built yet at http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html
there is ~400 packages that rpm-4.9.0 failed to parse the spec files.
the couple
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 16:28 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
snip
Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0.
We could think about updating the gtk3 package in F14 to 3.0.0 if that
is useful for people. We had essentially abandoned this and a few other
packages in F14
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:34:02 -0700
Kurt Seifried k...@seifried.org wrote:
Hey just pinging you, do I need to do anything to get added to the
packages still?
Hum. You are not currently a packager?
(or if so, I can't find your account in that group).
If you aren't, we will need to get you
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us writes:
We have also mass branched everything.
... so, given that I've used fedpkg co -B to create a working tree
with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/
subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's a better answer than
rm -rf and
... so, given that I've used fedpkg co -B to create a working tree
with a subdirectory per branch, what's the incantation to get an f15/
subdirectory added to that tree? I hope there's a better answer than
rm -rf and re-clone.
This is what I am doing:
for i in *; do
if [ -d $i -a -d
The first pass though the mass rebuild has been completed
Thanks and congrats!
list of all things not built yet at
http://ausil.fedorapeople.org/rebuild.html
there is ~400 packages that rpm-4.9.0 failed to parse the spec files.
Are there any more details about the errors?
Jens
--
devel
Hi,
i took ice since it is business critical, co-maintainers are *very* welcome.
best regards,
H.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit 47db636264024ac42c394bba9f0ac22ec33edda6
Author: Christopher Aillon cail...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Feb 10 07:10:08 2011 -0800
Rebuild against newer libevent
perl-Event-Lib.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Event-Lib.spec
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetPacket:
545776de880ee92586afe8ffe9f67e2a NetPacket-1.1.1.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f4795a84d6e5ab33fb9a40286e0a5d15f6c06691
Author: Jose Pedro Oliveira j...@di.uminho.pt
Date: Thu Feb 10 21:20:47 2011 +
* Update to 1.1.1.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-NetPacket.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3
Summary of changes:
f4795a8... * Update to 1.1.1. (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 74d9ede693cfd714a73ffe69b3446dd829ec03d6
Author: Nicolas Chauvet kwiz...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Feb 10 22:42:25 2011 +0100
- Rewritten to new filtering rules
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering#Perl
perl-AnyEvent.spec | 35
Summary of changes:
74d9ede... - Rewritten to new filtering rules http://fedoraproject.or (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676053
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=478160action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=478160action=edit
Description: Task version of export had a bug in handling the busy
instance error case. When returning due to the
30 matches
Mail list logo
