Dne 27.2.2011 06:51, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> I'm not sure why your mail is so strident, because we don't default to
> that. The default Fedora layout is either /boot , swap , / or /boot ,
> swap , / , and /home . Okay, that last one is four, but only if you
> count swap.
He confuses mountpoin
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:18 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> I suspect you are using SSSD to handle LDAP logins. This was broken in
> rawhide yesterday because I pushed a new version of libldb that
> apparently broke ABI without an SO bump. I have subsequently reverted
> this change. Please downg
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 17:33 -0500, Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote:
> Having more than 3 partitions on ANY system other than production
> servers seems foolish at best.
>
> To have it as default on a modern operating system is nothing short of
> insanity.
I'm not sure why your mail is so strident, b
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>
> Why? So users can scroll back to see this helpful stuff and try to
> decipher what it means?
I guess you have a point --- perhaps F15 and Natty 11.04 Alpha 2 have
it right --- this afternoon, Natty bombed out with a message to the
effect
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 06:47:55PM -0600, Larry Vaden wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:50:37AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680542
> >>
> >> Much of this is not a bug, it is intentional.
Hi, just to let you know that I'm dropping Beagle. Sadly, the
development has officialy stopped[1] for quite some time and the Gnome
Project seems to be foccusing in Tracker.
Regards
[1] -
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/dashboard-hackers/2010-January/msg1.html
--
Henrique "LonelySpooky" Ju
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:50:37AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680542
>>
>> Much of this is not a bug, it is intentional. The F14 way of
>
> That bug is that the kernel doesn't display a simpl
Compose started at Sat Feb 26 13:15:37 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
balsa-2.4.9-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-3.15.so.19()(64bit)
On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 11:17 -0500, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:50:37AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680542
> >
> > Much of this is not a bug, it is intentional. The F14 way of
>
> That bug is that the kernel doesn't display a
On 02/23/2011 04:37 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> And I'd like to counter-counter-propose that we just stop using ANY kind of
> subvolumes or volume management by default and just default to plain old
> partitions. IMHO, LVM causes more problems than it fixes. Sure, you can
> easily add storage from
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 07:50:37AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=680542
>
> Much of this is not a bug, it is intentional. The F14 way of
That bug is that the kernel doesn't display a simple "out of memory"
error message, instead scrolling a huge trace
>>> http://anonbadger.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/need-more-memory/
>>> Why does Anaconda need more memory? Such changes really need to be
>>> coordinated and documented better. We need changes in several
>>> documentation including installation guide and release notes not to
>>> mention changes in
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Please try to look beyond the rim of your KDE teacup for a moment. What
> about the DEs / WMs that do not provide a polkit agent? Shouldn't we
> make things like virt-manager just work in *every* environment?
Well, the DEs which don't provide their own agent should pick
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:42:40PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-02-26 at 10:51 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > http://anonbadger.wordpress.com/2011/02/25/need-more-memory/
> >
> > Why does Anaconda need more memory? Such changes really need to be
> > coordinated and d
On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 10:32:40 +0100,
Tim Niemueller wrote:
>
> What is the policy of accepting F-15 updates? I mean, there is no risk
> in accepting an update if the package was simply broken and unusable
> before anyway. I'd like to get rid of broken deps mails rather sooner
> than later...
Am Samstag, den 26.02.2011, 11:58 +0100 schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> >> Thats between you and the window managers... but
> >> as far as gnome is concerned, we don't want to depend on anything
> >> virtual
Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
>> Thats between you and the window managers... but
>> as far as gnome is concerned, we don't want to depend on anything
>> virtual, but control which agent is running.
>
> I can understand this very well
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/11 17:21, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Dne 25.2.2011 10:39, Mogens Kjaer napsal(a):
>>> create 640 root wheel
>>>
>>> to /etc/logrotate.d/syslog and have added bbuser to the wheel group.
>>>
On 25.02.2011 01:29, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Thu Feb 24 13:15:49 UTC 2011
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.1-1.fc15.x86_64 requires
> libboost_signals-mt.so.1.44.0()(64bit)
> fawkes-p
Hi Matthias,
thanks for your quick response. I was busy, that's why I'm not so quick.
Am Mittwoch, den 23.02.2011, 20:08 -0500 schrieb Matthias Clasen:
> On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 00:14 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote:
>
> > Can you explain what the advantage of your approach is? From a packaging
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
