On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 15:32 -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
I routinely encrypt all important partitions on my laptops /
workstations / servers using LUKS both at home and at work.
However, due to the
Changing gtk_key_theme to 'Emacs' on up-to-date F15 Gnome 2.91 seems
to have no effect. Is this by design or should I file a bug?
Mikko
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690115
Summary: perl-HTTP-Message-6.02 is available
Product: Fedora
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-File-Listing-6.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690114
Summary: perl-File-Listing-6.02 is available
Product: Fedora
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
The ticket is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket
F-15 builds should be done with fedpkg build --target=dist-f15-mysql
As of right now that target seems to
We are behind schedule on Release Notes. Most of the wiki beats have
been updated, at least for key features.
If you have been working on a beat, please review it and set the Wiki
Good indicator to 1 if you think it is OK on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Documentation_beats
If you are
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.81 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690116
Summary: perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.81 is available
Product: Fedora
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
The ticket is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket
F-15 builds should be done with fedpkg build
On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
The ticket is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
You can go ahead and rebuild for rawhide. According to the ticket
F-15 builds
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
The ticket is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
You can go ahead and rebuild for
On 03/23/2011 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
The ticket is here:
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 12:54:54 PM Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com:
On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I wrote:
The ticket is here:
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/4573
You can
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
Once upon a time, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com said:
I see regularly where new(er) users wonder why they see packages
installed with dist tags from previous versions of Fedora.
I understand why this occurs but now
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com writes:
Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
Yeah, I submitted an update request a couple days ago without realizing
that it should not have been filed yet, and
Am 23.03.2011 14:54, schrieb Tom Lane:
Jaroslav Reznik jrez...@redhat.com writes:
Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
Yeah, I submitted an update request a couple days ago without realizing
On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane wrote:
Jaroslav Reznikjrez...@redhat.com writes:
Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
Yeah, I submitted an update request a couple days ago without realizing
that it
To All,
I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
related to an update of libtiff.
Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a security fix
for CVE-2011-0192 that was found to be
On 03/23/2011 09:11 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
To All,
I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
related to an update of libtiff.
Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a
On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane wrote:
Jaroslav Reznikjrez...@redhat.com writes:
Hmm, seems like the problem is - mysql is already in updates-testing [1], I
thought there was one bundled update for all deps planned.
Yeah, I submitted an update
To All,
I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
related to an update of libtiff.
Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a security fix
for CVE-2011-0192 that was found to
- Original Message -
From: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 4:24:36 PM
Subject: Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream
On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 23/03/11 13:54, Tom Lane
Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca writes:
On 03/23/2011 08:03 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
I've built proftpd for the dist-f15-mysql target; I think it would be
best to at least bundle that with other related updates rather than me
and other maintainers creating our own updates.
So I've built
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
one big update, so please don't file your own updates into bodhi.
List of all dependent packages:
repoquery --whatrequires
Le 23/03/2011 17:11, Marcela Maslanova a écrit :
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
mysql-workbench
Please don't build this one which is FTBFS for now (gcc 4.6 issue).
I'm working on it, and should build it ASAP.
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
This would be more appropriate on fedora-devel (any follow-up questions
should go there).
Basically, you rebuild a package when there is a good reason to rebuild
it. You've made
Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com writes:
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
Of course, all these packages need to be rebuilt in rawhide too.
I don't think dhorak is offering to do that, so if you own one of
them, please do launch a
Remi Collet píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 17:20 +0100:
Le 23/03/2011 17:11, Marcela Maslanova a écrit :
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be
created
mysql-workbench
Please don't build this one which is FTBFS for now (gcc 4.6 issue).
I'm working on
Tom Lane píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 12:27 -0400:
Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com writes:
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
Of course, all these packages need to be rebuilt in rawhide too.
I don't think dhorak is offering to do
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:30:10 -0500,
Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
You can make a comment on the bug which will add you to the CC and then
when a build is made it will add a comment to that bug informing you of
a new build to test. Then you can upgrade to the test build and
On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 01:48 +0800, Yin Qiu wrote:
Hi,
I'm Yin from China. As the subject line says, I'd like to apply for
the summer project of adding automatic repo discovery for yum. I've
personally contacted Roland McGrath, who is supposed to be the mentor
for this project, and he told
Bodhi comments were enabled earlier today in AutoQA and as some have
noticed, old updates are being tagged as failed even though they have
already been pushed to stable updates.
We are aware of the issue and are working on it. We will send out
another email once the issue has been resolved.
Tim
commit 3411a46048da96be00bcd30d40c7ddb416202c00
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 18:19:29 2011 +0100
6.02 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Message.spec | 13 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility:
30d38d6106380333d12159604281cd62 Perl-Critic-Compatibility-1.001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit af4d1d63a2e1ff1c41d438c3df8c85732b03b480
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 18:22:20 2011 +0100
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Perl-Critic-Compatibility.spec | 53 +++
sources
ons 2011-03-23 klockan 12:11 -0400 skrev Marcela Maslanova:
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be needed
mass rebuild.
dhorak will build these, which are not rebuild yet. After that will be created
one big update, so please don't file your own updates into
Le 23/03/2011 17:28, Dan Horák a écrit :
thanks for info, mysql-workbench will be skipped
mysql-workbench-5.2.33b-1.fc15 tagged in dist-f15-mysql
(and, of course, rawhide)
Remi.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-03-23)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-03-23/fesco.2011-03-23-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
minimum, ideally also devel and fpl and rbergeron.
FESCo voted today to ship NetworkManager 0.9 with a compatibility
fallback for the 0.8 API so
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 02:16:13 PM Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
minimum, ideally also devel and fpl and rbergeron.
FESCo voted today to ship
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 12:16 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, all. I'd like to propose a special F15 schedule meeting for later
today or tomorrow; we'd need representation from QA and releng at a
minimum, ideally also devel and fpl and rbergeron.
OK, we're doing this meeting in
Dan Horák píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 17:30 +0100:
Tom Lane píše v St 23. 03. 2011 v 12:27 -0400:
Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com writes:
Because many packages in F-15 have broken dependencies there will be
needed mass rebuild.
Of course, all these packages need to be rebuilt
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:30:10 -0500,
Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote:
You can make a comment on the bug which will add you to the CC and then
when a build is made it will add a comment to that bug informing you of
a new build to test. Then you can upgrade to the test build and
Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net writes:
To All,
I recently had a problem with my tiff reader and found the problem was
related to an update of libtiff.
Even Rouault on tifflib list was kind enough to provide the answer :
Hum, I see this is a CCITTFAX4 image. You got caught by a security
On 03/23/2011 11:19 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
Bodhi comments were enabled earlier today in AutoQA and as some have
noticed, old updates are being tagged as failed even though they have
already been pushed to stable updates.
We are aware of the issue and are working on it. We will send out
commit 0c72a3a733b1879f50596620a36c38e2dcf6a119
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:03:30 2011 -0400
1.223
perl-Glib.spec | 19 +++
sources|2 +-
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Glib.spec
commit d9c406b67ffb4f7542e8e87d2537f701c20f19db
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:10:21 2011 -0400
initial package
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Pango.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
3 files
commit 3bf43091d4b9fb9caa9f5ed080b93e5023f9dc10
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:17:26 2011 -0400
initial package
perl-Pango.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0
commit 9403b105734b28995c3e7a4ba888c31b57b69fb7
Author: Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:18:00 2011 -0400
initial package
perl-Pango.spec | 60 +++
sources |1 +
2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 0
Dan =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Hor=E1k?= d...@danny.cz writes:
The F-15 and rawhide rebuilds are finished now with some failures
Thanks for that!
collectd
gmyth
grass (f15 only)
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
mapserver (f15 only)
pure-ftpd
ser
snort
zoneminder (Jason knows about it)
I looked through
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
Recompilation of the packages from f15 is not such a good option.
--jason
--
devel mailing list
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
Recompilation of the packages from f15 is not such a good
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.03.2011 22:35, schrieb Joshua C.:
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
At first, you mean 'Fedora was know
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest firefox 4.0?
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 04:31:44 PM Tom Lane wrote:
pure-ftpd's problem is
libpureftpd.a(libpureftpd_a-log_mysql.o): In function `pw_mysql_check':
/builddir/build/BUILD/pure-ftpd-1.0.29/src/log_mysql.c:454: undefined
reference to `make_scrambled_password'
which I'm not sure about ---
2011/3/23 Nathaniel McCallum nathan...@natemccallum.com:
On Wed, 2011-03-23 at 16:41 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 10:35:55PM +0100, Joshua C. wrote:
Hi,
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if
2011/3/23 Jochen Schmitt joc...@herr-schmitt.de:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 23.03.2011 22:35, schrieb Joshua C.:
fedora is known for offering the latest and greates software and
being on the edge etc. So I was just wondering if the latest f14
will ever get the latest
On Wednesday 23 March 2011 21:46:07 Jochen Schmitt wrote:
For KDE-4.6 we have the same situation. In this case you can
get it from the http://apt.kde-redhat.com which is maintained
by Rex Dieter.
It is .org not .com
The url is
http://apt.kde-redhat.org
--
José Abílio
--
devel
Am Mittwoch, den 23.03.2011, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Jochen Schmitt:
Perhaps, we have luck and get a so-called 'Feature Repository'.
I'm working on that...
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository on
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Tom Lane wrote:
ser's problem is
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lfl
which looks to me to be a flex incompatibility unrelated to mysql.
Probably needs BR flex-static.
Yup, you're right. It's been FTBFS for awhile:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository on
Or you can simply download it direct from mozilla.org and install it
in /usr/local/
--
devel mailing list
On 03/23/2011 08:36 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository on
Or you can simply download it direct from mozilla.org and install it
Compose started at Wed Mar 23 13:15:51 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
Io-language-extras-20080330-4.fc15.x86_64 requires
libevent-1.4.so.2()(64bit)
byzanz-0.2.2-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit)
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:36:33 -0400
Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
On 03/23/2011 07:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
If you want to get firefox4 on Fedora 14 now, the only way is to use
the private firefox4 repository on
Or you can simply download it direct
So, I just ran into an interesting issue talking over Fedora patches
with the upstream glew maintainer. glew installs its shared libraries
'manually', not using autotools / libtools; upstream installs them with
permissions of 0644, and we patch this to 0755. After talking to
upstream, they say
2011/3/24 Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com:
So, I just ran into an interesting issue talking over Fedora patches
with the upstream glew maintainer. glew installs its shared libraries
'manually', not using autotools / libtools; upstream installs them with
permissions of 0644, and we patch
they say on Debian and Ubuntu,
all shared libs have 0644 permissions.
What they say is incorrect.
I have Ubuntu 10.10 i686:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1421892 2011-01-21 15:08 /lib/libc-2.12.1.so
I have Ubuntu 10.4 x86_64:
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1405508 2011-01-21 14:25 /lib32/libc-2.11.1.so
The following packages in the repository suffer from broken dependencies:
==
The results in this summary consider Test Updates!
==
package:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690116
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689709
--- Comment #10 from Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de 2011-03-23 08:43:07
EDT ---
(In reply to comment #7)
Imho if this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689709
--- Comment #11 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2011-03-23 08:52:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
I am insisting on
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Text-CSV_XS:
1819e3d443f1611c8d0a0fb0ab4a17c7 Text-CSV_XS-0.81.tgz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit bec6b27308918019456fb031e6313a3051e318e2
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 14:00:08 2011 +0100
0.81 bump
Buildroot cleanup, ChangeLog conversion to utf8, example scripts
interpreters corrected
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec | 19
Summary of changes:
bec6b27... 0.81 bump Buildroot cleanup, ChangeLog conversion to utf8, (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 9cd247aad9aa162848ecfea0c0916201e168cde8
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 14:20:23 2011 +0100
Revert example scripts interpreter changes
perl-Text-CSV_XS.spec | 11 +--
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Summary of changes:
9cd247a... Revert example scripts interpreter changes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690116
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-03-23
09:28:46 EDT ---
perl-Text-CSV_XS-0.81-2.fc15 has
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-NonMoose:
906fa1025bc57b7928ecdcc61ded683d MooseX-NonMoose-0.20.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit a3cc83fa902161e53482b63d645f8e5811e62fa0
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 17:37:46 2011 +0100
update to 0.20
.gitignore|1 +
perl-MooseX-NonMoose.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=689709
--- Comment #12 from Zenon Panoussis redhatb...@provocation.se 2011-03-23
12:42:32 EDT ---
(In reply to comment #10)
our
Summary of changes:
8891b99... update to 0.18 (*)
67bcd57... update to 0.19 (*)
a3cc83f... update to 0.20 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-File-Listing:
57349906cdb1d2be954bc9ec44c961bf File-Listing-6.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit d487e7782c04ba77d00955b2a966720d610e0f0c
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 18:00:44 2011 +0100
6.02 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-File-Listing.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Message:
a6b28e44f7b5e5573362f042d522a456 HTTP-Message-6.02.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=690114
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-WWW-Mechanize:
ea7a5c9934447466b6bf6fbdd00c2f12 WWW-Mechanize-1.49_01.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 03cba8cb1e2b98dc06ef5283812d96d30bd6f5e1
Author: Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com
Date: Wed Mar 23 15:47:28 2011 -0600
import version 1.49 for EL5 (BZ #165650)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-WWW-Mechanize.spec | 179 ++
sources
86 matches
Mail list logo
