On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 05:20:03AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/31/2011 07:28 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>
> > domainname is only used for NIS,
> Hmm, this doesn't match with my understanding. Doma
On 04/01/2011 03:17 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a find on my Fedora 15 system for .la files, results in the
> following. Do we run any routine tests for things like this? is AutoQA
> meant to improve packaging?
I sense a misunderstanding. Though it's right, in general *.la's should
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:22:14PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 31.03.11 13:13, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
>
> > >>
> > >> Applications must never create or require special files or
> > >> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
> > >> hiera
On 03/31/2011 01:22 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 31.03.11 13:13, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
>
Applications must never create or require special files or
subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
hierarchy provide more than enou
On 03/31/2011 07:28 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 17:57 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> On 03/27/2011 05:27 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:48:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote
>
On 03/31/2011 02:31 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>
> I'll whip up a Feature page (probably we'll announce it for F-16) if
> there's an interest.
Sure. That would be awesome.
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi
Just a find on my Fedora 15 system for .la files, results in the
following. Do we run any routine tests for things like this? is AutoQA
meant to improve packaging?
---
/usr/lib64/gnome-bluetooth/libgnome-bluetooth-applet.la
/usr/lib64/gnome-shell/libgnome-shell.la
/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-
On 03/31/2011 01:17 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> This doesn't seem right. Can't compare across releases?
At the moment, this is expected behavior. Rpmguard only compares builds
within a release or, more specifically, within a koji tag (dist-f16 in
this particular case).
If you would like to see
First of all, I do not want to take any credit for this idea, it belongs
to John Rose, and has been bouncing around, trying to come to life,
since July 2010. I am just happy to help it finally hatch!
John, Jared, Paul, Max, and I all want to thank Fedora users and
contributors for everything that
This doesn't seem right. Can't compare across releases?
Original Message
Subject: rpmguard: PASSED; 0 warnings for netcdf-4.1.2-1.fc16
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:14:27 + (UTC)
From: aut...@fedoraproject.org
To: autoqa-resu...@lists.fedorahosted.org, netcdf-ow...@fedoraproject
Ankur Sinha wrote:
> Could you please glance through this? I intend to commit it tomorrow.
I'd suggest listing digikam at least as optional.
If you do, you'll probably also want a:
kipi-plugins
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject
Hi folks,
Could you please glance through this? I intend to commit it tomorrow.
> http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/comps-diff-design-suite.patch
Thanks,
Ankur
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 17:57 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/27/2011 05:27 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 03:58:06PM +0200, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> >> Hi.
> >>
> >> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 15:48:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote
> >>> NM supports static IPs these days. So I think
On 03/31/2011 02:56 AM, Chris Jones wrote:
>
> -Original Message-
> From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Orion Poplawski
> Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 7:06 AM
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: f
On 03/31/2011 12:06 PM, Martin Gieseking wrote:
> Am 31.03.2011 00:38, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>> I can do a review in exchange for hotot
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692281
> Hi Rahul,
>
> I've taken the review request. It would be nice if you could review
> liblouisutdml for me
On Thu, 31.03.11 13:13, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
> >>
> >> Applications must never create or require special files or
> >> subdirectories in the root directory. Other locations in the FHS
> >> hierarchy provide more than enough flexibility for any package.
> >>
> >
> > Well, w
On 03/30/2011 04:12 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 30, 2011 04:05:27 PM Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30.03.11 15:08, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 30.03
On 03/30/2011 03:21 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 30.03.11 15:08, Ralf Corsepius (rc040...@freenet.de) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03/30/2011 02:30 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30.03.11 18:04, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>>
>>
>>> Also, can somebody point me to the plac
Am 31.03.2011 01:38, schrieb Chris Adams:
> Once upon a time, Lennart Poettering said:
>> /etc is static configuration data.
>
> There are a number of things under /etc that are not static
> configuration data.
>
>> /etc is read-only during boot.
>>
>> /run is writable all the way.
>
> /etc/run
Fedora QA holds Test Day regarding ABRT 2 and Retrace Server
on March 31:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-03-31_ABRT_Retrace_Server
This test day will focus on Retrace Server feature [1] in
Fedora 15 as well as ABRT 2.0. Refreshed and bright new
test cases are prepared for your cons
On 03/30/2011 11:48 AM, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> Hi fellow Fedorans.
>
> I'd like to push a minor update of Lua, which incorporates a small
> bugfix patch, and some cosmetic fixes to the builds script. First
> testing by a proven tester has been done successfully, but I need more
> testing to be ab
-Original Message-
From: devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[mailto:devel-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Orion Poplawski
Sent: Thursday, March 31, 2011 7:06 AM
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
Subject: firefox/xulrunner-bin confusion
Fired up top on my F-15
22 matches
Mail list logo