Tomasz Torcz wrote, at 04/09/2011 07:57 PM +9:00:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Will Woods wrote:
>>> In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
>>> with them. They might not know how to test libtiff, or what needs
>>> testing, so ot
On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 13:31 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >> Will Woods wrote:
> >> > In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
> >> > with them. They mi
Compose started at Sat Apr 9 13:15:35 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
On 04/09/2011 02:35 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 13:19:55 -0700,
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>
>> Would it make more sense to refer to these as "Alpha Candidate", "Beta
>> Candidate" and "Release Candidate" ? ac{1,2,3}, bc{1,2}, rc1 ?
>>
>> It does mean the name will chang
On 11/15/2010 08:57 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 05:16:43 -0500 (EST)
> Jaroslav Skarvada wrote:
>
>> Please could any FESCo member approve the takeover of rrdtool
>> (according to nonresponsive package maintainers policy)? Or should I
>> open ticket for this?
>
> I'll approve it a
Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 08.04.2011 12:38, schrieb Jim Meyering:
>> So maybe there *is* a bug to report after all:
>>
>> With TMPDIR pointing to a directory with context not like /tmp,
>> the kernel's initramfs-building code fails and gives a diagnostic
>> (calling it Non-fatal), but le
On Sat, 09 Apr 2011 12:25:37 +0200, Andreas wrote:
> > Is there a releng ticket for the koji buildroot override?
> > If so, I couldn't find it.
> >
> > Currently, there are two competing test updates in bodhi:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchamplain-0.9.1-1.fc15
> > https://admin
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Will Woods wrote:
>> > In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
>> > with them. They might not know how to test libtiff, or what needs
>> > testing
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Related to this, fesco wanted to look at some changes for security
> updates for stable releases:
>
> https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/581
>
> Hopefully something like this would help the above case.
While I welcome those changes, I don't understand why we need to make
On Sat, Apr 09, 2011 at 05:32:04AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Will Woods wrote:
> > In fact, there's plenty of approvers available, but you're not engaging
> > with them. They might not know how to test libtiff, or what needs
> > testing, so other stuff gets tested first.
>
> The fact is, this i
On Fri, 2011-04-08 at 17:53 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> Is there a releng ticket for the koji buildroot override?
> If so, I couldn't find it.
>
> Currently, there are two competing test updates in bodhi:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libchamplain-0.9.1-1.fc15
> https://admin.f
Dennis Gilmore a écrit:
> Chris its the teminology we have always used.
> each phase has a series of release candidates.
>
> for alpha we do a series of RC composes until we get one that meets the
> release criteria, it then becomes the alpha release.
>
> for beta we do a series of RC composes
Caution, everyone!
It seems that bodhi no longer obsoletes update tickets when submitting
newer ones. Currently, there are several competing test-updates, where
a ticket exists for an old and a new release. But only the older release
is found in the repo actually due to a bug in bodhi (either regr
13 matches
Mail list logo
