On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 13:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
yes. I mailed the two update submitters directly and asked them to
coordinate.
I then also unpushed the 0.10.x one that was going to go to stable
without anyone having tested it or rebuilt any dependent aps. :)
There's a request to
Hi,
I made some noises on IRC about people upgrading to F15 (like myself)
who would all come across the same surprises and would have to find a
way to work around them. I suggested it might help to publish
something like release notes but more user oriented, to help to ease
the pain (and to
The driver is in staging rather than the main kernel, and we typically
only enable drivers in staging if there's someone who's willing and able
to handle the maintenance of the driver. So it's expected to fail to
work, I'm afraid.
--
Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org
I see. So what
Hi,
I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa rejected
the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the packages
to be properly pushed to fN+1 stable before green-lighting the
matching package for fN. Do I have to wait until the packages for f15
are pushed to
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:52:32 +0300, AT wrote:
Hi,
I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa rejected
the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the packages
to be properly pushed to fN+1 stable before green-lighting the
matching package for fN. Do I
W dniu 14.04.2011 00:38, Julian Sikorski pisze:
Dear List,
I was just trying to update gnome-mplayer (not in fedora, but that is
irrelevant) which migrated from gconf to gsettings. The problem is, that
the standard scriptlets [1] do not run on upgrades, leaving the package
in a not working
On Sat, 2011-04-16 at 23:03 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Sat, 16 Apr 2011 22:52:32 +0300, AT wrote:
Hi,
I built two sets of security updates for f13/f14/f15 and autoqa rejected
the f13/f14 packages. It looks like autoqa is waiting for the packages
to be properly pushed to fN+1
rt3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
rt3-3.8.10-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::)
On i386:
rt3-3.8.10-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697165
Summary: perl-Date-Manip-6.23 is available
Product: Fedora
commit dc3d184b0b0836be0d052ced1d2f4e5e6bd71d9c
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Sat Apr 16 18:14:36 2011 +0200
Work-around rpm's depgenerator defect:
Filter Requires: perl(DBIx::SearchBuilder::Handle::).
rt3.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673965
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary of changes:
dc3d184... Work-around rpm's depgenerator defect: Filter Requires: per (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696725
--- Comment #1 from Trever Adams night...@hotmail.com 2011-04-16 14:04:43 EDT
---
It appears that every time amavis shuts down,
perl-Math-Random-MT-Auto has broken dependencies in the F-15 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Math-Random-MT-Auto-6.16-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
perl(Object::InsideOut) = 0:2.06
On i386:
perl-Math-Random-MT-Auto-6.16-2.fc15.i686 requires
perl(Object::InsideOut) = 0:2.06
Please resolve this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697229
Vincent Danen vda...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Mojolicious: directory traversal flaw [fedora-all]
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697230
Summary: perl-Mojolicious: directory traversal flaw
Summary of changes:
3efa2cd... Add optional testsuite requirement perl(CHI). (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
17 matches
Mail list logo