> Coders have lots of new development tools to try out, including:
> * Updates to popular languages. Python 3.2, Rails 3.0.3, and
> OCaml 3.12 are all included in Fedora 15.
If we are going to mention OCaml then to be fair
can we please also mention GHC 7.0.2,
which is major new version upgrade si
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Jussi Lehtola
wrote:
> What package are we talking about?
>
> There is already at least one package in Fedora which does a similar
> thing: ATLAS. It normally automatically tunes itself for the optimal
> build flags, so some special tricks have to be done for packa
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:59:18 -0600
Jerry James wrote:
> I'm packaging a library that does some heavy mathematical
> computations. The build system tries to cleverly determine whether an
> Intel CPU with vector instructions is being used.
What package are we talking about?
There is already at le
Compose started at Wed Apr 20 13:15:55 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16()(64bit)
collectd-mysql-4.10.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
libmysqlclient.so.16(libmysqlc
On 4/20/11 5:57 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> The least capable processor we've gone out of our way to fix things for is
>> the AMD Geode GX, which has MMX and 3DNow, but is also slightly less than a
>> proper Pentium Pro in that it doesn't have n
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> The least capable processor we've gone out of our way to fix things for is
> the AMD Geode GX, which has MMX and 3DNow, but is also slightly less than a
> proper Pentium Pro in that it doesn't have nopl or cmov.
>
> However, rpm sets --march=i
Adam Williamson wrote:
> 2 karma points *including* a proventester. That is:
>
> 1 proventester + 1 non-pt
>
> OR
>
> 2 proventester
>
> are sufficient. And yes, that is the current policy.
Uh, that's the current policy for critical path packages, not for non-
critical packages which require o
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:02:12 +0300
> Axel Thimm wrote:
>
>> E.g. the packages are marked as security updates and whatever the
>> cause, autoqa, missing karma, missing time, for some reason (partly
>> undisclosed as mentioned in my post yesterday) bodhi rejects them.
>> IMO i
On 4/20/11 1:59 PM, Jerry James wrote:
> I'm packaging a library that does some heavy mathematical
> computations. The build system tries to cleverly determine whether an
> Intel CPU with vector instructions is being used. Until I can
> convince upstream to do this at runtime, I'll need to build
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=698428
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=493636&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 11:33 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 4/19/11 2:39 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > Could you please let us know once the new branch naming scheme is
> > available on the staging server?
>
> stg has the new branch names for now. The repo content is a bit stale
> though.
Tha
On 04/20/2011 02:54 PM, Andre Robatino wrote:
> (Sorry for the excessive pruning, have to make gmane happy.)
Pardon me for pontificating, but your pruning was perfect.
Too many posts technically use interleaved quoting, but render it
useless by failing to trim the quoted material. The purpose o
# F15 Blocker Review meeting #2
# Date: 2011-04-21
# Time: 17:00 UTC [1] (13:00 EDT, 10:00 PDT, 10:00 MST)
# Location: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
Due to upcoming holidays, the second F15 Final blocker review meeting
will be this Thursday at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-bugzappers. We'll revie
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/04/11 20:18, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:54:49 +0200
> Matthias Runge wrote:
>
Thank you for your offer.
Doug answered my mail and approved me. Recently I built latest versions
of eventlog and syslog-ng for rawhide. I think,
Michael Schwendt gmail.com> writes:
> Anonymous users' votes don't add to the karma level.
> Their votes are just informative.
Not being in a non-CLA group != anonymous. Anyone can create a bodhi account and
log in, but unless they're in a non-CLA group, their fp.o email doesn't work and
they ge
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 06:15:43 + (UTC), AR wrote:
> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes:
>
>
> > But if the user just wants to revoke their karma by changing their +/-1 to
> > a 0
> > (say they realize they're not able to test properly, which happened to me),
> > that's still not possib
On 4/19/11 2:39 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> Could you please let us know once the new branch naming scheme is
> available on the staging server?
stg has the new branch names for now. The repo content is a bit stale
though.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://id
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 11:02:12 +0300
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > You've tried to select "stable" as the target already when
> > submitting the updates, and bodhi rejected that. With the CVEs
> > mentioned for Mediawiki, why didn't you choose "s
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:54:49 +0200
Matthias Runge wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> the subject says it: Is someone able to reach Douglas Warner?
> I hope, he's ok, but it looks like, he's very busy.
Yeah, I hope he's ok too.
> He sought help for maintenanc
I've got a question whose answer I expected to find on one of these
pages, but no joy:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/x86
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/x86-64
I'm packaging a library that does some heavy mathematical
comput
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-04-20)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 17:30:41 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-04-20/fesco.2011-04-20-17.30.log.html
Meeting summary
-
On Wed, 2011-04-20 at 11:30 +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
> This mentions that critical packages and security updates need at least
> 2 karma points and a proventester, that's even more than setting karma
> on threshold 1 (???). Is that really the current policy for _security
> updates_?
2 karma point
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:54 +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 11:44:03AM +0300, Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> > This is probably part of the problem, I have been trying to push all 5
> > packages that are now in testing with bodhi rejecting due to autoqa.
> > Even packages that do have a
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 11:05 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> You've tried to select "stable" as the target already when submitting
> the updates, and bodhi rejected that. With the CVEs mentioned for Mediawiki,
> why didn't you choose "security" instead of "stable"?
But I did. All packages are mark
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 10:50 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > Maybe the bodhi messages confused me. When I logon to a.f.o/updates it
> > prominently displays:
> >
> > Bodhi is now enforcing the Package Update Acceptance
> > Criteria across all Fedor
25 matches
Mail list logo
