Please take a moment and read this brief email, as it is important.
Fedora is in the process of retiring our old "Individual Contributor
License Agreement" (also known as the ICLA or CLA) and replacing it with
the new Fedora Project Contributor Agreement (FPCA).
All Fedora contributors with accou
Branched Report wrote:
> Broken deps for x86_64
Are we going to get these uninstallable packages cleared up from the
Everything tree before sending the release to the mirrors? Otherwise,
they're going to come haunt us at each and every depcheck for F15+updates.
(AFAIK, at least repoclosure stil
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #515 Investigate a "features" repo for s
Compose started at Tue May 17 13:15:46 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
db4o-7.4-2.fc13.x86_64 requires mono(Mono.GetOptions) = 0:2.0.0.0
dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper
file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15
At the Fedora 15 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 15 Final
Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on May 24, 2011.
Please note that the Fedora 15 Release Wide Readiness Meeting will take
place on Thursday at 19:00 UTC (3 PM Eastern/ 12 PM Pacific) on
irc.freenode.net in #fedora-m
At the Fedora 15 Final Go/No-Go meeting today, the Fedora 15 Final
Release was declared GOLD and ready for release on May 24, 2011.
Please note that the Fedora 15 Release Wide Readiness Meeting will take
place on Thursday at 19:00 UTC (3 PM Eastern/ 12 PM Pacific) on
irc.freenode.net in #fedora-m
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 07:02:04PM +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 06:10 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
>
> > It used to be a module, but was converted to built-in as we were always
> > loading it in the network scripts. A lot of the decisions made in
> > those '5 second boot' days s
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Jerry James wrote:
> I've taken ownership of this package and will see what I can do to get
> it building again.
Here's the review request for the new dependency:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705585
Let me know if I can review something in return.
Tom Callaway (tcall...@redhat.com) said:
> Lately, I've been trying to resolve as many of these as reasonably
> possible. Here's what I know:
Note that the applet issues should be obsoleted by the gnome-panel
in updates-testing, slated for 0-day. I have not blocked the packages,
because most of t
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 20/2011
Time: 2011-05-17 15:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.o
look
http://bellard.org/jslinux/
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
msn, google talk: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br
+55 11 4063 5033 (FIXO SP)
+55 34 9158 9329 (TIM)
+55 34 8806 3989 (OI)
+55 34 3221 8599 (FIXO MG)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 09:33:51AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >> Is there some other way to add a noarch package that doesn't build on
> >> some architectures?
> >
> > Sadly this is a nasty situation. (I'm in the same boat with munin).
> >
> >
Lately, I've been trying to resolve as many of these as reasonably
possible. Here's what I know:
On 05/15/2011 07:03 PM, Branched Report wrote:
> Compose started at Sun May 15 13:15:23 UTC 2011
>
> Broken deps for x86_64
> --
> db4o-7.
Prabin Kumar Datta wrote:
> Hi!
> Currently, more then 3 of my packages are under review request.
> And 4+ packages are already packaged but not submitted for review
> since the dependency packages are not reviewed till now (or some other
> issues).
>
> My packages under review:
> 1. python-timelib
On Tue, 17.05.11 15:42, Michal Hlavinka (mhlav...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > > 5) in old initscripts, there was /etc/init.d/halt with section for ups
> > > shutdown. With that script gone, was that functionality ported to
> > > systemd
> > > somehow?
> >
> > Well, any such code is just inherently
> > 5) in old initscripts, there was /etc/init.d/halt with section for ups
> > shutdown. With that script gone, was that functionality ported to
> > systemd
> > somehow?
>
> Well, any such code is just inherently broken. It *cannot* work. A
> number of kernel subsystems hook into the shutdown code
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Is there some other way to add a noarch package that doesn't build on
>> some architectures?
>
> Sadly this is a nasty situation. (I'm in the same boat with munin).
>
> There are 2 answers, neither ideal (I'd love to hear better):
>
> 1. Make
On Sun, 15 May 2011 16:40:50 -0700
Eric Smith wrote:
> I'm trying to build Clapham for EPEL6. Clapham is a noarch package,
> but it depends on Batik, which is ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64. When I
> submitted a build with koji, it failed to build for ppc and ppc64 due
> to the missing dependency.
Sergio Belkin wrote:
> Hi,
> I made a build with a wrong spec file (shame on me) and I've untagged
> the builds but when I wan to run fedpkg build, it outputs:
>
> "Could not initiate build: UpTools-8.5.5-1.fc16 has already been built"
>
> Is there a way to "undo" or "drop" the build and do it agai
Hi,
I made a build with a wrong spec file (shame on me) and I've untagged
the builds but when I wan to run fedpkg build, it outputs:
"Could not initiate build: UpTools-8.5.5-1.fc16 has already been built"
Is there a way to "undo" or "drop" the build and do it again?
Thanks in advance
--
--
Ser
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > I noticed that gnome-applets is obsoleted by gnome-panel, but is still in
>> > the F15 repo. It probably shouldn't be. There are at
Compose started at Tue May 17 08:15:02 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
almanah-0.7.3-10.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit)
1:anerley-0.2.14-5.fc15
Greetings testers,
Three Final Release candidates were posted recently, and validation
tests were heavily executed from RC1 to RC3 to verify that they meet the
final release criteria[1]. The FINAL Go/No-Go Meeting will be held later
today based on the status of RC3, whose validation test results
23 matches
Mail list logo
