Hi Matt,
I just want to note that your script is not listing the package owners
correctly. There should be listed only people who have commit access,
but there are listed also people who just watch bugzilla and commits,
[1] for example. Unfortunately nobody of listed owners:
Dne 17.6.2011 14:01, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
Hi,
I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
conversion?
?php
$now = date('Y-m-d H:i:s', time());
$future = 2100-01-01 01:01:01;
$now_stt = strtotime($now);
$future_stt =
2011/6/27 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
conversion?
Where is the difference ... overflowing the 32bit integer due to the
current date being
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716174
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
2011/6/27 drago01 drag...@gmail.com:
2011/6/27 Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
conversion?
Where is the difference ... overflowing the 32bit
Am Freitag, den 17.06.2011, 14:37 +0200 schrieb Farkas Levente:
On 06/17/2011 02:01 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701000
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I'll ping Jeroen in the meantime, but we are both very busy with out
dayjob.
In that case approving one or all of the three people who have requested
commit access seems sensible.
--
sven === jabber/xmpp: s...@lankes.net
--
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-Tiny:
333727bed82ee70459bdc007a9a4fc2c YAML-Tiny-1.50.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4fdff80790478ec314a7c8044d1b564df6f0373f
Author: Petr Sabata con...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 27 10:49:13 2011 +0200
1.50 bump, cleanup, (build-time) dependencies corrected
.gitignore |1 +
perl-YAML-Tiny.spec | 31 ---
sources
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:15:52PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
I did a find_bind_mount() function as part of:
http://git.sv.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=coreutils.git;a=commitdiff;h=ddf6fb86
Note, be careful with st_dev, because:
* after
mount --bind /mnt/A /mnt/A
/mnt/A has
On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
Surely whatever northbridge code is required can be free software,
Is this just security through obscurity?
The
I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
conversion?
Yes, if simple date conversion uses a 32-bit time_t and does not
check-and-correct for 32-bit wrap-around.
On a system which uses a 32-bit
Compose started at Mon Jun 27 08:15:38 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadmsslutil.so.1()(64bit)
389-dsgw-1.1.6-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libadminutil.so.1()(64bit)
Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports:
Toshio, I wan to take fcitx.
Fedora Debian User, former Ubuntu User
My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info
Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager Ambassador
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Liangsuilong
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 3:10 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun
Hi,
Good to have you back!
On 06/27/2011 01:53 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen van Meeuwen? He is not answering
e-mails at his
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
What I don't understand is why this feature requires a binary blob.
Surely whatever northbridge code is required
Those packages are already orphaned.
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Liang Suilong liangsuil...@gmail.com wrote:
Toshio, I wan to take fcitx.
Fedora Debian User, former Ubuntu User
My Page: http://www.liangsuilong.info
Fedora Project Contributor -- Packager Ambassador
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 8:06 PM, Elder Marco elderma...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I created a new review request ( yad program -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683150)
This is my first package. So, if possible, could someone sponsor me?
Best Regards,
--
Elder Marco
parece
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
What I don't understand is why this feature requires
commit 3394a05a2aefe28fec9b1e2b847296375c4e7e22
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 27 16:11:50 2011 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-PerlIO-locale.spec | 58 +++
sources |1 +
3 files
For me the most important benefit is OS independent software, especially
web browser.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Debates like this expose a weakness in packaging philosophy. The
current philosophy seems to be
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:08:44 -0400
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Andrew Haley
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:12 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 12:11 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 24/06/11 20:49, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
The purpose of the blob is to measure the system state;
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564798
Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 16:53 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
The hardware manufacturer _only_ signs the sinit blob. Any kernel/OS
you use can be measured/protected
2011/6/27 Miloslav Trmač m...@volny.cz:
The hardware owner configures the TPM so that submitting specific
measurements is required to use keys stored in the TPM.
To avoid a misunderstanding, hardware owner is the customer, not
hardware manufacturer.
Mirek
--
devel mailing list
Once upon a time, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com said:
I would like to note that I am aware of that 32 bit systems will not
work after 2038. But does that mean that they can not do simple date
conversion?
Not if that simple date conversion uses the system time_t functions
(which most of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697694
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=506109action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=506109action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 08:03:17AM +0200, V?t Ondruch wrote:
Hi Matt,
I just want to note that your script is not listing the package owners
correctly. There should be listed only people who have commit access,
but there are listed also people who just watch bugzilla and commits,
[1] for
On Mon, 27.06.11 09:25, Jitesh Shah (jitesh.1...@gmail.com) wrote:
List,
This bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582798 has been
around since F12. It was a minor annoyance than which has now turned
into irritation. The fact that the sound menu is hidden deep inside in
F15
..snip..
Jack sensing is not really ready in the drivers yet. While many HDA
drivers now support a jack sensing API via the Linux input subsystem PA
does not make use of this and is unliekyl to anytime soon as most folks
agree that misusing the input subsystem for jack sensing is a bad idea
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 12:24 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) said:
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting tomorrow at 17:30UTC (1:30pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
I thought the decision at
- Original Message -
From: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
To: Fedora perl development team perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, June 24, 2011 4:41:37 PM
Subject: Re: News from rebuild
On 06/24/2011 02:41 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
2011/6/24 Marcela
On Mon, 27.06.11 09:41, Jitesh Shah (jitesh.1...@gmail.com) wrote:
..snip..
Jack sensing is not really ready in the drivers yet. While many HDA
drivers now support a jack sensing API via the Linux input subsystem PA
does not make use of this and is unliekyl to anytime soon as most
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:54 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
ack
On 06/27/2011 09:55 AM, Rich Megginson wrote:
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On 06/27/2011 07:52 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote
Debates like this expose a weakness in packaging philosophy. The
current philosophy seems to be all packages are equal.
It really isn't
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Critical_path_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
Rahul
--
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-06-27)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-06-27/fesco.2011-06-27-17.01.log.html
.
Meeting summary
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 10:22 -0400, Mark Bidewell wrote:
I apologize for the long rant.
Well...trying to think of a diplomatic way to put it, but I'd say the
long rant is fine, but we've had the same discussion at least five times
over the last couple of years and your post didn't seem to bring
I have no use for these packages anymore, and didn't even really
remember I owned them, until Ralf jumped in and fixed a ftbfs bug
against isic filed all of 4 days ago without saying boo to me,
other than suggesting in the bug that the AWOL maintainer dance
be started after he'd already fixed the
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
Good to have you back!
I'm still busy elsewhere. I was pointed in the direction of this thread by
someone else.
Consider those ACL requests that I could find approved.
--
Kind regards,
-- kanarip
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sven Lankes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:38:20AM +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote:
I'll ping Jeroen in the meantime, but we are both very busy with out
dayjob.
In that case approving one or all of the three people who have requested
commit access seems sensible.
Which package is this?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717061
Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Change request (no review request ticket exists)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717061
Summary: Change request (no review request ticket exists)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717061
--- Comment #1 from Jon Ciesla l...@jcomserv.net 2011-06-27 16:27:27 EDT ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
Configure
When I suspend or switch user gnome-screensaver should kick in (and
continue if successful).
It seems* instead that gnome-screensaver kicks in on resume, or when I
change back to the user.
* I see a flash of the user's screen or (sometimes) the screenlock
doesn't work at all.
Anyone know?
--
FESCo today approved a change to how orphan and deprecated packages are
handled in Fedora.
The prior policy was:
- Packages that have been orphaned for more than three months require
a re-review, regardless of whether or not they have been blocked.
The new policy is:
- Any package that is
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:09:40AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Below are the of packages which have outstanding FTBFS bugs from
earlier Fedora releases. I've split them up by their 'dist' tag which
shows when they were last successfully built.
I recommend and propose to FESCo that all
commit e11cf862689bc37512dc0570bcb6030ab506aa46
Author: Nathanael D. Noblet nathan...@gnat.ca
Date: Mon Jun 27 16:09:19 2011 -0600
remove and obsolete dspam-web
dspam.spec | 54 --
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
---
Just curious, did anyone try Cairo with OpenGL backend under Fedora
(i.e. so that components that use Cairo, such as GTK+ etc. all use
OpenGL for rendering)? If so, what was the experience like?
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 2011-06-26 12:33, Christoph Wickert wrote:
And I have no idea what part of our update policy should be violated by
this update. Please somebody enlighten me.
This part:
* Avoid changing the user experience if at all possible.
Specifically, the update breaks a number of user-installed
* #531 Orphaned package ownership claiming clarification (sgallagh,
17:40:47)
* AGREED: Policy will change to If a package is in orphan state in
pkgdb, feel free to take it and revivie it, no re-review needed. If
it's depreciated, you must re-review and get admins to unblock it
Dne 27.6.2011 14:44, Hans de Goede napsal(a):
Hi,
Good to have you back!
On 06/27/2011 01:53 PM, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Vít Ondruch wrote:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Jeroen
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701000
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-3.00-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(HTTP::Exception)
On i386:
perl-CGI-Application-Dispatch-3.00-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(HTTP::Exception)
Please resolve this as
commit 24d312b2f93173c00dcfc40bcae2f43c92b00342
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 27 13:52:18 2011 +0200
BR on perl-devel because this package contains macros used by rpmbuild
for Perl packages
perl-Module-Build.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6
commit baf258c005da5b8e65b978119cac083a8ba2f7ea
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 27 14:11:01 2011 +0200
BuildRequire perl(base)
perl-Encode-Locale.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Encode-Locale.spec
commit 5ccc2a1c8e05ebe84ad95e854ff8571ed804a432
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 27 15:05:28 2011 +0200
rebuild for Perl 5.14.1
apply experimental bootstrap macro
perl-HTTP-Lite.spec | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PerlIO-locale:
9b0d75d8907bbbe94486ead95cafa6a7 PerlIO-locale-0.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTTP-Exception:
3541f70932c99c0c44a1d0666bfec151 HTTP-Exception-0.03001.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ce8f5b14d501411f7b262b297978e0fd543a36d1
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Mon Jun 27 15:20:46 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Exception.spec | 51 ++
sources
commit 2ecd8dfb2f91c8109c4e147b43427680d7a3ac20
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Mon Jun 27 15:32:51 2011 +0200
Initial import.
.gitignore |1 +
perl-HTTP-Exception.spec | 51 ++
sources
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598989
Bug Zapper tri...@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hello list,
you might notice that rebuild stopped for a while. I run out of packages, which
had normal dependencies. Now I have a list of cyclic dependencies, which are
dependent back and forth.
Because we'll be doing mass rebuild every year, I'd like to use bootstrap
macro, which could help
commit 84194956442f6e46c7c2c8addffec34216f30268
Author: Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Jun 27 19:53:48 2011 +0200
rebuild with Perl 5.14.1
perl-Class-Inspector.spec | 10 --
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
The lightweight tag 'perl-GDTextUtil-0.86-8.el4' was created pointing to:
b4dafaf... dist-git conversion
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 3cb8334fd228ae382839fbf3b799430bdc761958
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Mon Jun 27 23:27:52 2011 +0100
Bump back release in preparation for first EPEL-4 build
perl-GDGraph.spec |5 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716404
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-06-27
19:54:12 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=716404
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
From 7950cbb484f6b517cd00fec4cdde93fc305ca01c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rich Megginson rmegg...@redhat.com
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 10:50:00 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] add support for ldif files with changetype: add
IPA config files use changetype: add to add new files. This was not
FESCo today approved a change to how orphan and deprecated packages are
handled in Fedora.
The prior policy was:
- Packages that have been orphaned for more than three months require
a re-review, regardless of whether or not they have been blocked.
The new policy is:
- Any package that is
74 matches
Mail list logo
