On 07/01/2011 04:04 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 06/30/2011 08:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, updates-testing is 'you get to keep both halves' territory.
wasn't it stable that broke things (sealert stopped working for example
after a stable update) - and then something from updates
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
Does serial console (Documentation/serial-console.txt) work over the
modem port of a T61?
Isn't the modem port actually a soundcard channel on modern laptops?
David
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
Does turning on kdump and installing debuginfo kernel stuff change
things in a way that a watchdog oops won't happen?
I doubt the debuginfo package install has anything to do with it, as
that is really only used by
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Coro-6.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718190
Summary: perl-Coro-6.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Compose started at Fri Jul 1 08:15:33 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
audacious-plugin-xmp-3.3.0-7.fc16.x86_64 requires audacious(plugin-api)
= 0:19
Hello,
when I'm building Code::Block in rawhide I'm getting into troubles with
the relro feature when combined with pre-compiled headers.
with default flags I get:
...
g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I/usr/lib64/wx/include/gtk2-unicode-release-2.8
-I/usr/include/wx-2.8 -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
glibc now includes libnss_db again, so the nss_db package is no longer
needed from f16 onward.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
And now for something completely different.
--
devel mailing list
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 12:09:35AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:34:35PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Is that port number exposed to the OS in any way?
Not that I can recall, which is why it was a horrible design. IIRC it
was just the remote IPMI port, but there may
On Fri, 2011-07-01 at 00:09 -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 06:34:35PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:27:47PM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
Portreserve is also useful to reserve (not let the OS make use of)
ports that are needed by an embedded
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718225
--- Comment #2 from John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com 2011-07-01 10:00:59 EDT
---
Typo: the bugzilla usability problem is bug
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718225
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718225
--- Comment #3 from John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com 2011-07-01 10:02:51 EDT
---
The same problem exists with:
Error: Package:
On Fri, Jul 01, 2011 at 02:15:21PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
glibc now includes libnss_db again, so the nss_db package is no longer
needed from f16 onward.
Okay, I've updated git, pkgdb, and comps, and filed a ticket with
release engineering to block the builds from the compose.
Thanks,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718225
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 04:37, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does turning on kdump and installing debuginfo kernel stuff change
things in a way that a watchdog oops won't happen?
I doubt the debuginfo
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:57 AM, Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Adam, Adam, Adam ;) it's this one in updates:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libreport-2.0.4-1.fc15
Is there an open ticket about the report package that needs to be
bumped to get this cleaned up. It seems
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 10:44, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 04:37, Josh Boyer jwbo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Does turning on kdump and installing debuginfo kernel stuff change
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 06:08:49PM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
Interesting though this is, why are we trying to bootstrap the entire
rebuild? Perl 5.14 is sufficiently compatible with 5.12 that we can
continue to provide perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.*) in perl-5.14.1 rpm
until the rebuild is
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=718225
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 07/01/2011 03:47 PM, Iain Arnell wrote:
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Petr Pisarppi...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 06:08:49PM +0200, Iain Arnell wrote:
Interesting though this is, why are we trying to bootstrap the entire
rebuild? Perl 5.14 is sufficiently compatible with
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715505
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-01
14:54:44 EDT ---
perl-Mail-MboxParser-0.55-5.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715505
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715543
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-07-01
15:00:10 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715543
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
24 matches
Mail list logo
