On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 19:16 +1000, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709923
Marek,
Could you please approve my request here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/cvsgraph
--
Bojan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.
-rhl
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Ryan Lewis wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > So I have this package that I made, but it has no 'assigned' reviewer:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
> >
> > if someone wouldn't mind doin
2011/7/2 Tom Lane :
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
>> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
>> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. I would put the odds
> of that no better than 5
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= writes:
> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. I would put the odds
of that no better than 50-50, though. I'm not going
Le 02/07/2011 17:30, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:21:48 -0500,
>Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:22:25 +0200,
>>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>>> I can't continue to maintain qucs because it FTBS and i'm not able to
>>> solve the problem https://bugzilla
Hi,
Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
2.9.x for F16 - the latest upstream version is 3.3.
--
Best regards,
Michal
http://eventhorizon.pl/
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 10:21:48 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:22:25 +0200,
> Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > I can't continue to maintain qucs because it FTBS and i'm not able to
> > solve the problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631404
> > i need help or
On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 12:22:25 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> I can't continue to maintain qucs because it FTBS and i'm not able to
> solve the problem https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631404
> i need help or the package will be retired.
I'm taking a look at qucs now. I might be able
On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:18:00 +0100
Khusro Jaleel wrote:
> On 06/18/2011 11:20 AM, Paul Flo Williams wrote:
> > The font packaging lifecycle is here:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
> >
> > League Gothic is already on the wishlist, so its page is here:
> >
> > https:/
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Ryan Lewis wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I have this package that I made, but it has no 'assigned' reviewer:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
>
> if someone wouldn't mind doing this, once I am a packager myself, I wouldn't
> mind reviewing other's packag
Hi,
So I have this package that I made, but it has no 'assigned' reviewer:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
if someone wouldn't mind doing this, once I am a packager myself, I wouldn't
mind reviewing other's packages.
-rhl
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Ryan Lewis wrote:
Compose started at Sat Jul 2 08:15:22 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell)
audacious-plugin-xmp-3.3.0-7.fc16.x86_64 requires audacious(plugin-api)
= 0:19
bibletime
12 matches
Mail list logo
