Hello all:
(Yes, Curiosity killed the cat, but never mind!)
I saw this message towards the end of building a custom Fedora spin:
"0 Stray cats were added.."
Was wondering what's the background?
Cheers,
Amit
--
http://echorand.me
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://adm
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:37:05 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 02:47, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> >On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
> > Eric Tanguy wrote:
> >>At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of freehdl
> >>appeared 0.0.8 but when i try to build it i have
Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 09:47:13AM +0100, Paul F. Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Something strange has happened on my system. At the start of last
> week, / was reporting that I had about 8Gb free. It now reports that /
> is completely full.
>
> chkrootkit is reporting nothing untoward.
>
> I have not
Le 09/07/2011 09:29, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 08:37:05 +0200,
>Eric Tanguy wrote:
>> Le 09/07/2011 02:47, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>>> On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 22:30:01 +0200,
>>>Eric Tanguy wrote:
At the same time qucs-0.0.16 were out a new version of fre
Compose started at Sat Jul 9 08:15:27 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9-0.2.a2.fc16.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
Hi Ben,
On 07/06/2011 10:27 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> googlecl (if chkr wants maintainership, that's fine, I'll wait until
> Friday to take it
Thanks for the heads-up! I would like to keep maintaining it so I have
taken ownership for now. If you would like to co-maintain it, I will
certainly appr
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 12:54:23 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> You are right. The scratch build build fine and the package is now on bodhi.
> I can't understand why there was a problem on my local build!
> Thanks
> Eric
If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
th
Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>
> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
> the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
> argument that says not to use rpath.
It's correct. If i use fedpkg mockbuild there is no error wher
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 18:50:43 +0200,
Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> >
> > If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
> > the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
> > argument that says not to u
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>>
>> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
>> the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
>> argument that says not to use rpath.
> It
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>>
>> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
>> the correct config options. I seem to remember that %config passes an
>> argument that says not to use rpath.
> It
On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 19:30:56 +0200,
Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
> > Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> >>
> >> If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be passing
> >> the correct config options. I seem to r
Le 09/07/2011 19:20, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
> On Sat, Jul 09, 2011 at 19:30:56 +0200,
>Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Eric Tanguy wrote:
>>> Le 09/07/2011 14:53, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
If you aren't using fedpkg to do the local build, you might not be pass
On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 10:22:07AM -0600, Petrus de Calguarium wrote:
> Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> > Did you upgrade this machine from an earlier version of Fedora? If so
> > then I suspect the old names will stick because you will have udev
> > persistent naming rules for them.
>
> No, I did a clean
On 07/08/2011 10:57 AM, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> On 07/08/2011 03:57 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> On 07/08/2011 08:23 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> So, I'd suggest strongly not to try starting all services from a single
>>> file. There's a reason why we explicitly forbid having more than one
>>
On 07/08/2011 10:57 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 08.07.11 09:57, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>> I am pretty sure systemd-devel is the better place to discuss this. But
>>> here are a few comments after reading throught the bug report:
>> I didn't know it existed...
>
On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:52 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual
> Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 8th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern
> Daylight Time). The purpose of this session is to co-ordinate the
> bootstrap of F15 hardfp (hardware
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-07-08 at 00:52 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>> We are hosting another one of our regular Fedora 15 hardfp Virtual
>> Fedora Activity Day today Friday July 8th, at 14:00UTC (10:00 Eastern
>> Daylight Time). The purpose of this sessi
19 matches
Mail list logo
