Hi,
On 07/13/2011 07:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:35 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe it it is an idea to build a whitelist for machines which do
>>> have working ACPI lid support? I realize maintaining s
Josef Bacik toxicpanda.com> writes:
> ...
> We aren't aiming for "hopefully stable", we're aiming for actually stable
> and reasonably safe. If we don't meet certain basic requirements no
> switch will be made and everything will carry on as normal.
>
> I'm not trying to shove Btrfs down peopl
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:11:23AM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 07/13/2011 07:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 11:35 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 16:57 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>
> >>> Maybe it it is an idea to build a whitelist for
> Orphan link-grammar
I am taking this one.
- fabiand
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 10:51:05 Thursday 14 July 2011 Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> > Orphan link-grammar
>
> I am taking this one.
>
> - fabiand
Can we get a v3 of the packages to be retired? There seem to be enough
changes in the list already.
Regards,
Alexander Kurtakov
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproj
On 07/14/2011 08:28 AM, JB wrote:
> Josef Bacik toxicpanda.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> We aren't aiming for "hopefully stable", we're aiming for actually stable
>> and reasonably safe. If we don't meet certain basic requirements no
>> switch will be made and everything will carry on as normal.
>>
>
I'm retiring these packages in devel, because:
a) their functionality is duplicated by modules shipped with httpd
(mod_authn_dbd, mod_authnz_ldap)
b) their upstreams are no longer active
Regards, Joe
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/li
What are the typical faults, and is it impossible to work around them,
maybe autodetecting if they are working or not? For a laptop without
an external display I would expect it to suspend when the lid is
closed, as that is what I usually configure.
However, it's not hard to imagine a feature of t
Ric Wheeler redhat.com> writes:
> ...
> Given that my family is from the hills of eastern
> Kentucky, I also find the "hill billie" comment off putting.
> ...
Ric, no offense ... injecting Kentucky hills was misguided ... I happened to
visit the state few times and was impressed with how nice
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:50 AM, JB wrote:
> I have difficulty swallowing the fact that there are so many Red Hat, Oracle,
> and other famous technology names involved (officially or dev's private
> contributions) in development of BTRFS, and at the same time they practice
> such loosely approach
On 07/14/2011 09:50 AM, JB wrote:
> Ric Wheeler redhat.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>
>> Given that my family is from the hills of eastern
>> Kentucky, I also find the "hill billie" comment off putting.
>> ...
> Ric, no offense ... injecting Kentucky hills was misguided ... I happened to
> visit the sta
Dne 14.7.2011 09:28, JB napsal(a):
> The original b-tree algorithm was a result of an academic study, formulation,
> and empirical testing, and was subjected to scientific scrutiny.
Ehm, I don't claim to have any deep knowledge on the matter, but I have
here B-trees explained in Wirth (1975), and
On 07/14/2011 07:42 AM, Iain Arnell wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Marcela Maslanova
> wrote:
>> Hello list,
>> you might notice that rebuild stopped for a while. I run out of packages,
>> which had "normal" dependencies. Now I have a list of cyclic dependencies,
>> which are depende
Martin Langhoff gmail.com> writes:
>
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 4:50 AM, JB gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have difficulty swallowing the fact that there are so many Red Hat,
> > Oracle,
> > and other famous technology names involved (officially or dev's private
> > contributions) in development of BT
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:25:04PM -0500, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
> Calling it a misfeature is a mistake. Just because you don't want to use it
> doesn't mean it shouldn't be there.
I'm perfectly capable of configuring priorities and frontends in dpkg,
thanks for your concerns. However it's n
Good timing! I have a related BTRFS / Fedora 16 question.
I have used the "btrfs" Anaconda option, and I get btrfs appearing as
a choice in the menus. However if I just change the root filesystem
to btrfs, then I would get:
/boot /dev/sda2
PV
VG
Matej Cepl redhat.com> writes:
>
> Dne 14.7.2011 09:28, JB napsal(a):
> > The original b-tree algorithm was a result of an academic study,
> > formulation,
> > and empirical testing, and was subjected to scientific scrutiny.
>
> Ehm, I don't claim to have any deep knowledge on the matter, but
The lightweight tag 'perl-Net-SSLeay-1.36-6.fc16' was created pointing to:
7c63ac1... Trivial tidy up
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Ric Wheeler redhat.com> writes:
> ...
> I think that it would be really rare to see pristine, academic algorithms
> implemented exactly as a non-coding mathematician designed them in code :)
> ...
Well, not convinced ... :-)
The algorithm has to be taken holisticly - it has been designed, tes
A strange alert:
The process /usr/bin/tee attempted to mount on /proc/bus/usb.
This is F14, fully updated.
Any ideas what this might be?
Thanks,
Andrew.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Américo Wang wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> > > Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
>>> > > for Fedora 16?
>>> > >
>>> > > https://fedorapro
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Config-Properties-1.72 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721336
Summary: perl-Config-Properties-1.72 is available
Product
On 07/14/2011 11:08 AM, JB wrote:
> Ric Wheeler redhat.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> I think that it would be really rare to see pristine, academic algorithms
>> implemented exactly as a non-coding mathematician designed them in code :)
>> ...
> Well, not convinced ... :-)
>
> The algorithm has to be
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PAR-Packer:
ee57def445e3d917d48cbf3a52813b54 PAR-Packer-1.010.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailma
commit 2cc03ab70c74702251f5b605618dfbee5e19321d
Author: Petr Sabata
Date: Thu Jul 14 13:07:55 2011 +0200
1.010 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-PAR-Packer.spec |9 +++--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.giti
Hallo everyone,
I am looking for someone to review synce-connector[1]. Synce-connector
is a connection framework and dccm-implementation which integrates with
udev. It effectively replaces all previous implementations from the
synce project (synce-serial, vdccm, odccm, synce-hal). Getting
synce-co
On 07/14/2011 01:07 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 13.07.2011 23:54, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
>>> Farkas Levente wrote:
>>> That's not the case at all, I'm not sure where you are getting that.
>>> If we don't have a released offline
perl-SDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-SDL-2.2.6-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libSDL_gfx.so.0()(64bit)
On i386:
perl-SDL-2.2.6-1.fc16.i686 requires libSDL_gfx.so.0
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraprojec
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Américo Wang
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feat
I think RAID-5 support would be reasonably important to have too ... I
dont think we want to have raid on top of btrfs ... right?
Ric - what is the current status of RAID-5 ?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/14/2011 06:11 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> A strange alert:
>
> The process /usr/bin/tee attempted to mount on /proc/bus/usb.
>
> This is F14, fully updated.
>
> Any ideas what this might be?
>
> Thanks, Andrew.
Please attach the actual AVC mess
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 06:35:05AM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Américo Wang
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >>> > > Would any of you kindly help to review my pr
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Good timing! I have a related BTRFS / Fedora 16 question.
>
> I have used the "btrfs" Anaconda option, and I get btrfs appearing as
> a choice in the menus. However if I just change the root filesystem
> to btrfs, then I would get:
>
>
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 6:08 AM, JB wrote:
> Ric Wheeler redhat.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> I think that it would be really rare to see pristine, academic algorithms
>> implemented exactly as a non-coding mathematician designed them in code :)
>> ...
>
> Well, not convinced ... :-)
>
> The algorithm
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:22:17AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Is this how F16 will be set up? The Feature page[1] suggests that LVM
> will be turned off by default, in which case it should look more like:
That would involve changes to Anaconda, and as far as I know there's
nobody curren
On 07/14/2011 03:35 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:08 PM, Américo Wang
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 9:52 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 03:50:07PM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> Would any of you kindly help to review my proposed feature
>> f
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>
>
>
> I think RAID-5 support would be reasonably important to have too ... I
> dont think we want to have raid on top of btrfs ... right?
>
> Ric - what is the current status of RAID-5 ?
This requires some other big changes that are disk
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:13:56AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> Well it should be more like
>
> /boot/dev/sda1
> swap/dev/sda2
> btrfs
Maybe I don't understand this. Is btrfs on /dev/sda3, or are the swap
and root filesystems somehow combined on /dev/sda2? And if the
latter, how does one
On 07/14/2011 03:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:13:56AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> Well it should be more like
>>
>> /boot/dev/sda1
>> swap/dev/sda2
>> btrfs
> Maybe I don't understand this. Is btrfs on /dev/sda3, or are the swap
> and root filesystems some
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
>
> I'll follow up to the devel-list on a separate mail that will hopefully
> catch a few more eyeballs, but essentially I'm going to propose to FESCo
> that this feature, along with all of the other features submitted at the
> last moment, be
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:06:33PM +0100, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 03:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:13:56AM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >>Well it should be more like
> >>
> >>/boot/dev/sda1
> >>swap/dev/sda2
> >>btrfs
> >Maybe I don't understand th
On 07/14/2011 02:54 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>
>>
>> I think RAID-5 support would be reasonably important to have too ... I
>> dont think we want to have raid on top of btrfs ... right?
>>
>> Ric - what is the current status of RAID-5 ?
Am 14.07.2011 03:57, schrieb Eric Sandeen:
>> bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
>> unstable / unfinsihed packages should never be default in GA nor replace
>> existing and over a long time well working things - never!
>
> You might have said the same thing
On 07/14/2011 10:17 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 02:54 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I think RAID-5 support would be reasonably important to have too ... I
>>> dont think we want to have raid on top of btrfs ... right?
>>>
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 07:30 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> I recently found that startup-notification is quite old in fedora and
> filed a bug to update to the recent upstream version. [1]
> So far I didn't get any feedback and would like to ask if someone of
> those [2] who also have commit on t
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 10:17 AM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>> On 07/14/2011 02:54 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
I think RAID-5 support would be reasonably important to have too ... I
>
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.07.2011 03:57, schrieb Eric Sandeen:
>>> bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
>>> unstable / unfinsihed packages should never be default in GA nor replace
>>> existing and over a long time well w
On 7/13/11 9:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.07.2011 03:57, schrieb Eric Sandeen:
>>> bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
>>> unstable / unfinsihed packages should never be default in GA nor replace
>>> existing and over a long time well working things
Josef Bacik toxicpanda.com> writes:
> ...
> I've already said
> that if it's not in good shape by Alpha the switch won't even be made,
> so quit your bitching.
>
> Josef
Josef,
would it be possible, BEFORE (in case that) you decide to switch on before
Alpha, to present some test suite results
On 7/14/11 10:21 AM, JB wrote:
> Josef Bacik toxicpanda.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> I've already said
>> that if it's not in good shape by Alpha the switch won't even be made,
>> so quit your bitching.
>>
>> Josef
>
> Josef,
> would it be possible, BEFORE (in case that) you decide to switch on bef
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 11:21 AM, JB wrote:
> Josef Bacik toxicpanda.com> writes:
>
>> ...
>> I've already said
>> that if it's not in good shape by Alpha the switch won't even be made,
>> so quit your bitching.
>>
>> Josef
>
> Josef,
> would it be possible, BEFORE (in case that) you decide to sw
On 07/14/2011 10:59 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>>
>> Another (Q) - once the format changes, will there be tools to change
>> the online format of existing filesystems - or will we need to delete
>> and start fresh ?
>>
>
> All format changes happen automatically (usually with a mount option
> so as
On 07/14/2011 11:12 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Something tells me if btrfs had been called "ext5" people would
> just nod their heads and move on. ;)
Heh ... like this ... Its not too late is it :-)
How about ext5-btrfs - and high level user space tools can shorten it
to ext5 :-)
--
devel ma
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:10 AM, JB wrote:
> Well, then you have to read the thread more carefully before you bark back -
> right in the first OP's post you have references, e.g.
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/18/144
Heh - now that you provide links it's better... anyway, that's a
completely hi
Josef Bacik toxicpanda.com> writes:
> ...
> We've reached the point where we really need wider user
> testing, because no amount of testing we do will ever be able to match
> up to the crazy things users do.
Please understand - convincing people (technical and non-technical) to
install a regular
On 07/14/2011 05:26 PM, JB wrote:
> Now just a loud thinking ...
> Have you thought about first preparing a CD (even a live CD) with BTRFS and
> some extra preinstalled software like VirtualBox etc just for testing ?
What, you mean like the live and non-live Fedora ISOs that have had btrfs
support
Bryn M. Reeves redhat.com> writes:
>
> On 07/14/2011 05:26 PM, JB wrote:
> > Now just a loud thinking ...
> > Have you thought about first preparing a CD (even a live CD) with BTRFS and
> > some extra preinstalled software like VirtualBox etc just for testing ?
>
> What, you mean like the live
On 07/14/2011 05:48 PM, JB wrote:
> Good. Perhaps a weekly snapshot CD, with the latest BTRFS and related utils,
> so that the testing would be more up-to-date and meaningful.
> JB
http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
Regards,
Bryn.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 14.07.2011 03:57, schrieb Eric Sandeen:
>>> bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
>>> unstable / unfinsihed packages should never be default in GA nor replace
>>> existing and over a long time
Bryn M. Reeves redhat.com> writes:
>
> On 07/14/2011 05:48 PM, JB wrote:
> > Good. Perhaps a weekly snapshot CD, with the latest BTRFS and related utils,
> > so that the testing would be more up-to-date and meaningful.
> > JB
>
> http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/nightly-composes/
>
> Regar
On 07/14/2011 12:31 PM, JB wrote:
> OK.
>
> Post every week on user, testers, and devel lists:
> - BTRFS testing reminder
> - BTRFS info (short notes; entries; pointers to any info, info/man pages)
> - test instructions
> - a link where to obtain latest Fedora snapshot/nightly live composes with
>
Michael Cronenworth cchtml.com> writes:
> ...
> If you're that concerned about the quality of Fedora 16 then I would
> suggest you join the test list, become a proventester, and attend QA
> meetings.
>
> (Ranting on this list and making demands won't make it happen.)I am not
> ranting
I am n
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 17:31:44 + (UTC)
JB wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves redhat.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On 07/14/2011 05:48 PM, JB wrote:
> > > Good. Perhaps a weekly snapshot CD, with the latest BTRFS and
> > > related utils, so that the testing would be more up-to-date and
> > > meaningful. JB
> >
On Sat, 2011-06-25 at 22:23 -0500, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:55 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> >
> > Heck, I'd be willing to accept ANY bittorrent server that can be both
> > tracker and primary seed and doesn't require a special apache module to
> > do it.
> >
> > The biggest virt
On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 00:22 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 09:55 PM, seth vidal wrote:
> > Heck, I'd be willing to accept ANY bittorrent server that can be both
> > tracker and primary seed and doesn't require a special apache module to
> > do it.
>
> Late to the party with this
Bernd Stramm gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> Would you help out with testing if given these specific instructions?
> If not yourself, who would actually do this?
> ...
I am only suggesting a mini form of so called user testing (that's what it is
called and practised in a software development corpor
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 18:09:53 + (UTC)
JB wrote:
> Bernd Stramm gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ...
> > Would you help out with testing if given these specific
> > instructions? If not yourself, who would actually do this?
> > ...
>
> I am only suggesting a mini form of so called user testing (th
Bernd Stramm gmail.com> writes:
> ...
> > Try it and see the results. Perhaps it will work
>
> But that is my point - you are not willing to do any part of this
> yourself. You are only instructing others to do specific work.
>
I am not instructing anybody. I am suggesting things.
I have em
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 01:06:45PM -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 14.07.2011 03:57, schrieb Eric Sandeen:
> >>> bleeeding edge / modern technology is not the same as dangerous defaults
> >>> unstable / unfinsihed packages
On 07/12/2011 05:10 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan: eet
> ecore requires eet-devel = 1.4.0-2.fc15
> ecore-devel requires eet-devel = 1.4.0-2.fc15
> qedje requires libeet.so.1
> qedje requires eet-devel = 1.4.0-2.fc15
> qedje-devel requires eet-devel = 1.4.0-2.fc15
> qed
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-HTML-Template:
49537aa239ab090698b9e1a0b0be7412 HTML-Template-2.10.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
commit 992ca89c736f2d627bcbde52588e4245e4a9516e
Author: Tom "spot" Callaway
Date: Thu Jul 14 15:13:10 2011 -0400
2.10
.gitignore|1 +
perl-HTML-Template-manpages.patch | 86 +++--
perl-HTML-Template.spec | 15 +++---
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 15:05:16 -0400, TC (Tom) wrote:
> > Orphan: xmms
> > logjam requires xmms-devel = 1:1.2.11-12.20071117cvs.fc15
> > logjam-xmms requires xmms = 1:1.2.11-12.20071117cvs.fc15
> > logjam-xmms requires libxmms.so.1
> > purple-plugin_pack requires xmms-devel = 1:1.2.1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=721340
Tom "spot" Callaway changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
It's that time again for Fedora 16.
New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
failed to build since before Fedora 14.
The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
you have a need f
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
*snip*
> Orphan userspace-rcu
I'll take that one.
--CJD
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
2011/7/14 Bill Nottingham :
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
> Orphan me-tv
I've just took me-tv on pkgdb
Nicolas (kwizart)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> Orphan jomolhari-fonts
> Orphan kanjistrokeorders-fonts
> Orphan tibetan-machine-uni-fonts
Taken. EPEL branches for kanjistrokeorders-fonts are available.
--
P
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 17:49 +, JB wrote:
> I am just suggesting how the devs can reach their audience and communicate
> with them for a mutual benefit.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggs
- ajax
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Adam Jackson redhat.com> writes:
>
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 17:49 +, JB wrote:
>
> > I am just suggesting how the devs can reach their audience and communicate
> > with them for a mutual benefit.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teaching_grandmother_to_suck_eggs
>
> - ajax
>
>
Well, I w
Anyone else have this issue?
Occasionally, but not frequently, mock will stall in the "D" state in
ps. I try to let to continue but I waited for over an hour and it
never made it out. Since you can't do anything with processes in the D
state I was forced to reboot...
Thanks,
Richard
--
devel mai
On 7/14/11 3:55 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Anyone else have this issue?
>
> Occasionally, but not frequently, mock will stall in the "D" state in
> ps. I try to let to continue but I waited for over an hour and it
> never made it out. Since you can't do anything with processes in the D
> state I wa
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 03:39:13PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan isic
seeing as I took ip6sic which is similar, I'll take this too.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
xml.4-0.1.20110714git97ddbe9.fc15.src.rpm
/var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
../SPECS/python-hl7.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
python-hl7-20110714.tar.gz
python-hl7.src: W: invalid-url Source0: python-hl7-20110714.tar.gz
python-hl7.src: W: invalid-url Source0: python-hl7-20110714.tar.gz
3 packages
t:
>
> [ankur@ankur SRPMS]$ rpmlint ../SPECS/python-hl7.spec
> python-hl7-0.1.1_xml.4-0.1.20110714git97ddbe9.fc15.src.rpm
> /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-i386/result/*.rpm
> ../SPECS/python-hl7.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
> python-hl7-20110714.tar.gz
> python-hl7.src: W: invalid-url
As FESCo doesn't have its own mailing list, and this isn't a trac item
exactly as I'm not really requesting any *action* on FESCo's part, I'm
sending this to devel and test in the hopes it reaches all parties
concerned. This relates mainly to the feature process and hence is of
particular interest
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 16:48 +, JB wrote:
> Bryn M. Reeves redhat.com> writes:
>
> >
> > On 07/14/2011 05:26 PM, JB wrote:
> > > Now just a loud thinking ...
> > > Have you thought about first preparing a CD (even a live CD) with BTRFS
> > > and
> > > some extra preinstalled software like Vi
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 12:36 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 07/14/2011 12:31 PM, JB wrote:
> > OK.
> >
> > Post every week on user, testers, and devel lists:
> > - BTRFS testing reminder
> > - BTRFS info (short notes; entries; pointers to any info, info/man pages)
> > - test instructions
> >
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 1:09 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The followi
Hi,
alright thanks for clarification. Then again I am wondering why there is
still the fc13 release in the repos even if it was rebuilt for f15.
Just curious.
Johannes
On 07/14/2011 04:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 07:30 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
>
>> I recently found that
90 matches
Mail list logo
