Re: systemd not in critpath

2011-08-24 Thread Toshio Kuratomi
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script that integrates with mas

systemd not in critpath

2011-08-24 Thread Garrett Holmstrom
Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Tasque orphaned

2011-08-24 Thread David Kaylor
Tasque has upstream bugs, and there has been no new release for over a year. Some of the bugs may be fixable with patches, but one of its dependencies, evolution-sharp has been deprecated in Fedora 16. Consequently, I am orphaning this package. -David Kaylor -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedo

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/25/2011 04:56 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > If Firefox were following the update policy, they'd backport the security > fixes, not push the new versions. That is just not true https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Security_fixes "If upstream does not provide security fixes for a parti

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Gerald Henriksen wrote: > In addition to the warning that Gimp 2.7.* is considered unstable and > not to be used in production (aka in a distribution), That's why my point is that F16 should ship with 2.6 and get upgraded to 2.8 once it is stable. > it comes with a warning that they are cleaning

Problems with bodhi buildroot overrides

2011-08-24 Thread Orion Poplawski
I'm been having nothing but grief with bodhi buildroot overrides. Latest: $ bodhi --my-overrides 1 Buildroot Overrides submitted by orion [ plplot-5.9.8-2.fc16 ] * Notes: Need to rebuild plplot users for soname bump * Submitter: orion * Submitted: 2

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
On Aug 24, 2011, at 12:49 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) said: >> Some of the argument here is that it is difficult to do this from a remote >> host. You'd have to engage in remote execution of software, e.g. using >> nagios nrpe to remotely (from the nagi

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
On Aug 24, 2011, at 1:33 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 11:52:23 AM Jesse Keating wrote: > >> That would require your nagios (or other monitoring) system to be running >> systemd, which may not be the case for quite a while :) > > Why? When used to access remote machines s

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lars Seipel
On Wednesday, August 24, 2011 11:52:23 AM Jesse Keating wrote: > That would require your nagios (or other monitoring) system to be running > systemd, which may not be the case for quite a while :) Why? When used to access remote machines systemctl shouldn't require running systemd locally. Lars

Re: How to ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2011-08-24 Thread Orion Poplawski
On 08/23/2011 12:47 PM, Thomas Moschny wrote: > 2011/8/23 Orion Poplawski: >> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719785 for the motivation >> >> The environment module system allows users to modify their environment in a >> predictable way, including setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. However,

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Bill Nottingham
Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) said: > Some of the argument here is that it is difficult to do this from a remote > host. You'd have to engage in remote execution of software, e.g. using > nagios nrpe to remotely (from the nagios system) execute commands on the > database system to c

Re: Orphaning dnsmasq

2011-08-24 Thread Josh Stone
On 08/24/2011 12:24 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > When libvirt starts dnsmasq, it tells it to ignore the configuration > file and passes all of the parameters on the command line. If you want > dnsmasq to not listen on 0.0.0.0:53 when it's started by libvirt, you'll > have to take that up with the libv

Re: Need help to build gimp-2.7.3

2011-08-24 Thread Luya Tshimbalanga
Quoting TASAKA Mamoru : > http://developer.gimp.org/NEWS > says > > Changes in GIMP 2.7.3 > = > Source and build system: > - Remove gimp-remote for good, it has been disabled for years > > Regards, > Mamoru > > Thanks, Mamoru. Luya -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedorapr

Re: Orphaning dnsmasq

2011-08-24 Thread Ian Pilcher
On 08/22/2011 06:35 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: > If it could also not grab port 0.0.0.0:53 in the future, that would be > great. I'd like to work with whichever libvirt developer takes this > package on. Are you talking about dnsmasq or the way that libvirt uses dnsmasq? The interfaces on which dnsm

[389-devel] Please review: Bug 733103 - large targetattr list with syntax errors cause server to crash or hang

2011-08-24 Thread Rich Megginson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733103 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519695&action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519695&action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-dev

[SOLVED] Re: Jmol, Java and netscape.javascript

2011-08-24 Thread Jussi Lehtola
On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:25:16 -0400 Omair Majid wrote: > On 08/23/2011 04:44 AM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > > $ ant -lib %{_datadir}/icedtea-web/plugin.jar doc main > > doesn't work, it still fails in the same error. > > There are two things that were causing problems. The spec file was > setting cla

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
On Aug 24, 2011, at 11:19 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 24.08.11 10:10, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote: > FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a database. I'd like to support the option ... the problem is to do so without b

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 19:59 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 24.08.11 10:05, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a > > > database. I'd like to support the option ... the problem is to do so > > > with

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 20:19 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 24.08.11 10:10, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote: > > > >> FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a > > >> database. I'd like to support the option ... the problem is to do so > > >

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 19:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 24.08.11 11:18, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a > > > database. I'd like to support the option ... the problem is to do so > > > without break

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 19:44 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 24.08.11 10:56, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > > > a random connection. There many reasons why you may have stopped the db > > > > (or it may have stopped itself) and requires inspection before > > > > attempting a n

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 10:10, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote: > >> FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a > >> database. I'd like to support the option ... the problem is to do so > >> without breaking existing, expected behaviors. > > > > It was noted

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 20:22, Alexander Kurtakov (akurt...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On 20:17:14 Wednesday 24 August 2011 Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:06 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > > If the service is enabled but the daemon not currently running, is it > > > > so terrible for a

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> The other option is for someone to build packages and host them on >> fedorapeople.org as a personal repository. >> >> I certainly wouldn't mind trying 2.7+ but I would like the abilit

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 17:09, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Hi, > > On 08/24/2011 04:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 14:37 -0700, Adam Wi

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 10:05, Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) wrote: > > FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a > > database. I'd like to support the option ... the problem is to do so > > without breaking existing, expected behaviors. > > It was noted up-thread

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 11:18, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > FWIW, I do think that there may be use-cases for socket activation of a > > database. I'd like to support the option ... the problem is to do so > > without breaking existing, expected behaviors. > > I am not sure you can, the only

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 11:40, Andrew McNabb (amcn...@mcnabbs.org) wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:14:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > systemctl list-unit-files is what you are looking for. It's simpler even > > than chkconfig --list. > > When I run "systemctl list-unit-files", I ge

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 10:56, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: > > > a random connection. There many reasons why you may have stopped the db > > > (or it may have stopped itself) and requires inspection before > > > attempting a new restart. Having to battle with socket activation while > > > in a cr

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Jef Spaleta
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Alexander Kurtakov > wrote: > >> I want to add one more POV - not every database is constantly-used. >> Example >> usage is Amarok using mysql database and I really want mysql to not be >> started >> until

[389-devel] Please Review: (732541) Ignore error 32 when adding automember config

2011-08-24 Thread Nathan Kinder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732541 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=519679&action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Andrew McNabb
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:14:34PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > systemctl list-unit-files is what you are looking for. It's simpler even > than chkconfig --list. When I run "systemctl list-unit-files", I get a "Unknown operation list-unit-files" error. Did you mean "systemctl list-units"

Re: Default services enabled -> there is no problem with mysqld

2011-08-24 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 24.08.11 10:45, Tom Lane (t...@redhat.com) wrote: > > Reindl Harald writes: > > Am 23.08.2011 23:28, schrieb Tom Lane: > >> there's no other way for "mysqladmin ping" to work, for example > > > and where is the problem? > > I'm not planning on repeating myself either, but: a database >

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Jef Spaleta
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: > I want to add one more POV - not every database is constantly-used. Example > usage is Amarok using mysql database and I really want mysql to not be > started > until I start Amarok. Not that this is very common usage scenario but > sti

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Alexander Kurtakov
On 20:17:14 Wednesday 24 August 2011 Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:06 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > > If the service is enabled but the daemon not currently running, is it > > > so terrible for a connection test to cause the daemon to start? > > > Remember, in systemd logic 'serv

Re: How to ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2011-08-24 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:44, Orion Poplawski wrote: > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719785 for the motivation > > The environment module system allows users to modify their environment in a > predictable way, including setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH.  However, this makes it > possible

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Jesse Keating
On Aug 24, 2011, at 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Simo Sorce writes: >>> On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > It generally is a bad idea to automat

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simo Sorce writes: > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>> It generally is a bad idea to automatically restart a database based on > >>> a random connec

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Adam Williamson
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:06 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > If the service is enabled but the daemon not currently running, is it so > > terrible for a connection test to cause the daemon to start? Remember, > > in systemd logic 'service enabled with socket activation, daemon not > > currently runnin

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-24 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/24/2011 05:05 PM, Kai Engert wrote: > > I would appreciate contributions, reviews, specific proposals. > I did note some of the prominent ones in my first mail https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-August/155758.html https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL https:

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:36 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >>  It could be built to be installed in parallel with 2.6 - which would >> allow those who want to test/play with it. > > The other option is for someone to build packages and host them

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/24/2011 05:11 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > It is also utterly ridiculous and pointless if you consider the fact > that the Firefox maintainers are allowed to push major (first digit! > Not minor like 2.6 to 2.8) version increments as "security" updates… > (Ironically, Firefox used to be one of t

F-16 Branched report: 20110824 changes

2011-08-24 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Wed Aug 24 13:15:20 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)

Re: Anaconda memory requirements

2011-08-24 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 11:31:55AM -0700, John Reiser wrote: > > ... I understand that some one is working on reducing the memory footprint > > of anaconda. > > > > Will it be ready for F16? > > The "treebuilder" branch of lorax, where such a project is being developed, > is not complete today.

Orphaning techtalk-pse

2011-08-24 Thread Ian Weller
I am orphaning the techtalk-pse package because the Gtk2::MozEmbed perl module will no longer be maintained in Fedora because gtkmozembed support has been removed from xulrunner. If upstream (or anybody) has the time to work on techtalk-pse and get it working with something like Gtk2::WebKit, I'm

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simo Sorce writes: > > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > >>> It generally is a bad idea to automatically restart a database based on > >>> a random connec

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
Simo Sorce writes: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> It generally is a bad idea to automatically restart a database based on >>> a random connection. There many reasons why you may have stopped the db >>>

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 08/24/2011 04:56 PM, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >>> On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 14:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: Why not? If the service is enabled but the daemon no

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 15:10 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 14:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > Why not? > > > > > > If the service is enabled but the daemon not currently running, is it so > > > terrible f

Re: Default services enabled -> there is no problem with mysqld

2011-08-24 Thread Tom Lane
Reindl Harald writes: > Am 23.08.2011 23:28, schrieb Tom Lane: >> there's no other way for "mysqladmin ping" to work, for example > and where is the problem? I'm not planning on repeating myself either, but: a database *monitoring* tool, as opposed to a vanilla client, needs to know whether the

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
FYI, I have placed JB on moderation on this list. I'll be happy to let through posts that are not personal attacks. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Default services enabled -> there is no problem with mysqld

2011-08-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 23.08.2011 23:28, schrieb Tom Lane: > Yeah. Another way in which socket activation is not transparent is that > code might try to determine whether the service is running by seeing > whether a connection attempt succeeds. well if you have enabled the service and a listening socket it is th

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 24.08.2011 15:04, schrieb Simo Sorce: > I fail to see any reason why you would want to socket-activate a > database. Either you need the database, so it should start asap, or > don't because systemd as shipped with F15 CAN NOT make sure that if it means "i have started mysql" mysqld is ready

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Richard Shaw
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >  It could be built to be installed in parallel with 2.6 - which would > allow those who want to test/play with it. The other option is for someone to build packages and host them on fedorapeople.org as a personal repository. I certainly w

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Genes MailLists
It could be built to be installed in parallel with 2.6 - which would allow those who want to test/play with it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Matthew Garrett
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 09:06:22AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 14:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Why not? > > > > If the service is enabled but the daemon not currently running, is it so > > terrible for a connection test to cause the daemon to start? Remember, > > in sy

Re: Need help to build gimp-2.7.3

2011-08-24 Thread TASAKA Mamoru
Luya Tshimbalanga wrote, at 08/24/2011 09:45 AM +9:00: > Attempting to build rpm version of gimp 2.7.3 ended with failure from > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3297263 > > For some reasons, I am puzzled about gimp-remote not built with this version > while it did with 2.7.2. Can

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Gerald Henriksen
On Wed, 24 Aug 2011 13:41:41 +0200, you wrote: >Nicu Buculei wrote: >> And we the people using it for real work still remember the times when >> Fedora used to be a bleeding edge distro and had such GIMP updated... > >+1 > >The new update strategy (because it IS new, contrary to what some lazy >m

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 09:05 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 08/23/2011 10:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Steve Grubb wrote: > >> I think it was mentioned before that systemd is consuming a lot > >> of memory. > > > > The amount quoted was actu

Broken dependencies: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch

2011-08-24 Thread buildsys
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as poss

Broken dependencies: perl-SOAP-Lite

2011-08-24 Thread buildsys
perl-SOAP-Lite has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-SOAP-Lite-0.714-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP) On i386: perl-SOAP-Lite-0.714-1.fc17.noarch requires perl(SOAP::Transport::TCP) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras

Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2011-08-24 Thread buildsys
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 14:37 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 17:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > Simo Sorce writes: > > > ... If instead the socket is listening but not really accepting and > > > processing requests, then yes, you can have a deadlock. > > > > > So socket activat

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/23/2011 10:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Steve Grubb wrote: >> I think it was mentioned before that systemd is consuming a lot >> of memory. > > The amount quoted was actually ridiculously small considering both > today's memory sizes and the fac

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Simo Sorce
On Tue, 2011-08-23 at 17:28 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Simo Sorce writes: > > ... If instead the socket is listening but not really accepting and > > processing requests, then yes, you can have a deadlock. > > > So socket activation is not transparent by any means and needs to be > > handled very c

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 24/08/11 14:18, JB wrote: > This guy is a loose cannon, with an outsized ego, but lacking UNIX > understanding and design skills. Ok, it's getting clear, both of you won't become best friends. Assuming, all arguments were written to this list, p

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread JB
JB gmail.com> writes: > ... > There is a video on Youtube (I can not find the link right now, it is on > www.osnews.com article in comments section) from a German Linux sysadmin > presentation in Munich, in 2009 I believe - with Lennart present in > the audience and constantly interrupting the pr

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Paul W. Frields
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 12:18:57PM +, JB wrote: > Richard Hughes gmail.com> writes: > > > > > On 24 August 2011 01:35, JB gmail.com> wrote: > > > ...do not expect them to accept your sick "world domination" drive > > > > ...and this is why some upstream developers have unsubscribed from >

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread JB
Richard Hughes gmail.com> writes: > > On 24 August 2011 01:35, JB gmail.com> wrote: > > ...do not expect them to accept your sick "world domination" drive > > ...and this is why some upstream developers have unsubscribed from > fedora-devel list. Ever wonder why people like David Zeuthen > uns

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Kevin Kofler
Nicu Buculei wrote: > And we the people using it for real work still remember the times when > Fedora used to be a bleeding edge distro and had such GIMP updated... +1 The new update strategy (because it IS new, contrary to what some lazy maintainers who always refused to follow the old policy o

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-24 Thread Kai Engert
On 24.08.2011 12:04, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 08/22/2011 03:01 AM, Kai Engert wrote: >> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but I suspect that Seamonkey is generally c

Re: bug in fuse-s3fs

2011-08-24 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 11:36:55AM +0300, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > > > > If you open a bug on fuse-s3fs with the problem you encountered, I'll > > gladly fix > > it. > > ok, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732939 > Thanks, I'll take care of it today. Neil > > > > > I've tried the

Re: Seamonkey status

2011-08-24 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On 08/22/2011 03:01 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>> Putting Firefox maintainers on CC to have a definite word on this, but >>> I suspect that Seamonkey is generally completely in the arms of >>> community. I guess i

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 06:11:45PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Another way of saying this is: people are used to being able to check > if a service is up without thereby changing its state. Consider for > example somebody who has a nagios alert set to check database server > availability every few se

Re: Default services enabled

2011-08-24 Thread Richard Hughes
On 24 August 2011 01:35, JB wrote: > ...do not expect them to accept your sick "world domination" drive ...and this is why some upstream developers have unsubscribed from fedora-devel list. Ever wonder why people like David Zeuthen unsubscribed? People like you. I'm also ---> <--- this close to

Re: bug in fuse-s3fs

2011-08-24 Thread Muayyad AlSadi
> > If you open a bug on fuse-s3fs with the problem you encountered, I'll gladly > fix > it. ok, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732939 > > I've tried the google code s3fs as well, and not had any luck in fixing it up. > I think thats probably a dead end. > I've tried the rpm in th

Re: How to ignore LD_LIBRARY_PATH

2011-08-24 Thread Eric Smith
On 08/23/2011 11:44 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719785 for the motivation > > The environment module system allows users to modify their environment in a > predictable way, including setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH. However, this makes it > possible to brea

Re: gimp

2011-08-24 Thread Nicu Buculei
On 08/23/2011 11:34 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Richard Shaw wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Genes MailLists wrote: >>> >>> Are there any plans to bring gimp 2.7.x -> 2.8 into F16 ? >> >> Is there a specific reason to? The home page states that t