I'd like to remove:
ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
very small minority of Fedora users.
Comments?
Karel
--
Karel Zak
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedor
On 08/25/2011 05:28 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
>
> You're probably referring to the updates 2.2->2.4 in '07 and 2.4->2.6 in
> '08 but please keep in mind that we're stuck with 2.6.x as the stable
> branch since then, so there's no reason to be gloomy about the Fedora
> side just yet.
I remember ho
On Monday, August 29, 2011, 7:54:10 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> I'd like to remove:
> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
> very small minority of Fedora users.
> Comments?
Why does it matter to you?
> On Monday, August 29, 2011, 7:54:10 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
>> I'd like to remove:
>> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
>
>> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
>> very small minority of Fedora users.
>> Comments?
>
> Why does it matter
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 07:25:18 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote:
>
> > On Monday, August 29, 2011, 7:54:10 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> >> I'd like to remove:
> >> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
> >
> >> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
> >> very small
Compose started at Mon Aug 29 08:15:12 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear
On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> I'd like to remove:
>
> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
>
> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
> very small minority of Fedora users.
>
> Comments?
Please do. This isn't really something
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to remove:
> >
> > ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
> >
> > command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
> > very small minority of
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
>
>> On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
>> >
>> > I'd like to remove:
>> >
>> > ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
>> >
>> > command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
>> > very small mi
commit a184a72b487bda28b1125cec1cd0fbbf5cb5b5d8
Author: remi
Date: Mon Aug 29 15:31:37 2011 +0200
first EPEL-6 build
perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP.spec |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP.spec b/perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733820
Yanko Kaneti changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:32:01 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to remove:
> >> >
> >> > ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
> >> >
> >> > command from r
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=733820
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-29
09:43:07 EDT ---
perl-Test-POE-Server-TCP-1.16-1.el6 has been submitted as
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:32:01 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > I'd like to remove:
>> >> >
>> >> > ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
>> >> >
>> >> > c
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728668
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-29
09:44:28 EDT ---
perl-POE-Component-Client-HTTP-0.895-1.el6 has been submit
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728668
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728669
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728667
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-29
09:46:58 EDT ---
perl-POE-Component-Client-DNS-1.051-1.el6 has been submitt
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728667
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728669
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-29
09:45:21 EDT ---
perl-POE-Component-Client-Keepalive-0.2620-1.el6 has been
On 08/29/2011 05:24 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> I'd like to remove:
>
> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
>
> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
> very small minority of Fedora users.
>
> Comments?
IIRC, you are upstream for this and could do
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730275
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
> On 08/29/2011 05:24 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
>> I'd like to remove:
>>
>> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
>>
>> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
>> very small minority of Fedora users.
>>
>> Comments?
>
> IIRC, you are upstream for thi
currently "updates-testing" offers GVV 4.6.1 (thank you!)
but "libtool" needs a rebuild for dependencies
this time the rebuild runs on my testing-VM to rebuild all my packages
later on this machine with new GCC, but this should also be in "updates-testing"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP dig
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Otherwise, make
> ddate a sub package and don't install it by default. Solved?
As an upstream the willingness of distributions to strip out commands
which I wanted to provide and don't offer a build option to disable
via sub-packaging wi
Once upon a time, Jon Ciesla said:
> > On 08/29/2011 05:24 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> > IIRC, you are upstream for this and could do this change upstream and
> > then, there wouldn't be a debate about this here. Otherwise, make
> > ddate a sub package and don't install it by default. Solved?
> >
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram
> wrote:
>>Â Otherwise, Â make
>> ddate a sub package and don't install it by default. Â Solved?
>
> As an upstream the willingness of distributions to strip out commands
> which I wanted to provide and don't offer a build option to disable
> via
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch:
f42982ea634401df953f88ce5eec1b7d DateTime-Format-Epoch-0.13.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fed
commit 283b2e9603b64f88c650f5f0e5f49ee7f5db86a2
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Aug 29 16:30:34 2011 +0200
initial import (rhbz#730043)
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-Format-Epoch.spec | 54 +++
sources |
Summary of changes:
283b2e9... initial import (rhbz#730043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Summary of changes:
283b2e9... initial import (rhbz#730043) (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Chris Adams wrote:
> Why does util-linux have two floppy disk formatters (/usr/bin/floppy and
> /usr/sbin/fdformat)?
Why does it have any floppy tools any more? The kernel maintainers don't
support the floppy module and the module hasn't been auto-loaded for
several releases.
--
devel mailing l
> Chris Adams wrote:
>> Why does util-linux have two floppy disk formatters (/usr/bin/floppy and
>> /usr/sbin/fdformat)?
>
> Why does it have any floppy tools any more? The kernel maintainers don't
> support the floppy module and the module hasn't been auto-loaded for
> several releases.
> --
> de
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:44:33AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Because there are still people with floppy drives?
+1
It's ridiculous to think that older HW doesn't exist because systems
with that HW are not sold anymore (I don't even know id the latter
is true at all -- some special purpose syste
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:47:40AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> That may be (both are human constructs, it's like say "hey, that's made up
> word!", but no, I don't. My point is simply that while it is extremely
> silly code, it is in fact code provided by upstream. It's still
> maintained, is of a
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:47:40 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote:
> >> The Julian and Gregorian calendars are also of religious origin.
> >
> > Apples and oranges.
> >
> > Do you find anything like in the "SEE ALSO" section of "man ddate" also
> > in "man date"?
> That may be (both are human constructs, it's l
Jos Vos wrote:
> We just have to wait till people come up with the argument that serial
> or parallel ports don't exist anymore.
No. You're making an apples to orange comparison. Just like Jon has done
this whole thread.
This bike shedding as gone on long enough.
Remove ddate. Karel, you're ups
On 08/29/2011 05:00 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:47:40AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> That may be (both are human constructs, it's like say "hey, that's made up
>> word!", but no, I don't. My point is simply that while it is extremely
>> silly code, it is in fact code provided
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:37:37AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Chris Adams wrote:
> > Why does util-linux have two floppy disk formatters (/usr/bin/floppy and
> > /usr/sbin/fdformat)?
>
> Why does it have any floppy tools any more?
because we still support floppy devices?
> The kernel m
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:47:40AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> That may be (both are human constructs, it's like say "hey, that's made
>> up
>> word!", but no, I don't. My point is simply that while it is extremely
>> silly code, it is in fact code provided by upstream. It's still
>> maintaine
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:47:40 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote:
>
>> >> The Julian and Gregorian calendars are also of religious origin.
>> >
>> > Apples and oranges.
>> >
>> > Do you find anything like in the "SEE ALSO" section of "man ddate"
>> also
>> > in "man date"?
>
>> That may be (both are human con
> Jos Vos wrote:
>> We just have to wait till people come up with the argument that serial
>> or parallel ports don't exist anymore.
>
> No. You're making an apples to orange comparison. Just like Jon has done
> this whole thread.
>
> This bike shedding as gone on long enough.
Playing devil's adv
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as po
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as possibl
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-Catalyst:
d4c69191f5e622b4c2e840cd4feaf629 Test-WWW-Mechanize-Catalyst-0.54.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http
commit 6cc6556fd0dcb5d64fea9a1fbd3972f69c900d69
Author: Iain Arnell
Date: Mon Aug 29 17:51:04 2011 +0200
update to 0.54
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Test-WWW-Mechanize-Catalyst.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7
Summary of changes:
6cc6556... update to 0.54 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:27:40 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote:
> I'm not suggesting ddate is mission-critical, I just want reasons for it's
> removal or re-packaging to be well thought-out, not simply "gosh, I don't
> sue that, so. . .". Otherwise we'll start dropping games.
Sure (and not limited to games,
Compose started at Mon Aug 29 13:15:28 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:03 +0300, Nicu Buculei wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 05:28 PM, Nils Philippsen wrote:
> >
> > You're probably referring to the updates 2.2->2.4 in '07 and 2.4->2.6 in
> > '08 but please keep in mind that we're stuck with 2.6.x as the stable
> > branch since then, so there's no rea
On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 01:25:52PM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Hello Harald,
> currently "updates-testing" offers GVV 4.6.1 (thank you!)
> but "libtool" needs a rebuild for dependencies
> this time the rebuild runs on my testing-VM to rebuild all my packages
> later on this machine with new GCC,
> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:27:40 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote:
>
>> I'm not suggesting ddate is mission-critical, I just want reasons for
>> it's
>> removal or re-packaging to be well thought-out, not simply "gosh, I
>> don't
>> sue that, so. . .". Otherwise we'll start dropping games.
>
> Sure (and not l
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Padre:
c62fee6509129ad42ab4773a1f68b644 Padre-0.90.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/
On 08/29/2011 07:46 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Otherwise, make
>> ddate a sub package and don't install it by default. Solved?
> As an upstream the willingness of distributions to strip out commands
> which I wanted to provide and don'
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 10:31:09AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > P.S. Your argument will be moot when the kernel drops the floppy module.
>
> Is there actually a plan for this to happen? Curious, not arguing here.
Not any time soon.
Dave
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapr
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:32:01AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote:
> >
> >> On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I'd like to remove:
> >> >
> >> > ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
> >> >
> >> > command
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
> I'd like to remove:
>
> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
>
> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
> very small minority of Fedora users.
>
> Comments?
That would make me very sad. Instead
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2011-08-29)
===
Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:05 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2011-08-29/fesco.2011-08-29-17.00.log.html
.
Meeting summary
-
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>> To participate, visit the following link:
>>
>> http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/f15hardfp/bootstrap/rootfs_stage4_20110825/
>
> Just a quick update that we've had mock builde
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> >
> >> To participate, visit the following link:
> >>
> >> http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/f15hardfp/bootstrap/rootf
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>> >
>> >> To participate, visit the following link:
>> >>
>> >> http://
Hi,
We are happy to announce Fedora Packager for Eclipse (a.k.a. Eclipse
Fedora Packager) 0.2. It comes with a lot of new features and many bug
fixes.
What's new?
* Fedora RPM projects which should make packaging new software for
Fedora a lot easier[1].
* SRPM based Koji scra
commit ec1066b724d81d719af2f9008b506d55fbe7d9b2
Author: Rich Megginson
Date: Mon Aug 29 12:55:34 2011 -0600
rebuild with latest f16 perl
perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec b/perl-Mozilla-LDAP.spec
i
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Niels de Vos wrote:
> The builder I've enabled runs on the new OLPC within a chroot and that seems
> to work very well. I'm not sure if the kernel is a hfp one, but I don't
> think that was a requirement.
Excellent! The kernels we provide atm are not hfp afaik --
On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>
> In both cases I had 2 gigs of ram. Should not be a memory issue.
That is more than enough. Please file a bug(s) and include the logs
from /tmp/*log
Memory usage during install also depends on what the packages being
install
Brian C. Lane wrote:
> selinux is a big example of
> this, causing a large spike as it is installed.
That should[1] no longer be an issue.
[1] http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/45414.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>>
>> In both cases I had 2 gigs of ram. Should not be a memory issue.
>
> That is more than enough. Please file a bug(s) and include the logs
> from /tmp/*log
>
> Memory us
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Brian C. Lane wrote:
>> selinux is a big example of
>> this, causing a large spike as it is installed.
>
> That should[1] no longer be an issue.
>
> [1] http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/45414.html
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.
On 2011/08/29 15:04 (GMT-0700) Jeremiah Summers composed:
> I just repatched Anaconda to use 512M
Literally? If so, does that work on systems with 512M installed but with 8M
allocated to an onboard video chip?
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." P
Hello all!
Just a reminder that this week is internationalization and localization
test week!
This test week will focus on translations quality, keyboard support,
langpack installation, fonts support and other aspects related to system
behavior on different international environments.
Please jo
Hi all,
My name is Steve Gordon, I'm a content author by day but I also have previous
experience as a developer (primarily Java and...COBOL...). My current interests
are primarily in virtualization and cloud software. I already have a FAS
account through my membership of the documentation group
Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 09:37:37AM -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>> The kernel maintainers don't
>> support the floppy module and the module hasn't been auto-loaded for
>> several releases.
>
> Does it mean that "modprobe floppy" does not work?
No, it means that (unless t
Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler said:
> No, it means that (unless this was recently fixed) you have to modprobe it
> manually (e.g. from rc.local) because nothing bothers trying to modprobe it
> for you anymore. IMHO, this is really broken, but the bug reports about it
> were ignored or declared
On 08/29/2011 10:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> It is very irritating, since I only use floppies when I really need to,
Is this due to the need to boot into DOS to run a firmware utility or
something similar? If so, you can create a bootable, DOS USB flash
drive. I haven't had a need for a floppy d
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:02 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
> >>
> >> In both cases I had 2 gigs of ram. Should not be a memory issue.
> >
> > That is more than enough. Please fil
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 15:04 -0700, Jeremiah Summers wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > Brian C. Lane wrote:
> >> selinux is a big example of
> >> this, causing a large spike as it is installed.
> >
> > That should[1] no longer be an issue.
> >
> > [1] http://d
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 08/29/2011 10:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > It is very irritating, since I only use floppies when I really need to,
>
> Is this due to the need to boot into DOS to run a firmware utility or
> something similar? If so, you can create
On 2011/08/30 15:06 (GMT+1000) Chris Jones composed:
> I can't see any reason for floppies these days considering their extreme
> price per data unit as opposed to usb memory.
For some people the price of floppies is a sunk cost, or was never a cost at
all (e.g. me, who has over a hundred empty
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2011/08/30 15:06 (GMT+1000) Chris Jones composed:
>
>> I can't see any reason for floppies these days considering their extreme
>> price per data unit as opposed to usb memory.
>
> For some people the price of floppies is a sunk cost, or was
79 matches
Mail list logo
