On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 08:40 +0200, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Felix Miata wrote:
> > On 2011/08/30 15:06 (GMT+1000) Chris Jones composed:
> >
> >> I can't see any reason for floppies these days considering their extreme
> >> price per data unit as opposed to usb memory.
> >
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/vpnc
vpnc is a VPN client compatible with Cisco EasyVPN.
Although I use vpnc daily, I only need/use the old version in RHEL 5,
and I don't have a machine on which I can conveniently study Fedora
bug reports. Therefore I have released ownership of t
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
karma. The same package went to stable in F16 a week ago with karma
automatism.
If you use Samba, SSSD, openchange, certmonger, evolution-mapi or
notmuch, please
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:33:04 +0200,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
> No, it means that (unless this was recently fixed) you have to modprobe it
> manually (e.g. from rc.local) because nothing bothers trying to modprobe it
> for you anymore. IMHO, this is really broken, but the bug reports about it
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:50:11AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:33:04 +0200,
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > No, it means that (unless this was recently fixed) you have to modprobe it
> > manually (e.g. from rc.local) because nothing bothers trying to modprobe it
>
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:41:57 +0100,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> ACPI turned out to be full of lies. The real problem is that machines
> will report a floppy controller even if they have no floppy drives
> attached, and the ACPI function that's supposed to return a list of
> drives usually
Compose started at Tue Aug 30 08:15:06 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit)
FlightGear
Once upon a time, Michael Cronenworth said:
> On 08/29/2011 10:22 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> > It is very irritating, since I only use floppies when I really need to,
>
> Is this due to the need to boot into DOS to run a firmware utility or
> something similar? If so, you can create a bootable, DO
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715745
Bug 715745 depends on bug 716369, which changed state.
Bug 716369 Summary: nocpulse-common-2.1.22 cannot be installed because of
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 13:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:50:11AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:33:04 +0200,
> > Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > > No, it means that (unless this was recently fixed) you have to modprobe
> > > it
> > >
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 03:20:22PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 13:41 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > ACPI turned out to be full of lies. The real problem is that machines
> > will report a floppy controller even if they have no floppy drives
> > attached, and the ACPI func
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> Or just add floppy-support and analog-joystick-support packages that
> include appropriate modprobe.conf fragments, and have documentation that
> instructs the user to install them.
To make this more precise, woulf the approp
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >
> > Or just add floppy-support and analog-joystick-support packages that
> > include appropriate modprobe.conf fragments, and have documentation that
> > ins
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:37:16 +0100,
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
> > Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > >
> > > Or just add floppy-support and analog-joystick-support packages that
> > > inc
On 08/30/2011 08:02 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> There are still things in the real world that exclusively use floppy
> disks, and they aren't going away as rapidly as some seem to think.
No need to tell me. I work everyday with SCO Unix machines that have no
idea what a USB device is. I've just foun
On 30/08/11 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I'll need to test it. Right now I use explicit modprobe commands in
> rc.local, which isn't good for packages. I looked at modprobe.conf
> documentation and it doesn't seem like it uses those files to determine
> what to load, only what to do if it is lo
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 02:50:10PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/08/11 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> >I'll need to test it. Right now I use explicit modprobe commands in
> >rc.local, which isn't good for packages. I looked at modprobe.conf
> >documentation and it doesn't seem like it uses t
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:50:10 +0100,
Tom Hughes wrote:
> On 30/08/11 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> > I'll need to test it. Right now I use explicit modprobe commands in
> > rc.local, which isn't good for packages. I looked at modprobe.conf
> > documentation and it doesn't seem like it us
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:37:16 +0100,
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 08:09:51AM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:26:39 +0100,
>> > Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Or just add flopp
On 2011/08/30 08:40 (GMT+0200) drago01 composed:
> Felix Miata wrote:
>> ...OM...
> CD/DVD ?
--
"The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
words are persuasive." Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)
Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!
Felix Miata *** ht
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30
10:41:44 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-1.224-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30
10:41:18 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-1.224-2.fc16 has been submitted as an update for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712886
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2011-08-30
10:41:32 EDT ---
perl-Gtk2-1.224-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) said:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 02:50:10PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > On 30/08/11 14:23, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> >
> > >I'll need to test it. Right now I use explicit modprobe commands in
> > >rc.local, which isn't good for packages. I looked at modprobe.c
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:49:37AM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Matthew Garrett (mj...@srcf.ucam.org) said:
> > On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 02:50:10PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> > > Or modules-load.d if you want to force load a module.
> >
> > Oops. Yes, that's what I meant.
>
> Is there a reason
I don't use this package, I only took it over in order to get another
package in which has since become irrelevant and most importantly
although i know plenty about java (and ant) i have no clue at all
about maven so this package could really do with a better owner.
The package currently has only
Compose started at Tue Aug 30 13:15:20 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit)
389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires
libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit)
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> ACPI turned out to be full of lies. The real problem is that machines
> will report a floppy controller even if they have no floppy drives
> attached, and the ACPI function that's supposed to return a list of
> drives usually returns a mixture of falsehoods and untruths. Me
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 18:25 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > ACPI turned out to be full of lies. The real problem is that machines
> > will report a floppy controller even if they have no floppy drives
> > attached, and the ACPI function that's supposed to return a list of
>
Matthew Garrett wrote:
> There's no way to get any feedback from the gameport driver as to (a)
> whether there's anything plugged in, or (b) what is plugged in. We could
> have the gameport driver automatically pull in analog but that'd
> probably break people doing midi or using some more speciali
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 06:30:30PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> An Arch Linux user once pointed out to me that Arch (at the time) probed for
> analog joysticks using this udev rule:
> SUBSYSTEM=="pnp", ENV{MODALIAS}!="?*", ATTRS{id}=="PNPb02f",
> RUN+="/lib/udev/load-modules.sh analog"
> (They h
On Tue, 30.08.11 18:30, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
>
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > There's no way to get any feedback from the gameport driver as to (a)
> > whether there's anything plugged in, or (b) what is plugged in. We could
> > have the gameport driver automatically pull in
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 07:18:40PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 30.08.11 18:30, Kevin Kofler (kevin.kof...@chello.at) wrote:
> > An Arch Linux user once pointed out to me that Arch (at the time) probed
> > for
> > analog joysticks using this udev rule:
> > SUBSYSTEM=="pnp", ENV{MODA
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
>
> This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
> karma. The same package went to stable in F16 a week ago with karma
> automatism.
>
> If you us
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 18:31 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
> >
> > This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without
> any
> > karma. The same package
Hey, it's been a quiet week so far...
I'm intending to update glibc for F16 using provenpackager privileges
tomorrow to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=730856 using
the patch submitted upstream at
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13013 , if the glibc
upstream develope
Summary of changes:
c5605de... Perl mass rebuild (*)
6bb0886... Update 1.2 rhbz#73941. (*)
9ec119e... Merge branch 'master' into el4
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-dev
commit 9ec119e20d39f6a40fcc4d00569589a01b97d19a
Merge: ee2422e 6bb0886
Author: Steve Traylen
Date: Tue Aug 30 20:18:49 2011 +0200
Merge branch 'master' into el4
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Directory-Queue.spec |8 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files chan
The unsigned tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.2-1.el4' was created.
Tagger: Steve Traylen
Date: Tue Aug 30 20:19:07 2011 +0200
Update 1.2 rhbz#73941.
Changes since the last tag 'perl-Directory-Queue-1.1-1.el4':
Marcela Mašláňová (1):
Perl mass rebuild
Steve Traylen (2):
Update 1.2
On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 16:58 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> Don't let us all fall in the GNOME3 trap (assuming that all hardware
> now has accelerated graphics support, which is even more ridiculous,
> although GNOME3 has become useless for most people I know anyway).
GNOME 3 does not do that. It has an
On 08/30/2011 09:02 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> It isn't why I use floppies under Linux, but my mother's very expensive
> computerized embroidery machine uses floppies to transfer patterns.
> There are still things in the real world that exclusively use floppy
> disks, and they aren't going away as r
Simo Sorce wrote:
> It seem much more intelligent to add a package owners of floppies can
> install, so that 99.9% of the others do not have to wait forever for no
> reason.
This goes against the principle that Fedora should Just Work on any hardware
it encounters if at all possible.
Kev
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
> I feel your pain; a lot of perfectly good lab equipment has floppies
> too, but whenever practical, I'd recommend a USB floppy drive emulator
> from ipcas or http://www.rioc.us/ufr-usb-floppy-replacement.php
On 08/30/2011 03:18 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:04 AM, Przemek Klosowski
> mailto:przemek.klosow...@nist.gov>> wrote:
>
> I feel your pain; a lot of perfectly good lab equipment has floppies
> too, but whenever practical, I'd recommend a USB floppy drive emulator
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 07:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
>
> This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
> karma. The same package went to stable in F16 a week ago with karma
> automatism.
>
> If you
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 09:13:05PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > It seem much more intelligent to add a package owners of floppies can
> > install, so that 99.9% of the others do not have to wait forever for no
> > reason.
>
> This goes against the principle that Fedora should
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 21:13 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Simo Sorce wrote:
> > It seem much more intelligent to add a package owners of floppies can
> > install, so that 99.9% of the others do not have to wait forever for no
> > reason.
>
> This goes against the principle that Fedora should Just W
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Przemek Klosowski <
przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote:
>
> They connect to the floppy cable and look like a floppy drive.
>
>
Bah, I'd think you'd want to go the other way if you could get an external
usb based floppy reader which is autodetected on the usb bus.
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 07:43 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
> >
> > This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
> > karma. The same package we
On 08/30/2011 03:36 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Przemek Klosowski
> mailto:przemek.klosow...@nist.gov>> wrote:
>
>
> They connect to the floppy cable and look like a floppy drive.
>
>
> Bah, I'd think you'd want to go the other way if you could get an
> extern
Once upon a time, Jef Spaleta said:
> Bah, I'd think you'd want to go the other way if you could get an external
> usb based floppy reader which is autodetected on the usb bus. Anything that
> hangs off the onboard floppy controller is going to need some lovin.
These are for embedded systems tha
Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> Making boot hang for long periods can easily be seen as 'Not working
> properly' and therefore make default floppy support 'not possible'.
> At least this is the reasoning I see and agree with.
How many systems are there that "hang forever" when the floppy mod
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 14:55 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> > Making boot hang for long periods can easily be seen as 'Not working
> > properly' and therefore make default floppy support 'not possible'.
> > At least this is the reasoning I see and agree with.
>
>
Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> I said:
> A) 99.9% of users do not needed the floppy anymore
> B) I said hang for "long periods" and not "forever", where here "long"
> is of course relative to modern machine boot times.
You said:
It seem much more intelligent to add a package owners of f
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Users who don't have a floppy
> drive and want to save some boot time can blacklist the driver manually.
s/Us/Hack/ to make that sentence true.
Björn Persson
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 15:12 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> > I said:
> > A) 99.9% of users do not needed the floppy anymore
> > B) I said hang for "long periods" and not "forever", where here "long"
> > is of course relative to modern machine boot times.
>
> You
Once upon a time, Simo Sorce said:
> They do not 'hang', they just take longer to boot, sometimes a lot
> longer.
How much longer? How many such machines? Again, I've booted systems
without floppy drives but with floppy support loaded, and I haven't seen
any significant hang.
Leaving known-wor
On 08/30/2011 03:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> How many systems are there that "hang forever" when the floppy module is
> loaded? I have never seen that happen, on systems with or without
> floppy drives, yet you seem to be saying it happens on vast numbers of
> them (99.9% in an earlier message).
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 04:25:18PM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 03:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> > How many systems are there that "hang forever" when the floppy module is
> > loaded? I have never seen that happen, on systems with or without
> > floppy drives, yet you seem to b
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 21:12, Chris Adams wrote:
> In any case, instead of arguing semantics, can you answer my actual
> question? How many systems hang when floppy.ko is loaded? If it is a
> large number, it should be easy to point to lots of data.
Ok, just some very approximate stats for a g
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722292
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520685&action=edit
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2011/08/29 15:04 (GMT-0700) Jeremiah Summers composed:
>
>> I just repatched Anaconda to use 512M
>
> Literally? If so, does that work on systems with 512M installed but with 8M
> allocated to an onboard video chip?
> --
> "The wise are know
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712699
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:33:06 -0700,
Jeremiah Summers wrote:
>
> Yes Literally I did, but as Adam just pointed out running Live just
> dumps the squashfs image to the drive and slaps grud on it. I'm not
It actually dumps the ext4 image on the drive and then resizes it to
fit the available s
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 14:36, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 13:33:06 -0700,
> Jeremiah Summers wrote:
>>
>> Yes Literally I did, but as Adam just pointed out running Live just
>> dumps the squashfs image to the drive and slaps grud on it. I'm not
>
> It actually dumps the ext
Here is a revised patch to address some review comments:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520694&action=edit
On 08/30/2011 01:31 PM, Nathan Kinder wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722292
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=520685&action=edit
> --
> 3
> It would be nice to get rid of the embedded ext4 image now that squashfs
> supports special files and extended attributes (needed for selinuix labels),
> but there are some other roadblocks that will block that change for the near
> future.
Where is this issue being tracked?
--
--
devel maili
The argument that some older hardware do not have USB support and require
floppy support is moot.
I have 3 PCs in total. 2 desktops and 1 file server. The 2 desktops run
Ubuntu/Linux and the server running BSD. The server is an old desktop system
that has had various upgrades and various transform
Once upon a time, Chris Jones said:
> I see it all the time. "Some older hardware still requires floppies..." It
> just seems like a generic defense statement for the fans of floppies and for
> those who insist on using them for god knows what reason.
Again, please stop trying to tell me what har
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:25 PM, Przemek Klosowski
wrote:
> On 08/30/2011 03:55 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
>
>> How many systems are there that "hang forever" when the floppy module is
>> loaded? I have never seen that happen, on systems with or without
>> floppy drives, yet you seem to be saying it
2011/8/30 Miloslav Trmač
> I hope no software is still doing this - that was idiotic 10 years
> ago, let alone now. (The purpose of the seek is to detect drives that
> can support only "double density", i.e. 360K, 5.25" disks, not "high
> density", i.e. 1.2M disks. It doesn't do anything useful
On 2011/08/31 09:30 (GMT+1000) Chris Jones composed:
> And for the cheap price of PCs these days, whether it is building your own
> or grabbing an oem system, just upgrade to something that does have full usb
> support.
So old PCs should fill landfills instead of going to people with no money for
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>
>
> 2011/8/30 Miloslav Trmač
>>
>> I hope no software is still doing this - that was idiotic 10 years
>> ago, let alone now. (The purpose of the seek is to detect drives that
>> can support only "double density", i.e. 360K, 5.25" disks, not "
2011/8/30 Miloslav Trmač
> The seek is there to detect the double-density _drive_ that was last
> shipped in PC XT: PC AT already had a high-density drive. Wikipedia
> tells me that the seek is there to detect hardware that became
> obsolete in 1984.
>
> you take the fun out of everything.
But
Hi,
On 08/30/2011 01:42 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Although I use vpnc daily, I only need/use the old version in RHEL 5,
> and I don't have a machine on which I can conveniently study Fedora
> bug reports. Therefore I have released ownership of this package in
> Fedora 14-17.
Since I have v
On 08/30/2011 06:30 PM, Chris Jones wrote:
> I see it all the time. "Some older hardware still requires floppies..."
> It just seems like a generic defense statement for the fans of floppies
> and for those who insist on using them for god knows what reason.
> Any hardware that is true to that stat
On 08/30/2011 06:40 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Again, please stop trying to tell me what hardware to use.
Manufacturers will tell you what hardware to use. Very few manufacturers
still produce drives and media. Sony has stopped[1] as of last year.
So, if it takes the death of your floppy drive to
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 15:22:21 -0700,
John Reiser wrote:
> > It would be nice to get rid of the embedded ext4 image now that squashfs
> > supports special files and extended attributes (needed for selinuix labels),
> > but there are some other roadblocks that will block that change for the nea
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 15:22:21 -0700,
John Reiser wrote:
> > It would be nice to get rid of the embedded ext4 image now that squashfs
> > supports special files and extended attributes (needed for selinuix labels),
> > but there are some other roadblocks that will block that change for the nea
Chris Adams wrote:
> Leaving known-working hardware unusable at install is just rude and
> irritating when it is needed. There should be good justification, not
> just "a bunch of developers don't use it anymore, so we don't think
> anybody else needs it".
+1
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mail
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Manufacturers will tell you what hardware to use. Very few manufacturers
> still produce drives and media. Sony has stopped[1] as of last year.
Unless the EU bans them (like those standard incandescence lightbulbs), I
don't think floppies will become completely unavai
Björn Persson wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Users who don't have a floppy
>> drive and want to save some boot time can blacklist the driver manually.
>
> s/Us/Hack/ to make that sentence true.
No. Users who want to tweak their system to the point of shaving a few
seconds off their boot times
Below is a proposed specfile for the floppy case. (Analog joystick would be
very similar.) I haven't tested the package for functionality yet, but did
test it with rpmbuild and rpmlint. Is this what we want? Is this ready
for a formal review?
Name: floppy-support
Version:1.0
Rele
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:02 +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Brian C. Lane wrote:
>> > On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
>> >>
>> >> In both cases I had 2 gigs of ram. Should not
On Tue, 2011-08-30 at 21:11 -0700, Jeremiah Summers wrote:
> I would say thank you but the tone I'm getting in the email seems
> rather reluctant to try and be as memory efficient as possible, a
> little bit like "we just did it to stop your whining". I'm sure that's
> not the tone you mean and ev
Hey, all. So, I'm looking at packaging tt-rss - an RSS reader
implemented as a PHP webapp - for Fedora, since I run it on my own
server. It became rapidly clear that it's a landmine of bundled PHP
libraries and snippets and uncertain licensing. I'm unsure which of the
things it bundles would be lik
Speaking about prototype and scriptaculous, I am sure that they are
bundled also in Rails and if there are some Rails applications packaged,
they will be included also in them. However I am not sure if they should
be packaged separately or just copylibs.
Vit
Dne 31.8.2011 06:35, Adam William
>From :
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
"At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is specifically
exempted from this but this will likely change in the future."
This explain why so much .js libraries are bundled in so mu
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 07:52 +0200, Remi wrote:
> >From :
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_libraries
>
> "At this time JavaScript intended to be served to a web browser is
> specifically exempted from this but this will likely change in the future."
>
Please wait until I am finished working on it. This is not a bug that
can be easily reproduced.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 08:50 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Please wait until I am finished working on it. This is not a bug that
> can be easily reproduced.
The Arch report claims a fully reliable reproducer:
https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24615
"I can 100% reliably reproduce it by creating an
91 matches
Mail list logo