In the meanwhile, several tools have been developed for the management
of my gnome or gnome3 desktop (gui or not gui based), but each time I
need to use them I have to think about what tool to use:
gnome-tweak-tool
gconf-editor
dconf-editor
gconftool-2
gnome-session-properties
...
It seems there
Kevin Fenzi scrye.com> writes:
> * As a maintainer you should only be pushing an update you feel
> works/fixes something anyhow. Shouldn't that be an implied +1 always
> from the maintainer?
Well, there's actual testing, vs. being convinced based on the apparent
simplicity of a patch that it
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:47 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:15:56 -0700
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > > On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson
> > > wrote:
> > > > Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect volun
On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 12:15:56 -0700
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > > Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance /
> > > case-by-case enforcement of this policy?
> >
Hi All,
On a related but different note. How hard would it be to get
yum-builddep to take an --arch arg to that we can esily get the 32-bit
builddeps on a 64-bit system?
Yours Tony
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 07:20:19PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:00:57 +1000, PH (Peter) wrote:
>
> > sometimes a +1 after weeks in testing is the only or at least easy way to
> > nudge a package into stable.
> >
> > e.g: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.07-1.fc17' was created pointing
to:
1b83f0c... Update to 1.07
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
commit 1b83f0cbec2db3fbea660fd425163e28dce2dc39
Author: Paul Howarth
Date: Wed Sep 7 22:52:25 2011 +0100
Update to 1.07
- New upstream release 1.07
- Apply VMS fixes backported from blead
perl-Module-Metadata.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata:
411d62f242c09ecee6ccaf558f516cc8 Module-Metadata-1.07.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 23:22 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:55:53PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>
> > See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo for specific
> > instructions on how to supply a mirror list in kickstart.
>
> But isn't it so that yum/anaconda sta
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:55:53PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Anaconda/Kickstart#repo for specific
> instructions on how to supply a mirror list in kickstart.
But isn't it so that yum/anaconda stay with the same mirror once one
is selected?
My problem was t
On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 16:28 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:22:48AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>>>
Broken how? If the mirror is not functional yum should switch to the
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 3:31 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 16:28 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:22:48AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>>
>> > Broken how? If the mirror is not functional yum should switch to the
>> > next mirror in your mirrorlist from mirrormana
Michał Piotrowski píše v Út 06. 09. 2011 v 20:27 +0200:
> 2011/9/6 Itamar Reis Peixoto :
> > 2011/9/6 Michał Piotrowski :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I'm trying to build cherokee-1.2.1 for EL5 on my F15 system and I'm
> >> getting an error
> >> DEBUG util.py:250: cherokee
> >> #
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> it's worth noting a 'cleaner' way to do this than messing up your main
> system with 32-bit packages is to use mock: you can use mock -r
> fedora-16-i386 --shell to give yourself interactive access to a nice
> clean 32-bit buildroot, then in
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:52 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> "gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me:
> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
> or directory
>
> If I copy the gnu/stubs-32.h file from the 32bit glibc-devel package
> into the right place and run the com
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 16:28 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:22:48AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
>
> > Broken how? If the mirror is not functional yum should switch to the
> > next mirror in your mirrorlist from mirrormanager.
>
> Well, I have had broken (kickstart) installs more t
On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 15:34 -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 09/06/2011 01:49 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 13:00:21 -0400, DJW (Daniel) wrote:
> >
> >> I guess what I really need is gnome-python2-gtkhtml2, has this
> >> been replaced?
> >
> > What I could find is a reques
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 15:46 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
> is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which
> should have been done for F15
>
> How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sys
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:50:53 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Jonathan, can you give bluez-4.96-3.fc17 a spin? It should fix your
> mouse + keyboard issue.
Will do, but not before the weekend - I forgot to bring the desktop
system to LPC :)
Thanks for addressing this,
jon
--
devel mailing list
de
On Sat, 2011-09-03 at 10:45 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 2.9.2011 22:54, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > Hum, I didn't realize our resolutions were so customized, I thought they
> > were the upstream ones; this is what I've been told when discussing
> > custom resolutions in the past. It's certain
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance /
> > case-by-case enforcement of this policy?
>
> I'm guilty of this too; when I file an update that's not getting
> eno
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:04:06 -0400, NM (Nathaniel) wrote:
> That was what I thought... Sot it was the first thing I tried (note,
> this is F16):
> $ sudo yum install glibc-devel.i686
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit,
> remove-with-leaves, rpm-warm-cache, show-
Am 07.09.2011 20:00, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
> Genes MailLists on 09/07/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
>> Seems pretty useful for users to see what changed - curious why not?
>
> Users are not programmers. Commits may range from "merge from branch
> such-n-such" to "ran indent to clean up formatting"
Genes MailLists on 09/07/2011 12:57 PM wrote:
> Seems pretty useful for users to see what changed - curious why not?
Users are not programmers. Commits may range from "merge from branch
such-n-such" to "ran indent to clean up formatting" which has extremely
little value to users.
--
devel maili
On 09/07/2011 01:50 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Rich Megginson on 09/07/2011 12:44 PM wrote:
>> git log --oneline TAG-OF-PREVIOUS-RELEASE.. | cat
>>
>> the | cat (or | more) is needed because git log will truncate lines
>
> This is not what I meant.
>
> Upstream may have had 20-30 commits in
Rich Megginson on 09/07/2011 12:44 PM wrote:
> git log --oneline TAG-OF-PREVIOUS-RELEASE.. | cat
>
> the | cat (or | more) is needed because git log will truncate lines
This is not what I meant.
Upstream may have had 20-30 commits inbetween tags. I wouldn't want to
see 20-30 lines of RPM changel
On 09/07/2011 11:12 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Genes MailLists wrote:
>> Would a git-shortlog suffice for %changelog ?
> It would need to be "git-short-shortlog" (hypothetically) as filling a
> rpm changelog with hundreds of lines of commits is not very helpful.
>
> I've always considered the
On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance /
> case-by-case enforcement of this policy?
I'm guilty of this too; when I file an update that's not getting
enough karma (after a few weeks) then I give it a spin in a *fresh* VM
a
On 09/07/2011 12:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>> On 09/07/2011 09:57 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> %changelog isn't for developers. It's for users to see what the
>>> developers changed in the package.
>>>
>>
>> Would a git-shortlog su
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:00:57 +1000, PH (Peter) wrote:
> sometimes a +1 after weeks in testing is the only or at least easy way to
> nudge a package into stable.
>
> e.g: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libXi-1.4.3-2.fc15
> even with my +1 still not there, and this isn't the only package I'
Genes MailLists wrote:
> Would a git-shortlog suffice for %changelog ?
It would need to be "git-short-shortlog" (hypothetically) as filling a
rpm changelog with hundreds of lines of commits is not very helpful.
I've always considered the rpm changelog to be a changelog of the spec
itself and a
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:23:11 -0400
> Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>
>> I don't appear to have any i[356]86 packages in any of the repos on my
>> F16 box. Is there an rpm I'm missing?
>
> No, it should show them out of the box.
>
> Does:
>
> yum --n
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 12:23:11 -0400
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> I don't appear to have any i[356]86 packages in any of the repos on my
> F16 box. Is there an rpm I'm missing?
No, it should show them out of the box.
Does:
yum --noplugins list glibc-devel.i686
work?
do you have any excludes= i
Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> I don't appear to have any i[356]86 packages in any of the repos on my
> F16 box. Is there an rpm I'm missing?
How are you making this determination? At first glance, this mirror[1]
has 32-bit and 64-bit binaries.
[1]
http://mirror.hiwaay.net/pub/fedora/linux/develop
On 09/07/2011 12:42 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>
> Unless of course you meant "have fedpkg automatically stick a
> git-shortlog into the %changelog section of the spec file on commit"
> or something. Then.. maybe.
Yah I meant this one .. :-)
>
> And yes, this assumes in all cases that develo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 09:57 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>
>>
>> %changelog isn't for developers. It's for users to see what the
>> developers changed in the package.
>>
>
> Would a git-shortlog suffice for %changelog ? Assuming appropriate
> comments
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:32 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 7 September 2011 16:31, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> It is intentional that both the base perl package and the split off package
>> provide the same things, they are expecting n-v-r ordering to sort it out.
>
> Sure, but I couldn't see why so
On 09/07/2011 09:57 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> %changelog isn't for developers. It's for users to see what the
> developers changed in the package.
>
Would a git-shortlog suffice for %changelog ? Assuming appropriate
comments are required for fedora's git repo.
--
devel mailing list
devel@l
On 7 September 2011 16:31, Jesse Keating wrote:
> It is intentional that both the base perl package and the split off package
> provide the same things, they are expecting n-v-r ordering to sort it out.
Sure, but I couldn't see why something that is involved with creating
makefiles would provide
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2011-09-07 12:04:06 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> That was what I thought... Sot it was the first thing I tried (note,
>> this is F16):
>> $ sudo yum install glibc-devel.i686
>> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-pac
Hi,
I just noticed a strange rpath issue with my PyQwt package.
Building the latest git version on F-16 and F-17 results in
"-rpath,/usr/lib64" being appended to the g++ compiler options.
Build logs of scratch builds are here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3332309&name=build.
On 2011-09-07 12:04:06 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> That was what I thought... Sot it was the first thing I tried (note,
> this is F16):
> $ sudo yum install glibc-devel.i686
> Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit,
> remove-with-leaves, rpm-warm-cache, show-
>
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Nathaniel McCallum
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
>> On 2011-09-07 11:52:58 AM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>>> "gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me:
>>> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
>>> or directo
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> On 2011-09-07 11:52:58 AM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
>> "gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me:
>> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
>> or directory
>>
>> If I copy the gnu/stubs-32.h file from the 32bit glibc-de
On 07/09/11 16:52, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> "gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me:
> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
> or directory
>
> If I copy the gnu/stubs-32.h file from the 32bit glibc-devel package
> into the right place and run the command above again
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 11:52:58AM -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> "gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me:
> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
> or directory
>
> If I copy the gnu/stubs-32.h file from the 32bit glibc-devel package
> into the right place and run
On 2011-09-07 11:52:58 AM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
> "gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me:
> /usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
> or directory
>
> If I copy the gnu/stubs-32.h file from the 32bit glibc-devel package
> into the right place and run the command abo
"gcc -m32 -o foo foo.c" gives me:
/usr/include/gnu/stubs.h:7:27: fatal error: gnu/stubs-32.h: No such file
or directory
If I copy the gnu/stubs-32.h file from the 32bit glibc-devel package
into the right place and run the command above again I get:
/usr/bin/ld: cannot find crt1.o: No such file or
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:28:19AM -0500, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > 05.09.2011, 20:35, "Fedora Python SIG"
> > :
> > > 31.08.2011, 00:58, "Matt Domsch" :
> > > - Is anyone in the Python SIG interested in maintaining
> > > - python-distutils-extra in el6? The Fedora maintainer has declined to
> > > -
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 11:30 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 19:16 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> >> Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> >> > seth vidal wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:04 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> >> >>
On Sep 7, 2011, at 7:52 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> Not really a big problem, but I got this in my daily updates check:
>
> (zif:836): Zif-WARNING **: found multiple provides for perl(DynaLoader) ~ :
> (zif:836): Zif-WARNING **:
> 1.perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.57.5-187.fc16.noarch (updates-testi
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 19:16 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
>> Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
>> > seth vidal wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:04 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>> Well, but what should I do if that mirror seems broke
> 05.09.2011, 20:35, "Fedora Python SIG" :
> > 31.08.2011, 00:58, "Matt Domsch" :
> > - Is anyone in the Python SIG interested in maintaining
> > - python-distutils-extra in el6? The Fedora maintainer has declined to
> > - participate in EPEL, but would welcome someone else doing so. The
> > - ra
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:38:09PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 07:38:53PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > plus a trac ticket. Whether it has some practical effect or not, it's
> > clearly against the current policy, and what I'm questioning is whether
> > Bodhi shoul
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 19:16 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> > seth vidal wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:04 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Well, but what should I do if that mirror seems broken?
> >>>
> >>>
> >> Broken how?
> >>
Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:04 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Well, but what should I do if that mirror seems broken?
>>>
>>>
>> Broken how?
>>
> Some SRPMS in fedora/linux/updates/14/SRPMS are missed.
>
Now the files
On 09/07/2011 03:06 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 03:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> On 09/07/2011 08:20 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>> (I would prefer dropping sysconfig file altogether, like Lennart
>>> suggested some time ago. And few other. It should work with only
>>> ExecSta
On 09/07/2011 03:04 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 09/07/2011 08:20 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>> (I would prefer dropping sysconfig file altogether, like Lennart
>> suggested some time ago. And few other. It should work with only
>> ExecStart= and User= in [Service]).
> I am fine with dropping the sy
On 09/07/2011 08:20 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> (I would prefer dropping sysconfig file altogether, like Lennart
> suggested some time ago. And few other. It should work with only
> ExecStart= and User= in [Service]).
I am fine with dropping the sysconfig file
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/07/2011 04:14 PM +9:00:
> 06.09.2011 18:47, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
>> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/06/2011 07:00 PM +9:00:
>>> 05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
>> 2. The line 28
%if %{?php_zend_api}0
cannot b
Not really a big problem, but I got this in my daily updates check:
(zif:836): Zif-WARNING **: found multiple provides for perl(DynaLoader) ~ :
(zif:836): Zif-WARNING **:
1. perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker-6.57.5-187.fc16.noarch (updates-testing)
(zif:836): Zif-WARNING **: 2. perl-4:5.14.1-187.fc16
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 02:43:56PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> Here is a service file for transmission
> https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/systemd-services/blob/master/transmission-daemon.service
> >>> From the looks of it missing an
> > I uploaded a new version with this co
On 09/07/2011 02:29 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> W dniu 7 września 2011 16:18 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
> napisał:
>> 2011/9/7 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On 09/07/2011 01:55 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Yes, conversion into two separate services seems to be the most
appropriate s
seth vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:04 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
>
>> Well, but what should I do if that mirror seems broken?
>>
>
> Broken how?
Some SRPMS in fedora/linux/updates/14/SRPMS are missed.
> Go to the url from the mirrorlist= line in a webbrowser and it will give
Daniel J Walsh wrote:
...
> Grab libselinux-2.1.5-3.fc17 out of koji, should fix the problem.
Thanks. That solved it for me.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
W dniu 7 września 2011 16:18 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
napisał:
> 2011/9/7 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
>> On 09/07/2011 01:55 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> Yes, conversion into two separate services seems to be the most
>>> appropriate solution.
>>>
>>> Here is a service file for transmission
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 10:22:48AM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> Broken how? If the mirror is not functional yum should switch to the
> next mirror in your mirrorlist from mirrormanager.
Well, I have had broken (kickstart) installs more than once, because
packages couldn't be found etc. I had to so
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:04 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> seth vidal wrote:
> > download.fedoraproject.org hits a redirector which sends you to the
> > nearest mirror from mirrormanager.
> >
>
> Well, but what should I do if that mirror seems broken?
Broken how? If the mirror is not functi
2011/9/7 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 09/07/2011 01:55 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Yes, conversion into two separate services seems to be the most
>> appropriate solution.
>>
>> Here is a service file for transmission
>> https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/systemd-services/blob/master/transmiss
On 09/07/2011 01:55 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Yes, conversion into two separate services seems to be the most
> appropriate solution.
>
> Here is a service file for transmission
> https://github.com/eventhorizonpl/systemd-services/blob/master/transmission-daemon.service
From the looks of it
seth vidal wrote:
> download.fedoraproject.org hits a redirector which sends you to the
> nearest mirror from mirrormanager.
>
Well, but what should I do if that mirror seems broken? Try to obtain
the full mirror list and try each mirror step by step? Why we no more
provide just a true "base
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:27:15PM -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > Well, yes, that parallel came up in my mind too, but really, the two
>> > aren't particularly similar. I don't
On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 17:53 +0400, Dmitry Butskoy wrote:
> I've discovered data inconsistencies in a (nearest) mirror of Fedora.
>
> For me,
> "https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f$releasever&arch=$basearch";
>
> return a mirror at "mirror.yandex.ru".
>
> Assuming
2011/9/7 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 09/07/2011 01:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> These two torrent packages includes init scripts for the daemons and
>> need to be converted to systemd. I have been meaning to convert but
>> could use some help. If someone can take a look a look and
I've discovered data inconsistencies in a (nearest) mirror of Fedora.
For me,
"https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f$releasever&arch=$basearch";
return a mirror at "mirror.yandex.ru".
Assuming it is some temporary issues, I prefer to switch (for a while)
to the "b
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Wishlist item:
>
> At the same time that RPM allows you to bundle a git repo, perhaps we
> can finally get rid of %changelog?
I suspect that fedpkg is a better integration point. Between the
"fedora patches" branch discussed in my other
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> As more projects become git based over time, the preferred form for code
> development might actually be a bisectable git checkout
+100 -- some of the git primitives seem to be here to stay - a hash
identifying a commit or tree as the key ident
On 09/07/2011 01:12 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> These two torrent packages includes init scripts for the daemons and
> need to be converted to systemd. I have been meaning to convert but
> could use some help. If someone can take a look a look and file a
> patch, I will be happy to role t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09/07/2011 04:01 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> I was getting ready to release coreutils-8.13, after two
> pre-release snapshots,
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.general/1554
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.gener
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML:
120025b9fd39b9dbfeb6ffc5f4a2dd8d CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.004.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Hi,
2011/9/7 Rahul Sundaram :
> Hi
>
> These two torrent packages includes init scripts for the daemons and
> need to be converted to systemd. I have been meaning to convert but
> could use some help. If someone can take a look a look and file a
> patch, I will be happy to role them in. Thanks
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:02 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:44:36PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>>> ...
>>> > $ touch a && $ env -i /usr/bin/install a b
>>> > zsh: segmentation fault env -i /usr/bin/install a b
>>> >
Hi
These two torrent packages includes init scripts for the daemons and
need to be converted to systemd. I have been meaning to convert but
could use some help. If someone can take a look a look and file a
patch, I will be happy to role them in. Thanks
Rahul
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:44:36PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Jim Meyering wrote:
>> ...
>> > $ touch a && $ env -i /usr/bin/install a b
>> > zsh: segmentation fault env -i /usr/bin/install a b
>> > [Exit 139 (SEGV)]
>>
>> Rich Jones found that updating t
Hi,
rcs license has changed from GPLv2+ to GPLv3+ in rcs-5.8, which will be
in Rawhide soon.
Regards,
Honza
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 03:27:15PM -0800, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > Well, yes, that parallel came up in my mind too, but really, the two
> > aren't particularly similar. I don't think there's any intent to
> > obfuscate in the case of the gl
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 01:44:36PM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> Jim Meyering wrote:
> ...
> > $ touch a && $ env -i /usr/bin/install a b
> > zsh: segmentation fault env -i /usr/bin/install a b
> > [Exit 139 (SEGV)]
>
> Rich Jones found that updating to libselinux-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64
>
Jim Meyering wrote:
...
> $ touch a && $ env -i /usr/bin/install a b
> zsh: segmentation fault env -i /usr/bin/install a b
> [Exit 139 (SEGV)]
Rich Jones found that updating to libselinux-2.1.5-2.fc17.x86_64
made it so he too sees the above failure.
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/736
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.10-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
2cc49aa... Update to 0.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.10-1.fc16' was created pointing to:
2cc49aa... Update to 0.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.10-1.el6' was created pointing to:
2cc49aa... Update to 0.10
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
The lightweight tag 'perl-Class-Load-0.08-1.fc17' was created pointing to:
cd10c7b... Update to 0.08:
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 36/2011
Time: 2011-09-05 15:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.o
I was getting ready to release coreutils-8.13, after two pre-release snapshots,
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.general/1554
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.coreutils.general/1631
when I went to make sure its tests all pass also on rawhide.
I test that regularly, a
06.09.2011 18:47, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/06/2011 07:00 PM +9:00:
>> 05.09.2011 19:17, TASAKA Mamoru wrote:
> 2. The line 28
>>>
>>> %if %{?php_zend_api}0
>>>
>>> cannot be parsed when %php_zend_api is not integer (and this is
>>> actually happening
>>
96 matches
Mail list logo
