13.09.2011 09:36, Remi Collet wrote:
Le 07/09/2011 09:14, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
%if 0%{?php_zend_api:1} if you want to use (guessing php_zend_api
is not defined as 0 even on EPEL)
Just for interest - is there change of minimal buildroot happened since
F15? Why it was
Hi Stephen,
Thanks for putting this issue on the table.
I am using Rawhide as my primary development environment. Indeed it
offers a mostly up-to-date development target for the next gnome
release.
But the situation is far from ideal, rawhide expectantly breaks major
components once in a while
I'm intending to build a new version of libmash in rawhide. The only
user I'm aware of is gnome-color-manager, which I'll also also
rebuild.
Thanks,
Richard.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Dne 13.9.2011 00:15, Jos Vos napsal(a):
I just started to use it myself and it is in some situations *so much*
faster than Firefox (on low-mem netbooks, for example), that I'm *very*
glad to have Spot's packages. Looking at Google's Chrome RPM, I would
definitely refuse to install it on any
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 09:57:34AM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
In reading the long trash each other fest that accompanies pre-release
jitters, could we start on a cleaner plate? What do the people who are
using rawhide day-in/day-out expect out of the channel? What level of
pain does
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
The fact that it is important for Fedora users, doesn't mean it must be
in the official Fedora repos (see MP3 codecs or other lovely programs in
non-Fedora repos). [...]
I know. I was just reacting to Adam's argument Given that
On 09/12/2011 10:55 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruno Wolff IIIbr...@wolff.to writes:
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 03:16:47 -0400,
Tom Lanet...@redhat.com wrote:
OK, it's built and filed at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/postgresql-9.1.0-1.fc16
One thing I noticed is that service postgresql
Could someone please help review the Apache Traffic Server:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463
I believe it should be more or less complete as far as I see it,
but the current reviewer doesn't have time to complete it so it's
been stalled for months now..
-jf
--
On 09/13/2011 10:46 AM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
Could someone please help review the Apache Traffic Server:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683463
I believe it should be more or less complete as far as I see it,
but the current reviewer doesn't have time to complete it
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 15:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 17:56 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
If there is
not enough karma for his package to bring it into the stable, then there
is probably time to ask somebody (probably on fedora-devel), to test
this
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:20:51AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Just out of curiosity I'am assuming this contains a daemon and if so has
it been converted to native systemd service files?
Yes it contains a daemon, but no, I haven't created the systemd service
files yet. I intended to
On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 22:55:21 -0400,
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
(This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
files.)
I don't remember what I did for 9.0. I either found that stuff or I did
a dump and
It is once again time to choose the release name for the next Fedora
release. Potential names will be accepted for consideration beginning
September 13th (in other words, NOW) through September 10. Please
submit your best ideas to the Fedora wiki at the address below:
I noticed this started in F15, but when I run createrepo --update
... it litters the current directory with a garbageid directory.
I'm not sure if anything ever exists in it but after createrepo exits
the directory is always empty for me.
Is there a reason for this or is this a bug?
Thanks,
Alle martedì 6 settembre 2011, Nicola Soranzo ha scritto:
I'm following the procedure at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
Does anyone know how to contact Štěpán Kasal (user kasal)? He is not
answering e-mails at his listed address (I've written
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:08 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I noticed this started in F15, but when I run createrepo --update
... it litters the current directory with a garbageid directory.
I'm not sure if anything ever exists in it but after createrepo exits
the directory is always empty for me.
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:12 AM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:08 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I noticed this started in F15, but when I run createrepo --update
... it litters the current directory with a garbageid directory.
I'm not sure if anything ever
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 13:22 +0200, Nils Philippsen wrote:
That's only a default, though; you can lower it to 1 when you submit the
update. Also, once a critpath update hits the required threshold - +1
from a proventester, +1 from anyone else (PT or no) - you can manually
push it to
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 12:24 +0200, Jos Vos wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 12:05:29PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
The fact that it is important for Fedora users, doesn't mean it must be
in the official Fedora repos (see MP3 codecs or other lovely programs in
non-Fedora repos). [...]
I
I saw in the last two weeks in a post by Larry Finger that finally the
Realtek r8712u driver has been released for inclusion in the kernel.
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/8/30/4612930
Is it possible/likely that this may get included in a 3.1 kernel or
later for f16 any time
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:04 PM, mike cloaked mike.cloa...@gmail.com wrote:
I saw in the last two weeks in a post by Larry Finger that finally the
Realtek r8712u driver has been released for inclusion in the kernel.
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2010/8/30/4612930
It's been
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Jared K. Smith
jsm...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
It is once again time to choose the release name for the next Fedora
release. Potential names will be accepted for consideration beginning
September 13th (in other words, NOW) through September 10.
Sorry for the
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:57:48AM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
I believe I agree with you [1] - but to be pedantic (sorry!) what Spot
is packaging is Chromium, not Chrome. AIUI, the former is Free
Software, the latter is not.
OK, thanks for the clarification. Substitute Chrome by Chromium
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.09.2011 21:41, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
thanks for this information , could I update systemd to systemd-35 in
Fedora 15 with rebuilding the src.rpm , I don't get in trouble ? or we
have some restrictions ?
I we don't have
Not sure if this went through either so forwarding as requested.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jonathan Corbet cor...@lwn.net
Date: Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 15:50
Subject: Re: What do rawhide testers want and expect?
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
On 09/14/2011 02:59 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
So Fedora guys what you are waiting for ? update systemd please , should
I open a report in bugzilla ?
I can explain each of your examples but since systemd upstream developer
is also the Fedora maintainer, I think he is in a better position to
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/patches/0001-Add-support-for-pre-post-db-transaction-plugins.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Am 13.09.2011 21:41, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
thanks for this information , could I update systemd to systemd-35 in
Fedora 15 with rebuilding the src.rpm , I don't get in trouble ? or we
have some restrictions ?
I we don't have restriction why systemd Fedora packager don't update
them on
Am 13.09.2011 23:25, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 23:15 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.09.2011 21:41, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
thanks for this information , could I update systemd to systemd-35 in
Fedora 15 with rebuilding the src.rpm , I don't get in trouble ? or we
have
Hi,
I was directed to contact this list about enlightenment packaging when I asked
around in #fedora-devel.
Our packages are (still) orphaned in Fedora, and we are hopeful that someone
may decide to take up ownership of them. We currently have all the necessary
spec files in our repository at
Hi
2011/9/13 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
(This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
files.)
I used this service file on F15 and it starts slower
4214ms postgresql.service
if we compare with an old SysVinit
Hi,
On Wed, 2011-09-14 at 01:03 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi
2011/9/13 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
(This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
files.)
I used this service file on F15 and it starts
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
2011/9/13 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
(This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
files.)
I used this service file on F15 and it starts slower
On 09/13/2011 05:58 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/14/2011 02:59 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
So Fedora guys what you are waiting for ? update systemd please , should
I open a report in bugzilla ?
I can explain each of your examples but since systemd upstream developer
is also the Fedora
On 09/14/2011 05:43 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Not sure what your point is above .. The kernel has undergone more
updates than systemd ... all for very good reasons - making it better
and solving problems. Sure the same would apply to systemd. Don't the
updates look pretty sensible?
The same
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
2011/9/13 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
(This isn't new with 9.1, btw --- the last version or so of 9.0
for F16 was the same, since we switched over to native systemd
files.)
I used this service
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com wrote:
The kernel has undergone more updates than systemd ... all for very
good reasons - making it better and solving problems. Sure the same
would apply to systemd.
We also go to some lengths to make sure that there is a
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
Certainly postgresql.init was never exactly lean-and-mean, so it
seems like it ought to have been doing more work than the unit file
requires. Are you sure you were comparing apples to apples as
On 09/13/2011 08:34 PM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Genes MailLists li...@sapience.com
mailto:li...@sapience.com wrote:
The kernel has undergone more updates than systemd ... all for very
good reasons - making it better and solving problems. Sure the same
On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 20:37 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
2011/9/14 Tom Lane t...@redhat.com:
Certainly postgresql.init was never exactly lean-and-mean, so it
seems like it ought to have been doing more work than the unit file
On 09/14/2011 06:47 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Good points - up to a point - but lets go slow and think for a few
minutes - unlike the kernel which is very hardware dependent and
therefore may run on many machines but not all, systemd is no - or
should not be for its core functionality. Its a
On 09/13/2011 09:48 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 09/14/2011 06:47 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Good points - up to a point - but lets go slow and think for a few
minutes - unlike the kernel which is very hardware dependent and
therefore may run on many machines but not all, systemd is no - or
Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com writes:
On 09/14/2011 09:55 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
Honestly, if systemd updates has 5% of users failing on an update to
the software - we should dump the thing immediately and go back to
upstart. That is insanely high bug rate for core code which is (or
On 09/14/2011 10:14 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
Really? To my mind, systemd is still on trial ... and it's failing.
I think there's a significant probability we'll go to something else
in a release or three.
It is a small number of people repeating bringing up high risk and
frankly silly ideas like
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735063
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-13
02:10:25 EDT ---
perl-Locale-Codes-3.18-1.fc16,
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=735063
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.37 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737885
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-1.37 is available
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables has broken dependencies in the F-16
tree:
On x86_64:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4)
On i386:
perl-HTML-FormatText-WithLinks-AndTables-0.01-2.fc15.noarch requires
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon as
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Carp:
b3504290991b57beb1c0c704864ebef0 Carp-1.22.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit b7b2d659632306228f492868e298594dca7053ed
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 13 15:10:21 2011 +0200
Import
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Carp.spec | 53 +
sources|1 +
3 files changed, 55
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3)
Please resolve this as soon
commit 801a2a8fe7eff73de9ce822f394711692f4a703d
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 13 15:47:54 2011 +0200
Build-require Carp because Carp dual-lives now
perl-Config-General.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
commit 0561b5ca084f7eb34107e690dccf414d7c601120
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 13 16:44:41 2011 +0200
Build-require Carp because Carp dual-lives now
perl-Moose.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Moose.spec
commit 5aceef15d84e62024277d390eed289d194820af9
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Sep 13 16:50:27 2011 +0200
Build-require Carp because Carp dual-lives now
perl-Net-FTPServer.spec |7 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Hello,
per upstream decision, I have made perl-Carp package dual-lived in F17. The
package provides perl(Carp) and perl(Carp::Heavy), so to be sure your
precious packages build against latest and greatest Carp, you need to put
appropriate BuildRequires tag into corresponding spec files.
I've
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715745
Bug 715745 depends on bug 716369, which changed state.
Bug 716369 Summary: nocpulse-common-2.1.22 cannot be installed because
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DateTime-TimeZone:
ba1eac739a65972368ddf0cd6be1f11a DateTime-TimeZone-1.37.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 2a66119a559fdeabc41876daf2132fc6bd1382c2
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Wed Sep 14 05:00:33 2011 +0200
update to 1.37
.gitignore |1 +
perl-DateTime-TimeZone.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Summary of changes:
2a66119... update to 1.37 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2a66119... update to 1.37 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Summary of changes:
2a66119... update to 1.37 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737885
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-13
23:16:36 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737885
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-13
23:16:44 EDT ---
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=737885
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2011-09-13
23:16:28 EDT ---
Rich Megginson wrote:
http://rmeggins.fedorapeople.org/patches/0001-Add-support-for-pre-post-db-transaction-plugins.patch
--
ack.
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
It is once again time to choose the release name for the next Fedora
release. Potential names will be accepted for consideration beginning
September 13th (in other words, NOW) through September 10. Please
submit your best ideas to the Fedora wiki at the address below:
68 matches
Mail list logo
