Re: Askbot - Additional dependencies to be packaged

On 09/20/2011 11:41 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > Hi, > > The upcoming release of Askbot (used for > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of additional > dependencies. Django-registration is already in the repository and was > packaged in advance of this but there are still quite

Askbot - Additional dependencies to be packaged

Hi, The upcoming release of Askbot (used for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of additional dependencies. Django-registration is already in the repository and was packaged in advance of this but there are still quite a few ones left * akismet - Praveen Kumar has filed a r

Zif backport repository for F15 available for testing

Hi, I have put up a repository with an updated zif snapshot for Fedora 15 at: http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/kkofler/zif-backport/fedora-zif-backport.repo The repository also includes a rebuild of PackageKit to deal with the bumped zif soname. This should only affect PackageKit-zif, but all

Re: selinux versus chcon

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Ken Dreyer wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Fulko Hew wrote: >> %{_bindir}/chcon -t httpd_sys_script_exec_t >> /var/www/html/nia/scripts/* 2>/dev/null >> semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nia/tmp' >> 2>/dev/null >> restorecon

Re: selinux versus chcon

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Fulko Hew wrote: > %{_bindir}/chcon -t httpd_sys_script_exec_t > /var/www/html/nia/scripts/* 2>/dev/null > semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t '/var/www/html/nia/tmp' > 2>/dev/null > restorecon -v '/var/www/html/nia/tmp' 2>/dev/null As an aside, it is

Re: how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

On Mon, 19.09.11 21:26, Juan Orti Alcaine (j.orti.alca...@gmail.com) wrote: > Yes, it's a poor choice for the daemon to use SIGHUP, I have found a lot of > oddities with this program. > > A collateral effect of this is that the router advertisement daemon (radvd) > is run as a child and meanwhile

Orphnaing some of my packages

Hi, Due to a lack of time, and to focus on the pacakges I use, I'm orphaning some of my packages : gestikk -- Use mouse gestures to control your PC (one bug : https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: selinux versus chcon

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Eric Paris wrote: > On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: > >> If so... why use chcon versus the semanage/restorecon technique? >> or if my assesement is wrong... can someone point me to a better >> explanation/tutorial? ... snip ... > So semanage+r

[pkgdb] perl-WWW-Curl ownership changed

Package perl-WWW-Curl in Fedora devel was orphaned by eponyme To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-WWW-Curl -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:33 AM, Richard Hughes wrote: > Can you open a ticket on Red Hat bugzilla please, component "zif" and > attach the output of "zif install paprefs -v" > I've not tested zif on F15 in a lng time and it's probably just a > trivial bug. Thanks. > > Filed : Bug 739701

Re: GNOME and Xfce terminal entries not distinguishable in menus

Am Montag, den 19.09.2011, 12:30 -0600 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: > On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:16:57 +0200 > Jos Vos wrote: > > > And the other way around, when starting a GNOME terminal in Xfce, > > the GNOME terminal immdiately shrinks itself (you see it shrinking!) > > horizontally to a width of 28 chara

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

- Original Message - > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:11PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > > This is incorrect. The whole reason the stage1.5 portion is an fs > > compatible reader is so that you can update the stage2 file and it > > will pick the changes up without needing to be reinstalle

Re: selinux versus chcon

On Mon, 2011-09-19 at 14:49 -0400, Fulko Hew wrote: > If so... why use chcon versus the semanage/restorecon technique? > or if my assesement is wrong... can someone point me to a better > explanation/tutorial? chcon is almost never the right way to go. It changes the file on the FS, but it is li

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

- Original Message - > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > The output of rpm -qf grub may be instructive. > > I suppose you mean rpm -ql grub… That worked better. And I see your point. I was mistaken in thinking that the grub files resided directly in /boot/grub. -- devel mailing list devel@li

Re: how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

Yes, it's a poor choice for the daemon to use SIGHUP, I have found a lot of oddities with this program. A collateral effect of this is that the router advertisement daemon (radvd) is run as a child and meanwhile gogoc is closing the tunnel, radvd is reloading its configuration, and then dying with

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

- Original Message - > > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Doug Ledford < dledf...@redhat.com > > wrote: > > > > > Like I said, not true. The grub package is designed to be updateable > without requiring an mbr reinstall. What's more is I had a look at > the stage1.[hS] files

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

Matthew Garrett wrote: > The output of rpm -qf grub may be instructive. I suppose you mean rpm -ql grub… Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Doug Ledford wrote: > Like I said, not true. The grub package is designed to be updateable > without requiring an mbr reinstall. What's more is I had a look at the > stage1.[hS] files in the grub shipped in FC-1 and RHEL-5, and just like I > said, they are inde

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:53:11PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > This is incorrect. The whole reason the stage1.5 portion is an fs > compatible reader is so that you can update the stage2 file and it > will pick the changes up without needing to be reinstalled. This is > also born out by the f

Re: selinux versus chcon

Sorry for the top posting. No, chcon is not necessary in your example. Perhaps the advice message is wrong, or it is something historical. Hth 2011/9/19, Fulko Hew : > I've reviewing my buildRPM spec file so that it works in newer distributions > (currently playing with RHEL 5.6), but my question

[perl-Perl6-Junction] Created tag perl-Perl6-Junction-1.40000-4.el6

The lightweight tag 'perl-Perl6-Junction-1.4-4.el6' was created pointing to: e005e9f... Include Changes and README files -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

- Original Message - > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:44:58PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > OK, technically it install the 1.5 or the 2.0 if you don't use a > > 1.5 > > (if you install both the 1.5 and 2.0, then it patches the name of > > the > > 2.0 into the 1.5 that it installs and the 1.5 r

Re: rpmlint complains about "BSD with attribution"

2011/9/19 Jason L Tibbitts III : >> "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes: > > SB> I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about "BSD with > SB> attribution", > > Please file a bug against rpmlint. OK, I will do it:) > >  - J< > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fe

selinux versus chcon

I've reviewing my buildRPM spec file so that it works in newer distributions (currently playing with RHEL 5.6), but my question is applicable to Fedora xxx as well. During the development of my package, I had encountered issues with my build and install procedures during the slow migration/accepta

Re: rpmlint complains about "BSD with attribution"

> "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes: SB> I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about "BSD with SB> attribution", Please file a bug against rpmlint. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Bug 656544] Please Update Spec File to use %ghost on files in /var/run and /var/lock

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656544 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 710984] clamd.amavisd does not start without manual intervention

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 676430] amavisd-new does not work with systemd

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676430 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 734271] Missing /etc/tmpfiles.d/amavisd.conf file

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=734271 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 548234] Freshclam cannot notify clamd of database updates due to permission denied

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=548234 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

[Bug 696725] RPM doesn't create /var/run/amavisd

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=696725 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added --

Re: GNOME and Xfce terminal entries not distinguishable in menus

On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 20:16:57 +0200 Jos Vos wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:33:06AM -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote: > > > Additionally, once you start an XFCE terminal, GNOME Shell thinks > > that it's actually a GNOME terminal and gets the window ownership > > wrong: > > > > https://bugzilla.gn

Re: GNOME and Xfce terminal entries not distinguishable in menus

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:33:06AM -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote: > Additionally, once you start an XFCE terminal, GNOME Shell thinks that > it's actually a GNOME terminal and gets the window ownership wrong: > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656300 And the other way around, when start

Re: Delinquent mirror process

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 04:06:47PM +0100, Matthew Booth wrote: > I've noticed that mirror.bytemark.co.uk hasn't been updated since 8th > September: > > http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/fedora/linux/updates/15/x86_64/repodata/ > > However, it's still being handed out by our mirror list. It seems to m

Re: SysV to systemd conversion: please double-check the default and post-upgrade state of your services

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:59:06AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Hey, everyone. > > I'm starting to get a bit concerned about one aspect of the SysV to > systemd conversion process. I've come across three separate bugs where > the default and/or post-upgrade state of services was incorrect: in t

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On 19 September 2011 17:41, Jef Spaleta wrote: > I've installed this zif from koji and I'm still not able to complete a "zif > install paprefs" transaction with realworld F15 configured public repository > set, whereas all the yum based tools: yum. repoquery etc... complete as > expected. > Guys w

Re: how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

On Mon, 19.09.11 19:28, Lennart Poettering (mzerq...@0pointer.de) wrote: > > On Mon, 19.09.11 13:25, Juan Orti Alcaine (j.orti.alca...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > Hello, I'm making a systemd service file for gogoc, a program to create IPv6 > > tunnels with Freenet6.net > > > > The program gets the

Re: how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

On Mon, 19.09.11 14:25, Juan Orti Alcaine (j.orti.alca...@gmail.com) wrote: > It works. I deleted the line KillMode because it has some child processes I > want to shut down even if the script times out. I have increased the timeout > to 30 secs because I noticed sometimes it takes a lot longer to

Re: how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

On Mon, 19.09.11 13:25, Juan Orti Alcaine (j.orti.alca...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hello, I'm making a systemd service file for gogoc, a program to create IPv6 > tunnels with Freenet6.net > > The program gets the network configuration and uses a shell script for > configuring the interface, and when r

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:51:29PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > I wouldn't have thought that. I would have thought that if the > Requires was already satisfied by phonon-backend-xine, that processing > would stop there. You have no need for suggests or recommends either > one when the depende

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:44:58PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > OK, technically it install the 1.5 or the 2.0 if you don't use a 1.5 > (if you install both the 1.5 and 2.0, then it patches the name of the > 2.0 into the 1.5 that it installs and the 1.5 reads the filesystem to > find the 2.0 so t

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: > > Why don't you just replace rpm, with deb too, while you are at it ? > * Because dpkg is missing essential RPM features (e.g. file and soname dependencies). * Because replacing RPM essentially means creating a new distribution, whereas the depsolver can be ea

[Bug 739461] Surprising value for --optimize in generated spec file

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739461 --- Comment #1 from Steven Pritchard 2011-09-19 13:02:40 EDT --- That is fixed in the current git tree, which I'll be releasing

rpmlint complains about "BSD with attribution"

Hi, I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about "BSD with attribution", I mean it hasn't the complete list of valid licenses of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses. Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com L

Fix of License tag in UpTools

I will fix the license of UpTools package, it was mistagged as "BSD" but is "BSD with attribution". -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.f

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

- Original Message - > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote: > > Kevin Kofler wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:26PM +0200: > > > Michael Schroeder wrote: > > > > Sounds like you want weak dependencies (i.e. "Suggests" et al). > > > > > > In this case, I think d

Re: grub / grub2 conflicts

- Original Message - > On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 03:01:06PM -0400, Doug Ledford wrote: > > On 9/15/2011 12:01 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 04:56:43PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones > > > wrote: > > > The most obvious case where it can fail involves grub being > > > ef

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Richard Hughes wrote: > > Naa, try the version of zif in F16, or grab the latest upstream SRPM > > and rebuild it for f15 from here: > > http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/fedora/15/SRPMS/ > > I submitted a Koji scratch build of zif-0.2.

Re: F15 -> F16 upgrade

2011/9/18 Michał Piotrowski : > > Just to let you know - I had to downgrade bind-libs-lite after the > update, because my network was broken. There is a problem with loading > lib that is required by dhclient. This happened to me as well. I think that it happened because I had been updating my F15

Re: GNOME and Xfce terminal entries not distinguishable in menus

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 12:04:36PM +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > > After having installed both GNOME and Xfce since F15, I noticed that the > GNOME terminal (package gnome-terminal) and Xfce terminal (package Terminal) > use the same Name and Icon in their desktop files. So when using the > "System" me

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:05:47AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:00:28PM +0100: > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote: > > > Kevin Kofler wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:26PM +0200: > > > > Michael Schroeder wrote: >

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:05:47AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote: > I see. So 'Suggests' means it gets automatically installed (unless it > explicitly conflicts with something already install I presume?), but > can be removed without breaking the package it was brought in for > (unless no other packa

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:46 PM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Matthew Garrett wrote: >>> Debian policy is that any virtual dependencies must also have an >>> explicit dependency. In your case it would be something like >>> >>> Requires:

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

Matthew Garrett wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 05:00:28PM +0100: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote: > > Kevin Kofler wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:26PM +0200: > > > Michael Schroeder wrote: > > > > Sounds like you want weak dependencies (i.e. "Suggests" et al). >

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 10:51:26AM -0500, Matyas Selmeci wrote: > Kevin Kofler wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:26PM +0200: > > Michael Schroeder wrote: > > > Sounds like you want weak dependencies (i.e. "Suggests" et al). > > > > In this case, I think disjunctive dependencies (default | virtua

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

Kevin Kofler wrote on Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:02:26PM +0200: > Michael Schroeder wrote: > > Sounds like you want weak dependencies (i.e. "Suggests" et al). > > In this case, I think disjunctive dependencies (default | virtual), as > Matthew Garrett pointed out, are the right solution, not soft de

FYI: ocamlnet in Rawhide updated to (incompatible) upstream version 3.4

ocamlnet 2.x and 3.x are not compatible. I stuck with ocamlnet 2.x for quite a long time because some other packages dependended on the old API. However ocamlnet 3.x has now been around for well over a year, so it's time to follow upstream. There may be some breakage from this change, but I'll

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: >> Debian policy is that any virtual dependencies must also have an >> explicit dependency. In your case it would be something like >> >> Requires: phonon-backend-gstreamer | phonon-backend > > Unfortunately, RPM does no

[perl-Starman] Update to 0.2014

commit 351eb3f2c4996cd228817324c5aa0a72d067b25c Author: Emmanuel Seyman Date: Mon Sep 19 17:42:42 2011 +0200 Update to 0.2014 .gitignore|1 + perl-Starman.spec |7 +-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitig

File Starman-0.2014.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman

A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Starman: 9f2e58e3d9916148a90edc4c99452bf1 Starman-0.2014.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/lis

Re: Delinquent mirror process

On 19/09/11 16:06, Matthew Booth wrote: > I've noticed that mirror.bytemark.co.uk hasn't been updated since 8th > September: > > http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/fedora/linux/updates/15/x86_64/repodata/ > > However, it's still being handed out by our mirror list. It seems to me > they should be, at le

Delinquent mirror process

I've noticed that mirror.bytemark.co.uk hasn't been updated since 8th September: http://mirror.bytemark.co.uk/fedora/linux/updates/15/x86_64/repodata/ However, it's still being handed out by our mirror list. It seems to me they should be, at least temporarily, dropped as an official mirror. Is

rawhide report: 20110919 changes

Compose started at Mon Sep 19 08:15:01 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46 389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require

[perl-Data-Section-Simple/el6] Update to 0.03

Summary of changes: 44f0225... Update to 0.03 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mail

Re: how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

It works. I deleted the line KillMode because it has some child processes I want to shut down even if the script times out. I have increased the timeout to 30 secs because I noticed sometimes it takes a lot longer to close the tunnel. Is there any problem about this? This is the way I have it: [S

Why was the design-suite group added to comps?

Hi, I wonder why the 'design-suite' group was added to comps. According to the wiki the idea of the feature was to *rename* the 'graphics' group [1] but now we have two apps with graphic apps. Looks kind of off in gpk-application's group view. Adding the feature owner and the committer to CC. Re

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 01:00:35PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: > > Debian policy is that any virtual dependencies must also have an > > explicit dependency. In your case it would be something like > > > > Requires: phonon-backend-gstreamer | phonon-backend > > Unfortunatel

Re: how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

On 09/19/2011 11:25 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine wrote: > [Service] > WorkingDirectory=/var/lib/gogoc > Type=simple > EnvironmentFile=-/etc/sysconfig/gogoc > ExecStart=/usr/bin/gogoc -f /etc/gogoc/gogoc.conf $GOGOC_OPTS > ExecStop=/bin/kill -s SIGHUP $MAINPID Try this totally untested instead... [Servic

how to make systemd wait for a process to die?

Hello, I'm making a systemd service file for gogoc, a program to create IPv6 tunnels with Freenet6.net The program gets the network configuration and uses a shell script for configuring the interface, and when receives the HUP signal, calls the shell script again for shutting down the tunnel, but

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

Michael Schroeder wrote: > Sounds like you want weak dependencies (i.e. "Suggests" et al). In this case, I think disjunctive dependencies (default | virtual), as Matthew Garrett pointed out, are the right solution, not soft dependencies (though those would also be nice). Kevin Kofler -

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

Matthew Garrett wrote: > Debian policy is that any virtual dependencies must also have an > explicit dependency. In your case it would be something like > > Requires: phonon-backend-gstreamer | phonon-backend Unfortunately, RPM does not support this idiom. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 02:40:30AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > The use case I have in mind, which is a real-world case, is this: > phonon Requires: phonon-backend > phonon-backend-* Provides: phonon-backend > phonon-backend-* Requires: phonon > I want any random phonon-backend-* to satisfy the dep

[Test-Announce] 2011-09-19 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting

WHAT: Fedora QA Meeting WHEN: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 08:00 PDT) WHERE: #fedora-meeting It's meeting time again! We'll be dominated by Beta discussion this time, I expect, so I'm clearing the schedule decks for that. Please bring any bugs or other things you're particularly concerned about for Beta

Re: how to have yum prefer one dependency over others

On 19 September 2011 01:46, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Well, looks like we also need a rebuild of PackageKit-zif against the new > soname (libzif.so.3, the package in F15 is built against libzif.so.2), so I > think the repo is the best solution if we want people to be able to test > this. Richard, what