As per the Fedora 16 schedule [1], Fedora 16 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Please see the following pages for
download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. In
general, official live images arrive a few hours after the install
images: see the links be
OK. Thank you, David.
My Desktop is used for productive environment. I do not want to reinstall OS
now. And I do not restore the logs before. So I want to do it after Fedora 6
Beta releases.
Maybe we should look for another UEFI-only system to test it.
Fedora && Debian User, former Ubuntu User
M
On Tue, 2011-09-27 at 10:30 +0800, Liang Suilong wrote:
> I bought a new notebook for my jobs, Lenovo IdeaPad S205 (AMD E-450
> APU), building in MeeGo modified by Linpus. There is no BIOS in it,
> just using UEFI. And there is no BIOS compatibility mode. So I must
> use EFI GRUB. As we knew, Fedo
I bought a new notebook for my jobs, Lenovo IdeaPad S205 (AMD E-450 APU),
building in MeeGo modified by Linpus. There is no BIOS in it, just using
UEFI. And there is no BIOS compatibility mode. So I must use EFI GRUB. As we
knew, Fedora 15 LiveUSB can not be booted on S205. There is a bug on Lenov
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 07:47:12 -0500,
Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
> Unless someone speaks up, with some plan to make the current version work
> in the near future, I'll start the retirement process in about a week.
Chess has now been retired (pending processing by releng of the block
ticket).
-
Am 26.09.2011 21:54, schrieb Kevin Kofler:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> normally the kmod-packages are updated the same time
>> as the kernel in stable repos, but you can not guarantee
>> this for external repos everytime, especially that the
>> mirror you catched is recent enough
>
> But akmods ar
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 21:54 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> The right solution is for the user to just uncheck the kernel from the
> list
> of packages to update in the PackageKit GUI of choice (be it gnome-
> packagekit, KPackageKit or Apper) if the kmod doesn't show up along
> with it.
> It's not
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > The right solution is for the user to just uncheck the kernel from
>> the list
>> > of packages to update in the PackageKit GUI of choice (be it gnome-
>> > packagekit, KPackage
d because
> of the strict %{version}-%{release} dependencies.
Since there have been several bug fixes and improvements to PackageKit-zif
as well, as of NOW, the PackageKit that is provided is no longer a straight
rebuild, but has pk-backend-zif.c backported from git master (currently
20110926, bu
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > The right solution is for the user to just uncheck the kernel from
> the list
> > of packages to update in the PackageKit GUI of choice (be it gnome-
> > packagekit, KPackageKit or Apper) if the kmod doesn't show up along
> with it.
> > It'
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> But akmods are a very hackish solution to that problem. Building modules on
> the end user system sucks on a binary distribution. It drags in the whole
> GCC toolchain, kernel-devel and the source code for the modules and the
> whole system is
Reindl Harald wrote:
> because akmods is used to build kernel-modules after the kernel
> was updated and the komd-package not - this was before vmxnet3
> as example hardly needed for vmware because without network
> yum makes no fun
>
> another example are the nvidia-drivers - for normal users
> i
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Image-ExifTool:
8b27b63af0eec744afb7f373750c282b Image-ExifTool-8.65.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org
On 8/9/11 8:15 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> ... now, finally, with more 64-bit-ness!
>
> From Ted:
>
>> I've made the first WIP release of e2fsprogs 1.42. The primary purpose
>> is for people to test the 64-bit functionality and be confident that we
>> didn't introduce any 32-bit regressions.
>
>
Doug Ledford wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Or Doug could take over grub if he is willing to fix the issues he
>> runs into. Or he could fork grub into maggot, use that for his needs.
>> If he is willing to support it and you are not.. that would move us
>> from this argument.
>
> I cou
- Original Message -
> Oh I figured if it was going to be dropped it would no longer be
> CRITPATH, but if it would remain that I would prefer not to have Mrs
> Ledford hunting me down .
You're probably safer that way... ;-)
--
Doug Ledford
GPG KeyID: CFBFF194
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 09:47, Doug Ledford wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> Or Doug could take over grub if he is willing to fix the issues he
>> runs into. Or he could fork grub into maggot, use that for his needs.
>> If he is willing to support it and you are not.. that would move us
>>
Am 26.09.2011 18:32, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> My question to you: why are these modules built at boot time at all? Why
> not at install time? Seems like the more appropriate time to me, given
> that the set of kernel packages does not change during boot, but only at
> install time.
because
- Original Message -
> Well, you can move your service into the early boot part if
> necessary. However, there's a fundamental problem here: iiuc you
> compile
> driver modules at boot and want them recognized by the system during
> the
> same boot run. That's hardly possible though. To com
On Sep 26, 2011, at 12:56 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:49:15 -0400,
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> Yeah, for some reason it's not seeing the python-gitdb I built up. Odd
>>> because I swore I tested this with the nose tests in GitPython. Oh well,
>>> my fault for buildi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 11:49:15 -0400,
Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Yeah, for some reason it's not seeing the python-gitdb I built up. Odd
> > because I swore I tested this with the nose tests in GitPython. Oh well,
> > my fault for building something on a Friday. Doubly my fault for
> > forg
On Sat, 24.09.11 08:48, Richard Shaw (hobbes1...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I just took over the akmods package at RPM Fusion and one of the many
> BZ requests is to convert it to systemd.
>
> The current suggestion is:
> [Unit]
> Description=Builds and install new kmods from akmod packages
> After=sysl
On 09/26/2011 05:18 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> today installed the new systemd-build which addresses the
> issue of no progress while fsck at boot and did not find
> a way to add karma directly on koji (maybe this should
> be directly possible there)
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?b
On Sep 24, 2011, at 9:35 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Sep 23, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 12:54:35PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
>>> I'm upgrading GitPython from 0.2x to 0.3 in rawhide. There are some
>>> changes that require consumers to do some minor
- Original Message -
> Or Doug could take over grub if he is willing to fix the issues he
> runs into. Or he could fork grub into maggot, use that for his needs.
> If he is willing to support it and you are not.. that would move us
> from this argument.
I could, but that would give me anot
I also need a sponsor. Sorry, forgot to mention that.
Upstream updated, so I updated the SRPM and spec files and added those
to the review request.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am 26.09.2011 17:03, schrieb Michal Schmidt:
> On 09/26/2011 04:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Your Fedora Account System account password
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
>>
>> is it OK to register here only for the use of "easy-karma" because
>> i have a testerver-virtual-machine an
On 09/26/2011 04:40 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Your Fedora Account System account password
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
>
> is it OK to register here only for the use of "easy-karma" because
> i have a testerver-virtual-machine and would like to help pushing
> packages from updates-s
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
meeting today at 17:00UTC (1:00pm EDT) in #fedora-meeting on
irc.freenode.net.
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
= Followups =
#topic #667 Request to fix CRITPATH update proce
Am 26.09.2011 16:34, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:02:54 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Comment? -1/0/1 -> karma, 'i' -> ignore, other -> skip> 1
> Comment> works for me
> Warning: Authentication error
> FAS Password for root:
>
> i do not find any information here what is "FAS Pa
2011/9/25 Kevin Fenzi :
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:19:45 -0300
> Sergio Belkin wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've read the examples about updates allowed and I've read in
>> examples section:
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Examples
>>
>> "Abiword releases a new version that adds compati
On 09/26/2011 01:02 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Comment? -1/0/1 -> karma, 'i' -> ignore, other -> skip> 1
> Comment> works for me
> Warning: Authentication error
> FAS Password for root:
>
> i do not find any information here what is "FAS Password"
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Ka
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:02:54 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
> Comment? -1/0/1 -> karma, 'i' -> ignore, other -> skip> 1
> Comment> works for me
> Warning: Authentication error
> FAS Password for root:
>
> i do not find any information here what is "FAS Password"
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedor
Comment? -1/0/1 -> karma, 'i' -> ignore, other -> skip> 1
Comment> works for me
Warning: Authentication error
FAS Password for root:
i do not find any information here what is "FAS Password"
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Easy_Karma
--
Reindl Harald
the lounge interactive design GmbH
A-10
Compose started at Mon Sep 26 08:15:31 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicuuc.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 requires libicui18n.so.46
389-admin-1.1.23-1.fc17.i686 require
Hey, everyone, while we're still busy validating Beta, there's a Test
Day going on today/tomorrow, Monday 2011-09-26, too:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2011-09-26_ABRT
Looking at ABRT, and particularly its integration with libreport (which
some of you may remember has caused a few prob
36 matches
Mail list logo
